People of Arizona, Katie Hobbs

7,561 Views | 95 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by fka ftc
TXAGFAN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oh no said:

2012heisman said:

Kari ran too close to Trump in a state that worships John McCain
none of the approved communist talking points like this one explain Hobbs
Well, we have a two party system so if they didn't vote for Lake then….
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TXAGFAN said:

annie88 said:

Not whining. stating truth.

I know the truth scared liberals.

Anyone with a brain knows the 2020 election was stolen. Even democrats know, the media knows, they just don't care.

This is like Covid. The lies will only go so far.
Waaa. Prove it. Arizona was a highly contested state and "stolen" according to the narrative, AG couldn't prove it.
Again.

Bless your heart.
fka ftc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Would like to provide some context as to why a person may not like them some Kari Lake.

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2022/10/arizona-gop-candidate-kari-lake-airs-an-ad-featuring-a-homophobic-and-extremist-pastor/

Explains a lot about that repetitive dislike being on display in this thread.
"The absence of the word accountability is not the same as wanting no accountability" -unknown

"You can never go wrong by staying silent if there is nothing apt to say" -Walter Isaacson
TXAGFAN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
annie88 said:

TXAGFAN said:

annie88 said:

Not whining. stating truth.

I know the truth scared liberals.

Anyone with a brain knows the 2020 election was stolen. Even democrats know, the media knows, they just don't care.

This is like Covid. The lies will only go so far.
Waaa. Prove it. Arizona was a highly contested state and "stolen" according to the narrative, AG couldn't prove it.
Again.

Bless your heart.
Ad hom attack like always. Nothing to support your POV.

If there was all this fraud in Arizona, how is it the AG couldn't prove it? You know more? Did pillow guy whisper the truth in your ear lol?
Beast of Burden
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TXAGFAN said:

Beast of Burden said:

oh no said:

Democrats no longer need candidates to be likable, or smart, or articulate, or anything. They don't even have to be known. They don't have to debate or have rallies. They can hide in basements like Biden or avoid debates like Hobbs. They can even be severely brain damaged like Fetterman. It doesn't matter anymore. Democrats no longer have to have big "get out the vote" concerts to excite young people to be motivated enough to go vote for a candidate they like. No more selling ideas or earning votes. No more donations or fund raising goes to these efforts anymore. The donations and fund raising all goes to NGOs to go get the mail-in ballots now. As both Joe Biden and Joe Stalin said, it's not about who votes, it's who counts the votes. WHO COUNTS THE VOTES. Repeat the line. End quote. Salute the Marines.


Yet our resident single-issue voters will throw all that common sense completely out the window in order to condescend to, and call conservatives crazy.
Is that not allowed now? Have you see how this board talks about democrats/liberals?

Don't worry, the rhetoric from the minority is always tempered by an invisible hand.


Speaking of your POV, what in the world are the democrats/liberals doing right these days? You always disappear when asked to back up your statements with actual policy.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You're questioning why the Democratic AG did not find fault in a Democratic candidate who didn't campaign hardly, wouldn't debate, certified her own election (while not illegal, or unconstitutional, nor unique is pretty shady in such a contested election) and has allegations of working with a Mexican cartel?

And that's only a few issues with the twit.

Oh, ok.

I'm tempted to bless you a third time but I won't.

Whistle Pig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Brnovich was a Trumpy Republican. He was AG during the 2020 and 2022 election.

TXAGFAN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
annie88 said:

You're questioning why the Democratic AG did not find fault in a Democratic candidate who didn't campaign hardly, wouldn't debate, certified her own election (while not illegal, or unconstitutional, nor unique is pretty shady in such a contested election) and has allegations of working with a Mexican cartel?

And that's only a few issues with the twit.

Oh, ok.

I'm tempted to bless you a third time but I won't.


No, this is an astronomically wrong and incorrect take. Read the post after this one. For someone who is a full on stolen election believer this demonstrates without question your research STOPS any time you're presented with a fact that doesn't fit that narrative.
TXAGFAN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Beast of Burden said:

TXAGFAN said:

Beast of Burden said:

oh no said:

Democrats no longer need candidates to be likable, or smart, or articulate, or anything. They don't even have to be known. They don't have to debate or have rallies. They can hide in basements like Biden or avoid debates like Hobbs. They can even be severely brain damaged like Fetterman. It doesn't matter anymore. Democrats no longer have to have big "get out the vote" concerts to excite young people to be motivated enough to go vote for a candidate they like. No more selling ideas or earning votes. No more donations or fund raising goes to these efforts anymore. The donations and fund raising all goes to NGOs to go get the mail-in ballots now. As both Joe Biden and Joe Stalin said, it's not about who votes, it's who counts the votes. WHO COUNTS THE VOTES. Repeat the line. End quote. Salute the Marines.


Yet our resident single-issue voters will throw all that common sense completely out the window in order to condescend to, and call conservatives crazy.
Is that not allowed now? Have you see how this board talks about democrats/liberals?

