NAZI's

9,343 Views | 131 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by historyhawg
willtackleforfood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What's interesting is the total media black out of Neo-Nazi's in Ukraine. In 2019, the Democrats were anti-Azov, before they were pro-Azov a few years later.

Forty Democrats Labeled Ukraine's Azov Battalion a Terrorist Organization in 2019

Silly Democrats.
Rabid Cougar
How long do you want to ignore this user?
1939 said:

Are you claiming that a few hundred Nazi sympathizers in the US in 1936-1940 equates to an American Nazi political party that had any legitimacy?
You claimed there was never a Nazi party in the US.

A tad more than a few hundred.

"On February 20, 1939, the Bund held an "Americanization" rally in New York's Madison Square Garden, denouncing Jewish conspiracies, President Roosevelt, and others. The rally, attended by 20,000 supporters and members, was protested by huge crowds of anti-Nazis, who were held back by 1,500 NYC police officers."

The Party fell apart as the shooting war started in 1939. The Federal government seized its assets and the FBI arrested their leader and deported him to Germany.

I would hazard guess the "huge crowd of anti-Nazis" were good American Communist.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fascism - the parties of Benito Mussolini and Adolph Hitler - are being compared to America's right wing because they were populist and nationalist in their day and in their countries, and Trump / MAGA is a populist movement that wants politicians and feds to put America first - ahead of globalist and elitist special interests. To a leftist, America first and wanting to get back to American exceptionalism and be the best, is scary nationalism so Trump might as well be Hitler. But that's where similarities end. Nazi fascists were socialist, which is what todays Democrats are. MAGA and conservatives who voted for Trump want smaller government and lower taxes. That can't be fascist. A less burdensome tax and regulatory environment encourages growth and investment, entrepreneurship and international investment, which creates jobs and is good everyone in America. Democrats' big government socialist taxation and spending creates inflation, eliminates the middle class, discourages investment and growth, and now as they are run by elitists in tech, finance, and industry and have all of mainstream media in their pocket as their pravda mouthpieces, they are far more like Marxist / Maoist communists, which fascists socialists are a precursor, than the right wing is like fascists.
cevans_40
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rabid Cougar said:

1939 said:

Are you claiming that a few hundred Nazi sympathizers in the US in 1936-1940 equates to an American Nazi political party that had any legitimacy?
You claimed there was never a Nazi party in the US.

A tad more than a few hundred.

"On February 20, 1939, the Bund held an "Americanization" rally in New York's Madison Square Garden, denouncing Jewish conspiracies, President Roosevelt, and others. The rally, attended by 20,000 supporters and members, was protested by huge crowds of anti-Nazis, who were held back by 1,500 NYC police officers."

The Party fell apart as the shooting war started in 1939. The Federal government seized its assets and the FBI arrested their leader and deported him to Germany.

I would hazard guess the "huge crowd of anti-Nazis" were good American Communist.
20,000 people in New York sounds serious.

They were outnumbered 5 to 1 by anti-protesters. That is the definition of a nothingburger
kb2001
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yes, there was a nazi party in the US. David Duke was infamously a member of the nazi party for years, before joining the democrat party

Nationalism and socialism are not opposites.

Fascism is not centered on race. In Italy, where fascism was created and named, the fascist party's primary objectives were to modernize the economy. It was an authoritarian command economy with workers rights at the core. In Italy, the internal fight was against the wealthy old guard. Hitler idolized Mussolini, and sought a similar revolution in Germany, their internal fight was against non-Aryans, focused on Jews as the source of all Germany's problems.

Some fascist models are still in place in Germany today. The Workers Council that every business is required to have, is a creation of Italian Fascism. It all stems from giving the workers more control over the means of production, these were the goals of the fascist command economy, you just had to be a fascist to qualify as a worker who can have control. Fascism took a less aggressive approach than the communists, they had all watched the Soviet model fail within 10 years, and instead of casting aside the people who built all those industries, the fascists decided just to tell them what to do. Basically, "you can keep your business, but you'll produce what we tell you to produce", vs the Soviet model of "your business is now ours, and you will be punished for ever haven been successful"
Matt Hooper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hitler was wildly anti-capitalist. His leftist authoritarianism (socialist/ fascist) was not lip-service in any way.

