Mike Lindell hoisted by his own petard

20,874 Views | 154 Replies | Last: 5 mo ago by J. Walter Weatherman
TheEternalPessimist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TXAGFAN said:

Get Off My Lawn said:

Lindel is just one man, and not at all representative of conservatives, but the Dems are glomming all over him to pivot any election discussion away from their illegal tampering of mechanics.
He shared the stage with president and president said favorable things about him an uncomfortable amount of times given his level of crazy. He's not just some guy, he's one of your guys. You can't just act like he's not.
Here is one of your "guys" who paid large sums of money to Nicholas Sandman for their lies:



--

"The Kingdom is for HE that can TAKE IT!" - Alexander
Robert L. Peters
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lindell is a businessman that wanted more. I don't care for him or his antics.
What you say, Paper Champion? I'm gonna beat you like a dog, a dog, you hear me!
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TheEternalPessimist said:

TXAGFAN said:

Get Off My Lawn said:

Lindel is just one man, and not at all representative of conservatives, but the Dems are glomming all over him to pivot any election discussion away from their illegal tampering of mechanics.
He shared the stage with president and president said favorable things about him an uncomfortable amount of times given his level of crazy. He's not just some guy, he's one of your guys. You can't just act like he's not.
Here is one of your "guys" who paid large sums of money to Nicholas Sandman for their lies:





That's not the only thing he paid large sums of money for.
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Remember when Trump had the pillow guy come to the White House in the dying days of his presidency to formulate a plan to thoroughly embarrass themselves with outright lies? I remember. Whatever happened with that?
Malibu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Get Off My Lawn said:

Lindel is just one man, and not at all representative of conservatives, but the Dems are glomming all over him to pivot any election discussion away from their illegal tampering of mechanics.




This is from January 15, 2021. When he's at the White House powwowing with Trump on election issues it's completely inbounds to insult him and the Trump supporters writ large for continued baseless conspiracy theories. When you meet with the President on this specific topic that you continue to get dunked on in court for being a clown you cease to be a blowhard on Twitter that I can ignore.
Watermelon Man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ellis Wyatt said:

Watermelon Man said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

OK. And still a distraction.

Everyone should be concerned about election sanctity and security. The people who are not are fully invested in the insecurity.
I'm all for election security. I do find it interesting that all the evidence for widespread Democratic fraud in the 2020 is based on lies and fabricated data.
Democrats make elections less secure every opportunity they can.
And it is so easy to prove that with all the lies and fabricated data.

I know that Democrats are your boogie man, but the thing is, without the lies and fabricated data, there is no evidence that the elections are not secure.

It's all made up.
It is much easier to fool someone than it is to convince someone that he has been fooled.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TXAGFAN said:

Impossible, so many said the election was stolen including Fox.

Well, every other media organization as well as the entire Democratic Party said that Russian interference and collusion with Trump was pivotal to his victory.

Surprised you weren't on here taking your L back then

And why didn't the media do a bunch of mea culpa stories about how wrong they'd been - to show that they were truly unbiased of course...

I think what we need is a huge DOJ investigation into this issue - along with a special prosecutor dedicated to nothing but 2020 election issues. Even if the money is completely pissed away, it's a good idea to look into it.
Robert L. Peters
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag with kids said:

TXAGFAN said:

Impossible, so many said the election was stolen including Fox.

Well, every other media organization as well as the entire Democratic Party said that Russian interference and collusion with Trump was pivotal to his victory.

Surprised you weren't on here taking your L back then

And why didn't the media do a bunch of mea culpa stories about how wrong they'd been - to show that they were truly unbiased of course...


I'm gonna go out on a limb and agree that there was no vote tampering to any significant degree. But the lies about the laptop, govt influence over social media, the complicit msm and blm and covid was used to steal the election.
What you say, Paper Champion? I'm gonna beat you like a dog, a dog, you hear me!
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Watermelon Man said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

Watermelon Man said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

OK. And still a distraction.

