agent-maroon said:

---

Ol_Ag_02 said:

---

agent-maroon said:

---

civilaggie2011 said:

---

Alt-right Papists

---

More Protestants in Uganda than Catholics. Still mad?

---

That so?

Quote:

---

The Roman Catholic Church had the largest number of adherents (39.3 percent, down from 41.6 in 2002), followed by the Anglican Church of Uganda (32 percent, down from 35.9 percent). The category of Evangelical/Pentecostal/Born-Again showed the most growth, rising from 4.7% in 2002 to 11.1% in 2018. Adventist and other Protestant churches claimed most of the remaining Christians, although there was also a small Eastern Orthodox community. The next most reported religion of Uganda was Islam, with Muslims representing 13.7 percent of the population, up from 12.1% in 2002.

---

So you're trying to pin this on Protestants, despite being completely wrong about the Ugandan religious majority, instead of focusing on who we're actually focusing on in this thread.

I hope as a Doctor you're a little more thorough in your research and less biased in your diagnoses.

---

Roman Catholic = 39.3%
Anglican + Pentecostal = 32 + 11.1 = 43.1 %

43.1 > 39.3, so therefore there are more Protestants than Catholics in Uganda.

Catholic and physician bash denied.

---

Anglicans and Pentecostal are as far apart as Catholic and Wiccan.


The largest religion in Uganda is Catholic.
It's not a bad thing.

The laws in homosexuality are.
Are you trying to deflect so Catholics don't look bad here?

Well, your brethren are doing a good job on this thread of doing exactly that.

Tanya 93 said:

---

Dies Irae said:

---

Tanya 93 said:

---

Dies Irae said:

---

I am trying to wrap my head around "if X leads to the end of all life as we know it, stopping it is a violation of human rights"

I have to say this entire discourse makes more sense if viewed through that lens

---

So you will be forced to only have gay sex if it isn't illegal and punished by death?

I mean, I love Lucy Pinder's tits, but it doesn't make me a lesbian.

---

You sound somewhat lesbish. If I said "I like Henry Cavill's ass but it doesn't make me gay." I would be gay.

---

Well, we know what you are suppressing now.


And his chest is much better than his ass.
Jonathan Rhys Meyers, who he starred with on The Tutors, has a much better ass.

---

Now makes a lot more sense as to why he thinks being gay is contagious.

Tanya 93 said:

---

Dies Irae said:

---

I am trying to wrap my head around "if X leads to the end of all life as we know it, stopping it is a violation of human rights"

I have to say this entire discourse makes more sense if viewed through that lens

---

So you will be forced to only have gay sex if it isn't illegal and punished by death?

I mean, I love Lucy Pinder's tits, but it doesn't make me a lesbian.

---

We agree here.

Dies Irae said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Dies Irae said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Dies Irae said:

---

I am trying to wrap my head around "if X leads to the end of all life as we know it, stopping it is a violation of human rights"

I have to say this entire discourse makes more sense if viewed through that lens

---

How does two consenting adults doing something in the privacy of their home "end life as we know it"?

---

If it's in the privacy of their homes how do we know about it? And the statement was in response to the poster who said "even if it's an existential threat it still shouldn't be curtailed because liberty "

---

Why does it need to be illegal and punishable by death if you won't know about it and it has zero impact on anyone besides those two individuals?

---

Doesn't have to be punishable by death. The best laws are the ones that don't need to be enforced. Keeping it illegal keeps it away from public consumption, keeps it out of mainstreet. That's the goal.

---

i don't often walk down the street and see a dude balls deep in another dude. maybe where you live though.

agent-maroon said:

---

Ol_Ag_02 said:

---

agent-maroon said:

---

civilaggie2011 said:

---

Alt-right Papists

---

More Protestants in Uganda than Catholics. Still mad?

---

That so?

Quote:

---

The Roman Catholic Church had the largest number of adherents (39.3 percent, down from 41.6 in 2002), followed by the Anglican Church of Uganda (32 percent, down from 35.9 percent). The category of Evangelical/Pentecostal/Born-Again showed the most growth, rising from 4.7% in 2002 to 11.1% in 2018. Adventist and other Protestant churches claimed most of the remaining Christians, although there was also a small Eastern Orthodox community. The next most reported religion of Uganda was Islam, with Muslims representing 13.7 percent of the population, up from 12.1% in 2002.

---

So you're trying to pin this on Protestants, despite being completely wrong about the Ugandan religious majority, instead of focusing on who we're actually focusing on in this thread.