He was hyper-focused on the collective (German national collective) and subjected the individual and private industry to the national, authoritarian stated goals. Individuals or businesses that did not comply saw their ownerships and businesses removed from their possession and handed to new ownership that was compliant to the authoritarian directives.

Conservatism is first and foremost about limited government. It is antithetical authorization command and control. Right wing (in US terminology - associated with conservatism) had and has nothing to do with Fascism or Nazi-ism. They are incompatible.
Hooper Drives the Boat
texagbeliever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Definitely Not A Cop said:

BluHorseShu said:

1939 said:

Where did all of the Nazi nonsense come from, especially calling them right wing.

First off, you can't be a Nazi. the Nazi's were a legit (in the sense that they were organized and recognized) political party in Germany in the 30's and 40's; it no longer exists, especially in America where the party never existed in the first place.

Second, they aren't right wing, they were socialists and were most definitely not supporters of Israel and the Jews. How is that "right wing"? Modern day American Democrats = Socialists who do no support Israel - Nazi's sound pretty left wing to me.
The 'socialist' that Hitlers party used was in name only. He only used it to bring in the workers into his nationalist fold. In no way did they operate as socialists.. Hitler only paid lip service to this notion as a means to his end. This is a common misperception. They were nationalists.


That opposed capitalism. So national socialists.

Nazi Germany was not socialist.
Socialist is the creation of classless society. Nazi Germany never tried to implement that. USSR did.

It is like this.
Bernie Sanders is the USSR type politician. Pushes for the goal of classless society.
Biden and democrats are Facists (Musolini or Hitler) types that want to slowly grow control of government over the capitalists in order to secure permanent power for themselves in what can be called a command or authoritarian style economy or a "managerial system" as Burnham would put it.

Really important point. Capitalism and socialism are not the only 2 types of economic systems. Just because one is not capitalist doesn't make it socialist.
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiez03 said:

Anything 'they' don't agree with is 'right wing'...

You haven't figured this out yet?

Religion - Right Wing
2nd Amendment - Right Wing
Free Speech - Right Wing
Common Sense - Right Wing
Sounds like the GOP needs to be putting this into their ads. Let everyone know where their freedoms come from and who's trying to take them away.
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Facism and its cousin naziism were nstinslist socislist (populist) movements and both were seeking to develop an authoritarian state power to direct the actions of the citizens toward the collective greatness of the nation. They wanted an idealized state that disregarded outside or international influences and had a unified culture. The Italian version was already multiethnic and so did not care so much about racial issues as the adoption of the state sanctioned nationalism and culture and politics and the direction of efforts towards that ends.

The nazi version was ethically purist due to the beliefs of its leadership that only the proper ethnicity would belong to and could achieve the nations culture the state wanted to promote. If you were an outsider to that, you were going to be rejected and purged as a threat. The economy was nationalized to the extent that was feasible, and though not ever socialized, there was a clear trend in that direction.

As such, it contained conservative elements of idealization of past and existing social and cultural standards, but merged them with an authoritarian and socialist state managed economic model where the state would arrange for the well being and best employment of all of its citizens. Both are populist and in competition with internationalist Marxism or democratic capitalism.

The closest modern analogue would be China, where they are culturally monolithic with an official single party state that manages the economy while allowing a degree of freedom within it that meets the productivity needs of the state that complete Marxism fails at. The Chinese have come closest to the goals of Facism/National Socialism in the modern world, of course their own version of it.
aggiez03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexAgs91 said:

aggiez03 said:

Anything 'they' don't agree with is 'right wing'...

You haven't figured this out yet?

Religion - Right Wing
2nd Amendment - Right Wing
Free Speech - Right Wing
Common Sense - Right Wing
Sounds like the GOP needs to be putting this into their ads. Let everyone know where their freedoms come from and who's trying to take them away.
NEWSFLASH...

THEY DON'T CARE.

Executive Orders by Trump - LITERALLY A NAZI

Exective Orders by Obama or Potato - Love Them, that will show Congress for not acting quickly!

