Congresswoman Hartzler crying over the Respect for Marriage Act

4,971 Views | 63 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by cajunaggie08
cajunaggie08
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:24p, 12/8/22
AG
Republican Congresswoman Hartzler breaks down in tears on the House floor pleading for other representatives to vote down the Respect for Marriage Act. Being forced to recognize other states' marriage licenses really has her all worked up. I thought Democrats were supposed to be the emotional ones.

https://www.businessinsider.com/a-congresswoman-cried-begging-colleagues-to-vote-against-a-same-sex-marriage-bill-2022-12?utm_source=reddit.com
Reply Quote
10
Post removed:
by user
4:27p, 12/8/22
SociallyConditionedAg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:28p, 12/8/22
AG
This just opens the door to child marriages and persecution of churches and Christians. Good job, liberals.
Reply Quote
63
BluHorseShu
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to cajunaggie08 • 4:32p, 12/8/22
AG
cajunaggie08 said:
Republican Congresswoman Hartzler breaks down in tears on the House floor pleading for other representatives to vote down the Respect for Marriage Act. Being forced to recognize other states' marriage licenses really has her all worked up. I thought Democrats were supposed to be the emotional ones.

https://www.businessinsider.com/a-congresswoman-cried-begging-colleagues-to-vote-against-a-same-sex-marriage-bill-2022-12?utm_source=reddit.com
Chicks and histrionics…whada ya gonna do? Am I right?
Reply Quote
4
cajunaggie08
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to [removed post] • 4:33p, 12/8/22
AG
Marriage is still left up to the states. A state isn't being forced to issue marriage certificates for couples they don't believe should be allowed to. But just like many other cases in this country, a license from one state should be recognized by the other state. Would you feel better if it wasn't called marriage but rather "government recognized union with all the benefits and legal protections as what we used to call marriages but churches didn 't like the word being co-opted?"
Reply Quote
12
Post removed:
by user
In reply to cajunaggie08 • 4:38p, 12/8/22
Keller6Ag91
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to cajunaggie08 • 4:38p, 12/8/22
AG
cajunaggie08 said:
Marriage is still left up to the states. A state isn't being forced to issue marriage certificates for couples they don't believe should be allowed to. But just like many other cases in this country, a license from one state should be recognized by the other state. Would you feel better if it wasn't called marriage but rather "government recognized union with all the benefits and legal protections as what we used to call marriages but churches didn 't like the word being co-opted?"
Yes. It should be a civil union as the word marriage was instituted by the Church and it's founder and creator.

If you keep Marriage and apply it to forms of marriage the Church wouldn't recognize (same sex, multiple wives, children, farm animals, etc), it's not a Marriage ordained and sanctioned by GOD, but by the legal authorities of the entity only.

And that's fine.
Gig'Em and God Bless,

JB'91
Reply Quote
23
cajunaggie08
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SociallyConditionedAg • 4:38p, 12/8/22
AG
How does this open the door to child marriages. Do you think one of the states will suddenly going to go full scale Libertarian and say anyone can marry any living person they want regardless of age?
Reply Quote
7
1 edit
Post removed:
by user
In reply to cajunaggie08 • 4:40p, 12/8/22
Kvetch
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:40p, 12/8/22
AG
Well the explicit destruction of the fundamental union of society is a pretty big deal. Honestly not sure why she's the only one distraught by the utter idiocy of the modern body politic.

But hey, just live and let live, man. There is no object truth or moral reality. Right? I'm sure that's a solid philosophy.
Reply Quote
14
43rd Street Posse
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to cajunaggie08 • 4:41p, 12/8/22
cajunaggie08 said:
Republican Congresswoman Hartzler breaks down in tears on the House floor pleading for other representatives to vote down the Respect for Marriage Act. Being forced to recognize other states' marriage licenses really has her all worked up. I thought Democrats were supposed to be the emotional ones.

https://www.businessinsider.com/a-congresswoman-cried-begging-colleagues-to-vote-against-a-same-sex-marriage-bill-2022-12?utm_source=reddit.com
And? It's only very recently legal in like 29 out of almost 200 countries in the world. I don't think any Asian country has legal same sex marriage...are they all bigoted homophobes?. This is very consistent with history, across time, place and religions. Marriage is between a man and a woman...up until very recently, just in a few places.

In that light, it's actually kind of a big deal to change such an institution.

