Twitter/Hunter Biden story will be released at 5p ET. -Elon

93,396 Views | 707 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by Showertime at the Bidens
neAGle96
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Who?mikejones! • 6:36p, 12/2/22
AG
Agthatbuilds said:
BlueTaze said:
So what's new?

I didnt see anything other than maybe direct communication with political admins. So a bit more detail and coms on what we already knew. Twitter was extremely biased and killed the story and anyone posting it....under the justification the laptop was hacked.

I guess this is better than FNC and Newsmax reporting the same thing over last 2 years.


Right now, they haven't revealed anything other than political bias at a private company though they did revealed working directly with a political campaign to influence an election....

I'd probably wait until the end to draw any firm conclusions


It's not a leap to think similar correspondence wasn't sent to ABC, CBS, NBC. CNN and perhaps even fox from bidens campaign to sensor unfavorable stories
Reply Quote
29
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Who?mikejones! • 6:36p, 12/2/22
AG
Quote:
Right now, they haven't revealed anything other than political bias at a private company though they did revealed working directly with a political campaign to influence an election....
This isn't the Times or Wall Street Journal writing an Op-Ed. It is censorship.
Reply Quote
42
H2Ag
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:37p, 12/2/22
AG
This pales in comparison to what ever misinformation Russia or China was peddling ANYTIME!!!!!

Somebody needs to be in Jail before daybreak! NATIONAL SECURTY!!!!!
Reply Quote
37
RED AG 98
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:37p, 12/2/22
AG
And good on Khanna for attempting to stand up for free speech! Need more of that from the party of love and tolerance!
Reply Quote
48
fka ftc
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to captkirk • 6:38p, 12/2/22
captkirk said:
Agthatbuilds said:
captkirk said:


I actually don't think this is bad management
Its disingenuous. No evidence anything was hacked
Correct. Taibbi addressed this in the first few posts. They were addressing issues for both sides but due to the left leaning affiliations of most Twitter employees, it skewed heavily one direction. Then the Hunter Laptop, and it went straight to the top.

Treating the Hunter laptop as child porn level stuff. Which, ironically, it did contain child porn. Of the President's son and the President's granddaughter.
Reply Quote
24
ballchain
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:38p, 12/2/22
Reply Quote
63
1 edit
Who?mikejones!
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to neAGle96 • 6:38p, 12/2/22
neAGle96 said:
Agthatbuilds said:
BlueTaze said:
So what's new?

I didnt see anything other than maybe direct communication with political admins. So a bit more detail and coms on what we already knew. Twitter was extremely biased and killed the story and anyone posting it....under the justification the laptop was hacked.

I guess this is better than FNC and Newsmax reporting the same thing over last 2 years.


Right now, they haven't revealed anything other than political bias at a private company though they did revealed working directly with a political campaign to influence an election....

I'd probably wait until the end to draw any firm conclusions


It's not a leap to think similar correspondence wasn't sent to ABC, CBS, NBC. CNN and perhaps even fox from bidens campaign to sensor unfavorable stories


I think it's a given.


The listserve is real
Reply Quote
5
Who?mikejones!
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to fka ftc • 6:39p, 12/2/22
At the time it was presented, I think a pretty fair legal route for Twitter to take would have been to say, this might be hacked material and against our policies.

But, that's not really what they did.
Reply Quote
1
Who?mikejones!
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:40p, 12/2/22
Reply Quote
6
ballchain
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to RED AG 98 • 6:41p, 12/2/22
Reply Quote
23
1 edit
Little Rock Ag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to RED AG 98 • 6:41p, 12/2/22
AG
RED AG 98 said:
And good on Khanna for attempting to stand up for free speech! Need more of that from the party of love and tolerance!
But, was he really standing up for free speech or just trying to be pragmatic about the issue? In other words, he seemed to be saying that he thought it would hurt the Biden campaign more than help, so that was his ultimate rationale for opposing Twitter's stance.
Reply Quote
13
1 edit
ballchain
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Who?mikejones! • 6:42p, 12/2/22
Reply Quote
19
1 edit
ballchain
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Little Rock Ag • 6:42p, 12/2/22
Reply Quote
17
1 edit
captkirk
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Who?mikejones! • 6:43p, 12/2/22
AG
Agthatbuilds said:
At the time it was presented, I think a pretty fair legal route for Twitter to take would have been to say, this might be hacked material and against our policies.

But, that's not really what they did.
They knew internally there was no evidence of a hack
Reply Quote
7
RED AG 98
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Little Rock Ag • 6:43p, 12/2/22
AG
Little Rock Ag said:
RED AG 98 said:
And good on Khanna for attempting to stand up for free speech! Need more of that from the party of love and tolerance!
But, was she really standing up for free speech or just trying to be pragmatic about the issue? In other words, she seemed to be saying that she thought it would hurt the Biden campaign more than help, so that was her ultimate rationale for opposing Twitter's stance.
Very true and that is certainly a valid interpretation of the ultimate motive here. Still the rationale presented is clearly better than "orange man bad suppress all other views"

Reply Quote
1
fka ftc
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Who?mikejones! • 6:43p, 12/2/22
Agthatbuilds said:
At the time it was presented, I think a pretty fair legal route for Twitter to take would have been to say, this might be hacked material and against our policies.

But, that's not really what they did.
But they were not censoring hacked material. They were censoring a news outlet and those commenting and sharing a sourced news story by the Country's oldest newspaper and one of the largest newspapers.

A story that the very well experienced editors, owners and lawyers at this newspaper approved to print.

And they themselves admit the premise is loose and will not hold up, but gives them some breathing room to appease team Biden.

