Paxton vs Crenshaw

14,235 Views | 271 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by Thaddeus Beauregard
LegalDrugPusher
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:36p, 4/19/23
For potential Governor nomination?

Just got off the phone with a significant insider to the Texas GOP

Paxton will be the grassroots/America 1st Texans choice and Crenshaw will be the establishment choice

Abbott will not seek re election
Reply Quote
BenFiasco14
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:37p, 4/19/23
Good lord.
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
Reply Quote
Post removed:
by user
6:38p, 4/19/23
Deputy Travis Junior
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:39p, 4/19/23
If Paxton will be a grassroots choice then why is the Texas GOP the one telling you this?
Reply Quote
Bunk Moreland
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:39p, 4/19/23
Pure scum vs an ever evolving political fraud.

Great choices Texas GOP!
Reply Quote
Post removed:
by user
6:39p, 4/19/23
Bryanisbest
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:40p, 4/19/23
Not real strong on Paxton.
Cannot stand Crenshaw.
I'll support Paxton unless a good gov candidate comes along
Reply Quote
aggiez03
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:41p, 4/19/23
Be surprised if Dan Patrick doesn't throw his hat in the ring...
Reply Quote
LegalDrugPusher
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Deputy Travis Junior • 6:41p, 4/19/23
Deputy Travis Junior said:
If Paxton will be a grassroots choice then why is the Texas GOP the one telling you this?


Because this guy plays both sides very very well, and let me tell you our G OP has a lot of grassroots conservatives starting with our Chairman Matt Rinaldi
Reply Quote
LegalDrugPusher
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiez03 • 6:42p, 4/19/23
aggiez03 said:
Be surprised if Dan Patrick doesn't throw his hat in the ring...


It won't be him
Reply Quote
LegalDrugPusher
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Bunk Moreland • 6:43p, 4/19/23
Bunk Moreland said:
Pure scum vs an ever evolving political fraud.

Great choices Texas GOP!


How is Paxton scum? Link?
Reply Quote
powerbelly
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BenFiasco14 • 6:45p, 4/19/23
BenFiasco14 said:
Good lord.


What a ****ty choice.
Reply Quote
Definitely Not A Cop
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:47p, 4/19/23
I'd vote for Beto.
Reply Quote
Bunk Moreland
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to LegalDrugPusher • 6:49p, 4/19/23
LegalDrugPusher said:
Bunk Moreland said:
Pure scum vs an ever evolving political fraud.

Great choices Texas GOP!


How is Paxton scum? Link?


https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2023/03/05/nate-paul-investor-ken-paxton-corruption-allegations-ordered-jail/8541678040038/

https://www.texastribune.org/2023/02/16/texas-attorney-general-ken-paxton-corruption-doj/

He was known scum before this. But I happen to know a little more about Paul than most. The fact that Paxton was mucking it up with a guy like that still has a chance of being just pure coincidence but that chance lessens by the day.
Reply Quote
1 edit
Teslag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:50p, 4/19/23
Paxton is trash. Crenshaw is garbage.
Reply Quote
Sea Speed
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:50p, 4/19/23
Bookmarked. Odds none of this happens?
Reply Quote
SociallyConditionedAg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:52p, 4/19/23
Glad to see Abbott's not running again, but Crenshaw is a no go and I'm not crazy about Paxton. Hopefully, Huffines will run again and be the next in line.
Reply Quote
TyHolden
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:52p, 4/19/23
one more time???

Reply Quote
BenFiasco14
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to powerbelly • 6:54p, 4/19/23
powerbelly said:
BenFiasco14 said:
Good lord.


What a ****ty choice.


Seriously. I feel like Ken Paxton is one of the few potential nominees that could lose to some nutjob democrat. If Paxton is a potential nominee, the Dems might throw up Beto again - cause Beto would probably win that race.

Paxton consistently receives the lowest amount of votes for for statewide offices, doesn't he? Why put him at the top of the ticket? Just asking for trouble.

