The last guy's personal lawyer facilitated a million dollar payoff for the RNC finance chair's abortion…. He knew about it.

This didn't phase any of his voters so maybe you are right.

M1Buckeye said:

---

Dies Irae said:

---

FJB announces a comprehensive plan to root out anti-semitism and Islamophobia.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/05/25/fact-sheet-biden-harris-administration-releases-first-ever-u-s-national-strategy-to-counter-antisemitism/

This admin is anti-Christian and anti- family in the extreme

---

There are two types of people in this world, those who are of God (wheat) and those who are of Satan (tares) and Joe Biden appears to be of the latter.

Matthew 13:24-30 esv
"The kingdom of heaven may be compared to a man who sowed good seed in his field, 25 but while his men were sleeping, his enemy came and sowed weeds[c] among the wheat and went away. 26 So when the plants came up and bore grain, then the weeds appeared also. 27 And the servants[d] of the master of the house came and said to him, 'Master, did you not sow good seed in your field? How then does it have weeds?' 28 He said to them, 'An enemy has done this.' So the servants said to him, 'Then do you want us to go and gather them?' 29 But he said, 'No, lest in gathering the weeds you root up the wheat along with them. 30 Let both grow together until the harvest, and at harvest time I will tell the reapers, "Gather the weeds first and bind them in bundles to be burned, but gather the wheat into my barn."'"

---

Amen brother

Manhattan said:

---

The last guy's personal lawyer facilitated a million dollar payoff for the RNC finance chair's abortion…. He knew about it.

This didn't phase any of his voters so maybe you are right.

---

I have never said Donald Trump is a Christian... and I still don't think he is.

But he enacted policies that were LESS harmful and hostile to Christians and gave us a Supreme Court that overturned Roe and protected our churches from gross overreaches by your leftist friends in blue states.

I voted for policy. Not the person.

But if we are comparing personal character and claiming Biden has more character than Trump.... that is indeed laughable when thinking about Ashley's diary and the other things we know about Mr. Sniffy.

Martin Cash said:

---

nai06 said:

---

Yep Christianity is definitely under attack. Especially when the majority of the country is Christian, the majority of law makers are Christian, and the president is Catholic.

---

That's debatable.

---

It's actually not really debatable. He is in fact not Catholic.

He can claim it all day long, but much like men claiming they are women, claiming it doesn't make it so.

Reading the responses in each of the posts really show how badly conservative and Christian's are at countering the game of NAZI like politics by the left. It is now scaring me to watch the government apparatus expand and create additional ways to oppress the populous while increasing their control and perfecting the tools to identify political enemies. Basically to coerce citizens to vote a certain way.

Based on previous behavior of this administration and the shadowy power brokers who are making and implementing policy that is self serving for the group that wields power and weakening protections for US Citizen's. This is why it is important NOT to allow the SCOTUS to be expanded, or the constitution to be changed and equally important return to punishing law makers who break laws. Benghazi comes to mind. An Ambassador was killed and HRC and the rest of the Sec of State Department went all out to cover up and control the narrative while unlawfully arresting an American citizen who had zero to do with the attacks that led to the Ambassador's death.

Using the excuse of "Rooting out Semitism" allows the bad, abusive elements in the government to dial in to threatened, provide an additional means to control, turn people against each other, enhance the govt ability to destroy and demolish yet another traditional institution. How many streams of control do they want? They want all of them……academics, law, religion, medical, military and politics. They darn near have it all. I can't really name one institution that hasn't been corrupted.

While conservative and Christian's debate whether are not there is evidence of anti-semitism and that this is an attack on religion itself…..the strategy of using wedge issue to cloak the real motives of growing a gestapo type force by the left to investigate and use the full power and weight of the government to oppress dissenters and to change the governmental structure that afforded protections to the common US Citizen. .

We need to hold any politician who claims to be a Republican to identify the many different streams of control that already exists and start to aggressively dismantle all of the governments organizations that exists to oppress the enemy of the power brokers.

