Adventure to the Titanic goes terribly wrong [Staff Warning in OP]

277,778 Views | 1587 Replies | Last: 4 mo ago by Stat Monitor Repairman
Duckhook
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This thread started off with some good knowledgeable input the first few pages, but then it predictably.....

[url=https://imgbb.com/][/url]

[We are fixing that issue. -Staff]
BG Knocc Out
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SPI-FlatsCatter 84 said:

So, does the USCG have a winch and 12,000 feet of cable to pull it up?

What are the options IF they find it in the next few hours?
As someone mentioned earlier, at this point, seems like the humane thing to do would be to find a way to get explosives in proximity and detonate. I'll eat crow if I am wrong, but there is no way to get that thing up in time, assuming they are even alive still.

I cannot imagine how horrific that fate must be if they were trapped inside together at the bottom of the ocean with no handgun to off themselves. I am hoping for their sake, assuming they cannot be rescued, that it was a structural failure that resulted in instant death for all aboard. Assuming you'd get squashed like a bug immediately at those depths.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag_of_08 said:

It's n9t the pressure pushing you down, it's the rapid compression of gasses in your BCD and body that cause the buoyancy variance.
I mean, which is caused by the pressure.
SPI-FlatsCatter 84
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That's what I was afraid of

Even if they locate it are there even any options to save them? Maybe a bump if they're stuck under a rod or beam or?
_________________________________________________________
Nothing is getting fixed in D.C. until we get term limits for both the House and the Senate
bthotugigem05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BG Knocc Out said:

SPI-FlatsCatter 84 said:

So, does the USCG have a winch and 12,000 feet of cable to pull it up?

What are the options IF they find it in the next few hours?
As someone mentioned earlier, at this point, seems like the humane thing to do would be to find a way to get explosives in proximity and detonate. I'll eat crow if I am wrong, but there is no way to get that thing up in time, assuming they are even alive still.

I cannot imagine how horrific that fate must be if they were trapped inside together at the bottom of the ocean with no handgun to off themselves. I am hoping for their sake, assuming they cannot be rescued, that it was a structural failure that resulted in instant death for all aboard. Assuming you'd get squashed like a bug immediately at those depths.

Very safe assumption at the end.
Ag_07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So any updates on the actual search and rescue effort?

Anything come of the noises reportedly heard?
MarathonAg12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What's wrong with the vessel?
Quincey P. Morris
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No one has any idea. There's no communication. Sure seems like the most likely scenario is it got crushed.
Quincey P. Morris
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I saw a video clip claiming the banging is coming at regular intervals that are something navies teach. I have no idea if that's actually true.
one MEEN Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quincey P. Morris said:

I saw a video clip claiming the banging is coming at regular intervals that are something navies teach. I have no idea if that's actually true.
Its a great way to send a signal of intelligence. If you just beat on the hull like crazy for minutes on end or randomly you could come off sounding like something natural in the ocean.

[Warning in effect as of this post. -Staff]
NPH-
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sound data heard from yesterday and this morning is so far inconclusive.

Searching in the areas where the sound was heard, but Coast Guard reminded the media that there are many vessels in the area assisting with the search, and it is a very real possibility that it could have been one of those making the noise.
NPH-
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This still remains a search and rescue operation.
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
[You were warned. -Staff]
MarathonAg12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Documentary on all of this will be air tomorrow

Streetfighter 02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Anonymous Source said:

chase128 said:

They lost communication with the surface during the dive that made it down to the Titantic right?

Sorry I can't watch the video right now.
That's true. There was a point in one trip...before the reporter took his...where they were just adrift for 2 1/2 hours, according to one of the passengers.
They have no positioning information to go down to the wreck with any precision so each dive is a crap shoot. It's not implausible that they could descend down in low visibility and tag the sub on top of the wreckage if this is actually the case.
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NPH- said:

Sound data heard from yesterday and this morning is so far inconclusive.

Searching in the areas where the sound was heard, but Coast Guard reminded the media that there are many vessels in the area assisting with the search, and it is a very real possibility that it could have been one of those making the noise.


That's got to be hard to everyone searching, and with time not on their side. Here's to hoping they pull off a miracle and save them.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
YellAgs
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MarathonAg12 said:

Documentary on all of this will be air tomorrow


that was fast
jokershady
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
this video was posted roughly 3 hours ago....it's the CBS guy from the original video discussing some of the things that were said and his take back when he was there.....was interesting to listen to

PA24
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We used side sonars for offshore survey and for finding objects. Literally hangs off the side of the ship with a small tripod. We lost a small boat and found it miles away from where it sank and the water not near as deep as this one.