I'll be honest, I became a "meh, why not?" supporter of gay marriage a while back, but I think I have changed back to against after seeing that that wasn't all they really wanted after all. They want so much more, that I am not willing to budge on.
“Elon's wife left him for a trans woman and he dove right into the alt right pipeline, can't make this stuff up”
-Old McDonald
Reply Quote
14
2 edits
rocky the dog
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:43p, 12/8/22
AG
Elections are when people find out what politicians stand for, and politicians find out what people will fall for.
Reply Quote
17
cajunaggie08
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to 43rd Street Posse • 4:44p, 12/8/22
AG
43rd Street Posse said:
cajunaggie08 said:
Republican Congresswoman Hartzler breaks down in tears on the House floor pleading for other representatives to vote down the Respect for Marriage Act. Being forced to recognize other states' marriage licenses really has her all worked up. I thought Democrats were supposed to be the emotional ones.

https://www.businessinsider.com/a-congresswoman-cried-begging-colleagues-to-vote-against-a-same-sex-marriage-bill-2022-12?utm_source=reddit.com
And? It's only very recently legal in like 29 out of almost 200 countries in the world. I don't think any Asian country has legal same sex marriage...are they all bigoted homophobes?. This is very consistent with history, across time, place and religions. Marriage is between a man and a woman...up until very recently, just in a few places.

In that light, it's actually kind of a big deal to change such an institution.
The government is just listening to the people for once. If you don't like it, why dont you go move to one of the hundreds of other countries that doesn't allow it.

https://news.gallup.com/poll/350486/record-high-support-same-sex-marriage.aspx
Reply Quote
5
Garrelli 5000
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to cajunaggie08 • 4:45p, 12/8/22
AG
I'll concede her emotional hysterics are....stupid.

If you'll agree your party's emotional hysterics are....stupid.

Your entire platform is based on hysterics, emotional pleas for your feels. Congrats on finding 1 person on the opposite side of the isle that isn't looking at your entire team with a smirtk while you all cry like a tantrum throwing tit. That's your entire party platform for the last decade (at a minimum).

Cry to that reality in your pillow tonight. You brought a knife to a 2nd Amendment sanctioned gun fight.
Staff - take out the trash.
Reply Quote
15
2 edits
cajunaggie08
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to [removed post] • 4:46p, 12/8/22
AG
C@LAg said:
cajunaggie08 said:
How does this open the door to child marriages. Do you think one of the states will suddenly going to go full scale Libertarian and say anyone can marry any living person they want regardless of age?
yes. eventually Dems will push the boundaries into areas that are generally considered unacceptable to the majority of people, regardless of party affiliation.
Sadly child marriage is still legal in the majority of states.

Since 2018, six states have banned all marriages before 18: Delaware and New Jersey in 2018, Pennsylvania and Minnesota in 2020, Rhode Island and New York in 2021. Other states have recently tightened permissive child marriage laws, raising ages and adding some safeguards. Looks at those evil Democratic lead states banning marriage.
Reply Quote
5
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to cajunaggie08 • 4:47p, 12/8/22
cajunaggie08 said:
Republican Congresswoman Hartzler breaks down in tears on the House floor pleading for other representatives to vote down the Respect for Marriage Act. Being forced to recognize other states' marriage licenses really has her all worked up. I thought Democrats were supposed to be the emotional ones.
She is correct that it should be voted down. It will be used to violate our First Amendment rights. Marriage is a state issue. The feds are abusing their power. Again.
Reply Quote
14
43rd Street Posse
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to cajunaggie08 • 4:51p, 12/8/22
cajunaggie08 said:
How does this open the door to child marriages. Do you think one of the states will suddenly going to go full scale Libertarian and say anyone can marry any living person they want regardless of age?
All bets are off in those psychotic states that are talking about making full term abortions legal, without question. To me that is every bit as bad if not worse than child marriage.
“Elon's wife left him for a trans woman and he dove right into the alt right pipeline, can't make this stuff up”
-Old McDonald
Reply Quote
2
Ol_Ag_02
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Keller6Ag91 • 5:06p, 12/8/22
AG
Keller6Ag91 said:
cajunaggie08 said:
Marriage is still left up to the states. A state isn't being forced to issue marriage certificates for couples they don't believe should be allowed to. But just like many other cases in this country, a license from one state should be recognized by the other state. Would you feel better if it wasn't called marriage but rather "government recognized union with all the benefits and legal protections as what we used to call marriages but churches didn 't like the word being co-opted?"
Yes. It should be a civil union as the word marriage was instituted by the Churchand it's founder and creator.

If you keep Marriage and apply it to forms of marriage the Church wouldn't recognize (same sex, multiple wives, children, farm animals, etc), it's not a Marriage ordained and sanctioned by GOD, but by the legal authorities of the entity only.

And that's fine.


So there were zero marriages before the Church? There were no Jewish marriages, Hindu marriages, Buddhist marriages, Zoroastrian marriages, etc, etc?

