Trump's insights: Netanyahu let us down and Hezbollah is very smart

12,842 Views | 213 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by PA24
texagbeliever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Phatbob said:

texagbe said:

Also does anyone want to tell phatbob that the Muslims have the same Old Testament and can be using the same scripture to justify their jihad against Jews. Also it is important to know that it is not a tenet of Islam some versions of Islam to commit genocide. That is simply false.
FIFY

Look, I am not trying to say we need to wipe out the entire population of Gaza or that all Muslims are the problem, but you can't treat it like it's just another "oppressed minority" group. They aren't and they aren't going to behave the same way, it's already been tried countless times.
The bold seems to contradict with this quote from you.
Quote:

and he told Israel to kill every man, woman, and child of the Canaanites, including livestock. Sometimes the people are so wicked and unsalvageable that the normal rules of engagement won't work

As you can see I'm confused because you seem to be contradicting yourself pretty hard here. If you aren't and your Old Testament comment was just way out of place and missed its mark I understand. Otherwise I don't know what you are trying to say then.
Phatbob
How long do you want to ignore this user?
My point was that yes, we need to be concerned about innocent lives, but not to the extreme of being pacifist at all cost, at least not using God as the reason. Even when Jesus told his disciples to preach to the cities, he told them to shake the dust off their feet if they were rejected and the city would be judged (yes, I get that it is referring to the judgement, but making the point that there are consequences for rejection that have to do with the city, not just the middle aged fighting men). Not everything can be solved with "love and patience" there is still evil in the world. Sometimes you really do have no other choice than to just let God sort them out.
texagbeliever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So then why are you arguing with me. I stated multiple times the need to be precise and retributive against the responsible party of Hamas. We are saying the same things. You don't have to disagree with me you know.
cevans_40
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I would argue that Israel needs to be retributive and we need to be proactive and preventative.
Phatbob
How long do you want to ignore this user?
texagbeliever said:

So then why are you arguing with me. I stated multiple times the need to be precise and retributive against the responsible party of Hamas. We are saying the same things. You don't have to disagree with me you know.
1. Where's the fun in that...
2. I think the time to be worried about being precise has passed. The problem is bigger than that. I really don't like the implications, but the cancer has spread through the entire body there.
texagbeliever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Phatbob said:

texagbeliever said:

So then why are you arguing with me. I stated multiple times the need to be precise and retributive against the responsible party of Hamas. We are saying the same things. You don't have to disagree with me you know.
1. Where's the fun in that...
2. I think the time to be worried about being precise has passed. The problem is bigger than that. I really don't like the implications, but the cancer has spread through the entire body there.
So you are back to total annihilation? If not please expand on how if the cancer has fully spread through the entire body there is a solution that isn't total annihilation?
Phatbob
How long do you want to ignore this user?
texagbeliever said:

Phatbob said:

texagbeliever said:

So then why are you arguing with me. I stated multiple times the need to be precise and retributive against the responsible party of Hamas. We are saying the same things. You don't have to disagree with me you know.
1. Where's the fun in that...
2. I think the time to be worried about being precise has passed. The problem is bigger than that. I really don't like the implications, but the cancer has spread through the entire body there.
So you are back to total annihilation? If not please expand on how if the cancer has fully spread through the entire body there is a solution that isn't total annihilation?
I never said I have an answer that would work in practicality, and right there I said I don't like the implications. The real answer is for them to change their religion (if you want to call it a "version" of their own religion, whatever). GL with an answer to that.
Science Denier
How long do you want to ignore this user?
mslags97 said:

Science Denier said:

mslags97 said:

Science Denier said:

annie88 said:

rgvag11 said:

annie88 said:

He was mocking Biden in the video.


I thought that was obvious. He started off with talking about the money the Biden administration released to Iran and, in predictable Trump fashion, him predicting this very attack three days before it happened.


Yes, but I'm talking about an edited version of the video, making its rounds claiming Trump said what he didn't say.


Typical DeSantis lies. Dude can't talk without lying. At this point, desperation has taken over.

Good thing there are only a dozen or so that follow him and actually believe his lies.


Point to the lies. Don't take propaganda. There was no deception in the clips he played. You are so full of it….. you are just like the blowhard you support. Full to the brim of ****!!!
Edited video = lie. Sorry, but that's a lie.


What a dumbass!!!! It says the exact same thing. You are either a complete moron, a liar, or a troll….
Dumbass? I can read.


Quote:

DeSantis War Room
New: Trump praises Hezbollah
Trump said Hezbollah was ruthless and smart in their attacks. Israel wasn't ready and Hezbollah took advantage.

That's nowhere near praise.

That's a lie and taken out of context to misrepresent what he said.

Now, I can't dumb this down any further. I may be a dumbass, but even dumbasses can read.

Phatbob
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Science Denier said:

mslags97 said:

Science Denier said:

mslags97 said:

Science Denier said:

annie88 said:

rgvag11 said:

annie88 said:

He was mocking Biden in the video.


I thought that was obvious. He started off with talking about the money the Biden administration released to Iran and, in predictable Trump fashion, him predicting this very attack three days before it happened.


Yes, but I'm talking about an edited version of the video, making its rounds claiming Trump said what he didn't say.


Typical DeSantis lies. Dude can't talk without lying. At this point, desperation has taken over.

