"I'm here with my father & would like to know why commitment hasn't been fulfilled"

6,425 Views | 49 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by Logos Stick
pagerman @ work
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AGHouston11 said:

pagerman @ work said:

Fat Black Swan said:



Of course it doesn't.

Hunter is making a claim that his father is "next to him". Without any evidence to support that claim, it's merely the word of a pathetic junkie trying to squeeze money out of someone by using the threat of his father.

It shows that Hunter certainly was using his father to get money from people, but it doesn't show his father knew or took part.

I believe Joe did know and participate, but this message doesn't prove that.


What about his notebook and including the emails

The question from the reporter quoted the WhatsApp message linked in the OP, which is Hunter claiming to be next to his father and asked if it contradicted FJB's statements that he was unaware of his son's business activities and they never talked about it. It never specifically mentions anything (i.e. notebook & emails) other than that statement.

Junkie Hunter claiming he is sitting next to his father is not evidence of him sitting next to his father.
DallasAg 94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AndesAg92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
pagerman @ work said:

AGHouston11 said:

pagerman @ work said:

Fat Black Swan said:



Of course it doesn't.

Hunter is making a claim that his father is "next to him". Without any evidence to support that claim, it's merely the word of a pathetic junkie trying to squeeze money out of someone by using the threat of his father.

It shows that Hunter certainly was using his father to get money from people, but it doesn't show his father knew or took part.

I believe Joe did know and participate, but this message doesn't prove that.


What about his notebook and including the emails

The question from the reporter quoted the WhatsApp message linked in the OP, which is Hunter claiming to be next to his father and asked if it contradicted FJB's statements that he was unaware of his son's business activities and they never talked about it. It never specifically mentions anything (i.e. notebook & emails) other than that statement.

Junkie Hunter claiming he is sitting next to his father is not evidence of him sitting next to his father.


I understand your point. I feel like if this was a murder investigation this gets proved one way or another in about two seconds. If they have the message. They have the data on date/time and other things tied to it.

There is no way there isn't logs of everywhere Biden has been since he's the former VP with secret service on him.

How hard is it for either the Feds to prove Hunter was truthful about him sitting next to him or the WH to show with easy proof he was not?

Politics is infuriating sometimes.
Houstonag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And Nixon was forced to resign because his team took a peak at the play book.
DallasAg 94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
P.H. Dexippus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
pagerman @ work said:

AGHouston11 said:

pagerman @ work said:

Fat Black Swan said:



Of course it doesn't.

Hunter is making a claim that his father is "next to him". Without any evidence to support that claim, it's merely the word of a pathetic junkie trying to squeeze money out of someone by using the threat of his father.

It shows that Hunter certainly was using his father to get money from people, but it doesn't show his father knew or took part.

I believe Joe did know and participate, but this message doesn't prove that.


What about his notebook and including the emails

The question from the reporter quoted the WhatsApp message linked in the OP, which is Hunter claiming to be next to his father and asked if it contradicted FJB's statements that he was unaware of his son's business activities and they never talked about it. It never specifically mentions anything (i.e. notebook & emails) other than that statement.

Junkie Hunter claiming he is sitting next to his father is not evidence of him sitting next to his father.

No, it is evidence of exactly that. It may not be definitive. You may not find it persuasive. It may be hearsay, or it may be an exception to the hearsay rule. But it is evidence Joe was present.
AndesAg92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
P.H. Dexippus said:

pagerman @ work said:

AGHouston11 said:

pagerman @ work said:

Fat Black Swan said:



Of course it doesn't.

Hunter is making a claim that his father is "next to him". Without any evidence to support that claim, it's merely the word of a pathetic junkie trying to squeeze money out of someone by using the threat of his father.

It shows that Hunter certainly was using his father to get money from people, but it doesn't show his father knew or took part.

I believe Joe did know and participate, but this message doesn't prove that.


What about his notebook and including the emails

The question from the reporter quoted the WhatsApp message linked in the OP, which is Hunter claiming to be next to his father and asked if it contradicted FJB's statements that he was unaware of his son's business activities and they never talked about it. It never specifically mentions anything (i.e. notebook & emails) other than that statement.

Junkie Hunter claiming he is sitting next to his father is not evidence of him sitting next to his father.

No, it is evidence of exactly that. It may not be definitive. You may not find it persuasive. It may be hearsay, or it may be an exception to the hearsay rule. But it is evidence Joe was present.


I think what he meant is it is evidence but not proof
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
doubledog said:

The real question is what "unpaid" bill was Hunter trying to collect.