Lockdowns, Required Masks, Required Vaccinations - Love them all


Republicans Wanting to Enforce Existing Laws on the books for 20+ years = NAZIS

Democrats Not Enforcing ANY Law - Good for America


Republicans Wanting to Enforce Existing Immigration Law = You guessed it, NAZIS

Democrats Not Enforcing ANY Immigration Law - Good for America (As long as it is only border states, we don't want those kind of people up here, we have our own issues, and don't really have room, but it is your problem, and you should deal with it, and be sympathetic to the mass invasion, theft, etc )



In Short, GOVERN ME HARDER DADDY!!!!
Tom Kazansky 2012
How long do you want to ignore this user?
texagbeliever said:

Definitely Not A Cop said:

BluHorseShu said:

1939 said:

Where did all of the Nazi nonsense come from, especially calling them right wing.

First off, you can't be a Nazi. the Nazi's were a legit (in the sense that they were organized and recognized) political party in Germany in the 30's and 40's; it no longer exists, especially in America where the party never existed in the first place.

Second, they aren't right wing, they were socialists and were most definitely not supporters of Israel and the Jews. How is that "right wing"? Modern day American Democrats = Socialists who do no support Israel - Nazi's sound pretty left wing to me.
The 'socialist' that Hitlers party used was in name only. He only used it to bring in the workers into his nationalist fold. In no way did they operate as socialists.. Hitler only paid lip service to this notion as a means to his end. This is a common misperception. They were nationalists.


That opposed capitalism. So national socialists.

Nazi Germany was not socialist.
Socialist is the creation of classless society. Nazi Germany never tried to implement that. USSR did.

It is like this.
Bernie Sanders is the USSR type politician. Pushes for the goal of classless society.
Biden and democrats are Facists (Musolini or Hitler) types that want to slowly grow control of government over the capitalists in order to secure permanent power for themselves in what can be called a command or authoritarian style economy or a "managerial system" as Burnham would put it.

Really important point. Capitalism and socialism are not the only 2 types of economic systems. Just because one is not capitalist doesn't make it socialist.
Saying the USSR tried is laughable. They never got close. Neither did China or any other attempt at making a classless society. They just murdered the producers (capitalists) and made sure their generals/oligarchs with power shared the top class's spot. Germany was largely similar in that they basically made sure the war effort leaders were well fed and taken care of even down to the last days before Hitler's suicide.

This is the same pattern in all socialist societies we have witnessed since the Bolsheviks took over in 1917. Classless society has always been "reward my friends that brought me to power and take from the ones producing at the time of my takeover".
DatTallArchitect
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BluHorseShu said:

Definitely Not A Cop said:

BluHorseShu said:

1939 said:

Where did all of the Nazi nonsense come from, especially calling them right wing.

First off, you can't be a Nazi. the Nazi's were a legit (in the sense that they were organized and recognized) political party in Germany in the 30's and 40's; it no longer exists, especially in America where the party never existed in the first place.

Second, they aren't right wing, they were socialists and were most definitely not supporters of Israel and the Jews. How is that "right wing"? Modern day American Democrats = Socialists who do no support Israel - Nazi's sound pretty left wing to me.
The 'socialist' that Hitlers party used was in name only. He only used it to bring in the workers into his nationalist fold. In no way did they operate as socialists.. Hitler only paid lip service to this notion as a means to his end. This is a common misperception. They were nationalists.


That opposed capitalism. So national socialists.
Sure...like we are a democracy.
We're a democratic republic, not democracy. Always have been.
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiez03 said:

TexAgs91 said:

aggiez03 said:

Anything 'they' don't agree with is 'right wing'...

You haven't figured this out yet?

Religion - Right Wing
2nd Amendment - Right Wing
Free Speech - Right Wing
Common Sense - Right Wing
Sounds like the GOP needs to be putting this into their ads. Let everyone know where their freedoms come from and who's trying to take them away.
NEWSFLASH...

THEY DON'T CARE.

Executive Orders by Trump - LITERALLY A NAZI

Exective Orders by Obama or Potato - Love Them, that will show Congress for not acting quickly!

Lockdowns, Required Masks, Required Vaccinations - Love them all


Republicans Wanting to Enforce Existing Laws on the books for 20+ years = NAZIS

Democrats Not Enforcing ANY Law - Good for America


Republicans Wanting to Enforce Existing Immigration Law = You guessed it, NAZIS

Democrats Not Enforcing ANY Immigration Law - Good for America (As long as it is only border states, we don't want those kind of people up here, we have our own issues, and don't really have room, but it is your problem, and you should deal with it, and be sympathetic to the mass invasion, theft, etc )



In Short, GOVERN ME HARDER DADDY!!!!