I hope as a Doctor you're a little more thorough in your research and less biased in your diagnoses.

---

Roman Catholic = 39.3%
Anglican + Pentecostal = 32 + 11.1 = 43.1 %

43.1 > 39.3, so therefore there are more Protestants than Catholics in Uganda.

Catholic and physician bash denied.

---

I'm sure you researched all this before you want Prot bashing. Your crew is in the majority. And it's only your crew on this thread that are supporting this. But again this thread was never about Catholics vs Prots. It was about the totalitarian Ugandan president and his TexAgs fan boys.

Doctor tags on this site are ruining the general perception of physicians.

Appeals to authority rarely work.

Dies Irae said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Dies Irae said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Dies Irae said:

---

I am trying to wrap my head around "if X leads to the end of all life as we know it, stopping it is a violation of human rights"

I have to say this entire discourse makes more sense if viewed through that lens

---

How does two consenting adults doing something in the privacy of their home "end life as we know it"?

---

If it's in the privacy of their homes how do we know about it? And the statement was in response to the poster who said "even if it's an existential threat it still shouldn't be curtailed because liberty "

---

Why does it need to be illegal and punishable by death if you won't know about it and it has zero impact on anyone besides those two individuals?

---

Doesn't have to be punishable by death. The best laws are the ones that don't need to be enforced. Keeping it illegal keeps it away from public consumption, keeps it out of mainstreet. That's the goal.

---

I would argue the best laws are ones that actually protect people from being harmed. Sounds like you think legislating private lives based on your personal worldview is more important.

Quote:

---

Alt-right Papists

---

The only thing I'm defending is the quoted post above which implied that this whole Ugandan anti-gay law issue was the fault of Catholics somehow. No context to the post other than a perceived blaming of Catholics. The poster made a later reply that he/she was referring to the OP and not Catholics in general. While this clarification was appreciated, I didn't feel compelled to delete or edit my previous response. I fail to see any evidence that there is a religious motivation to this law be it Catholic, Protestant, Muslim or otherwise, but if there were any such evidence that I had missed then I wanted it to be clear that it was happening in the absence of a Catholic majority.

My personal response to you Ol_Ag_02 is that your ability to perceive information without bias from the facts at hand sucks. The Catholic vs Protestant math was easy addition from your own post. I don't know (nor do I care) what your problem with me and/or Catholics and/or physicians is, but if you want to take this off line then post your contact info and I'll get with you ASAP.

agent-maroon said:

---

Quote:

---

Alt-right Papists

---

The only thing I'm defending is the quoted post above which implied that this whole Ugandan anti-gay law issue was the fault of Catholics somehow. No context to the post other than a perceived blaming of Catholics. The poster made a later reply that he/she was referring to the OP and not Catholics in general. While this clarification was appreciated, I didn't feel compelled to delete or edit my previous response. I fail to see any evidence that there is a religious motivation to this law be it Catholic, Protestant, Muslim or otherwise, but if there were any such evidence that I had missed then I wanted it to be clear that it was happening in the absence of a Catholic majority.

My personal response to you Ol_Ag_02 is that your ability to perceive information without bias from the facts at hand sucks. The Catholic vs Protestant math was easy addition from your own post. I don't know (nor do I care) what your problem with me and/or Catholics and/or physicians is, but if you want to take this off line then post your contact info and I'll get with you ASAP.

---

Calm down…. It's a discussion board.

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Dies Irae said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Dies Irae said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Dies Irae said:

---

I am trying to wrap my head around "if X leads to the end of all life as we know it, stopping it is a violation of human rights"

I have to say this entire discourse makes more sense if viewed through that lens

---

How does two consenting adults doing something in the privacy of their home "end life as we know it"?

---

If it's in the privacy of their homes how do we know about it? And the statement was in response to the poster who said "even if it's an existential threat it still shouldn't be curtailed because liberty "

---

Why does it need to be illegal and punishable by death if you won't know about it and it has zero impact on anyone besides those two individuals?

---

Doesn't have to be punishable by death. The best laws are the ones that don't need to be enforced. Keeping it illegal keeps it away from public consumption, keeps it out of mainstreet. That's the goal.

---

I would argue the best laws are ones that actually protect people from being harmed. Sounds like you think legislating private lives based on your personal worldview is more important.

