Gigem_94 said:
If those providing so called gender affirming care to minors are so confident that it is best, then there is no reason for them to oppose such a law. I'm fact, they should be confident to stand up and support it if they truly believe it. Put their money where their mouth is.
Over, under, WAAAAAAAAY over.45-70Ag said:
Oh this is going to be good. 18 bans, three permas and 21 emails sent to staph.
I would suggest you always, always check before getting into a completely compromised scenario.uncover&humpit said:
Based on the size of those hands, I can say yes, they do in fact, have a *****.
Quote:
A hearing to debate gender-affirming care in Arkansas has sparked outrage after a Republican lawmaker asked a transgender doctor if she has a *****.
CDUB98 said:
If they would just leave kids the **** alone, this would not even be an issue.
If someone wants to absolutely **** up their body after they turn 18, as long as it does not harm anyone else's rights, have at it. I don't care. You're going to regret it.
This damned ****ing nonsense of trying to shove kids into these lifelong, physical alterations which cannot be undone is something straight out of a dystopian nightmare. It's ****ing bull***** **** all of you supporting this *****
In a conservative sense, yes._mpaul said:The way to do that is to make the procedure illegal.Tea Party said:I think you have this backwards._mpaul said:Quote:
The Senate Bill 199 bill would allow someone who received gender-affirming care as a minor to file a malpractice lawsuit against their doctor for up to 30 years after they turn 18.
That's insane. So 30 years from now, when all these kids are showing signs of mental trauma and regret from their earlier bad decisions, and when we told them this is a bad idea, they'd be allowed to file suit for malpractice. Liberal mind virus.
That actually might have the unintended consequence of lowering the number of providers willing to provide that kind of care. Insurance costs would soar, and doctors aren't going to want to be on the hook for 3 decades.
Edit: Actually, as I read things closer, looks like that's the point and what she's testifying against, so I misread the story at first.
The kids are just confused and do not have their brains fully developed yet.
Mental illness is a real thing, and could be temporarily synonymous with kids making dumb decisions.
Doctors should have responsibility by turning a kids temporary mental illness into a relatively permanent problem.
This is to defend kids from being taken advantage of by doctors that either want to make money on the mental illness, or doctors that want to enable an agenda.
Bro has never heard of WelshBrittmoore Car Club said:
They almost always pick weird names or awkward spelled variations of girls' names. Gwendolyn? LOL
dead said:Bro has never heard of WelshBrittmoore Car Club said:
They almost always pick weird names or awkward spelled variations of girls' names. Gwendolyn? LOL
Quote:
Herzig went on to say: 'I'm a healthcare professional a doctor please treat me as such.'
Quote:
medical ethics.
45-70Ag said:
Oh this is going to be good. 18 bans, three permas and 21 emails sent to staph.
bigblock said:
That senator is a badass!
The look on the lady's face with glasses and then the priest!ProgN said:
In all my life I've never felt compelled to ask someone about their genitals, maybe some of you need a hobby.IslanderAg04 said:
We are at the point in life where you have to ask someone posing as a woman if they have a dick.
In all my life I've never not known the difference between a man and a woman.TXAGFAN said:In all my life I've never felt compelled to ask someone about their genitals, maybe some of you need a hobby.IslanderAg04 said:
We are at the point in life where you have to ask someone posing as a woman if they have a dick.
TXAGFAN said:In all my life I've never felt compelled to ask someone about their genitals, maybe some of you need a hobby.IslanderAg04 said:
We are at the point in life where you have to ask someone posing as a woman if they have a dick.
TXAGFAN said:In all my life I've never felt compelled to ask someone about their genitals, maybe some of you need a hobby.IslanderAg04 said:
We are at the point in life where you have to ask someone posing as a woman if they have a dick.
To clarify, I meant "the procedure illegal for minors." I don't think you would get too much libertarian resistance on that.Tea Party said:In a conservative sense, yes._mpaul said:The way to do that is to make the procedure illegal.Tea Party said:I think you have this backwards._mpaul said:Quote:
The Senate Bill 199 bill would allow someone who received gender-affirming care as a minor to file a malpractice lawsuit against their doctor for up to 30 years after they turn 18.
That's insane. So 30 years from now, when all these kids are showing signs of mental trauma and regret from their earlier bad decisions, and when we told them this is a bad idea, they'd be allowed to file suit for malpractice. Liberal mind virus.
That actually might have the unintended consequence of lowering the number of providers willing to provide that kind of care. Insurance costs would soar, and doctors aren't going to want to be on the hook for 3 decades.
Edit: Actually, as I read things closer, looks like that's the point and what she's testifying against, so I misread the story at first.
The kids are just confused and do not have their brains fully developed yet.
Mental illness is a real thing, and could be temporarily synonymous with kids making dumb decisions.
Doctors should have responsibility by turning a kids temporary mental illness into a relatively permanent problem.
This is to defend kids from being taken advantage of by doctors that either want to make money on the mental illness, or doctors that want to enable an agenda.
In a libertarian sense, no but the consequences should be high like the 30 year time period allows.
In a leftist sense, no and doctors should be praised for playing their role in continuing the slippery slope.