So it was absolutely NOT against their policies. They lied to themselves and to the public, at the request of a powerful political candidate.
Reply Quote
29
Who?mikejones!
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to captkirk • 6:44p, 12/2/22
captkirk said:
Agthatbuilds said:
At the time it was presented, I think a pretty fair legal route for Twitter to take would have been to say, this might be hacked material and against our policies.

But, that's not really what they did.
They knew internally there was no evidence of a hack


Haven't seen that yet.

I'm just stating the lawyer is giving good advice, imo, if that's all he knows about the situation
Reply Quote
captkirk
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:44p, 12/2/22
AG
Reply Quote
12
captkirk
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Who?mikejones! • 6:45p, 12/2/22
AG
Agthatbuilds said:
captkirk said:
Agthatbuilds said:
At the time it was presented, I think a pretty fair legal route for Twitter to take would have been to say, this might be hacked material and against our policies.

But, that's not really what they did.
They knew internally there was no evidence of a hack


Haven't seen that yet.

I'm just stating the lawyer is giving good advice, imo, if that's all he knows about the situation
They inferred that in their debate about the case to censor.

Everyone on the Hill knew it was BS
Reply Quote
7
1 edit
RED AG 98
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:46p, 12/2/22
AG
Fully onboard with the idea this is Elon's wicked smaht move to vault twitter to the top of the most trusted source in news. Blue star to whomever stated that earlier.
Reply Quote
27
Who?mikejones!
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:47p, 12/2/22
https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1598840927199469569?s=20&t=LG****vMPRB1nTayyvjRwA

https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1598840927199469569?s=20&t=LG****vMPRB1nTayyvjRwA
Reply Quote
1
1 edit
captkirk
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:47p, 12/2/22
AG
Reply Quote
14
TRM
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Who?mikejones! • 6:48p, 12/2/22
AG
Agthatbuilds said:
FIFY
Take out everything after the ?
Reply Quote
7
LOYAL AG
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Who?mikejones! • 6:48p, 12/2/22
AG
Agthatbuilds said:


Names


22. Has been proven already. Zuckerberg said on Rogan that the FBI "warned them of a drop of Russian disinformation" and requested they act in a manner to prevent said information from being spread. I'd be shocked if Twitter didn't get the same "warning".
A fearful society is a compliant society. That's why Democrats and criminals prefer their victims to be unarmed. Gun Control is not about guns, it's about control.
Reply Quote
15
Who?mikejones!
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TRM • 6:48p, 12/2/22
It's weird because that's the first problem on this thread.

The problem is it has m i l f int he link
Reply Quote
Finn
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:49p, 12/2/22
AG
Late to the thread. Is there anything illegal here in these actions or is it just a company censoring political speech?
Reply Quote
1 edit
Who?mikejones!
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Finn • 6:49p, 12/2/22
Def 1st amendment issues
Reply Quote
4
BluHorseShu
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to ballchain • 6:50p, 12/2/22
AG
ballchain said:
BlueTaze said:
So what's new?

I didnt see anything other than maybe direct communication with political admins. So a bit more detail and coms on what we already knew. Twitter was extremely biased and killed the story and anyone posting it....under the justification the laptop was hacked.

I guess this is better than FNC and Newsmax reporting the same thing over last 2 years.


You got squashed by Twitter for even sharing the links in DMs - a restriction only used for extremes like Child Porn. Twitter employees and Gov conspired to interfere in the 2020 election by burying negative stories and this feed by Taibbi is spilling the beans on it.
I think people are reading a lot into this bc hopes are so high to find something to take the Bidens down. The left did the same thing with Trump and Russia. It's far too early to make any sense of the impact and any repercussions. But Elon sure is increasing Twitter activity. He's a great marketer
Reply Quote
captkirk
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Finn • 6:50p, 12/2/22
AG
Finn said:
Late to the thread. Is there anything illegal here in these actions or is it just a company censoring political speech?
At the direction of the Biden campaign and the DNC
Reply Quote
26
PatriotAg02
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to RED AG 98 • 6:51p, 12/2/22
AG
RED AG 98 said:
Fully onboard with the idea this is Elon's wicked smaht move to vault twitter to the top of the most trusted source in news. Blue star to whomever stated that earlier.


He's gonna force a comms blackout if he keeps this up
Reply Quote
8
1 edit
IDaggie06
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:51p, 12/2/22
AG
I was hoping this would be a little juicier with feds or someone involved directing Twitter to suppress the laptop story. We already knew how biased the executives at Twitter were.
Reply Quote
Who?mikejones!
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to IDaggie06 • 6:51p, 12/2/22
It's not over yet
Reply Quote
18
Funky Winkerbean
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Finn • 6:51p, 12/2/22
AG
Finn said:
Late to the thread. Is there anything illegal here in these actions or is it just a company censoring political speech?
Actively deleting everything the Biden team requested they "review".
Reply Quote
19
johnnyblaze36
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:52p, 12/2/22
AG
This is going to do wonders for Taibbi's substack. He's gone from 600K to over 900K followers on twitter in the last hour. He deserves it in an industry (journalism) that has been in the grave for quite some time, at least in the mainstream.
Reply Quote
20
fka ftc
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to captkirk • 6:52p, 12/2/22
captkirk said:
Finn said:
Late to the thread. Is there anything illegal here in these actions or is it just a company censoring political speech?
At the direction of the Biden campaign and the DNC
Any federal employee who participated in this should lose their job immediately as they did not uphold the oath of office each and every one take. They did not "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic..."
Reply Quote
15
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.