Everyone should be concerned about election sanctity and security. The people who are not are fully invested in the insecurity.
I'm all for election security. I do find it interesting that all the evidence for widespread Democratic fraud in the 2020 is based on lies and fabricated data.
Democrats make elections less secure every opportunity they can.
And it is so easy to prove that with all the lies and fabricated data.

I know that Democrats are your boogie man, but the thing is, without the lies and fabricated data, there is no evidence that the elections are not secure.
That's a lie.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Green Dragon said:

Ag with kids said:

TXAGFAN said:

Impossible, so many said the election was stolen including Fox.

Well, every other media organization as well as the entire Democratic Party said that Russian interference and collusion with Trump was pivotal to his victory.

Surprised you weren't on here taking your L back then

And why didn't the media do a bunch of mea culpa stories about how wrong they'd been - to show that they were truly unbiased of course...


I'm gonna go out on a limb and agree that there was no vote tampering to any significant degree. But the lies about the laptop, govt influence over social media, the complicit msm and blm and covid was used to steal the election.
People repeatedly dropped stack of ballots in drop boxes. It wasn't because they were Good Samaritans. That's vote tampering.
RoadkillBBQ
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HTownAg98 said:

His recent actions would prove otherwise.
Then maybe he really is concerned about election integrity.
Labeling someone that has done more to bring awareness to the problems we have with election integrity a conman is a cheap shot. What have any of us done about it besides sit at home and complain thru the keyboard?
Robert L. Peters
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maybe. But this is controlled opposition ***** The real election interference is right in front of us and easily provable.
What you say, Paper Champion? I'm gonna beat you like a dog, a dog, you hear me!
RoadkillBBQ
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BDUB95 said:

RoadkillBBQ said:

HTownAg98 said:

Lindell is not concerned about election security; he's concerned about making money. He's reduced himself to being a con artist now.
Being labeled an election denier by MSM and government mouthpieces that have peoples ears is a pretty poor business plan. I'm going to bet Lindell is smarter than that.
He's been making a killing from all the Trumpkins with pro-TDS.
Trumpkins. Nice.
Better a Trumpkin than a liberal POS.

TXAGFAN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TheEternalPessimist said:

TXAGFAN said:

Get Off My Lawn said:

Lindel is just one man, and not at all representative of conservatives, but the Dems are glomming all over him to pivot any election discussion away from their illegal tampering of mechanics.
He shared the stage with president and president said favorable things about him an uncomfortable amount of times given his level of crazy. He's not just some guy, he's one of your guys. You can't just act like he's not.
Here is one of your "guys" who paid large sums of money to Nicholas Sandman for their lies:




Not even close to the same thing and you know that.
Malibu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Legitimate positions to hold:
1. Ballot harvesting increases the likelihood that fraud will occur and is a bad idea.
2. Mail in ballots increase the likelihood that fraud will occur and is probably a bad idea.
3. Voters should be able to prove their identity to vote in an election.
4. Creating laxer regulations around voting in 2020 due to Covid allowed substantially more voters who would've stayed home on election day to lazily mail in ballot, and that absolutely made the difference for the Democrats.

Illegitimate positions to hold:
1. The voting systems were hacked and fraudulently cast Biden votes.
2. There was a massive conspiracy to stop counting the votes and pad the vote totals for the Democrats in the middle of the night.
3. A huge conspiracy of illegal voting rings spread across multiple states, requiring a substantial amount of manpower resulted in Democrats winning the election and not a single person has come forward as a whistleblower.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Illegitimate positions to hold:
1. The voting systems were hacked and fraudulently cast Biden votes.
2. There was a massive conspiracy to stop counting the votes and pad the vote totals for the Democrats in the middle of the night.
3. A huge conspiracy of illegal voting rings spread across multiple states, requiring a substantial amount of manpower resulted in Democrats winning the election and not a single person has come forward as a whistleblower.
Never heard of Zuckbucks and CTCL "grants" with massive strings attached?
Watermelon Man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ellis Wyatt said:

Watermelon Man said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

Watermelon Man said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

OK. And still a distraction.