Good thing there are only a dozen or so that follow him and actually believe his lies.


Point to the lies. Don't take propaganda. There was no deception in the clips he played. You are so full of it….. you are just like the blowhard you support. Full to the brim of ****!!!
Edited video = lie. Sorry, but that's a lie.


What a dumbass!!!! It says the exact same thing. You are either a complete moron, a liar, or a troll….
Dumbass? I can read.


Quote:

DeSantis War Room
New: Trump praises Hezbollah
Trump said Hezbollah was ruthless and smart in their attacks. Israel wasn't ready and Hezbollah took advantage.

That's nowhere near praise.

That's a lie and taken out of context to misrepresent what he said.

Now, I can't dumb this down any further. I may be a dumbass, but even dumbasses can read.


I have yet to see good evidence of that. You can try to spin it that way because that is the most generous way you could spin what you WANT for him to have said, but it isn't what he actually said.
aggie93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cevans_40 said:

BMX Bandit said:

cevans_40 said:

BMX Bandit said:

He gives reasoned analysis as to why he thinks DeSantis is a better candidate. Sorry it's hurts your feelings. If anything, it shows you have TDS far worse than aggie93.
In your haste to point and call names, you have glossed over the fact that I feel the exact same way and I truly hope DeSantis can win the primary. But again, TDS riddled brains can't process this ability.



Pointing out the absurdity of your name-calling is not calling you name in haste



Go back and review the thread. Hurt feelings is the entire basis of this thread. DeSantis supporters and CM's up in arms because of "the timing" and "the optics" of factual statements made by our former President all because they don't want him re-elected. Not because any of it was wrong but because it hurt their feelings. And I never called anyone any names until the low-IQ claims surfaced.
In my case at least this is wrong. I'm voting for Trump if he is the nominee and mistakes like this will hurt him in the General. There are a lot of Jews for instance that are disillusioned with the Dems but have voted that way all their life. Statements like this will push them back into that camp. It's just a stupid unforced error. Of course it is also a reason to vote for DeSantis because he doesn't tend to make many unforced errors.

As I have said before DeSantis is Iceman and Trump is Maverick. Maverick is more fun and he does some wild stuff that no one expects but he also makes some big mistakes that cost him. Iceman isn't as flashy but he simply doesn't really make mistakes and in the end he wins the Trophy and becomes an Admiral. Trump is out buzzing the tower and I'm calling it stupid and you are saying that pointing that out is TDS.
"The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help."

Ronald Reagan
aggie93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Science Denier said:

mslags97 said:

Science Denier said:

mslags97 said:

Science Denier said:

annie88 said:

rgvag11 said:

annie88 said:

He was mocking Biden in the video.


I thought that was obvious. He started off with talking about the money the Biden administration released to Iran and, in predictable Trump fashion, him predicting this very attack three days before it happened.


Yes, but I'm talking about an edited version of the video, making its rounds claiming Trump said what he didn't say.


Typical DeSantis lies. Dude can't talk without lying. At this point, desperation has taken over.

Good thing there are only a dozen or so that follow him and actually believe his lies.


Point to the lies. Don't take propaganda. There was no deception in the clips he played. You are so full of it….. you are just like the blowhard you support. Full to the brim of ****!!!
Edited video = lie. Sorry, but that's a lie.


What a dumbass!!!! It says the exact same thing. You are either a complete moron, a liar, or a troll….
Dumbass? I can read.


Quote:

DeSantis War Room
New: Trump praises Hezbollah
Trump said Hezbollah was ruthless and smart in their attacks. Israel wasn't ready and Hezbollah took advantage.

That's nowhere near praise.

That's a lie and taken out of context to misrepresent what he said.

Now, I can't dumb this down any further. I may be a dumbass, but even dumbasses can read.


Calling them smart is praising them. Sorry but it is. Was that what Trump really meant? No, but it was a dumb thing to say and blaming DeSantis for pointing it out is equally dumb. Trump has never had message control and he finds ways to grab defeat from the jaws of victory constantly. In this case he managed to screw up an otherwise decent speech criticizing Biden by throwing out the "smart" comment and then criticizing Bibi just out of the blue because he is mad at Bibi for saying that Trump lost.

This is the problem with Trump and his supporters at times. The reaction to a mistake by Trump isn't to say, "Trump shouldn't have said that but he isn't the best speaker" and instead it is to attack others for pointing out Trump said something stupid and not giving him the benefit of the doubt. It's especially an eye roll because Trump lies with impunity about his opponents and there is no attack too personal or unfair to him.
"The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help."

Ronald Reagan
PeekingDuck
How long do you want to ignore this user?
texagbeliever said:


So you are back to total annihilation? If not please expand on how if the cancer has fully spread through the entire body there is a solution that isn't total annihilation?
I think the only possible solution is total annihilation of the Islamic religion because it will always remain cancerous. Hard to kill an idea though, even if you kill a whole bunch of people. They worship a pedophile so maybe start there? Sensible people across the globe can agree to reject pedophilia, which inherently means they should reject Islam and Islamists.
cevans_40
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggie93 said:

cevans_40 said:

BMX Bandit said:

cevans_40 said:

BMX Bandit said:

He gives reasoned analysis as to why he thinks DeSantis is a better candidate. Sorry it's hurts your feelings. If anything, it shows you have TDS far worse than aggie93.
In your haste to point and call names, you have glossed over the fact that I feel the exact same way and I truly hope DeSantis can win the primary. But again, TDS riddled brains can't process this ability.