About 75 million people do care. And many more would if they didn't get their "news" from Pravda
AggieMD95
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AgBQ-00 said:

The Commie-Nazi fight was a progressive sectarian fight. They had the same authoritarian bent and the same belief in total govt control of the economy, one based off of class warfare jealousy and dehumanization, the other based off of race warfare and dehumanization.


Right on.

And today the Marxist calls everything they believe in progressive and label everything they abhor right wing or fascist
texagbeliever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tom Kazansky 2012 said:

texagbeliever said:

Definitely Not A Cop said:

BluHorseShu said:

1939 said:

Where did all of the Nazi nonsense come from, especially calling them right wing.

First off, you can't be a Nazi. the Nazi's were a legit (in the sense that they were organized and recognized) political party in Germany in the 30's and 40's; it no longer exists, especially in America where the party never existed in the first place.

Second, they aren't right wing, they were socialists and were most definitely not supporters of Israel and the Jews. How is that "right wing"? Modern day American Democrats = Socialists who do no support Israel - Nazi's sound pretty left wing to me.
The 'socialist' that Hitlers party used was in name only. He only used it to bring in the workers into his nationalist fold. In no way did they operate as socialists.. Hitler only paid lip service to this notion as a means to his end. This is a common misperception. They were nationalists.


That opposed capitalism. So national socialists.

Nazi Germany was not socialist.
Socialist is the creation of classless society. Nazi Germany never tried to implement that. USSR did.

It is like this.
Bernie Sanders is the USSR type politician. Pushes for the goal of classless society.
Biden and democrats are Facists (Musolini or Hitler) types that want to slowly grow control of government over the capitalists in order to secure permanent power for themselves in what can be called a command or authoritarian style economy or a "managerial system" as Burnham would put it.

Really important point. Capitalism and socialism are not the only 2 types of economic systems. Just because one is not capitalist doesn't make it socialist.
Saying the USSR tried is laughable. They never got close. Neither did China or any other attempt at making a classless society. They just murdered the producers (capitalists) and made sure their generals/oligarchs with power shared the top class's spot. Germany was largely similar in that they basically made sure the war effort leaders were well fed and taken care of even down to the last days before Hitler's suicide.

This is the same pattern in all socialist societies we have witnessed since the Bolsheviks took over in 1917. Classless society has always been "reward my friends that brought me to power and take from the ones producing at the time of my takeover".

I've made the point elsewhere but USSR proved the practical fallacies of classless society. Which is why it lasted that way for less than blip. But it was implemented. Which was not the case for the Nazi party
BassCowboy33
How long do you want to ignore this user?
1939 said:

Where did all of the Nazi nonsense come from, especially calling them right wing.

First off, you can't be a Nazi. the Nazi's were a legit (in the sense that they were organized and recognized) political party in Germany in the 30's and 40's; it no longer exists, especially in America where the party never existed in the first place.

Second, they aren't right wing, they were socialists and were most definitely not supporters of Israel and the Jews. How is that "right wing"? Modern day American Democrats = Socialists who do no support Israel - Nazi's sound pretty left wing to me.


This isn't new. Bush was labeled a Nazi back in the early '00s. South Park had a whole episode about it. It goes back to the "everyone who disagrees with me is Hitler/Stalin."
197361936
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rapier108 said:

The claim that the Nazis were "right wing" is one of the biggest lies ever sold.

They were left wing authoritarians.

And as we know in this country, the left always accuses the right of what they themselves are guilty of doing/being.




Thisx10^averybignumber.
Anyone who chooses to ride a bicycle in the street is a threat to themselves, and others. If a vehicle strikes you accidentally, YOU are at fault; and the laws of physics supercede all else when you're in the path of a 2 ton killing machine. Know your place, stay off the road.
Definitely Not A Cop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
texagbeliever said:

Definitely Not A Cop said:

BluHorseShu said:

1939 said:

Where did all of the Nazi nonsense come from, especially calling them right wing.