I'd be fine with Crenshaw.
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
Reply Quote
powerbelly
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BenFiasco14 • 6:55p, 4/19/23
BenFiasco14 said:
powerbelly said:
BenFiasco14 said:
Good lord.


What a ****ty choice.


Seriously. I feel like Ken Paxton is one of the few potential nominees that could lose to some nutjob democrat. If Paxton is a potential nominee, the Dems might throw up Beto again - cause Beto would probably win that race.

Paxton consistently receives the lowest amount of votes for for statewide offices, doesn't he? Why put him at the top of the ticket? Just asking for trouble.

I'd be fine with Crenshaw.


Crenshaw sucks.

Beto could definitely beat Paxton and make it interesting with Crenshaw.
Reply Quote
Definitely Not A Cop
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BenFiasco14 • 6:55p, 4/19/23
McConaughey would beat Paxton.
Reply Quote
LegalDrugPusher
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Bunk Moreland • 6:56p, 4/19/23
Bunk Moreland said:
LegalDrugPusher said:
Bunk Moreland said:
Pure scum vs an ever evolving political fraud.

Great choices Texas GOP!


How is Paxton scum? Link?


https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2023/03/05/nate-paul-investor-ken-paxton-corruption-allegations-ordered-jail/8541678040038/

https://www.texastribune.org/2023/02/16/texas-attorney-general-ken-paxton-corruption-doj/

He was known scum before this. But I happen to know a little more about Paul than most. The fact that Paxton was mucking it up with a guy like that still has a chance of being just pure coincidence but thst chance lessens by the day.


Of course, you pulled out a bunch of old allegations that have never gone anywhere and never will. Anybody can indict a ham sandwich.
Reply Quote
LegalDrugPusher
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to powerbelly • 6:57p, 4/19/23
powerbelly said:
BenFiasco14 said:
powerbelly said:
BenFiasco14 said:
Good lord.


What a ****ty choice.


Seriously. I feel like Ken Paxton is one of the few potential nominees that could lose to some nutjob democrat. If Paxton is a potential nominee, the Dems might throw up Beto again - cause Beto would probably win that race.

Paxton consistently receives the lowest amount of votes for for statewide offices, doesn't he? Why put him at the top of the ticket? Just asking for trouble.

I'd be fine with Crenshaw.


Crenshaw sucks.

Beto could definitely beat Paxton and make it interesting with Crenshaw.


No he couldn't
Reply Quote
Jock 07
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:57p, 4/19/23
With those choices this immediately popped into my head for some reason.
Reply Quote
LegalDrugPusher
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Sea Speed • 6:58p, 4/19/23
Sea Speed said:
Bookmarked. Odds none of this happens?


Then put an educated guess out then
Reply Quote
CrackerJackAg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:58p, 4/19/23
I'll vote for anyone that agrees secession is a legitimate option. My only requirement.
Reply Quote
rgag12
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:59p, 4/19/23
Paxton would lose to a good dem candidate, he doesn't do well with squishy republicans. Dan Patrick would be better. There's lots of time between now and 2026
Reply Quote
Pookers
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:59p, 4/19/23
Cringeshaw is an absolute disaster. I fully expect GOP ****servatives to vote for him cuz muh naby seawl.
Reply Quote
powerbelly
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to LegalDrugPusher • 7:00p, 4/19/23
LegalDrugPusher said:
powerbelly said:
BenFiasco14 said:
powerbelly said:
BenFiasco14 said:
Good lord.


What a ****ty choice.


Seriously. I feel like Ken Paxton is one of the few potential nominees that could lose to some nutjob democrat. If Paxton is a potential nominee, the Dems might throw up Beto again - cause Beto would probably win that race.

Paxton consistently receives the lowest amount of votes for for statewide offices, doesn't he? Why put him at the top of the ticket? Just asking for trouble.

I'd be fine with Crenshaw.


Crenshaw sucks.

Beto could definitely beat Paxton and make it interesting with Crenshaw.