---

I'm convinced of the harm that has befallen the young in our country as a result of a pervasive culture of promiscuity, pornography, disordered sexual behavior, debauchery, sex before marriage, fatherless homes, no fault divorce, etc. Do you agree that we've been harmed by these things? Gay marriage, IVF, surrogacy, and gay adoption are a big part of the problem. If you wanted to root these things out, I'm curious how all of you would approach it if not through some statute that has teeth. I'm not going to defend this law in particular because I don't know the particulars, but philosophically I'm not opposed to making unnatural sex against the law.

Weak sauce response. It's always easier when you can hide behind the anonymity of a discussion board, right?

Dies Irae said:

---

Science Denier said:

---

Here you have the essence of the difference between right and left.

Right calls out policy that is wrong, not matter what. Cruz calling this out is correct.

Left not only ignores policy that's wrong, but takes it a step further.
1. See NY abortion bill that allows murder of babies born alive
2. See their antics to force children to attend drag shows
3. See their work to try to get as many kids as possible to have sex change operations

---

This is not right vs left. This is liberal vs illiberal left. The majority of the Republican Party is now merely the liberal left.

---

Reject liberalism in all its forms. Embrace Christianity. Aggies used to love tradition.

Quote:

---

1 Co 11:2 Now I praise you, brethren, that you remember me in all things and keep the traditions just as I delivered them to you

---

Reject rational thought and protection of individual rights? That's a bold take.

Ol_Ag_02 said:

---

RebelE Infantry said:

---

This Uganda law is horrific & wrong.

Any law criminalizing homosexuality or imposing the death penalty for “aggravated homosexuality” is grotesque & an abomination.

ALL civilized nations should join together in condemning this human rights abuse.#LGBTQ https://t.co/tTIMR8VtqW

— Ted Cruz (@tedcruz) May 29, 2023

Horrible look here from Cruz. Absolutely no need to comment on this at all and just signals support for the opposition.

---

Why am I not surprised your siding with the Ugandan president on this.

---

Why am I not surprised you can't read and comprehend?

This thread

Secular Judaism, Secular Hellenism/Epicureanism are the only paths for humanity.

Christianity is a lie based upon a candidate for the truth.

Dies Irae said:

---

Teslag said:

---

Where does the human right to have straight sex come from?

---

God. Even our founding fathers knew where our rights came from.

---

Whose god? I thought it said creator?

RebelE Infantry said:

---

This Uganda law is horrific & wrong.

Any law criminalizing homosexuality or imposing the death penalty for “aggravated homosexuality” is grotesque & an abomination.

ALL civilized nations should join together in condemning this human rights abuse.#LGBTQ https://t.co/tTIMR8VtqW

— Ted Cruz (@tedcruz) May 29, 2023

Horrible look here from Cruz. Absolutely no need to comment on this at all and just signals support for the opposition.

---

What!!! You think that condemning governments executing its homosexual citizens is supporting the opposition?

What side are you on? If everybody on your side has sinister laughs and sneaks around on their tippy toes while greedily rubbing there hands together pondering world destruction you may be on the wrong side.

I will be completely blunt. I think homosexuality (Dudes anyway) is super gross. I also believe and letting people live their lives the way that they want to and ask they leave me alone.

I am also against any government executing any citizens for moral or political reasons. Any conservative that is pro death penalty is out of their damn mind. The government should never be trusted to the extent it can execute its citizens.

Bob Lee said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Dies Irae said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Dies Irae said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Dies Irae said:

---

I am trying to wrap my head around "if X leads to the end of all life as we know it, stopping it is a violation of human rights"

I have to say this entire discourse makes more sense if viewed through that lens

---

How does two consenting adults doing something in the privacy of their home "end life as we know it"?

---

If it's in the privacy of their homes how do we know about it? And the statement was in response to the poster who said "even if it's an existential threat it still shouldn't be curtailed because liberty "

---

Why does it need to be illegal and punishable by death if you won't know about it and it has zero impact on anyone besides those two individuals?

---

Doesn't have to be punishable by death. The best laws are the ones that don't need to be enforced. Keeping it illegal keeps it away from public consumption, keeps it out of mainstreet. That's the goal.

---

I would argue the best laws are ones that actually protect people from being harmed. Sounds like you think legislating private lives based on your personal worldview is more important.

---

I'm convinced of the harm that has befallen the young in our country as a result of a pervasive culture of promiscuity, pornography, disordered sexual behavior, debauchery, sex before marriage, fatherless homes, no fault divorce, etc. Do you agree that we've been harmed by these things? Gay marriage, IVF, surrogacy, and gay adoption are a big part of the problem. If you wanted to root these things out, I'm curious how all of you would approach it if not through some statute that has teeth. I'm not going to defend this law in particular because I don't know the particulars, but philosophically I'm not opposed to making unnatural sex against the law.