First off, you can't be a Nazi. the Nazi's were a legit (in the sense that they were organized and recognized) political party in Germany in the 30's and 40's; it no longer exists, especially in America where the party never existed in the first place.

Second, they aren't right wing, they were socialists and were most definitely not supporters of Israel and the Jews. How is that "right wing"? Modern day American Democrats = Socialists who do no support Israel - Nazi's sound pretty left wing to me.
The 'socialist' that Hitlers party used was in name only. He only used it to bring in the workers into his nationalist fold. In no way did they operate as socialists.. Hitler only paid lip service to this notion as a means to his end. This is a common misperception. They were nationalists.


That opposed capitalism. So national socialists.

Nazi Germany was not socialist.
Socialist is the creation of classless society. Nazi Germany never tried to implement that. USSR did.

It is like this.
Bernie Sanders is the USSR type politician. Pushes for the goal of classless society.
Biden and democrats are Facists (Musolini or Hitler) types that want to slowly grow control of government over the capitalists in order to secure permanent power for themselves in what can be called a command or authoritarian style economy or a "managerial system" as Burnham would put it.

Really important point. Capitalism and socialism are not the only 2 types of economic systems. Just because one is not capitalist doesn't make it socialist.


You can say it's "classless," but that's not really true. The goal is to get down to one class. The practical reality is that there always ends up being two classes. The normal citizen and the politburo. Both the USSR and Nazi Germany ended up with these class systems, they just used different methods to get there. Nazis had an emphasis on race as a scapegoat to go after the capitalist industries, the USSR used wealth at first, then evolved to any kind of dissent or abnormalization from typical society as a scapegoat. Both went after the banks first.

Socialism is an economic idea, it's the antithesis of capitalism. It's not necessarily a political one. Different political ideologies are proposed to achieve this command economy structure. Both nazism and communism fall under this structure, with different methods of achieving government control over the economy.
BluHorseShu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Definitely Not A Cop said:

Not the same. We call ourselves a democratic republic. Our government is set up that way. Only the LIV's think we are actually a democracy.

In a similar vein, the Nazis called themselves national socialists. They set up their economy this way. They went after the banks immediately after securing power. They operated a command economy. The only people arguing that they weren't a command economy are the LIV's.
The NAZI's were not a true socialists. They were more fascist than socialist...with a dictator. Your example of the banks still works for fascism, its just the people were in control, the ruling political party/state was (and ultimately their leader). The state takes absolute control of the resources. They may allow some private ownership..but only if it benefits the state. There few if any credible source that will argue that NAZIs were true socialists. They only had that term used in their 'National Socialist German Workers' Party'. Hitler was a master manipulator and new how to use this as propaganda to garner support. He had no intention of letting the people own anything of their own.
Burrus86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Definitely Not A Cop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BluHorseShu said:

Definitely Not A Cop said:

Not the same. We call ourselves a democratic republic. Our government is set up that way. Only the LIV's think we are actually a democracy.

In a similar vein, the Nazis called themselves national socialists. They set up their economy this way. They went after the banks immediately after securing power. They operated a command economy. The only people arguing that they weren't a command economy are the LIV's.
The NAZI's were not a true socialists. They were more fascist than socialist...with a dictator. Your example of the banks still works for fascism, its just the people were in control, the ruling political party/state was (and ultimately their leader). The state takes absolute control of the resources. They may allow some private ownership..but only if it benefits the state. There few if any credible source that will argue that NAZIs were true socialists. They only had that term used in their 'National Socialist German Workers' Party'. Hitler was a master manipulator and new how to use this as propaganda to garner support. He had no intention of letting the people own anything of their own.


This is incorrect. Socialism is an economic system, the Nazi party was a political system that believed in socialism based on race.
BluHorseShu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DatTallArchitect said:

BluHorseShu said:

Definitely Not A Cop said:

BluHorseShu said:

1939 said:

Where did all of the Nazi nonsense come from, especially calling them right wing.

First off, you can't be a Nazi. the Nazi's were a legit (in the sense that they were organized and recognized) political party in Germany in the 30's and 40's; it no longer exists, especially in America where the party never existed in the first place.