Manhattan said:

---

The last guy's personal lawyer facilitated a million dollar payoff for the RNC finance chair's abortion…. He knew about it.

This didn't phase any of his voters so maybe you are right.

---

As voters we essentially have two choices, bad and horrific. I voted for "bad" but 81 million (allegedly) voted for horrific.

pagerman @ work said:

---

Martin Cash said:

---

nai06 said:

---

Yep Christianity is definitely under attack. Especially when the majority of the country is Christian, the majority of law makers are Christian, and the president is Catholic.

---

That's debatable.

---

It's actually not really debatable. He is in fact not Catholic.

He can claim it all day long, but much like men claiming they are women, claiming it doesn't make it so.

---

I don't think one needs to be the prophet Daniel to discern that folks like Joe, Nancy, Hillary, Barack, and many, MANY more are going to a VERY bad place after they pass away. Essentially, they have traded the untold and unfathomable riches of Heaven in return for what is tantamount to a cup of soup in this life. They are foolish, stupid, and EVIL.

Matthew 7:21-23 esv
Not everyone who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of heaven, but the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. 22 On that day many will say to me, 'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many mighty works in your name?' 23 And then will I declare to them, 'I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness.'

Dies Irae said:

---

SantaLucia said:

---

How are Christians under attack in the US? I mean under threat not being inconvenienced or just respected less.

---

A demented trans stormtrooper killed a ton of kids at a Christian school

---

7 is not 'a ton'. Leave the hyperbole to the leftists. You can make your point without resorting to hysteria. That's a prog ploy.

Sethtevious said:

---

Dies Irae said:

---

SantaLucia said:

---

How are Christians under attack in the US? I mean under threat not being inconvenienced or just respected less.

---

A demented trans stormtrooper killed a ton of kids at a Christian school

---

7 is not 'a ton'. Leave the hyperbole to the leftists. You can make your point without resorting to hysteria. That's a prog ploy.

---

1 kid is tons wrong, punk.

pagerman @ work said:

---

Martin Cash said:

---

nai06 said:

---

Yep Christianity is definitely under attack. Especially when the majority of the country is Christian, the majority of law makers are Christian, and the president is Catholic.

---

That's debatable.

---

It's actually not really debatable. He is in fact not Catholic.

He can claim it all day long, but much like men claiming they are women, claiming it doesn't make it so.

---

Was he baptized? If so, then he is Catholic. I was baptized, decided I didn't want to be Catholic anymore, called up the archdiocese, and they told me I cannot be taken off the register unless I am excommunicated or the baptismal record is destroyed (it won't be). Full stop.

So yes, he is IN FACT, a Catholic. Even if he doesn't follow all the principles.

Vepp said:

---

pagerman @ work said:

---

Martin Cash said:

---

nai06 said:

---

Yep Christianity is definitely under attack. Especially when the majority of the country is Christian, the majority of law makers are Christian, and the president is Catholic.

---

That's debatable.

---

It's actually not really debatable. He is in fact not Catholic.

He can claim it all day long, but much like men claiming they are women, claiming it doesn't make it so.

---

Was he baptized? If so, then he is Catholic. I was baptized, decided I didn't want to be Catholic anymore, called up the archdiocese, and they told me I cannot be taken off the register unless I am excommunicated or the baptismal record is destroyed (it won't be). Full stop.

So yes, he is IN FACT, a Catholic. Even if he doesn't follow all the principles.

---

This is a mouthful of wordplay.

Though he may be on the rolls, I'm more of a Catholic than he is and I no longer worship in the Catholic Church. He's aligns with very few, if any" of the Catholic tenants to call himself one.

Dies Irae said:

---

nai06 said:

---

Hungry Ojos said:

---

nai06 said:

---

Yep Christianity is definitely under attack. Especially when the majority of the country is Christian, the majority of law makers are Christian, and the president is Catholic.

---

50% of American "Christians" from this current generation don't believe that Jesus actually died on a cross.

