Near misses, aircraft. Worse now?

16,038 Views | 136 Replies | Last: 7 mo ago by Logos Stick
BenFiasco14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Planes smashing into each other, bridges collapsing … but hey at least I won't be called a racist.
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Japanese diversity is out of control
doubledog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fact : more airplanes in the air more near misses

https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/by_the_numbers
B-1 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We need to cut air traffic controllers by 50% more! - Vivek
Being in TexAgs jail changes a man……..no, not really
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
B-1 83 said:

We need to cut air traffic controllers by 50% more! - Vivek


No, let's nuke the departments of energy and education completely and train some of them to be air traffic controllers without using DEI as the basis for the hiring.
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Velvet Jones said:

I have to admit I don't understand this post.

She's in the right seat. She's not the pilot, and it looks like she's in a newer-model 172 or a Warrior 2.
Its called a meme or joke. Try to understand.


Also, if she was the pilot, she didn't get it because of merit.

https://news.sky.com/story/royal-air-force-unlawfully-discriminated-against-white-male-recruits-in-bid-to-boost-diversity-inquiry-finds-12911888
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GeorgiAg said:

Logos Stick said:

Listening to Walsh yesterday. He claimed Obama went hard on DIE in the FAA in 2013. Claimed that per NASA the last decade, the number of near misses has risen significantly, normalized for number of flights.

I googled and there are numerous articles, one from NYT in August , backing this claim.

Are we headed for a disaster here?
Near misses are racist.


Reverse racism is racist, I agree. I would like to go back to picking the best pilot regardless of skin color or gender.
TexasRebel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
samurai_science said:

Velvet Jones said:

I have to admit I don't understand this post.

She's in the right seat. She's not the pilot, and it looks like she's in a newer-model 172 or a Warrior 2.
Its called a meme or joke. Try to understand.


Also, if she was the pilot, she didn't get it because of merit.

https://news.sky.com/story/royal-air-force-unlawfully-discriminated-against-white-male-recruits-in-bid-to-boost-diversity-inquiry-finds-12911888


Also, if it's a selfie, the image is reversed.
CanyonAg77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasRebel said:

samurai_science said:

Velvet Jones said:

I have to admit I don't understand this post.

She's in the right seat. She's not the pilot, and it looks like she's in a newer-model 172 or a Warrior 2.
Its called a meme or joke. Try to understand.


Also, if she was the pilot, she didn't get it because of merit.

https://news.sky.com/story/royal-air-force-unlawfully-discriminated-against-white-male-recruits-in-bid-to-boost-diversity-inquiry-finds-12911888


Also, if it's a selfie, the image is reversed.

And if she's the instructor, should would teach from the right seat
Morbo the Annihilator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CanyonAg77 said:

TexasRebel said:

samurai_science said:

Velvet Jones said:

I have to admit I don't understand this post.

She's in the right seat. She's not the pilot, and it looks like she's in a newer-model 172 or a Warrior 2.
Its called a meme or joke. Try to understand.


Also, if she was the pilot, she didn't get it because of merit.

https://news.sky.com/story/royal-air-force-unlawfully-discriminated-against-white-male-recruits-in-bid-to-boost-diversity-inquiry-finds-12911888


Also, if it's a selfie, the image is reversed.

And if she's the instructor, should would teach from the right seat
Yes. We covered all of this some time ago.

And again, I'm a pilot. I was asking for context, not insults.
CanyonAg77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Didn't insult you.
Morbo the Annihilator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CanyonAg77 said:

Didn't insult you.
That wasn't directed at you sir.

Apologies for not replying to the correct person.
e=mc2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CheeseSndwch said:

Mayor Pete has been an abject failure as Secretary of Transportation.


But he's a chest feeder. The only thing that matters to liberals. **** your safety.
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Another incident at DCA.
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Door Dash driver ends up on the runway at O'Hare.

24-years after 9-11 and trillions spent on physical security and the door dash guy just drives right on in.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Which has zero to do with the topic of this thread.

Why do you constantly bump old threads to post about something completely unrelated?
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Because thats just the way it is man.

I'm not in the business of creating a new thread when there is already a existing thread on that topic.
BigRobSA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Stat Monitor Repairman said:



Door Dash driver ends up on the runway at O'Hare.

24-years after 9-11 and trillions spent on physical security and the door dash guy just drives right on in.
That mofo wanted that tip!!!


He's about to get one.....just not the one he wanted.
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Recruiter goes on fam ride; ejects.
Deerdude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TriAg2010 said:

Señor Chang said:

K2-HMFIC said:

Correlation vs Causation.
So the number of near misses is correlated to "diversity" in the FAA? What conclusion would you draw from this?