Pointing out the absurdity of your name-calling is not calling you name in haste



Go back and review the thread. Hurt feelings is the entire basis of this thread. DeSantis supporters and CM's up in arms because of "the timing" and "the optics" of factual statements made by our former President all because they don't want him re-elected. Not because any of it was wrong but because it hurt their feelings. And I never called anyone any names until the low-IQ claims surfaced.
In my case at least this is wrong. I'm voting for Trump if he is the nominee and mistakes like this will hurt him in the General. There are a lot of Jews for instance that are disillusioned with the Dems but have voted that way all their life. Statements like this will push them back into that camp. It's just a stupid unforced error. Of course it is also a reason to vote for DeSantis because he doesn't tend to make many unforced errors.

As I have said before DeSantis is Iceman and Trump is Maverick. Maverick is more fun and he does some wild stuff that no one expects but he also makes some big mistakes that cost him. Iceman isn't as flashy but he simply doesn't really make mistakes and in the end he wins the Trophy and becomes an Admiral. Trump is out buzzing the tower and I'm calling it stupid and you are saying that pointing that out is TDS.
In my case, I am happy with either as they are infinitely better than the alternative. I don't see the need to point of every mistake each guy makes and give the left any ammo for their complaints. Just laugh at them, point out all of their idiocy and hope that one day they get tired of doing all of their mental gymnastics.
cevans_40
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PeekingDuck said:

texagbeliever said:


So you are back to total annihilation? If not please expand on how if the cancer has fully spread through the entire body there is a solution that isn't total annihilation?
I think the only possible solution is total annihilation of the Islamic religion because it will always remain cancerous. Hard to kill an idea though, even if you kill a whole bunch of people. They worship a pedophile so maybe start there? Sensible people across the globe can agree to reject pedophilia, which inherently means they should reject Islam and Islamists.
cevans_40
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggie93 said:

Science Denier said:

mslags97 said:

Science Denier said:

mslags97 said:

Science Denier said:

annie88 said:

rgvag11 said:

annie88 said:

He was mocking Biden in the video.


I thought that was obvious. He started off with talking about the money the Biden administration released to Iran and, in predictable Trump fashion, him predicting this very attack three days before it happened.


Yes, but I'm talking about an edited version of the video, making its rounds claiming Trump said what he didn't say.


Typical DeSantis lies. Dude can't talk without lying. At this point, desperation has taken over.

Good thing there are only a dozen or so that follow him and actually believe his lies.


Point to the lies. Don't take propaganda. There was no deception in the clips he played. You are so full of it….. you are just like the blowhard you support. Full to the brim of ****!!!
Edited video = lie. Sorry, but that's a lie.


What a dumbass!!!! It says the exact same thing. You are either a complete moron, a liar, or a troll….
Dumbass? I can read.


Quote:

DeSantis War Room
New: Trump praises Hezbollah
Trump said Hezbollah was ruthless and smart in their attacks. Israel wasn't ready and Hezbollah took advantage.

That's nowhere near praise.

That's a lie and taken out of context to misrepresent what he said.

Now, I can't dumb this down any further. I may be a dumbass, but even dumbasses can read.


Calling them smart is praising them. Sorry but it is. Was that what Trump really meant? No, but it was a dumb thing to say and blaming DeSantis for pointing it out is equally dumb. Trump has never had message control and he finds ways to grab defeat from the jaws of victory constantly. In this case he managed to screw up an otherwise decent speech criticizing Biden by throwing out the "smart" comment and then criticizing Bibi just out of the blue because he is mad at Bibi for saying that Trump lost.

This is the problem with Trump and his supporters at times. The reaction to a mistake by Trump isn't to say, "Trump shouldn't have said that but he isn't the best speaker" and instead it is to attack others for pointing out Trump said something stupid and not giving him the benefit of the doubt. It's especially an eye roll because Trump lies with impunity about his opponents and there is no attack too personal or unfair to him.
Who cares? I sure as hell don't. And if you care enough about the optics of what/when he says you are a moron of the highest order. Let the policy speak for itself. Talk about not seeing the forest for the trees.
texagbeliever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PeekingDuck said:

texagbeliever said:


So you are back to total annihilation? If not please expand on how if the cancer has fully spread through the entire body there is a solution that isn't total annihilation?
I think the only possible solution is total annihilation of the Islamic religion because it will always remain cancerous. Hard to kill an idea though, even if you kill a whole bunch of people. They worship a pedophile so maybe start there? Sensible people across the globe can agree to reject pedophilia, which inherently means they should reject Islam and Islamists.
Yeah America is seeing an increase in pedophilia acceptance and grooming of kids in our OWN country. Proof that evil finds a way no matter the guise (atheism, Insecurityism (this is my own term), Islam, Judaism (there is a reason the Old Testament has plenty of punishments for them).

Hamas and those leaders need to face justice. 100% on board. Same for the soldiers that carried out those horrific acts.

