Still waitingsamurai_science said:You tell medead said:Then what is it?Quote:
We know it's not 2829
That's not how this works, I say it's much less. Arbitrary is Arbitrary. They pick random number and call it a "mass shooting" I pick a number, lets call it, however many have been carried about by trans people. Those are the only mass shootings. See, now we agree.dead said:
2829 until you can prove otherwise
GMaster0 said:
It just seems odd to me that we have so many threads on this topic. Is it really worth discussing to this level of ad nauseam given how few people identify as such in our total population. I think probably less than one percent of the population identify as transgender?
My whole life I have known only two people that were transgender and both were decent people. Both were primary healthcare providers and good at their jobs. I really didn't see anything for me to be apprehensive or fearful about them personally or related to being transgender.
The questions I ask is how does this topic personally affect you in a negative way and if doesn't affect you personally, why do you feel so strongly about it?
dead said:
you rn
This is exactly it OP. If a rational person cant see that, then they're either blind or stupid.. . . said:
Small percent and yet…
Neehau said:The same to you. We have always had insane people. Its in our genes. We are imperfectly evolved mammals. If a weapon gets in the hands of a crazy person they are going to use it. If that person didnt have access to the gun, like this person did who bought the gun through legal means, we wouldnt have these dead children.RafterAg223 said:Have you taken a break from spewing your drivel here long enough to realize that this thing was likely raging from some sort of biochemistry issue as a result of taking testosterone to change her body into something that it isn't? Of course you haven't. People like you focus on the buying of a firearm. You never want to focus on what drives these types of events. If this individuals didn't have these issues, this wouldn't even be a discussion at all. The same goes for the overwhelming majority of other mass shooting events in recent history. But, let's go ahead and make guns harder for law abiding normal people to obtain, while the criminal element and those wanting to do harm will still obtain them by any means necessary. That will almost certainly curb gun violence in this country. At least be intellectually honest when you engage here.Neehau said:Old May Banker said:
She lied on the application about her mental illness or the purchase would've been denied.
That is really a diagnosis of the symptom, not the illness. Refer back to my original post.
The population level statistics are the driving force behind the firearms crime epidemic.
If it were the case firearms weren't as easy to acquire (not only in ease of passing the application but in numerical availability as well), this would be an academic discussion.
Instead of focusing on your hate for the left, why don't you focus on reason? No one wants take away your guns. People do want to ensure crazy people cant get guns. That is the problem.
Y
How about you poll all 340 million Americans, put in a database, then we can search it and find out what each individual believes.dead said:
Going back to the very first question I asked, what's the general public's definition of a mass shooting?