Everyone should be concerned about election sanctity and security. The people who are not are fully invested in the insecurity.
I'm all for election security. I do find it interesting that all the evidence for widespread Democratic fraud in the 2020 is based on lies and fabricated data.
Democrats make elections less secure every opportunity they can.
And it is so easy to prove that with all the lies and fabricated data.

I know that Democrats are your boogie man, but the thing is, without the lies and fabricated data, there is no evidence that the elections are not secure.
That's a lie.
OK. I'll believe you if you can provide any proof (at least, any proof other than "My guy lost!", he said with tears in his eyes).

Otherwise, your lie is just a lie, like all your other lies.
It is much easier to fool someone than it is to convince someone that he has been fooled.
RoadkillBBQ
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Watermelon Man said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

Watermelon Man said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

OK. And still a distraction.

Everyone should be concerned about election sanctity and security. The people who are not are fully invested in the insecurity.
I'm all for election security. I do find it interesting that all the evidence for widespread Democratic fraud in the 2020 is based on lies and fabricated data.
Democrats make elections less secure every opportunity they can.
And it is so easy to prove that with all the lies and fabricated data.

I know that Democrats are your boogie man, but the thing is, without the lies and fabricated data, there is no evidence that the elections are not secure.

It's all made up.

How about we at least get rid of ballot harvesting, drop boxes, mail in voting and require voting in person with a valid ID.
AggieVictor10
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Y'all should be giving the pillow guy all your money. If you don't, can you really say you care about election security and America?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No less than Amy Klobuchar was complaining about how insecure electronic voting machines were in 2019.

https://www.klobuchar.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2019/3/ranking-members-klobuchar-warner-reed-and-peters-press-election-equipment-manufacturers-on-security
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
another loss for the Trumpers

1. Dominion gets 800 million for being defamed by Fox News over false claims of election cheating

2. Lindell forced to pay out 5 million for using fake data trying to prove election cheating

3. not a single US court has held there is any evidence there was cheating which changed the election

4. Sidney Powell is still an insane maniac and Trump is still ranting and raving how he was stripped from power by Mike Pence

5. Always Trumpers still insult the rest of us as "CMs" for not fully buying in to their fatuous and unsupported claims
Get Off My Lawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Admiral Adama said:

Get Off My Lawn said:

Lindel is just one man, and not at all representative of conservatives, but the Dems are glomming all over him to pivot any election discussion away from their illegal tampering of mechanics.




This is from January 15, 2021. When he's at the White House powwowing with Trump on election issues it's completely inbounds to insult him and the Trump supporters writ large for continued baseless conspiracy theories. When you meet with the President on this specific topic that you continue to get dunked on in court for being a clown you cease to be a blowhard on Twitter that I can ignore.
You say that like it's some kind of a dunk. I said conservatives. You say Trump. They're not synonymous.
BigJim49 AustinNowDallas
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HTownAg98 said:

Lindell is not concerned about election security; he's concerned about making money. He's reduced himself to being a con artist now.
Don't ya just hate him! And a billionaire to boot!
Secolobo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So does that mean we can get our $1200 from the university?
BluHorseShu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ellis Wyatt said:

OK. And still a distraction.

Everyone should be concerned about election sanctity and security. The people who are not are fully invested in the insecurity.
Headline - "Definitive Proof the Election was not Stolen"....F16- "So what, its just a distraction".

This is called the Texas Sharp Shooter fallacy

Of course everyone is concerned about election security. But unfortunately people are still distracted by their belief the 2020 election was stolen.
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
every time your team loses you call it a distraction lol..