Asking for someone to reject Islam is a poor case. Giving them an actual opportunity to ACCEPT something else is far better. Think about what allows for that. What allows many people to see a message of hope and light that they haven't had the opportunity to hear. Let the power of that change hearts and let God be God.
texagbeliever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Phatbob said:

texagbeliever said:

Phatbob said:

texagbeliever said:

So then why are you arguing with me. I stated multiple times the need to be precise and retributive against the responsible party of Hamas. We are saying the same things. You don't have to disagree with me you know.
1. Where's the fun in that...
2. I think the time to be worried about being precise has passed. The problem is bigger than that. I really don't like the implications, but the cancer has spread through the entire body there.
So you are back to total annihilation? If not please expand on how if the cancer has fully spread through the entire body there is a solution that isn't total annihilation?
I never said I have an answer that would work in practicality, and right there I said I don't like the implications. The real answer is for them to change their religion (if you want to call it a "version" of their own religion, whatever). GL with an answer to that.
So I'm not calling for genocide but man genocide sure seems like the best option. Wink wink. That is what you are saying. There is a reason you "don't like it" it is because you hate that idea. Yet part of you wants that revenge, wants to see someone else's evil punished. It is something we all struggle with.
Phatbob
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cev said:

Who cares? I sure as hell don't. And if you care enough about the optics of what/when he says you are a moron of the highest order. Let the policy speak for itself. Talk about not seeing the forest for the trees.
This sounds like a "we have to pass it so we know what's in it" argument. How exactly do we know what his policy is without listening to the guy? With Trump you actually have to assume he means something different than what he says in order to come to the conclusion that his policy is great, because he has a very mixed record.

If you want to go not with listening to his words, but his record, he spends like no Dem before him, he's fine with 2nd amendment regulation, and he is very bad at hiring people for their jobs in the highest rankings, and that isn't even getting into the Covid failures.

You can't ignore what he says while at the same time ignoring his record and still have any leg to stand on for him being more qualified for president than my nephew who does HVAC.
Phatbob
How long do you want to ignore this user?
texagbeliever said:

Phatbob said:

texagbeliever said:

Phatbob said:

texagbeliever said:

So then why are you arguing with me. I stated multiple times the need to be precise and retributive against the responsible party of Hamas. We are saying the same things. You don't have to disagree with me you know.
1. Where's the fun in that...
2. I think the time to be worried about being precise has passed. The problem is bigger than that. I really don't like the implications, but the cancer has spread through the entire body there.
So you are back to total annihilation? If not please expand on how if the cancer has fully spread through the entire body there is a solution that isn't total annihilation?
I never said I have an answer that would work in practicality, and right there I said I don't like the implications. The real answer is for them to change their religion (if you want to call it a "version" of their own religion, whatever). GL with an answer to that.
So I'm not calling for genocide but man genocide sure seems like the best option. Wink wink. That is what you are saying. There is a reason you "don't like it" it is because you hate that idea. Yet part of you wants that revenge, wants to see someone else's evil punished. It is something we all struggle with.
There's a difference between being heavy handed and genocide. If your answer is to put them all through Catholic school, that's fine with me, too (and I'm not Catholic).
aggie93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
texagbeliever said:

aggie93 said:

texagbeliever said:

aggie93 said:

texagbeliever said:

I think that is the most likely outcome. I think that outcome "sounds" right. I just think historically the FAFO is a terrible war strategy.

Look at America we did the whole FAFO on Afghanistan. Our country with far deeper pockets and far better technology. And after 20 years we gifted the Taliban billions of dollars of state of the art military equipment because eventually America grew tired and elected the right level of incompetence to allow for total calamity.

Germany after WW1 was left decimated ---> Nazi Germany.
Afghanistan war with Russia ----> Taliban
America war with Afghanistan (Taliban) ---> Still Taliban
Overthrowing Saddam by America (pt 2) ---> Rise of ISIS

Meanwhile America with Japan post WW2, reconciled and brought back into the fold. Now an ally.
America with Western Germany post WW2, reconciled and brought back into the fold. Now an ally (well up until 2010s)
I believe it was Montgomery who stationed British troops on a French bridge to prevent the allies from blowing it up in retaliation against the french. He was a big advocate for reconciling the French. Something that would eventually pay off in WW1.
Those aren't comparable though because you are talking about a country a world away. A harsher and better example? American Indians in the US being put on Reservations or forced to pacify.

Israel can't make this problem go away because it is right there, they have to deal with it. The examples you gave are of a country going thousands of miles away and conquering a country. The exception is Russia and Afghanistan but that was a war of conquest and the nature of Afghanistan's geography makes it impossible for anyone to really control, Russia wasn't threatened by Afghanistan. This is more like Northern Mexico and Pancho Villa raiding across the border and we sent Pershing in though it is an imperfect example just as the Indian one is.

BTW, in Japan's case it did take complete destruction and control in order to reset that country, we literally used the only nuclear weapons ever used in combat to scare the crap out of them. Nazi Germany also took a prolonged occupation. Both made a complete cultural shift that was forced upon them by us to pacify.

I have no illusions of a happy ending here. It's just if Israel wants to exist they have to meet brute force with brute force.

That said we need to keep our distance as much as we can and let them figure this out. Let Israel do what they want.
Geography plays a role in it and makes each situation unique.

