So how about we factor in the corporate world where I'm STRONGLY urged to monitor and evaluate what I post on social media to which it could be tied back to the company I work for and create negative feedback. We've been lectured on controversial statements, flags, pictures, etc. Not just the company I work for, but I'm sure 1000s of others out there. BUT, it's perfectly OK to market to and allow outright controversial postings that promote a certain lifestyle because this seaman may do his job really well?Quantum Entanglement said:
Honestly I don't want to snap to judgment.
1. Does he do his job well as assigned?
2. Does his extracurricular activities have a negative effect of his fleet? (This would apply to all sailors.)
3. Does he deserve any credit for his willingness to serve? To risk his life?
I say a person's religion and lifestyle etc… is none of my business as long as it's not illegal and doesn't affect his assigned duties or the morale of the fleet. The last part is dicey because there are both human rights and practical factors of a united fighting force at play.
If he keeps his side act away from work gossip maybe it's a true American trait to just say "thank you for your service."
What if he was a damn good medic attending to car wrecks? A firefighter? I lean as a default to feeling thankful rather than being judgmental and closed-minded.
If a person is a Democrat, Republican, a Wokester, LGBTXYZ,…are they good soldiers? If the individual soldier is good AND they do not create drama off duty, why not thank them for their service?
I do suggest very high physical tests and standards. Focus hard on what is important. Politics can rattle the brain. Be able to measure if a sailor is successful and a team player.
You seriously think that is a two way street? How can it be one course of action is lecturing and monitoring and the other course of action is promotion?
Person Not Capable of Pregnancy