ABATTBQ11 said:
AlaskanAg99 said:
ABATTBQ11 said:
one safe place said:
ABATTBQ11 said:
For all the complaints about valuation, how many people see their property valued at prices they know they couldn't sell at? Ours has about doubled since we bought 7 years ago, but it's not like the valuation is out of line with market value. I could sell right now to OpenDoor or Offerpad for more than my current tax valuation. If it's accurate, what's the complaint beyond property tax in general?
Property tax is a tax on unrealized gain. A tax on something you own. Like the wealth tax they were proposing where tax was going to be assessed on the value of your assets, even though you sold nothing.
With an income tax, you can see where you had income, it is pretty much measurable for most people. With a sales tax, or consumption tax, that too is measurable, you know what you spent and are taxed on that spending. But property tax isn't based on a transaction, like income and consumption taxes are, but on someone's opinion of the value of what you own.
Yeah, I get all that, but for everyone comparing about the appraisals, if the appraisals are at realistic market values, then what is the complaint? It's one thing to say you don't like property taxes, but I find it disingenuous to complain about appraisals if they're correct
Because you haven't realized the increased appraisal because you haven't sold the property. You're paying tax without a corresponding benefit of having sold.
*Eye roll*
Yeah. I get why people don't like property tax. That's not the question. The question is what exactly are CADs doing wrong when they establish appraisals that appreciate market value. There are lots of complaints here about CADs and how much they keep raising appraisals, but if the appraisals are at or near market value based on selling prices, exactly what are the CADs doing wrong? It's like people are pissed that their property value went up and are blaming the CAD instead of the market.
I get what you are saying and I don't know the answers to any of this until you completely overhaul the tax system.
Let's say you have two homes next door to one another with similar/same comps both appraised at $250k. One of those homes is then sold for $325k. The new owner now has a home that is worth $325k and I guess we are saying that the other guy that didn't sell should still only pay taxes on a $250k home.
So now you have two homes with same comps and a large disparity in value. From the POV of any other asset, I would say that would be fine because I shouldn't pay tax on an unrealized gain if I'm owner of $250k house just because my neighbor sold his house.
If we are just taxing on realized gains, then you could effectively grandfather yourself into lower taxes by staying put and never moving. That is roughly the California model? That, then, is essentially a progressive tax policy assuming market rates are higher than appraised rates and you move and buy something new. You have now locked yourself into a higher tax bracket by doing this.
However, that's not how the process works and that process funds public schools. So the only way to address it is to have a state-wide, NASTY, very political discourse on how we are going to fund public schools. The CAD is irrelevant until you tackle the source of this issue - funding public schools.
You want to pay lower property taxes and figure out something else for public schools? Then welcome to your new state income tax, or your separate school funding tax.
So we can get mad at them all we want but you are pissing in the wind until/if the tax code changes.