In the early 1800s, General Andrew Jackson (eventual General over the Battle of New Orleans in 1812 and President of the United States) was seeking revenge against a band of Native Americans led by Red Eagle. Jackson wanted Red Eagle's head on a platter as revenge for his massacre of a western outpost. One day after some successful military engagements with Red Eagle's army, Red Eagle walked into Jackson's camp to surrender. Jackson then changed his mind on killing Red Eagle and instead got Red Eagle to cooperate and get the other tribes to also put down their arms in the western front. By sedating is desire for blood, he spared the blood of many soldiers and likely women and children native americans.

It is important to note that in many respects Red Eagle = Hamas and Great Britain = Iran. So after America defeated Great Britain in the War of 1812 aka Madison's War, the source of funding and encouragement for military insurrection dried up. With it much of the resisting capabilities of the Native Americans.

From that lesson, it would appear the goal wouldn't be to attack Hamas, but rather attack their funding.


Also my point on Japan and Germany were that America invested significant amount of money in the rebuilding efforts of Japan & Germany. Both countries, Germany more so than Japan, were destroyed after WW2. America made it the policy to rebuild both of them economically. It was a successful rebuild that led to both countries becoming respectable and potential allies for the United States.
There is no Red Eagle with Hamas. If there was one he would be killed in short order. It's immensely more complex than your example.

Palestine has nothing in common with Japan and Germany which were countries with well educated people with still significant infrastructure in place. Besides that they have tried that model. They have sent untold billions into Palestine but they won't spend it on anything but terrorism. It's like trying to rebuild Afghanistan in terms of the populace. I mean the average IQ in the Gaza Strip is 67. No Arab countries want to help either, Palestinians are the bottom of the pecking order among Arabs. It's hard to overstate how screwed up that place is and how hard it will be to fix it.
I brought up Red Eagle in counter to your point that America annihilated the Native Americans and thus eliminated the problem. Well not really, now Americans have been forced to subsidize Native Americans all of its modern history as well as create a black mark against capitalism and our Nation as a whole. I would not call the Native American story a good one for America. It just had a long pay back. Why, because we failed to assimilate and rebuild them as a people.

The point isn't that Hamas is exactly like any other nation. The point is that this truth holds across MANY different nations with different religions, different races, different time periods and different geographies. A truth you can derive from a narrow view is a weak truth, but one that can be derived from a broad view in vastly different circumstances has the chance of holding true.

I really do think you'd enjoy reading Strategy by B.H.Liddell Hart.

The point i made was that after Israel takes out Hamas they need to find a way to put in a structure that can allow for progress in Palestine. Just because it will be hard to fix doesn't mean we can accept just killing everyone as an alternative answer. I will never support such an unchristian approach especially in light of it not being historically wise.
The bolded is why you are wrong. Hamas isn't a nation at all. It's a terrorist group supported by other countries. Palestine isn't a country either, it's a collection of tribes that lived in that area that have never operated as a nation in their entire history unless they were controlled by someone else.

I'm not in favor of just killing everyone at all either, I'm in favor of letting Israel do whatever they need to do to control the area and provide security for their people. I don't want us to tell them what to do. That said mass murder isn't going to work. What might work is inflicting enough pain on the leaders of Hamas and other terror groups that they get the message that it isn't worthwhile to attack Israel. They have to understand that hiding behind civilians isn't going to work and Israel is willing to kill those civilians if they have to in order to stop the threat. The hope being that Hamas will realize their tactic of civilian shields is ineffective so they will move on to another or simply realize they can't win.

Understand there is no likely happy ending here. You aren't dealing with rational people that want peace and a better standard of living. In reality Hamas is just a puppet of Iran in their ongoing power struggle with Saudi, you can't negotiate with them about the best interests of Palestine when the issue is the best interests of Iran.

It's layer upon layer of complexity and unless you want the US to get fully engaged our view of Christian morality has nothing to do with it. Israel isn't Christian and Gaza isn't either. We are all People of the Book but the religious issue really is a distraction anyway, this is about regional powers fighting far more than Islam vs the Jews or much less the Christians. In many ways it isn't much different than parts of Africa that are basically doomed to be constantly at war with each other. It's terrible but there is very little we can do about it unless we want to go full on Empire mode and just "Make the World England" but that isn't happening.

So the best thing we can do as Christians is pray for the innocent and the sinners and help out the victims as best we can. As Americans though we have to focus on our interests as a nation and that means letting Israel figure this out without us telling them what to do.
"The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help."

Ronald Reagan
texagbeliever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yes, most of what you said is in agreement with me.

My point that you seem to be hung up on, but not really, is that success won't be because of the degree of retribution but rather in the degree of reconciliation. Just like the US civil war. Just like WW2. Just like WW1. Just like the Napoleonic wars. Just like the Peloponnesian wars. Everyone is quick to cheer for war, especially when it won't be us fighting it, but what matters most is the reconciliation after. Because of that, war should be waged keeping in mind what the PEACE we want after the war to be.