Don't worry, the rhetoric from the minority is always tempered by an invisible hand.


Speaking of your POV, what in the world are the democrats/liberals doing right these days? You always disappear when asked to back up your statements with actual policy.
What are you talking about? Start a new thread with a coherent OP.
Garrelli 5000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TXAGFAN said:

TexAgs91 said:

Yes, dems are dumb. And yet somehow they're winning every battle.
well, in arizona they picked a more likable candidate.

Haha. Votes on butt stuff only.
Staff - take out the trash.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The election was stolen whether you want to admit it or not. But we will have to agree to disagree.

I said "if" regarding Fetterman.

You said he might be. It's the same ****ing thing.

I have no problem with peoples views, they're entitled to them, you're wrong regarding the election, but you can believe anything you want.

Liberals often live in a place where the truth doesn't exist.

It's nothing new.
SCHTICK00
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Probably deserves it's own thread. Arizona is owned and run by the cartel
TXAGFAN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
annie88 said:

The election was stolen whether you want to admit it or not. But we will have to agree to disagree.

I said "if" regarding Fetterman.

You said he might be. It's the same ****ing thing.

I have no problem with peoples views, they're entitled to them, you're wrong regarding the election, but you can believe anything you want.

Liberals often live in a place where the truth doesn't exist.

It's nothing new.
So completely ignoring the report from Arizona Republican AG I see. You never disappoint.

You are the one living in an alternative reality where the truth doesn't exist. If you didn't you would at least acknowledge the report and the fact that a Republican AG with all the information and thousands of man hours couldn't prove the viewpoint you've clung to for YEARS now about Arizona 2020 election results.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TXAGFAN said:

annie88 said:

The election was stolen whether you want to admit it or not. But we will have to agree to disagree.

I said "if" regarding Fetterman.

You said he might be. It's the same ****ing thing.

I have no problem with peoples views, they're entitled to them, you're wrong regarding the election, but you can believe anything you want.

Liberals often live in a place where the truth doesn't exist.

It's nothing new.
So completely ignoring the report from Arizona Republican AG I see. You never disappoint.

You are the one living in an alternative reality where the truth doesn't exist. If you didn't you would at least acknowledge the report and the fact that a Republican AG with all the information and thousands of man hours couldn't prove the viewpoint you've clung to for YEARS now about Arizona 2020 election results.
The 2020 election wasn't just stolen in Arizona, genius.

And the original reference was to Katie Hobbs election not the 2020 election.

But while we're talking about Maricopa County, you can't trust a ******* thing that comes out of there. But once again, you're talking about a republican AG, who was surrounded by Democrats, liberal media, liberal county officials and liberal DNC party being dishonest. If you're going to cheat, do it well.

If you want to believe the 2020 election was not stolen go right ahead. Most of your other views are wrong as well. Pulling up your comments on Covid right now Would probably be very interesting as well. As that narrative is getting completely blown out of the water from left to right, no pun intended.

You are completely deflecting your own failures and naivety.

Please do try to keep up.

Bless your…. Oh nevermind.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No no everyone. The programmed masses are supposed to believe a mother Jones article linked above. all the mail-in ballots for stupid unpopular Hobbs were because a county in AZ ran an ad that featured a guy who mother Jones later reported has said something anti-Islamic and anti-gay. Arizonans united against Lake after that because obviously dimwit-led communism is the only answer. They showed up in the mail in ballot counting en mass after that ad, despite the bad polling and unpopularity of Hobbs. And of course all those machines not working on election day had nothing to do with Hobbs winning.
fka ftc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oh no said:

No no everyone. The programmed masses are supposed to believe a mother Jones article linked above. all the mail-in ballots for stupid unpopular Hobbs were because a county in AZ ran an ad that featured a guy who mother Jones later reported has said something anti-Islamic and anti-gay. Arizonans united against Lake after that because obviously dimwit-led communism is the only answer. They showed up in the mail in ballot counting en mass after that ad, despite the bad polling and unpopularity of Hobbs. And of course all those machines not working on election day had nothing to do with Hobbs winning.
Sounds like you got it right. That's the story they want to weave, regardless of the truth.

Its about personality to Dems, not principles. About feelz, not laws. About their "truth" and not facts.
"The absence of the word accountability is not the same as wanting no accountability" -unknown

"You can never go wrong by staying silent if there is nothing apt to say" -Walter Isaacson
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

So completely ignoring the report from Arizona Republican AG I see. You never disappoint.
You sure do put a lot of stock in party labels. If the last 6 years have shown you anything, it's that republicans do not have a hive mind like democrats do.