All of which celebrate marriage and predate Christianity.
Reply Quote
8
TXAGFAN
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to cajunaggie08 • 5:23p, 12/8/22
AG
cajunaggie08 said:
How does this open the door to child marriages. Do you think one of the states will suddenly going to go full scale Libertarian and say anyone can marry any living person they want regardless of age?
It doesn't, but that's the talking point they heard on tv/radio.
Reply Quote
6
doubledog
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to cajunaggie08 • 5:28p, 12/8/22
cajunaggie08 said:
Marriage is still left up to the states. A state isn't being forced to issue marriage certificates for couples they don't believe should be allowed to. But just like many other cases in this country, a license from one state should be recognized by the other state. Would you feel better if it wasn't called marriage but rather "government recognized union with all the benefits and legal protections as what we used to call marriages but churches didn 't like the word being co-opted?"
So if Utah legalizes bigamy, then one could travel to Utah, marry 3 women and then return to Texas and live the good life (if that is what you are in to)? Is that how it works?

Reply Quote
8
43rd Street Posse
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TXAGFAN • 5:30p, 12/8/22
TXAGFAN said:
cajunaggie08 said:
How does this open the door to child marriages. Do you think one of the states will suddenly going to go full scale Libertarian and say anyone can marry any living person they want regardless of age?
It doesn't, but that's the talking point they heard on tv/radio.
I will say this...any gay person who is against polygamous marriages is a complete hypocrite. About as big of a hypocrite as the "my body my choice!" (even though it literally affects a completely different body) people were when it came to vaccine mandates and people simply wanting bodily autonomy and the right to make their own medical decisions.

I think any gay person who is against incestuous marriages is a hypocrite too, personally.
“Elon's wife left him for a trans woman and he dove right into the alt right pipeline, can't make this stuff up”
-Old McDonald
Reply Quote
5
TXAGFAN
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to 43rd Street Posse • 5:33p, 12/8/22
AG
43rd Street Posse said:
TXAGFAN said:
cajunaggie08 said:
How does this open the door to child marriages. Do you think one of the states will suddenly going to go full scale Libertarian and say anyone can marry any living person they want regardless of age?
It doesn't, but that's the talking point they heard on tv/radio.
I will say this...any gay person who is against polygamous marriages is a complete hypocrite. About as big of a hypocrite as the "my body my choice!" (even though it literally affects a completely different body) people were when it came to vaccine mandates and people simply wanting bodily autonomy and the right to make their own medical decisions.

I think any gay person who is against incestuous marriages is a hypocrite too, personally.
I care what you think. Forgive me, I don't think gay marriage is the same as marrying your sister or multiple people.
Reply Quote
3
1 edit
TexasAggie73
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to [removed post] • 5:45p, 12/8/22
AG
Once the Federal government got involved with married couple getting tax benefits, then yes marriage license should be good state to state.
Reply Quote
2
VitruvianAg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to cajunaggie08 • 5:50p, 12/8/22
AG
cajunaggie08 said:
C@LAg said:
cajunaggie08 said:
How does this open the door to child marriages. Do you think one of the states will suddenly going to go full scale Libertarian and say anyone can marry any living person they want regardless of age?
yes. eventually Dems will push the boundaries into areas that are generally considered unacceptable to the majority of people, regardless of party affiliation.
Sadly child marriage is still legal in the majority of states.

Since 2018, six states have banned all marriages before 18: Delaware and New Jersey in 2018, Pennsylvania and Minnesota in 2020, Rhode Island and New York in 2021. Other states have recently tightened permissive child marriage laws, raising ages and adding some safeguards. Looks at those evil Democratic lead states banning marriage.


Okay then, what is your boundary for age of consent?

13, 14, 16, 17? I guarantee a majority of American kids are "hooking up" within that cohort.

That's not to say that many people have no business being married at any age if statistics on marriage are to be believed.

My wife's grandparents eloped from the Dairyfarm off to Rockville, MD from Manassas, VA when she was 16, married until the day he died and she followed soon after.
Reply Quote
3
Watermelon Man
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:09p, 12/8/22
The Right Blogosphere has failed in defining this position (I know, shock!).

Obergefell v. Hodges is the decision that prevents states from issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples. That is, any state that refused to issue a marriage license to a same-sex couple would be in violation of that ruling.

This bill does nothing to enforce that ruling. If you feel same-sex marriages are destroying your way of life, that was occurring just as much before this bill as it will after the bill is signed into law. The right of states prevent the issue of marriage license to same-sex couples was affected by Obergefell, not by this bill.
Reply Quote
2
Ag_of_08
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SociallyConditionedAg • 6:13p, 12/8/22
AG
SociallyConditionedAg said:
This just opens the door to child marriages and persecution of churches and Christians. Good job, liberals.