Hamas is as much a "nation" as Nazism was a nation. Or the Native American Tribes that were launching attacks were "nations" (generally it was a subset of a tribe that caused the trouble). The point wasn't a literal by the book definition of a nation but rather the geographical and pollical conformity of power around an entity.
Opalka
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gigem314 said:

The most amusing part about this will be the "Israel is a bad actor" crowd miraculously condemning Trump for criticizing Israel because it's Trump whose saying it.
Your analysis is most amusing. Your "group" that you're referring to is quite small, since many anti-Trump people have been speaking out against Hamas since day 1, Your spin on this is weak.
texagbeliever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Phatbob said:

texagbeliever said:

Phatbob said:

texagbeliever said:

Phatbob said:

texagbeliever said:

So then why are you arguing with me. I stated multiple times the need to be precise and retributive against the responsible party of Hamas. We are saying the same things. You don't have to disagree with me you know.
1. Where's the fun in that...
2. I think the time to be worried about being precise has passed. The problem is bigger than that. I really don't like the implications, but the cancer has spread through the entire body there.
So you are back to total annihilation? If not please expand on how if the cancer has fully spread through the entire body there is a solution that isn't total annihilation?
I never said I have an answer that would work in practicality, and right there I said I don't like the implications. The real answer is for them to change their religion (if you want to call it a "version" of their own religion, whatever). GL with an answer to that.
So I'm not calling for genocide but man genocide sure seems like the best option. Wink wink. That is what you are saying. There is a reason you "don't like it" it is because you hate that idea. Yet part of you wants that revenge, wants to see someone else's evil punished. It is something we all struggle with.
There's a difference between being heavy handed and genocide. If your answer is to put them all through Catholic school, that's fine with me, too (and I'm not Catholic).
I think your choice of imagery perhaps failed you in distinguishing that difference. Your biblical reference (genocide) and cancer throughout the entire body both point to the extreme take. I of course completely understand that you were meaning just heavy handed justification but your point was perhaps too strongly made in pursuit of that. Which caused us to split hairs in argument. But I appreciate this discussion. You are a smart person.
cevans_40
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Phatbob said:

cev said:

Who cares? I sure as hell don't. And if you care enough about the optics of what/when he says you are a moron of the highest order. Let the policy speak for itself. Talk about not seeing the forest for the trees.
This sounds like a "we have to pass it so we know what's in it" argument. How exactly do we know what his policy is without listening to the guy? With Trump you actually have to assume he means something different than what he says in order to come to the conclusion that his policy is great, because he has a very mixed record.

If you want to go not with listening to his words, but his record, he spends like no Dem before him, he's fine with 2nd amendment regulation, and he is very bad at hiring people for their jobs in the highest rankings, and that isn't even getting into the Covid failures.

You can't ignore what he says while at the same time ignoring his record and still have any leg to stand on for him being more qualified for president than my nephew who does HVAC.
If you nephew ran as a Republican and displayed any semblance of republican values, I would happily vote for him and not look to drag him trough the mud at every turn.
Phatbob
How long do you want to ignore this user?
texagbeliever said:

Yes, most of what you said is in agreement with me.

My point that you seem to be hung up on, but not really, is that success won't be because of the degree of retribution but rather in the degree of reconciliation. Just like the US civil war. Just like WW2. Just like WW1. Just like the Napoleonic wars. Just like the Peloponnesian wars. Everyone is quick to cheer for war, especially when it won't be us fighting it, but what matters most is the reconciliation after. Because of that, war should be waged keeping in mind what the PEACE we want after the war to be.

Hamas is as much a "nation" as Nazism was a nation. Or the Native American Tribes that were launching attacks were "nations" (generally it was a subset of a tribe that caused the trouble). The point wasn't a literal by the book definition of a nation but rather the geographical and pollical conformity of power around an entity.
Respectfully, that is wishful thinking. In the case of almost all other groups, this would be true, but we aren't talking about a people who just want to live their lives in peace, at least not how we define peace. Their version of peace involves the annihilation of Christians and Jews. That is the only peace they want to live in. That doesn't mean they have to all be killed, but they need to know 100% that their goals can never and will never happen. How painful that needs to be for that point to come across is entirely up to them.
texagbeliever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You do realize that Islam as perceived now, is very different than Islam pre revolutions and radicalization. You know Iran/Afghanistan/Saudi Arabia were just as modern in dress and culture as the West before fundamentalism gripped them. If radicalization can happen so suddenly in one direction, I think it is reasonable to believe it can turn around in the other direction as well. At least I believe in a powerful enough God to make that happen.

I would strongly encourage you to read some B.H. Liddell Hart (Strategy, Sherman biography, Why don't we learn from History) are all fantastic books. He really does a far better job then I ever could to highlight how Grand Strategy, and keeping an eye on the peace is critical in a successful war campaign.
Gigem314
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Opalka said:

Gigem314 said:

The most amusing part about this will be the "Israel is a bad actor" crowd miraculously condemning Trump for criticizing Israel because it's Trump whose saying it.
Your analysis is most amusing. Your "group" that you're referring to is quite small, since many anti-Trump people have been speaking out against Hamas since day 1, Your spin on this is weak.
I didn't say Hamas nor was I referring to the current conflict, I said "Israel is a bad actor". So spare your whining over "spin" when you proceed to do the very thing you accuse others of.

There are a LOT of people on the left who may not agree with Hamas but definitely hold a resentment for Israel and roll their eyes anytime they hear someone talking about Israel being an ally of the U.S.

But nice try.

aggie93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cevans_40 said:

aggie93 said:

Science Denier said:

mslags97 said:

Science Denier said:

mslags97 said:

Science Denier said:

annie88 said:

rgvag11 said:

annie88 said:

He was mocking Biden in the video.


I thought that was obvious. He started off with talking about the money the Biden administration released to Iran and, in predictable Trump fashion, him predicting this very attack three days before it happened.