60% of American "Christians" from this current generation don't believe that Jesus was actually resurrected.

So I have to kindly disagree with your assertion that we are a "majority" Christian nation.

---

I know it's hard to believe, but there are different flavors of Christianity. The one you subscribe to may not be the same as everyone else.

---

I know it's hard to believe, but if you're in a flavor of Christianity that doesn't believe Christ died on a cross or was resurrected, you're not actually Christian. That's kind of the bare minimum.

---

I thought the issue of "Christianity" was settled in Nicaea in 325AD. Am I wrong.

deddog said:

---

If Christianity is under attack , it's because of the incompetence of the church itself - they sat back and allowed the government to dictate how many could assemble at church. Disallowed family at funerals and the church did nothing. We have Catholics who think Abortion is a right and yet I've heard very few criticize Biden or the "church goers" who believe this heresy

You don't get to pick and choose what you like from the Bible

---

The existence of evil is not the fault of good. Now - I will agree with the lazy / soft church diagnosis. And it started well before Covid. Modern American churches have largely ignored sin, truth, and justice in favor of grace, compassion, and kindness.

The success of the Christian church in America was so complete that generations were trained to conform to cultural expectations in order to be a "good Christian." They failed to fight to maintain the culture, failed to see the threat, failed to train subsequent generations for their new role as cultural insurgents, and then failed to take a stand when government ordered them to lock up.

I remember thinking people were insane for songs like "I just wanna be a sheep." My Bible had clearly informed me that God instructs is against being timid conformists to the ways of the world.

Keller6Ag91 said:

---

Vepp said:

---

pagerman @ work said:

---

Martin Cash said:

---

nai06 said:

---

Yep Christianity is definitely under attack. Especially when the majority of the country is Christian, the majority of law makers are Christian, and the president is Catholic.

---

That's debatable.

---

It's actually not really debatable. He is in fact not Catholic.

He can claim it all day long, but much like men claiming they are women, claiming it doesn't make it so.

---

Was he baptized? If so, then he is Catholic. I was baptized, decided I didn't want to be Catholic anymore, called up the archdiocese, and they told me I cannot be taken off the register unless I am excommunicated or the baptismal record is destroyed (it won't be). Full stop.

So yes, he is IN FACT, a Catholic. Even if he doesn't follow all the principles.

---

This is a mouthful of wordplay.

Though he may be on the rolls, I'm more of a Catholic than he is and I no longer worship in the Catholic Church. He's aligns with very few, if any" of the Catholic tenants to call himself one.

---

No, you don't seem to understand language. He is IN FACT a Catholic, he also IN FACT is a practicing Catholic. Now if you don't agree that he follows the tenants of catholicism as closely as you'd like, then you have a point.

Remember, "judge not, lest you be judged". Right?

Dies Irae said:

---

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

---

Christians aren't under attack.

Maybe you just identify as persecuted.

---

This is the trick. The entire time they're persecuting you they pretend like they aren't, and you're a snowflake. Then when they finally have you crushed they say "and what are you going to do about it?"

Moral victory denied. We have 2,000 years of martyrs, and it has done nothing but strengthen the church.

---

Saltwater Assassin said:

---

Jesus told us we would be persecuted, it should not be a surprise that it is coming from a group that is openly Godless.

---

It's a very interesting needle they thread. At some point, the Dem party will reveal themselves as the Jews haters they are, despite the money they will sacrifice from American Jews. Satan masquerades as an angel of light.

I'd say within the next decade they will take the mask off.

Vepp said:

---

Keller6Ag91 said:

---

Vepp said:

---

pagerman @ work said:

---

Martin Cash said:

---

nai06 said:

---

Yep Christianity is definitely under attack. Especially when the majority of the country is Christian, the majority of law makers are Christian, and the president is Catholic.

---

That's debatable.

---

It's actually not really debatable. He is in fact not Catholic.

He can claim it all day long, but much like men claiming they are women, claiming it doesn't make it so.