Already legal in several states, and most of them very conservative ...

Abhorrent and nasty, but already legalized and sanctioned
Reply Quote
5
Bondag
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:27p, 12/8/22
AG
It's a way to weaponize the IRS against churches

You won't host a gay wedding in the church and your 501c3 status is gone.
Reply Quote
3
FJB
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:31p, 12/8/22
AG
Crazy cat ladies should be able to marry their cats and have it recognized. Bake the kibble cake.
Reply Quote
2
dead
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Keller6Ag91 • 6:38p, 12/8/22
What's up with some people on here talking about marrying kids or farm animals?
Reply Quote
2
Tom_Fox
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to cajunaggie08 • 6:46p, 12/8/22
cajunaggie08 said:
Marriage is still left up to the states. A state isn't being forced to issue marriage certificates for couples they don't believe should be allowed to. But just like many other cases in this country, a license from one state should be recognized by the other state. Would you feel better if it wasn't called marriage but rather "government recognized union with all the benefits and legal protections as what we used to call marriages but churches didn 't like the word being co-opted?"


When can I expect NY to recognize my license to carry?

Before or after NYC is underwater from global warming?
Reply Quote
12
Keller6Ag91
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ol_Ag_02 • 6:52p, 12/8/22
AG
Ol_Ag_02 said:
Keller6Ag91 said:
cajunaggie08 said:
Marriage is still left up to the states. A state isn't being forced to issue marriage certificates for couples they don't believe should be allowed to. But just like many other cases in this country, a license from one state should be recognized by the other state. Would you feel better if it wasn't called marriage but rather "government recognized union with all the benefits and legal protections as what we used to call marriages but churches didn 't like the word being co-opted?"
Yes. It should be a civil union as the word marriage was instituted by the Churchand it's founder and creator.

If you keep Marriage and apply it to forms of marriage the Church wouldn't recognize (same sex, multiple wives, children, farm animals, etc), it's not a Marriage ordained and sanctioned by GOD, but by the legal authorities of the entity only.

And that's fine.


So there were zero marriages before the Church? There were no Jewish marriages, Hindu marriages, Buddhist marriages, Zoroastrian marriages, etc, etc?

All of which celebrate marriage and predate Christianity.
I wasn't implying Christianity, but mainline Religions like Jewish, Hindu, Christian.
Gig'Em and God Bless,

JB'91
Reply Quote
3
Keller6Ag91
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to dead • 6:52p, 12/8/22
AG
dead said:
What's up with some people on here talking about marrying kids or farm animals?
If you can't see the direction this is going, I don't know what to tell you.
Gig'Em and God Bless,

JB'91
Reply Quote
4
Watermelon Man
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Tom_Fox • 6:52p, 12/8/22
Tom_Fox said:
cajunaggie08 said:
Marriage is still left up to the states. A state isn't being forced to issue marriage certificates for couples they don't believe should be allowed to. But just like many other cases in this country, a license from one state should be recognized by the other state. Would you feel better if it wasn't called marriage but rather "government recognized union with all the benefits and legal protections as what we used to call marriages but churches didn 't like the word being co-opted?"


When can I expect NY to recognize my license to carry?

Before or after NYC is underwater from global warming?
After would be my bet.
Reply Quote
Tom_Fox
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Watermelon Man • 6:57p, 12/8/22
Watermelon Man said:
Tom_Fox said:
cajunaggie08 said:
Marriage is still left up to the states. A state isn't being forced to issue marriage certificates for couples they don't believe should be allowed to. But just like many other cases in this country, a license from one state should be recognized by the other state. Would you feel better if it wasn't called marriage but rather "government recognized union with all the benefits and legal protections as what we used to call marriages but churches didn 't like the word being co-opted?"


When can I expect NY to recognize my license to carry?

Before or after NYC is underwater from global warming?
After would be my bet.


That's cool. That should be the same timeline for red states to be required to recognize gay marriages by federal fiat.
Reply Quote
5
Martin Cash
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to cajunaggie08 • 9:50p, 12/8/22
AG
cajunaggie08 said:
Marriage is still left up to the states. A state isn't being forced to issue marriage certificates for couples they don't believe should be allowed to. But just like many other cases in this country, a license from one state should be recognized by the other state. Would you feel better if it wasn't called marriage but rather "government recognized union with all the benefits and legal protections as what we used to call marriages but churches didn 't like the word being co-opted?"
Really? So a state can refuse to issue marriage licenses to same sex couples? I thought Obergefell settled that.
The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left. Ecclesiastes 10:2
Reply Quote
4
1 edit
Page 1 of 2 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.