Yes, but I'm talking about an edited version of the video, making its rounds claiming Trump said what he didn't say.


Typical DeSantis lies. Dude can't talk without lying. At this point, desperation has taken over.

Good thing there are only a dozen or so that follow him and actually believe his lies.


Point to the lies. Don't take propaganda. There was no deception in the clips he played. You are so full of it….. you are just like the blowhard you support. Full to the brim of ****!!!
Edited video = lie. Sorry, but that's a lie.


What a dumbass!!!! It says the exact same thing. You are either a complete moron, a liar, or a troll….
Dumbass? I can read.


Quote:

DeSantis War Room
New: Trump praises Hezbollah
Trump said Hezbollah was ruthless and smart in their attacks. Israel wasn't ready and Hezbollah took advantage.

That's nowhere near praise.

That's a lie and taken out of context to misrepresent what he said.

Now, I can't dumb this down any further. I may be a dumbass, but even dumbasses can read.


Calling them smart is praising them. Sorry but it is. Was that what Trump really meant? No, but it was a dumb thing to say and blaming DeSantis for pointing it out is equally dumb. Trump has never had message control and he finds ways to grab defeat from the jaws of victory constantly. In this case he managed to screw up an otherwise decent speech criticizing Biden by throwing out the "smart" comment and then criticizing Bibi just out of the blue because he is mad at Bibi for saying that Trump lost.

This is the problem with Trump and his supporters at times. The reaction to a mistake by Trump isn't to say, "Trump shouldn't have said that but he isn't the best speaker" and instead it is to attack others for pointing out Trump said something stupid and not giving him the benefit of the doubt. It's especially an eye roll because Trump lies with impunity about his opponents and there is no attack too personal or unfair to him.
Who cares? I sure as hell don't. And if you care enough about the optics of what/when he says you are a moron of the highest order. Let the policy speak for itself. Talk about not seeing the forest for the trees.
Optics absolutely matter in foreign policy. Many times things happen or don't happen not because they are in the best interests of all involved but because of those optics. Are they the most important thing? No, but they do matter.

As for Trump I take him for what he is. He says things he doesn't mean all the time and he has an astounding lack of self discipline that hurts him regularly. Often he can overcome that and I know that many people love it because he has lots of "F Yeah!" type statements but they come at a cost. Overall Trump was great at foreign policy but statements like this one aren't productive.

Simply because you don't care about feelings or optics when it comes to other countries doesn't mean they don't matter or impact foreign policy. It's not about how I feel either btw, it's about how it affects our relationship with other countries.
"The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help."

Ronald Reagan
Phatbob
How long do you want to ignore this user?
texagbeliever said:

You do realize that Islam as perceived now, is very different than Islam pre revolutions and radicalization. You know Iran/Afghanistan/Saudi Arabia were just as modern in dress and culture as the West before fundamentalism gripped them. If radicalization can happen so suddenly in one direction, I think it is reasonable to believe it can turn around in the other direction as well. At least I believe in a powerful enough God to make that happen.

I would strongly encourage you to read some B.H. Liddell Hart (Strategy, Sherman biography, Why don't we learn from History) are all fantastic books. He really does a far better job then I ever could to highlight how Grand Strategy, and keeping an eye on the peace is critical in a successful war campaign.
We've really derailed the thread, but you have to decide which one is the outlier, the "pre-revolution" Islam or the current version. Historically, whether you are talking about Islam or any other version of civilization, the non-fundamentalist version is the outlier. I'd get into the reasons for that in my opinion, but this isn't the religion board.
BluHorseShu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Science Denier said:

mslags97 said:

Science Denier said:

mslags97 said:

Science Denier said:

annie88 said:

rgvag11 said:

annie88 said:

He was mocking Biden in the video.


I thought that was obvious. He started off with talking about the money the Biden administration released to Iran and, in predictable Trump fashion, him predicting this very attack three days before it happened.


Yes, but I'm talking about an edited version of the video, making its rounds claiming Trump said what he didn't say.


Typical DeSantis lies. Dude can't talk without lying. At this point, desperation has taken over.

Good thing there are only a dozen or so that follow him and actually believe his lies.


Point to the lies. Don't take propaganda. There was no deception in the clips he played. You are so full of it….. you are just like the blowhard you support. Full to the brim of ****!!!
Edited video = lie. Sorry, but that's a lie.


What a dumbass!!!! It says the exact same thing. You are either a complete moron, a liar, or a troll….
Dumbass? I can read.


Quote:

DeSantis War Room
New: Trump praises Hezbollah
Trump said Hezbollah was ruthless and smart in their attacks. Israel wasn't ready and Hezbollah took advantage.

That's nowhere near praise.

That's a lie and taken out of context to misrepresent what he said.

Now, I can't dumb this down any further. I may be a dumbass, but even dumbasses can read.