TRUMP is a massive distraction - and yet I don't hear his supporters telling him to get out of the way.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Headline - "Definitive Proof the Election was not Stolen"....F16- "So what, its just a distraction".
Someone didn't read the decision of the arbitration panel.
BluHorseShu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PatriotAg02 said:

I don't see how this country will survive another stolen election.
We will because it wasn't stolen. What will be challenging is if we continue to have fringe groups challenging every election lost. We've got the House back and I'm confident we'll take back the Presidency.
The OP is just another peg removed from the Jenga tower of election conspiracy.
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GAC06 said:

Remember when Trump had the pillow guy come to the White House in the dying days of his presidency to formulate a plan to thoroughly embarrass themselves with outright lies? I remember. Whatever happened with that?
DeSantis eats pudding with his fingers!!!

AARGHAAHAHA!!
HTownAg98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RoadkillBBQ said:

HTownAg98 said:

His recent actions would prove otherwise.
Then maybe he really is concerned about election integrity.
Labeling someone that has done more to bring awareness to the problems we have with election integrity a conman is a cheap shot. What have any of us done about it besides sit at home and complain thru the keyboard?

If he was legitimately concerned about election security, one would think at least one of his claims would have been proven true by now. Instead, he keeps saying "I have the data! Just one more week!" When you keep hiding the football, people eventually catch on, and consider you to be a loon. He's done more to hurt than help.
BluHorseShu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Get Off My Lawn said:

Lindel is just one man, and not at all representative of conservatives, but the Dems are glomming all over him to pivot any election discussion away from their illegal tampering of mechanics.
Well there were certainly some who thought Lindell should be appointed to an office should Trump be elected again. So some hold him in high regard.
I don't give a crap about the Dems. I care about putting forward intelligent, moral Republicans who can win the election AND get things done. DeSantis '24
BluHorseShu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ellis Wyatt said:

The Green Dragon said:

Ag with kids said:

TXAGFAN said:

Impossible, so many said the election was stolen including Fox.

Well, every other media organization as well as the entire Democratic Party said that Russian interference and collusion with Trump was pivotal to his victory.

Surprised you weren't on here taking your L back then

And why didn't the media do a bunch of mea culpa stories about how wrong they'd been - to show that they were truly unbiased of course...


I'm gonna go out on a limb and agree that there was no vote tampering to any significant degree. But the lies about the laptop, govt influence over social media, the complicit msm and blm and covid was used to steal the election.
People repeatedly dropped stack of ballots in drop boxes. It wasn't because they were Good Samaritans. That's vote tampering.
The courts have thus far disagreed. Look, every election there are some idiots that do something illegal either intentionally or unintentionally. It just hasn't been proven that it even remotely rose to some mass effort or vast conspiracy to do it. Both dem and republican voters have been indicted for tampering. Election security should always be scrutinized....but I guarantee that whoever is our nominee in '24, if they continue to harp on the 'stolen election' we will likely lose voters.
Duckhook
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

No less than Amy Klobuchar was complaining about how insecure electronic voting machines were in 2019.

https://www.klobuchar.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2019/3/ranking-members-klobuchar-warner-reed-and-peters-press-election-equipment-manufacturers-on-security


I asked this in the other thread where you posted this, what were the various company's replies to this?
JDCAG (NOT Colin)
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BigJim49 AustinNowDallas said:

HTownAg98 said:

Lindell is not concerned about election security; he's concerned about making money. He's reduced himself to being a con artist now.
Don't ya just hate him! And a billionaire to boot!


billionaire? lol.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Duckhook said:

aggiehawg said:

No less than Amy Klobuchar was complaining about how insecure electronic voting machines were in 2019.

https://www.klobuchar.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2019/3/ranking-members-klobuchar-warner-reed-and-peters-press-election-equipment-manufacturers-on-security


I asked this in the other thread where you posted this, what were the various company's replies to this?
None as far as I know. Probably got a few donations out of it. And Klobuchar went away.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.