No he couldn't


Paxton is toxic with a big portion of the gop. You are just asking for another round of getting slaughtered down ballot.
Reply Quote
Bunk Moreland
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to LegalDrugPusher • 7:00p, 4/19/23
LegalDrugPusher said:
Bunk Moreland said:
LegalDrugPusher said:
Bunk Moreland said:
Pure scum vs an ever evolving political fraud.

Great choices Texas GOP!


How is Paxton scum? Link?


https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2023/03/05/nate-paul-investor-ken-paxton-corruption-allegations-ordered-jail/8541678040038/

https://www.texastribune.org/2023/02/16/texas-attorney-general-ken-paxton-corruption-doj/

He was known scum before this. But I happen to know a little more about Paul than most. The fact that Paxton was mucking it up with a guy like that still has a chance of being just pure coincidence but thst chance lessens by the day.


Of course, you pulled out a bunch of old allegations that have never gone anywhere and never will. Anybody can indict a ham sandwich.


You asked for a link and I gave you 2 articles as recent as the last 2 months.

Here's a snippet from one since we all know you actually aren't interested in learning one of many reasons Paxton is scum:

Quote:
The Washington-based investigators will now look into allegations made by Paxton's former top deputies that the attorney general took bribes to benefit a political donor who also employed a woman with whom Paxton was alleged to have had an extramarital affair. The latest news was made public less than one week after Paxton agreed to apologize and pay $3.3 million in taxpayer money to settle a whistleblower lawsuit with four of the employees who accused him of crimes. The settlement still needs court and legislative approval.


Why did us taxpayers have to pay $3.3M on his behalf to people employed by him that accused him of crimes?
Reply Quote
2 edits
BenFiasco14
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to powerbelly • 7:00p, 4/19/23
powerbelly said:
BenFiasco14 said:
powerbelly said:
BenFiasco14 said:
Good lord.


What a ****ty choice.


Seriously. I feel like Ken Paxton is one of the few potential nominees that could lose to some nutjob democrat. If Paxton is a potential nominee, the Dems might throw up Beto again - cause Beto would probably win that race.

Paxton consistently receives the lowest amount of votes for for statewide offices, doesn't he? Why put him at the top of the ticket? Just asking for trouble.

I'd be fine with Crenshaw.


Crenshaw sucks.

Beto could definitely beat Paxton and make it interesting with Crenshaw.


I doubt any Dem could beat Crenshaw. Like him or not, he's a Republican that as able to win in the Houston Heights.
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
Reply Quote
Pookers
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to powerbelly • 7:02p, 4/19/23
powerbelly said:
LegalDrugPusher said:
powerbelly said:
BenFiasco14 said:
powerbelly said:
BenFiasco14 said:
Good lord.


What a ****ty choice.


Seriously. I feel like Ken Paxton is one of the few potential nominees that could lose to some nutjob democrat. If Paxton is a potential nominee, the Dems might throw up Beto again - cause Beto would probably win that race.

Paxton consistently receives the lowest amount of votes for for statewide offices, doesn't he? Why put him at the top of the ticket? Just asking for trouble.

I'd be fine with Crenshaw.


Crenshaw sucks.

Beto could definitely beat Paxton and make it interesting with Crenshaw.


No he couldn't


Paxton is toxic with a big portion of the gop. You are just asking for another round of getting slaughtered down ballot.


The GOP is the party of imbiciles. Better vote for WEF eyepatch mccain because he speaks like a politician.
Reply Quote
rgag12
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Definitely Not A Cop • 7:03p, 4/19/23
Definitely Not A Cop said:
McConaughey would beat Paxton.


Agree, McConaughy would get in the race faster than you could say bongo drum if Paxton was the opponent.

McConaughy Is probably going to be the dem choice anyway no matter what, so the Republican candidate has to be very strong
Reply Quote
zoneag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:03p, 4/19/23
Do better Texas
Reply Quote
Definitely Not A Cop
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Pookers • 7:04p, 4/19/23
You don't think it would be more imbecilic to nominate the guy who could lose to Beto?
Reply Quote
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.