Second, they aren't right wing, they were socialists and were most definitely not supporters of Israel and the Jews. How is that "right wing"? Modern day American Democrats = Socialists who do no support Israel - Nazi's sound pretty left wing to me.
The 'socialist' that Hitlers party used was in name only. He only used it to bring in the workers into his nationalist fold. In no way did they operate as socialists.. Hitler only paid lip service to this notion as a means to his end. This is a common misperception. They were nationalists.


That opposed capitalism. So national socialists.
Sure...like we are a democracy.
We're a democratic republic, not democracy. Always have been.
I was being facetious based on the response.
BluHorseShu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Definitely Not A Cop said:

BluHorseShu said:

Definitely Not A Cop said:

Not the same. We call ourselves a democratic republic. Our government is set up that way. Only the LIV's think we are actually a democracy.

In a similar vein, the Nazis called themselves national socialists. They set up their economy this way. They went after the banks immediately after securing power. They operated a command economy. The only people arguing that they weren't a command economy are the LIV's.
The NAZI's were not a true socialists. They were more fascist than socialist...with a dictator. Your example of the banks still works for fascism, its just the people were in control, the ruling political party/state was (and ultimately their leader). The state takes absolute control of the resources. They may allow some private ownership..but only if it benefits the state. There few if any credible source that will argue that NAZIs were true socialists. They only had that term used in their 'National Socialist German Workers' Party'. Hitler was a master manipulator and new how to use this as propaganda to garner support. He had no intention of letting the people own anything of their own.


This is incorrect. Socialism is an economic system, fascism is a political system that falls under socialism.
Okay. Agree to disagree. Find me a credible source that claims the Nazi's were true socialists. The people owned nothing under Hitler.
Definitely Not A Cop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BluHorseShu said:

Definitely Not A Cop said:

BluHorseShu said:

Definitely Not A Cop said:

Not the same. We call ourselves a democratic republic. Our government is set up that way. Only the LIV's think we are actually a democracy.

In a similar vein, the Nazis called themselves national socialists. They set up their economy this way. They went after the banks immediately after securing power. They operated a command economy. The only people arguing that they weren't a command economy are the LIV's.
The NAZI's were not a true socialists. They were more fascist than socialist...with a dictator. Your example of the banks still works for fascism, its just the people were in control, the ruling political party/state was (and ultimately their leader). The state takes absolute control of the resources. They may allow some private ownership..but only if it benefits the state. There few if any credible source that will argue that NAZIs were true socialists. They only had that term used in their 'National Socialist German Workers' Party'. Hitler was a master manipulator and new how to use this as propaganda to garner support. He had no intention of letting the people own anything of their own.


This is incorrect. Socialism is an economic system, fascism is a political system that falls under socialism.
Okay. Agree to disagree. Find me a credible source that claims the Nazi's were true socialists. The people owned nothing under Hitler.


Their name doesn't count? Revisionist history never admits that any thing was ever "true" socialism.
rocky the dog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Elections are when people find out what politicians stand for, and politicians find out what people will fall for.
BluHorseShu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Matt Hooper said:

Hitler was wildly anti-capitalist. His leftist authoritarianism (socialist/ fascist) was not lip-service in any way.

He was hyper-focused on the collective (German national collective) and subjected the individual and private industry to the national, authoritarian stated goals. Individuals or businesses that did not comply saw their ownerships and businesses removed from their possession and handed to new ownership that was compliant to the authoritarian directives.

Conservatism is first and foremost about limited government. It is antithetical authorization command and control. Right wing (in US terminology - associated with conservatism) had and has nothing to do with Fascism or Nazi-ism. They are incompatible.
You're conflating a lot here. Fascism is not socialism. There was no social ownership under the Nazi's. And you're correct, Hitler was anticapitalism if it didn't benefit the state. That does not automatically equal true socialism.
But I'm sure no one on here will actually research and go..."hmm, maybe its more nuanced that I thought". Egos abound.
HoustonAg2106
How long do you want to ignore this user?
1939 said:

Where did all of the Nazi nonsense come from, especially calling them right wing.

First off, you can't be a Nazi. the Nazi's were a legit (in the sense that they were organized and recognized) political party in Germany in the 30's and 40's; it no longer exists, especially in America where the party never existed in the first place.

Second, they aren't right wing, they were socialists and were most definitely not supporters of Israel and the Jews. How is that "right wing"? Modern day American Democrats = Socialists who do no support Israel - Nazi's sound pretty left wing to me.


