Houston Lee said:
Manhattan said:
Quote:
Its always better to own a home and earn equity than to throw it away paying rent.
A $500,000 loan at 6% with 20% down, 2.2% property tax less homestead, and $2000/yr for insurance is $3,408 a month.
That's like $400 a month going to equity at the beginning of the loan, you can rent a pretty nice place right now for $3,000 and not have to put $100,000 down.
And what does the renter do next year when the landlord raises their rent every year? But, the homeowner is still paying the same monthly amount..year--after--year...
There's a lot variability to the rent vs buy equation, and it all depends on the individual. A home is something you use, not just an investment, so that has to figure in as well.
Much of it has to do with the time horizon you expect to be there. With a rental, you're at the mercy of the landlord and market every year. You may not see rent decreases unless you move, which means you have to go through the hassle and cost of moving to get a better rate. If you buy, you can be locked in at a housing payment for a long time and refinance if the market improves. If you intend to be somewhere awhile, buying makes sense. If you move a lot, renting is a better idea.
Renting also comes with less risk because you don't own the house and aren't responsible for much of the maintenance or anything breaking. If you're really handy though, the maintenance and fixing may not be a roadblock to you.
Renting limits what you can customize on the home or apartment. You can't just paint walls or change fixtures if you don't like them like on a house you own. Typically a landlord would require you to put everything back to the state it was in when you moved in, meaning you have to pay for that kind of stuff twice. Also, any improvements you make stay with the landlord, and may not be deductible from your rent (like rehabbing a backyard).
To say that one is always better than the other is a huge oversimplification either way.