If you call someone 'smart', it doesn't meaning your saying they are a good person...But it is acknowledging a positive trait. And any seasoned politician knows you have to choose your words carefully. Trump should have stopped with 'Ruthless'. I imagine if someone refers to you as being 'smart' that is a point of pride for your. So yeah, Trump screwed the pooch with his not carefully chosen words. I'm not saying you didn't taking it the way your saying....we expect nothing less from Trump devotees...but those experience in geopolitics understood it was a dumbass comment. And to point out that Israel failed in its intelligence...That kind of comment maybe should be made later down the road. We all know the U.S. had an intelligence failure on 9/11. But if some idiot from one of our allies claimed we failed out of the gate when we're still trying to find bodies...I don't think we'd take to kindly to that. And by "we" I mean patriotic americans speaking as one.
cevans_40
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggie93 said:

cevans_40 said:

aggie93 said:

Science Denier said:

mslags97 said:

Science Denier said:

mslags97 said:

Science Denier said:

annie88 said:

rgvag11 said:

annie88 said:

He was mocking Biden in the video.


I thought that was obvious. He started off with talking about the money the Biden administration released to Iran and, in predictable Trump fashion, him predicting this very attack three days before it happened.


Yes, but I'm talking about an edited version of the video, making its rounds claiming Trump said what he didn't say.


Typical DeSantis lies. Dude can't talk without lying. At this point, desperation has taken over.

Good thing there are only a dozen or so that follow him and actually believe his lies.


Point to the lies. Don't take propaganda. There was no deception in the clips he played. You are so full of it….. you are just like the blowhard you support. Full to the brim of ****!!!
Edited video = lie. Sorry, but that's a lie.


What a dumbass!!!! It says the exact same thing. You are either a complete moron, a liar, or a troll….
Dumbass? I can read.


Quote:

DeSantis War Room
New: Trump praises Hezbollah
Trump said Hezbollah was ruthless and smart in their attacks. Israel wasn't ready and Hezbollah took advantage.

That's nowhere near praise.

That's a lie and taken out of context to misrepresent what he said.

Now, I can't dumb this down any further. I may be a dumbass, but even dumbasses can read.


Calling them smart is praising them. Sorry but it is. Was that what Trump really meant? No, but it was a dumb thing to say and blaming DeSantis for pointing it out is equally dumb. Trump has never had message control and he finds ways to grab defeat from the jaws of victory constantly. In this case he managed to screw up an otherwise decent speech criticizing Biden by throwing out the "smart" comment and then criticizing Bibi just out of the blue because he is mad at Bibi for saying that Trump lost.

This is the problem with Trump and his supporters at times. The reaction to a mistake by Trump isn't to say, "Trump shouldn't have said that but he isn't the best speaker" and instead it is to attack others for pointing out Trump said something stupid and not giving him the benefit of the doubt. It's especially an eye roll because Trump lies with impunity about his opponents and there is no attack too personal or unfair to him.
Who cares? I sure as hell don't. And if you care enough about the optics of what/when he says you are a moron of the highest order. Let the policy speak for itself. Talk about not seeing the forest for the trees.
Optics absolutely matter in foreign policy. Many times things happen or don't happen not because they are in the best interests of all involved but because of those optics. Are they the most important thing? No, but they do matter.

As for Trump I take him for what he is. He says things he doesn't mean all the time and he has an astounding lack of self discipline that hurts him regularly. Often he can overcome that and I know that many people love it because he has lots of "F Yeah!" type statements but they come at a cost. Overall Trump was great at foreign policy but statements like this one aren't productive.

Simply because you don't care about feelings or optics when it comes to other countries doesn't mean they don't matter or impact foreign policy. It's not about how I feel either btw, it's about how it affects our relationship with other countries.
Don't care how they take it. Do what's best for America and they can either toughen up and handle the tough love or go about it on their own.
eric76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hopefully, more and more people are seeing Trump for what he really is.
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
eric76 said:

Hopefully, more and more people are seeing Trump for what he really is.


There's a reason Trump keeps hiding from the debates, and that's because more people will see that there really are much better alternatives to him.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
mslags97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Phatbob said:

Science Denier said:

mslags97 said:

Science Denier said:

mslags97 said:

Science Denier said:

annie88 said:

rgvag11 said:

annie88 said:

He was mocking Biden in the video.


I thought that was obvious. He started off with talking about the money the Biden administration released to Iran and, in predictable Trump fashion, him predicting this very attack three days before it happened.


Yes, but I'm talking about an edited version of the video, making its rounds claiming Trump said what he didn't say.


Typical DeSantis lies. Dude can't talk without lying. At this point, desperation has taken over.

Good thing there are only a dozen or so that follow him and actually believe his lies.


Point to the lies. Don't take propaganda. There was no deception in the clips he played. You are so full of it….. you are just like the blowhard you support. Full to the brim of ****!!!
Edited video = lie. Sorry, but that's a lie.


What a dumbass!!!! It says the exact same thing. You are either a complete moron, a liar, or a troll….
Dumbass? I can read.


Quote:

DeSantis War Room
New: Trump praises Hezbollah
Trump said Hezbollah was ruthless and smart in their attacks. Israel wasn't ready and Hezbollah took advantage.

That's nowhere near praise.

That's a lie and taken out of context to misrepresent what he said.

Now, I can't dumb this down any further. I may be a dumbass, but even dumbasses can read.


I have yet to see good evidence of that. You can try to spin it that way because that is the most generous way you could spin what you WANT for him to have said, but it isn't what he actually said.
.

This….. manipulations don't change actualities no matter how hard you try…..
mslags97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
eric76 said:

Hopefully, more and more people are seeing Trump for what he really is.


His idiotic statements here, and the fact that in this moment he is still trying to make it all about him, should maybe open some eyes. We can hope…..
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.