Democrats are united by debauchery, theft, harming America and taking away freedoms. Republicans are not united at all.
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oh no said:

Grapesoda2525 said:

Ciboag96 said:

<<<conservative says or posts something about Katie Hobbs>>>

Media Matters: Ok everyone, please turn your Media Matters Manual to page 172 and post any of the 6 approved comments from Section 3b - Response to Katie Hobbs Attack. Please make sure to reword it a bit so it doesn't all sounds the same. Thanks. <<Red Rose Emoji>>

NPC1: She's more likable!

NPC2: You should have ran someone more likeable!

NPC3: Katie Hobbs is more likeable!

NPC4: Governor Hobbs is more likeable!

NPC5: You didn't run a candidate more likeable!
Whether you guys like it or not, the superficial **** matters. Bush only beat gore because women thought he was attractive and most non-republicans who voted for him knew Bush wasn't smart, but they said stuff like he's the president you would want to have a beer with.
bad candidate Bush won because he's attractive (really?) and voters could have a beer with him??? so why did bad candidate Katie Hobbs win? She's not attractive, no one wants to have a drink with her. what superficial **** that matters helped her out here?
The MSM took care of the fact that Katie Hobbs is unlikable, a self centered egomaniac and very unethical.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
fasthorse05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Todays events have changed this thread just a tad.

I've got to say until these are proved, nothing changes. I don't want WP to come running to remind me that everything is still the same, and I realize that.

We'll see if this is properly investigated. Of course, based on todays testimony, who knows if the AG's report from last week was written without outside influence.
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Grapesoda2525 said:

MouthBQ98 said:

It's all about "Team D" no matter who or what, and the ideology versus any candidate. The candidates are interchangeable puppets who spew out the same ideological message. They don't need to be effective and dynamic individuals. They have a large majority of the media to protect them from mistakes and hide faults, and run narratives. They have have staffs of ideologues from various special interests and party minders to actually implement Dem policy. Almost any eligible human being will do as a Dem candidate these days.
Don't people on this board do the same thing? By supporting terrible candidates like Dan Patrick who's keeping Texas in the 1950's and Ken Paxton who actually has a criminal record?

Mike collier is a good alternative to Patrick, he's not an AOC liberal, but nobody on this board will even look into him.

Quote:

He will also fight to enact into law red flag laws, raise the age to purchase a firearm to 21, and end permitless carry which puts our law enforcement officers and communities in harms way.

Nah, he's a loon too.
Opalka
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag87H2O said:

Once the conversation goes beyond what they are prepped to say, their ignorance becomes evident. Biden gave them the template. All that matters is that they get elected.

Don't tell me you missed the hundreds of trump clips of what "going off the script" looks like. More like "going off the rails".
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Opalka said:

Ag87H2O said:

Once the conversation goes beyond what they are prepped to say, their ignorance becomes evident. Biden gave them the template. All that matters is that they get elected.

Don't tell me you missed the hundreds of trump clips of what "going off the script" looks like. More like "going off the rails".
Nice derail. Having said that, he may have rambled at times but he could answer questions off the cuff. Hobbs isn't going off script - she can't answer a question without one. She's an empty suit.
Whistle Pig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fasthorse05 said:

Todays events have changed this thread just a tad.

I've got to say until these are proved, nothing changes. I don't want WP to come running to remind me that everything is still the same, and I realize that.

We'll see if this is properly investigated. Of course, based on todays testimony, who knows if the AG's report from last week was written without outside influence.


"Today's events" meaning last werk's baseless accusations from a disbarred criminal loon that every politician in Arizona and the Mormon church are involved in drug smuggling and money laundering with the Sinaloa cartel?
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Opalka said:

Ag87H2O said:

Once the conversation goes beyond what they are prepped to say, their ignorance becomes evident. Biden gave them the template. All that matters is that they get elected.

Don't tell me you missed the hundreds of trump clips of what "going off the script" looks like. More like "going off the rails".
WHOOP!'91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Opalka said:

Ag87H2O said:

Once the conversation goes beyond what they are prepped to say, their ignorance becomes evident. Biden gave them the template. All that matters is that they get elected.

Don't tell me you missed the hundreds of trump clips of what "going off the script" looks like. More like "going off the rails".
Trump's manner of speaking is odd, and he did tend to meander around once he got going.

That said, he would stand in front of reporters for hours answering questions on a variety of topics. Remember how the Dems were worried about his mental capacity? No worries about senile Joe, though.
fka ftc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
WHOOP!'91 said:

Opalka said:

Ag87H2O said:

Once the conversation goes beyond what they are prepped to say, their ignorance becomes evident. Biden gave them the template. All that matters is that they get elected.

Don't tell me you missed the hundreds of trump clips of what "going off the script" looks like. More like "going off the rails".
Trump's manner of speaking is odd, and he did tend to meander around once he got going.

That said, he would stand in front of reporters for hours answering questions on a variety of topics. Remember how the Dems were worried about his mental capacity? No worries about senile Joe, though.
One can answer questions on the spot and for as long as someone wants to keep asking when one is speaking TRUTH.

When one is lying, they typically avoid questions and shake hands with ghosts.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.