Kari Lake Vindicated?

6,558 Views | 55 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by jt2hunt
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TikkaShooter said:

Lol that source.
Lol, look at the link provided above for original source material
rocky the dog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Elections are when people find out what politicians stand for, and politicians find out what people will fall for.
TAMU1990
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Logos Stick said:

But she lost by 17,000 /libs
I get it, but since when does 100% of the voter roll vote, much less having an additional 8000+?
TikkaShooter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Can we watch 2000 Mules together?
rocky the dog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Elections are when people find out what politicians stand for, and politicians find out what people will fall for.
TXAggie2011
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TAMU1990 said:

Logos Stick said:

But she lost by 17,000 /libs
I get it, but since when does 100% of the voter roll vote, much less having an additional 8000+?
The report is not claiming 100% + 8,000 of registered voters voted.

The report is claiming that 8,000 more votes were reported than number of individual voters listed as voting.
Bunk Moreland
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Logos Stick said:

Bunk Moreland said:

Logos Stick said:

TikkaShooter said:

Lol that source.


When you can't dispute the facts presented, ad hom!

And what facts are those? That 'article' is just a long form version of the tweet. They have zero facts as to what happened or how.

Yet most on this thread are taking that as rock solid proof the Dems cheated Kari Lake out of the election. Interesting when things are legit facts that can't be disputed or when they aren't, isn't it?


Can you show us some substance from the paper that lends support to your brother's ad hom?

I didn't attack the source. You and your fellow lefty did, so I'd like to see some substance as to why it's bogus.

I didn't attack the source and I'm a conservative, not a lefty. I don't appreciate either of your vicious ad hom attacks against me.
TAMU1990
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TXAggie2011 said:

TAMU1990 said:

Logos Stick said:

But she lost by 17,000 /libs
I get it, but since when does 100% of the voter roll vote, much less having an additional 8000+?
The report is not claiming 100% + 8,000 of registered voters voted.

The report is claiming that 8,000 more votes were reported than number of individual voters listed as voting.
Faustus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NM
Tramp96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ts5641 said:

Wake me up when something is actually done.
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TAMU1990 said:

TXAggie2011 said:

TAMU1990 said:

Logos Stick said:

But she lost by 17,000 /libs
I get it, but since when does 100% of the voter roll vote, much less having an additional 8000+?
The report is not claiming 100% + 8,000 of registered voters voted.

The report is claiming that 8,000 more votes were reported than number of individual voters listed as voting.

And for those on the short bus, that's a sure sign of cheating.
eric76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
captkirk said:


This "study" would have a lot more credibility if it weren't from a source with clear bias in the case and pushing no agenda.
whatthehey78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GeorgiAg said:

Some red flags with the tweet.

It's only the first page of the report, with no link to read the report.

"an analysis was conducted" who what, when, where?

"a potential ... vote discrepancy..." Potential?


Head in the sand much?
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
eric76 said:

captkirk said:


This "study" would have a lot more credibility if it weren't from a source with clear bias in the case and pushing no agenda.
So I guess we can forever more completely ignore the entirety of the mainstream media?
AGHouston11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JWinTX said:

This strategy the leftists have created is unbeatable. There is no crime if the authorities won't call a crime a crime. Phoenix, Vegas, Atlanta, Philly, and Milwaukee are perfect places for this strategy's effectiveness. Don't worry about Florida, Texas, or Ohio if you are guaranteed these 5 states.


Harris County says hello too
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Don't know if this is the right place? Is this the same case?

"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Close enough. Pertains to a Special Action under the open records provisions and ballot signature verification issues.

Everyone except Steve Richer was dismissed as that particular duty was his. He's the guy who sued her for defamation.
JWinTX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AGHouston11 said:

JWinTX said:

This strategy the leftists have created is unbeatable. There is no crime if the authorities won't call a crime a crime. Phoenix, Vegas, Atlanta, Philly, and Milwaukee are perfect places for this strategy's effectiveness. Don't worry about Florida, Texas, or Ohio if you are guaranteed these 5 states.


Harris County says hello too


They haven't been able to turn Texas blue yet. These other states have not been so lucky…
ChemEAg08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GeorgiAg said:

Some red flags with the tweet.

It's only the first page of the report, with no link to read the report.

"an analysis was conducted" who what, when, where?

"a potential ... vote discrepancy..." Potential?




This guy is part of the 81 mm* that voted for Brandon.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ChemEAg08 said:

GeorgiAg said:

Some red flags with the tweet.

It's only the first page of the report, with no link to read the report.

"an analysis was conducted" who what, when, where?

"a potential ... vote discrepancy..." Potential?




This guy is part of the 81 mm* that voted for Brandon.
Geez, some people are really lazy. (Not directed at you ChemEAg08 but at the poster you responded to. Sorry if there was confusion.)

Here's the full report.

https://assets.americafirstpolicy.com/assets/uploads/files/Research_Report_-_Voter_Discrepancies_Found_In_The_Arizona_2022_General_Election.pdf

ETA: Sorry was unclear.
jt2hunt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">BREAKING: Arizona Judge grants Kari Lake a trial to determine whether she is entitled to a full audit of the mail in ballot signatures used in the 2022 election<br><br>Adrian Fontes, the former cartel lawyer and questionably elected Secretary of State, represented by the fraudulently… <a href="https://t.co/yHnvVuIwmG">pic.twitter.com/yHnvVuIwmG</a></p>— George (@BehizyTweets) <a href="https://twitter.com/BehizyTweets/status/1695987598144176498?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 28, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Refresh
Page 2 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.