Where is the data to show that diversity hires are involved in near-misses or accidents at higher rates? I see some taking anecdotes - whether verified or not - and passing that off as accepted fact. There are obvious reasons why near misses could be increasing that are not caused by DEI hires:

- The skies are busier. Total aircraft movements in the U.S. are up about 50% from 2009 to 2019.

- Experience is down regardless of demographics. Lots of pilots and controllers hit retirement in the last decade. Airlines are desperately trying to hire and train new crews - to extent they are opening their own flight schools.

That has to be considered before reaching a conclusion.
m not sure that hiring the DEI is the problem in and of itself. But when more qualified candidates are NOT hired to hire a DEI then you headed in the wrong direction.
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Deerdude said:

TriAg2010 said:

Señor Chang said:

K2-HMFIC said:

Correlation vs Causation.

So the number of near misses is correlated to "diversity" in the FAA? What conclusion would you draw from this?


Where is the data to show that diversity hires are involved in near-misses or accidents at higher rates? I see some taking anecdotes - whether verified or not - and passing that off as accepted fact. There are obvious reasons why near misses could be increasing that are not caused by DEI hires:

- The skies are busier. Total aircraft movements in the U.S. are up about 50% from 2009 to 2019.

- Experience is down regardless of demographics. Lots of pilots and controllers hit retirement in the last decade. Airlines are desperately trying to hire and train new crews - to extent they are opening their own flight schools.

That has to be considered before reaching a conclusion.

m not sure that hiring the DEI is the problem in and of itself. But when more qualified candidates are NOT hired to hire a DEI then you headed in the wrong direction.

And because of DEI we will never know if the best person was hired until its too late.
Deerdude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
samurai_science said:

Deerdude said:

TriAg2010 said:

Señor Chang said:

K2-HMFIC said:

Correlation vs Causation.

So the number of near misses is correlated to "diversity" in the FAA? What conclusion would you draw from this?


Where is the data to show that diversity hires are involved in near-misses or accidents at higher rates? I see some taking anecdotes - whether verified or not - and passing that off as accepted fact. There are obvious reasons why near misses could be increasing that are not caused by DEI hires:

- The skies are busier. Total aircraft movements in the U.S. are up about 50% from 2009 to 2019.

- Experience is down regardless of demographics. Lots of pilots and controllers hit retirement in the last decade. Airlines are desperately trying to hire and train new crews - to extent they are opening their own flight schools.

That has to be considered before reaching a conclusion.

m not sure that hiring the DEI is the problem in and of itself. But when more qualified candidates are NOT hired to hire a DEI then you headed in the wrong direction.

And because of DEI we will never know if the best person was hired until its too late.


Well if you can trust the statements and I tend to in this, Biden and Barry both passed up more qualified candidates.
BQ_90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Stat Monitor Repairman said:



Recruiter goes on fam ride; ejects.

Hey is this the handle to move the seat ba………woosh
The Kraken
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Stat Monitor Repairman doubles down on "I'll post whatever I want"
JB!98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BQ_90 said:

Stat Monitor Repairman said:



Recruiter goes on fam ride; ejects.

Hey is this the handle to move the seat ba………woosh


Hey it happens! I think in this case it was a flight surgeon that pulled the loud handle here.

***Edit, it was the Commander of a Cruiser***


Today, unfortunately, many Americans have good reason to fear that they will be victimized if they are unable to protect themselves. And today, no less than in 1791, the Second Amendment guarantees their right to do so. - Justice Samuel Alito 2022
BQ_90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Was that a Tomcat
JB!98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BQ_90 said:

Was that a Tomcat

Yessir! A F-14D to be exact.
Today, unfortunately, many Americans have good reason to fear that they will be victimized if they are unable to protect themselves. And today, no less than in 1791, the Second Amendment guarantees their right to do so. - Justice Samuel Alito 2022
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
D was the convertible model
USAFAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GAC06 said:

D was the convertible model


Or "family model"
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Another angle of the tarmac eject.
ThunderCougarFalconBird
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Near misses are down 50% this year.
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ThunderCougarFalconBird said:

Near misses are down 50% this year.


Good. Trump doing work LOL

I watched Pilot Debrief today with Hoover. I watch just about everyone of his vids, even though I don't fly. Good grief!

How many pilots die because they are VFR and get into the weather?! Same mistakes over and over. They don't check the weather right before departure and it has changed. They choose to not turn on their auto pilot after hitting they clouds. They refuse to ask the tower for help. Etc

It happens over and over and over again. Every pilot should be required to watch at least 10 episodes.

Yes, hijack because I started this thread.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.