---

Was he baptized? If so, then he is Catholic. I was baptized, decided I didn't want to be Catholic anymore, called up the archdiocese, and they told me I cannot be taken off the register unless I am excommunicated or the baptismal record is destroyed (it won't be). Full stop.

So yes, he is IN FACT, a Catholic. Even if he doesn't follow all the principles.

---

This is a mouthful of wordplay.

Though he may be on the rolls, I'm more of a Catholic than he is and I no longer worship in the Catholic Church. He's aligns with very few, if any" of the Catholic tenants to call himself one.

---

No, you don't seem to understand language. He is IN FACT a Catholic, he also IN FACT is a practicing Catholic. Now if you don't agree that he follows the tenants of catholicism as closely as you'd like, then you have a point.

Remember, "judge not, lest you be judged". Right?

---

Ah - the cudgel of a fraction of a message devoid of all context! It reminds me of all of the teachings about letting brothers wallow in their sin and appointing wolves to oversee the flock because Jesus wants us to be naive and helpless against evil.

Vepp said:

---

Keller6Ag91 said:

---

Vepp said:

---

pagerman @ work said:

---

Martin Cash said:

---

nai06 said:

---

Yep Christianity is definitely under attack. Especially when the majority of the country is Christian, the majority of law makers are Christian, and the president is Catholic.

---

That's debatable.

---

It's actually not really debatable. He is in fact not Catholic.

He can claim it all day long, but much like men claiming they are women, claiming it doesn't make it so.

---

Was he baptized? If so, then he is Catholic. I was baptized, decided I didn't want to be Catholic anymore, called up the archdiocese, and they told me I cannot be taken off the register unless I am excommunicated or the baptismal record is destroyed (it won't be). Full stop.

So yes, he is IN FACT, a Catholic. Even if he doesn't follow all the principles.

---

This is a mouthful of wordplay.

Though he may be on the rolls, I'm more of a Catholic than he is and I no longer worship in the Catholic Church. He's aligns with very few, if any" of the Catholic tenants to call himself one.

---

No, you don't seem to understand language. He is IN FACT a Catholic, he also IN FACT is a practicing Catholic. Now if you don't agree that he follows the tenants of catholicism as closely as you'd like, then you have a point.

Remember, "judge not, lest you be judged". Right?

---

This is ridiculous, we have rules. I don't care if someone has a membership card from "Vegan Association of America" if they eat meat, they're not a Vegan. Ask any canon lawyer what Latae Sententiae Excommunication entails.

"Judge not, lest you be judged" is the most misunderstood verse in the Bible. It doesn't mean if I go around strangling people, that you can't say that's bad.

The lack of God in every single leftist's posts on here is beyond evident. A total lack of perspective and ignorance galore. Narcissism masked as compassion for others.

Vepp said:

---

Keller6Ag91 said:

---

Vepp said:

---

pagerman @ work said:

---

Martin Cash said:

---

nai06 said:

---

Yep Christianity is definitely under attack. Especially when the majority of the country is Christian, the majority of law makers are Christian, and the president is Catholic.

---

That's debatable.

---

It's actually not really debatable. He is in fact not Catholic.

He can claim it all day long, but much like men claiming they are women, claiming it doesn't make it so.

---

Was he baptized? If so, then he is Catholic. I was baptized, decided I didn't want to be Catholic anymore, called up the archdiocese, and they told me I cannot be taken off the register unless I am excommunicated or the baptismal record is destroyed (it won't be). Full stop.

So yes, he is IN FACT, a Catholic. Even if he doesn't follow all the principles.

---

This is a mouthful of wordplay.

Though he may be on the rolls, I'm more of a Catholic than he is and I no longer worship in the Catholic Church. He's aligns with very few, if any" of the Catholic tenants to call himself one.

---

No, you don't seem to understand language. He is IN FACT a Catholic, he also IN FACT is a practicing Catholic. Now if you don't agree that he follows the tenants of catholicism as closely as you'd like, then you have a point.

Remember, "judge not, lest you be judged". Right?

---

That's not what that means.