---

How does two consenting individuals having what you consider "unnatural sex" in the privacy of their home impact you?

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Bob Lee said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Dies Irae said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Dies Irae said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Dies Irae said:

---

I am trying to wrap my head around "if X leads to the end of all life as we know it, stopping it is a violation of human rights"

I have to say this entire discourse makes more sense if viewed through that lens

---

How does two consenting adults doing something in the privacy of their home "end life as we know it"?

---

If it's in the privacy of their homes how do we know about it? And the statement was in response to the poster who said "even if it's an existential threat it still shouldn't be curtailed because liberty "

---

Why does it need to be illegal and punishable by death if you won't know about it and it has zero impact on anyone besides those two individuals?

---

Doesn't have to be punishable by death. The best laws are the ones that don't need to be enforced. Keeping it illegal keeps it away from public consumption, keeps it out of mainstreet. That's the goal.

---

I would argue the best laws are ones that actually protect people from being harmed. Sounds like you think legislating private lives based on your personal worldview is more important.

---

I'm convinced of the harm that has befallen the young in our country as a result of a pervasive culture of promiscuity, pornography, disordered sexual behavior, debauchery, sex before marriage, fatherless homes, no fault divorce, etc. Do you agree that we've been harmed by these things? Gay marriage, IVF, surrogacy, and gay adoption are a big part of the problem. If you wanted to root these things out, I'm curious how all of you would approach it if not through some statute that has teeth. I'm not going to defend this law in particular because I don't know the particulars, but philosophically I'm not opposed to making unnatural sex against the law.

---

How does two consenting individuals having what you consider "unnatural sex" in the privacy of their home impact you?

---

Did you read what I wrote? If the culture only existed in our periphery and in the privacy of people's homes, we wouldn't need to have this discussion. You would not hear any complaints out of me if that were the case.

Quote:

---

Any law criminalizing homosexuality or imposing the death penalty for "aggravated homosexuality" is grotesque & an abomination.

---

Hmm

Quote:

---

13 "'If a man has sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They are to be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads.

---

Dies Irae said:

---

Ol_Ag_02 said:

---

Dies Irae said:

---

Fightin_Aggie said:

---

Dies Irae said:

---

Fightin_Aggie said:

---

Support for Human Rights <> support for LGBTQ mafia

This is a policy every conservative would support even if though our liberal friends will tell you otherwise

LGBTQ does not advocate for human rights, they advocate for totalitarianism and to shut up opposing viewpoints

---

When the hell did the right to have gay sex become a Human Right?

---

Can you pick a side?

The right to life is a human right. The right to not be murdered for what you believe is a human right. Sounds like Cruz is supporting that.

---

That's preposterous, some people believe it's okay to rape women and have sex with children.

---

Even you should be better than equating consensual sexual interactions between same sex adults to rape and pedophilia.

It's a really low bar and you should try harder.

---

That's not the point, he said "the right not to be murdered for what you believe is a human right".

We are inventing human rights out of thing air

---

The right to breathe is a human right made up out of thin air?

You are a foolish troll

agent-maroon said:

---

Weak sauce response. It's always easier when you can hide behind the anonymity of a discussion board, right?

---

Yep it is. That's why Silian Rail can keep making **** posts whining about how he can't marginalize gays and other minorities with religion.

This thread should be a case study in Message Boards 101.

boboguitar said:

---

Quote:

---

Any law criminalizing homosexuality or imposing the death penalty for "aggravated homosexuality" is grotesque & an abomination.

---

Hmm

Quote:

---

13 "'If a man has sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They are to be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads.

---

---

Old Testament.

Why is it a horrible look to call out something you genuinely think is wrong?

B-1 83 said:

---

boboguitar said:

---

Quote:

---

Any law criminalizing homosexuality or imposing the death penalty for "aggravated homosexuality" is grotesque & an abomination.

---

Hmm

Quote:

---

13 "'If a man has sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They are to be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads.

---

---

Old Testament.

---

Was still a law.

I like where this thread went. Keep it up.

Tanya 93 said:

---

agent-maroon said:

---

Ol_Ag_02 said:

---

agent-maroon said:

---

civilaggie2011 said:

---

Alt-right Papists

---

More Protestants in Uganda than Catholics. Still mad?

---

That so?