When you drop a free falling object in the water, its landing target is somewhat proportional to the depth of the water, a cone shape landing area. There is a formula for determining the approximate landing distance the object could reach from its drop point.

pdc093
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Isn't tomorrow their 'end of oxygen' day?
Jesus. I pray their suffering is minimal, if at all.
fka ftc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Still pinging on the Triton reference (now a ghost in this thread, other one is locked)

This article is dated and lists it at $48million and notes it was tested to 20,000 feet in Russia and has made other deep dives.

Seems like if the Triton was ready for prime time it would be on duty going places to Titanic. Makes me think that it may not be ready for commercial production or the limitation of 2 crew, one of whom has to be trained / skilled to drive the thing may have resulted in Oceangate being an "alternative".

https://www.fanaticalfuturist.com/2018/11/tritons-48million-submarine-takes-the-super-rich-to-the-bottom-of-the-deepest-ocean/

Quote:

This is a place that only three people have visited before and only as one-offs. According to Triton, the Triton 36000/2 has been tested at the Krylov State Research Center in St. Petersburg, Russia to 20,305 psi (1,382 atmospheres), as well as on deep dives in the Bahamas. It has a pressure safety factor at least 20 percent greater than it will ever encounter. In addition, it can go to those depths repeatedly on trips of over 16 hours including the 2.5 hour descent. Triton claims that this repeatability is a world first for manned submersibles operating that such depths.
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
pdc093 said:

Isn't tomorrow their 'end of oxygen' day?
Jesus. I pray their suffering is minimal, if at all.

Sounds like their death may have been almost instant.
"I'm sure that won't make a bit of difference for those of you who enjoy a baseless rage over the decisions of a few teenagers."
aggielostinETX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
“A republic, if you can keep it”

AggieKatie2 said:
ETX is honestly starting to scare me a bit as someone who may be trigger happy.
aggie93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Anonymous Source said:

aggie93 said:

cbr said:

JABQ04 said:

I'd imagine they hope it could go down and somehow attach a cable to the Titan and have it hauled up

A very neat and not well known but of American deep sea operations was project Azorian where we were able to retrieve a large section of a Russian nuclear sub that sank in the Pacific in the 70s. Granted the whole Project also took like 6 or 7 years from inception to execution. The sun was almost 3 miles down.
Yes, but that was a nearly decade long hundred billion dollar project in todays dollars….run by elite 50 year old white dudes, that failed to recover much of the sub.

This wouldnt be secret and much smaller, but the details of that project illustrate the difficulties


I've only been lightly following this story as I think it is sad but not really something that matters much in the grand scheme. I look at it the same way as doing any other risky activity and think it is cool but dangerous and sometimes that ends badly. Hope they somehow are saved, just a terrible way to die.

That said, has it been mentioned that it would seem a basic safety measure would be to simply connect the sub to a cable to begin with? I mean they aren't going inside the hull of the Titanic and you could always set it up to cut away if need be. It just seems like a cable would allow for them to be pulled to the surface pretty easily in a circumstance like this and they aren't going to go that far from the ship. It would certainly need to be a very long cable but not especially thick, just strong. That would have made all of this moot.
The thing about cables is, the stronger they are, the thicker they are.
Sub weighs 23,000 pounds and if it's where they think it is, it's over two miles down. That's a ****load of heavy cable.
Don't want to pretend I am an engineer. No doubt it would be expensive and possibly impractical. Even if it had limited ability to pick up the sub though and was just a thin cable it would solve the location issue. Just seems nuts to me to have a sub like this down there with no real safety plan to extract it or locate it.
"The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help."

Ronald Reagan
MarathonAg12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good to hear!
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fka ftc said:

Still pinging on the Triton reference (now a ghost in this thread, other one is locked)

This article is dated and lists it at $48million and notes it was tested to 20,000 feet in Russia and has made other deep dives.