Nazi is code for white supremacist, it's that simple
Ernest Tucker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
texagbeliever said:

1939 said:

Where did all of the Nazi nonsense come from, especially calling them right wing.

First off, you can't be a Nazi. the Nazi's were a legit (in the sense that they were organized and recognized) political party in Germany in the 30's and 40's; it no longer exists, especially in America where the party never existed in the first place.

Second, they aren't right wing, they were socialists and were most definitely not supporters of Israel and the Jews. How is that "right wing"? Modern day American Democrats = Socialists who do no support Israel - Nazi's sound pretty left wing to me.


I think the reason they are called right wing is how they did their authortarian transition especially when compared to the USSR. (I dont like this intellectual shorthand personally).

Nazi Germany and USSR both ended up with the same style of government.
USSR path: capitalist -> social revolution that killed capitalists-> socialism (for a very brief time) -> authoritarian command economy
Nazi Path: capitalist -> capitalist becoming bureaucrats-> eventually enough power becomes bureaucratic that remaining capitalists were crushed -> authoritarian command economy.

So it could theoretically be described as right because the capitalists were involved in the movement from the first stage. It is a misrepresentation because the capitalists in the end either became bureaucrats or were eliminated. And generally right and capitalism go together.


Nazi Path: capitalist -> capitalist becoming bureaucrats-> eventually enough power becomes bureaucratic that remaining capitalists were crushed -> authoritarian command economy.

In todays world we are seeing the capitalist (think majority of largest and most influential Fortune 500) collaborate with leftist ideology and in many cases becoming part of the liberal government bureaucracy. I don't think it's appropriate for these "capitalists" to be associated in any way to the American Conservative movement. Do you?
agracer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rabid Cougar said:

1939 said:

Are you claiming that a few hundred Nazi sympathizers in the US in 1936-1940 equates to an American Nazi political party that had any legitimacy?
You claimed there was never a Nazi party in the US.

A tad more than a few hundred.

"On February 20, 1939, the Bund held an "Americanization" rally in New York's Madison Square Garden, denouncing Jewish conspiracies, President Roosevelt, and others. The rally, attended by 20,000 supporters and members, was protested by huge crowds of anti-Nazis, who were held back by 1,500 NYC police officers."

The Party fell apart as the shooting war started in 1939. The Federal government seized its assets and the FBI arrested their leader and deported him to Germany.

I would hazard guess the "huge crowd of anti-Nazis" were good American Communist.
yeah, there a lot more than a few hundred. They were also pretty popular in Hollywood. Henry Ford and Lindbergh also looked favorably on the Nazi's.
AgBQ-00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You are under the delusion that the people actually own anything in a socialist state. The fact is that the STATE owns everything and commands the entirety of economy and the populace for the goals of the state.
The utopian fairytale of the "workers owned paradise" is nothing more than that, a fairytale. It always boils down to the use of extreme authoritarian thuggery and mass murders due to the very nature of socialism. You cannot have people refusing to go along with the State mandated equity and proving the folly of the system.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Burrus86 said:


See Post #10 by Aggie1944. Probably the highest rated post ever on TA.

Whats the coolest thing you have ever shot and with what? | TexAgs
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
dead
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Democratic People's Republic of Korea must be a democratic republic, right?
Definitely Not A Cop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dead said:

Democratic People's Republic of Korea must be a democratic republic, right?


Irrelevant. Is the DPRK set up with a capitalist economy or a command economy?
dead
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Their name doesn't count?
Matt Hooper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I simply disagree.

I think you are trying too hard to dance around the socialistic/fascistic nature of the Nazi's. Purity of implementation of any economic structure does not exist. It's not definitive in itself - but the Socialists in the party name is no small thing, and I think you dismiss it to readily. I would agree that fascist is better descriptor - but the differences are not of great magnitude. These are but differing traits of leftist authoritarians.

Note - Capitalism does not exist in pure form. Yet capitalism is what one would ascribe to our economic underpinnings.

To the OP original post - Naziism, Fascism are not products of the right (US right terminology). They are products of authoritarian leftists, always and everywhere - however you wish to identify the ….ism.

Hooper Drives the Boat
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.