Quote:

---

The Roman Catholic Church had the largest number of adherents (39.3 percent, down from 41.6 in 2002), followed by the Anglican Church of Uganda (32 percent, down from 35.9 percent). The category of Evangelical/Pentecostal/Born-Again showed the most growth, rising from 4.7% in 2002 to 11.1% in 2018. Adventist and other Protestant churches claimed most of the remaining Christians, although there was also a small Eastern Orthodox community. The next most reported religion of Uganda was Islam, with Muslims representing 13.7 percent of the population, up from 12.1% in 2002.

---

So you're trying to pin this on Protestants, despite being completely wrong about the Ugandan religious majority, instead of focusing on who we're actually focusing on in this thread.

I hope as a Doctor you're a little more thorough in your research and less biased in your diagnoses.

---

Roman Catholic = 39.3%
Anglican + Pentecostal = 32 + 11.1 = 43.1 %

43.1 > 39.3, so therefore there are more Protestants than Catholics in Uganda.

Catholic and physician bash denied.

---

Anglicans and Pentecostal are as far apart as Catholic and Wiccan.


The largest religion in Uganda is Catholic.
It's not a bad thing.

The laws in homosexuality are.
Are you trying to deflect so Catholics don't look bad here?

Well, your brethren are doing a good job on this thread of doing exactly that.

---

Could you please elaborate on what you meant by "brethren" in this post (i.e. - do you mean "Catholics" (which I am) or supporters of this Ugandan law (which I am not))

TIA

Bob Lee said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Bob Lee said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Dies Irae said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Dies Irae said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Dies Irae said:

---

I am trying to wrap my head around "if X leads to the end of all life as we know it, stopping it is a violation of human rights"

I have to say this entire discourse makes more sense if viewed through that lens

---

How does two consenting adults doing something in the privacy of their home "end life as we know it"?

---

If it's in the privacy of their homes how do we know about it? And the statement was in response to the poster who said "even if it's an existential threat it still shouldn't be curtailed because liberty "

---

Why does it need to be illegal and punishable by death if you won't know about it and it has zero impact on anyone besides those two individuals?

---

Doesn't have to be punishable by death. The best laws are the ones that don't need to be enforced. Keeping it illegal keeps it away from public consumption, keeps it out of mainstreet. That's the goal.

---

I would argue the best laws are ones that actually protect people from being harmed. Sounds like you think legislating private lives based on your personal worldview is more important.

---

I'm convinced of the harm that has befallen the young in our country as a result of a pervasive culture of promiscuity, pornography, disordered sexual behavior, debauchery, sex before marriage, fatherless homes, no fault divorce, etc. Do you agree that we've been harmed by these things? Gay marriage, IVF, surrogacy, and gay adoption are a big part of the problem. If you wanted to root these things out, I'm curious how all of you would approach it if not through some statute that has teeth. I'm not going to defend this law in particular because I don't know the particulars, but philosophically I'm not opposed to making unnatural sex against the law.

---

How does two consenting individuals having what you consider "unnatural sex" in the privacy of their home impact you?

---

Did you read what I wrote? If the culture only existed in our periphery and in the privacy of people's homes, we wouldn't need to have this discussion. You would not hear any complaints out of me if that were the case.

---

You have no evidence that one leads to the others, just your opinion. Thankfully you don't get to force your views on people who objectively have done nothing that impacts your day to day life.

aggiehawg said:

---

No.

Ted never needs to say anything about Uganda.

---

Why the hell not? Cruz is dead to rights in his commentary here.

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Bob Lee said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Bob Lee said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Dies Irae said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Dies Irae said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Dies Irae said:

---

I am trying to wrap my head around "if X leads to the end of all life as we know it, stopping it is a violation of human rights"

I have to say this entire discourse makes more sense if viewed through that lens

---

How does two consenting adults doing something in the privacy of their home "end life as we know it"?

---

If it's in the privacy of their homes how do we know about it? And the statement was in response to the poster who said "even if it's an existential threat it still shouldn't be curtailed because liberty "

---

Why does it need to be illegal and punishable by death if you won't know about it and it has zero impact on anyone besides those two individuals?

---

Doesn't have to be punishable by death. The best laws are the ones that don't need to be enforced. Keeping it illegal keeps it away from public consumption, keeps it out of mainstreet. That's the goal.

---

I would argue the best laws are ones that actually protect people from being harmed. Sounds like you think legislating private lives based on your personal worldview is more important.