Seems like if the Triton was ready for prime time it would be on duty going places to Titanic. Makes me think that it may not be ready for commercial production or the limitation of 2 crew, one of whom has to be trained / skilled to drive the thing may have resulted in Oceangate being an "alternative".

https://www.fanaticalfuturist.com/2018/11/tritons-48million-submarine-takes-the-super-rich-to-the-bottom-of-the-deepest-ocean/

Quote:

This is a place that only three people have visited before and only as one-offs. According to Triton, the Triton 36000/2 has been tested at the Krylov State Research Center in St. Petersburg, Russia to 20,305 psi (1,382 atmospheres), as well as on deep dives in the Bahamas. It has a pressure safety factor at least 20 percent greater than it will ever encounter. In addition, it can go to those depths repeatedly on trips of over 16 hours including the 2.5 hour descent. Triton claims that this repeatability is a world first for manned submersibles operating that such depths.



The Triton you are looking at is different. That one is 36000/2...that one can theoretically go to the bottom of the Mariana Trench.

Look for the 13000/2 Titanic Explorer. It had reviews from people saying they used it to film Blue Planet 2 for discovery and another one. It claims to be perfect for repeated visits to the Titanic site.
fka ftc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggie93 said:



Don't want to pretend I am an engineer. No doubt it would be expensive and possibly impractical. Even if it had limited ability to pick up the sub though and was just a thin cable it would solve the location issue. Just seems nuts to me to have a sub like this down there with no real safety plan to extract it or locate it.
Safety plan would be to drop ballast and surface. So whatever happened resulted in this not being available - either implosion, stuck on floor / wreck, or power failure / malfunction that prevented the ballast from being dropped.
bonfarr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Anonymous Source said:

chase128 said:

They lost communication with the surface during the dive that made it down to the Titantic right?

Sorry I can't watch the video right now.
That's true. There was a point in one trip...before the reporter took his...where they were just adrift for 2 1/2 hours, according to one of the passengers.


I saw a recent interview with the reporter and he clarified his comments. They weren't adrift for 2.5 hours he said the submersible descended to where they thought the Titanic would be and they couldn't locate it. The sub has no directional capability, they get instructions by text from the Mothership on where to go. "Go forward 60 meters, go left 10 meters" etc. They couldn't find the wreckage then there was a period of several hours where communications broke down and the sub received no further instructions so they never located the Titanic and came back up to the surface.
Lake08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So 3 scenarios, imo

At bottom of ocean (screwed)
Tangled in the wreckage (screwed)
Floating on top (best scenario)
fka ftc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So these really rich guys took the option of flying in John Denver's homemade aircraft vs the corporate jet.

Cannot explain that, even with ego at play. Seems exceptionally foolish.

Also, from the updated clip of CBS dude. See link to part in video where he describes that there are 18 bolts to fasten the end cap on, but on his trip they stopped at 17 cause the other one was "hard to reach" and they told him it would be fine.

Again, exceptional carelessness and stupidity it would seem.

torrid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Lake08 said:

So 3 scenarios, imo

At bottom of ocean (screwed)
Tangled in the wreckage (screwed)
Floating on top (best scenario)
Yeah even if they are somehow found alive, there is simply no way to retrieve them from the bottom of the ocean.
nai06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
As far as rescue efforts go:

L'Atalante is French-operated ship heading to the scene with an ROV that can operate at depth of Titanic wreckage. The Rov is connected to ship via a cable for power and control. It's expected to arrive sometime today.

The Horizon Arctic is also en route. It's a large commercial vessel loaded with winch system.

I think the idea is that the ROV could potentially either pull the submersible up itself or attach a cable to it and allow it to be winched up.

Either way they are quickly running out of time.
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yes. Here's an article about it being released in 2021.

Says price tag is 15m at the time.

www.dailymail.co.uk/travel/travel_news/article-9294939/amp/The-sub-cockpit-gull-wings-capable-diving-13-000ft.html
fka ftc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nai06 said:

As far as rescue efforts go:

L'Atalante is French-operated ship heading to the scene with an ROV that can operate at depth of Titanic wreckage. The Rov is connected to ship via a cable for power and control. It's expected to arrive sometime today.

The Horizon Arctic is also en route. It's a large commercial vessel loaded with winch system.

I think the idea is that the ROV could potentially either pull the submersible up itself or attach a cable to it and allow it to be winched up.

Either way they are quickly running out of time.
From a practical standpoint, I think the trip down takes at least a few hours and I would imagine a trip up would be longer, so time is becoming extremely scarce.

Potentially ROV could release the ballast if the sub is otherwise intact.
ThunderCougarFalconBird
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Seems like there's be a fail safe feature in the design to auto-drop ballast. Probably means either stuck or hull failure.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.