Stop defending Taiwan.
Gunny456
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Had a guy on Newsmax last week that was trying to make folks understand that Republicans lost the Senate slim margin and barely control the house. He said lots of what they do takes 2/3 majority and they don't have that.
We had a chance at mid terms to change all of that perhaps and the majority of the country "appears" to be fine with everything or we would have had the infamous " red wave".
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yesterday ABC reported that the Lawyer stated that Hunter should not be held responsible for words he may or may not have said while under the influence of narcotics.

So they aren't denying he wrote the message. Just that addicts do and say things they shouldn't.

That's a novel argument.
bigfooticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oops…

'Four photographs on the hard drive of Hunter Biden's laptop show him posing behind the wheel of Joe Biden's 1967 Corvette Stingray at 6:49 p.m. on July 30, 2017. GPS metadata embedded in the photos shows they were taken in close proximity Joe Biden's Wilmington, Delaware home.'

https://freebeacon.com/biden-administration/photos-place-hunter-biden-at-fathers-house-the-day-he-invoked-dads-name-to-chinese-business-partner/
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
pagerman @ work said:

AGHouston11 said:

pagerman @ work said:

Fat Black Swan said:



Of course it doesn't.

Hunter is making a claim that his father is "next to him". Without any evidence to support that claim, it's merely the word of a pathetic junkie trying to squeeze money out of someone by using the threat of his father.

It shows that Hunter certainly was using his father to get money from people, but it doesn't show his father knew or took part.

I believe Joe did know and participate, but this message doesn't prove that.


What about his notebook and including the emails

The question from the reporter quoted the WhatsApp message linked in the OP, which is Hunter claiming to be next to his father and asked if it contradicted FJB's statements that he was unaware of his son's business activities and they never talked about it. It never specifically mentions anything (i.e. notebook & emails) other than that statement.

Junkie Hunter claiming he is sitting next to his father is not evidence of him sitting next to his father.


There are time dated photographs of Hunter at his father's residence just hours after the time stamp of the conversation with the Chinese showing Hunter in the drive behind the seat of Joe's corvette.

The data and schedules indicate Joe and Hunter were both at Joe's residence that day so it is plausible they were in fact both present for the WhatsApp messaging.

See above.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And it is still vacay time for Hunter and Joe.

Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
pagerman @ work said:

AGHouston11 said:

pagerman @ work said:

Fat Black Swan said:



Of course it doesn't.

Hunter is making a claim that his father is "next to him". Without any evidence to support that claim, it's merely the word of a pathetic junkie trying to squeeze money out of someone by using the threat of his father.

It shows that Hunter certainly was using his father to get money from people, but it doesn't show his father knew or took part.

I believe Joe did know and participate, but this message doesn't prove that.


What about his notebook and including the emails

The question from the reporter quoted the WhatsApp message linked in the OP, which is Hunter claiming to be next to his father and asked if it contradicted FJB's statements that he was unaware of his son's business activities and they never talked about it. It never specifically mentions anything (i.e. notebook & emails) other than that statement.

Junkie Hunter claiming he is sitting next to his father is not evidence of him sitting next to his father.


It's not?

It doesn't prove it, but it is evidence yes. Whether you choose to believe it is another matter.

Trials are full of people making claims. Those claims are considered evidence.
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MouthBQ98 said:

pagerman @ work said:

AGHouston11 said:

pagerman @ work said:

Fat Black Swan said:



Of course it doesn't.

Hunter is making a claim that his father is "next to him". Without any evidence to support that claim, it's merely the word of a pathetic junkie trying to squeeze money out of someone by using the threat of his father.

It shows that Hunter certainly was using his father to get money from people, but it doesn't show his father knew or took part.

I believe Joe did know and participate, but this message doesn't prove that.


What about his notebook and including the emails

The question from the reporter quoted the WhatsApp message linked in the OP, which is Hunter claiming to be next to his father and asked if it contradicted FJB's statements that he was unaware of his son's business activities and they never talked about it. It never specifically mentions anything (i.e. notebook & emails) other than that statement.

Junkie Hunter claiming he is sitting next to his father is not evidence of him sitting next to his father.


There are time dated photographs of Hunter at his father's residence just hours after the time stamp of the conversation with the Chinese showing Hunter in the drive behind the seat of Joe's corvette.

The data and schedules indicate Joe and Hunter were both at Joe's residence that day so it is plausible they were in fact both present for the WhatsApp messaging.

See above.


The interesting thing is now the WH is saying that Joe was never in business with Hunter. Before it was Joe has never discussed business with Hunter.
Refresh
Page 2 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.