---

I'm convinced of the harm that has befallen the young in our country as a result of a pervasive culture of promiscuity, pornography, disordered sexual behavior, debauchery, sex before marriage, fatherless homes, no fault divorce, etc. Do you agree that we've been harmed by these things? Gay marriage, IVF, surrogacy, and gay adoption are a big part of the problem. If you wanted to root these things out, I'm curious how all of you would approach it if not through some statute that has teeth. I'm not going to defend this law in particular because I don't know the particulars, but philosophically I'm not opposed to making unnatural sex against the law.

---

How does two consenting individuals having what you consider "unnatural sex" in the privacy of their home impact you?

---

Did you read what I wrote? If the culture only existed in our periphery and in the privacy of people's homes, we wouldn't need to have this discussion. You would not hear any complaints out of me if that were the case.

---

You have no evidence that one leads to the others, just your opinion. Thankfully you don't get to force your views on people who objectively have done nothing that impacts your day to day life.

---

It's self evident. Gay couples adopting children doesn't happen in the privacy of their bedroom, and it doesn't happen in a vacuum. IVF and surrogacy don't happen in the privacy of people's bedrooms. Those involve children, and they are clearly violative of children's rights. There's a direct line between the redefinition of marriage to include couplings who never intend to remain faithful for life, and same sex couplings, etc. to a perceived right to bring children into existence through unnatural and monstrous technical procedures.

agent-maroon said:

---

Tanya 93 said:

---

agent-maroon said:

---

Ol_Ag_02 said:

---

agent-maroon said:

---

civilaggie2011 said:

---

Alt-right Papists

---

More Protestants in Uganda than Catholics. Still mad?

---

That so?

Quote:

---

The Roman Catholic Church had the largest number of adherents (39.3 percent, down from 41.6 in 2002), followed by the Anglican Church of Uganda (32 percent, down from 35.9 percent). The category of Evangelical/Pentecostal/Born-Again showed the most growth, rising from 4.7% in 2002 to 11.1% in 2018. Adventist and other Protestant churches claimed most of the remaining Christians, although there was also a small Eastern Orthodox community. The next most reported religion of Uganda was Islam, with Muslims representing 13.7 percent of the population, up from 12.1% in 2002.

---

So you're trying to pin this on Protestants, despite being completely wrong about the Ugandan religious majority, instead of focusing on who we're actually focusing on in this thread.

I hope as a Doctor you're a little more thorough in your research and less biased in your diagnoses.

---

Roman Catholic = 39.3%
Anglican + Pentecostal = 32 + 11.1 = 43.1 %

43.1 > 39.3, so therefore there are more Protestants than Catholics in Uganda.

Catholic and physician bash denied.

---

Anglicans and Pentecostal are as far apart as Catholic and Wiccan.


The largest religion in Uganda is Catholic.
It's not a bad thing.

The laws in homosexuality are.
Are you trying to deflect so Catholics don't look bad here?

Well, your brethren are doing a good job on this thread of doing exactly that.

---

Could you please elaborate on what you meant by "brethren" in this post (i.e. - do you mean "Catholics" (which I am) or supporters of this Ugandan law (which I am not))

TIA

---

Catholics

boboguitar said:

---

B-1 83 said:

---

boboguitar said:

---

Quote:

---

Any law criminalizing homosexuality or imposing the death penalty for "aggravated homosexuality" is grotesque & an abomination.

---

Hmm

Quote:

---

13 "'If a man has sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They are to be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads.

---

---

Old Testament.

---

Was still a law.

---

We know you're nothing but a "gotcha" poster, but like all libs, you fail miserably when trying to use the Bible.

Yes, that was the law in ancient Israel. Lots of other laws too like dietary restrictions (which if one looks at them, it was about food safety) which no one enforces, although practicing Jews chose to follow them.

However, Jesus took away the penalty for sin from us, assuming we accept his sacrifice. We still still have to answer for our sins the day we stand before God, but at the same time, God no longer requires we be punished on Earth for every moral failure we have.

There are plenty of things which were crimes, even capital crimes, which are against the law to this day such as murder. But the Bible aside, murder is a universal crime in almost every single society that has existed since time immemorial.

Tanya 93 said:

---

agent-maroon said:

---

Tanya 93 said:

---

The laws in homosexuality are.
Are you trying to deflect so Catholics don't look bad here?

Well, your brethren are doing a good job on this thread of doing exactly that.

---

Could you please elaborate on what you meant by "brethren" in this post (i.e. - do you mean "Catholics" (which I am) or supporters of this Ugandan law (which I am not))

TIA

---

Catholics

---

Thank you for your response. Please realize that it is some or even most self-identified Catholics on this thread, but not all.

Have a great day!