PA Supreme Court Rules Undated Mail Ballots Can't Be Counted

5,718 Views | 48 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by B-1 83
Videx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If minorities couldn't get IDs Spirit airlines would be out of business.
Houstonag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We need a simple but specific absentee, early voting, etc. system. One person one vote and ballot harvesting is illegal.

Without secure and honest elections we are doomed to be like other countries around the globe.
B-1 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wow……staff cleaned this thread up. Not sure why, it was a really good look at how set the Dem talking points are about supposed minority voter suppression and ID.
Being in TexAgs jail changes a man……..no, not really
Red Red Wine
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What the heck????

I had some good data on my posts!!
B-1 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Red Red Wine said:

What the heck????

I had some good data on my posts!!
I'll give you two guesses……
Being in TexAgs jail changes a man……..no, not really
japantiger
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Red Red Wine said:

What the heck????

I had some good data on my posts!!
repost...I missed it
“It was miraculous. It was almost no trick at all, he saw, to turn vice into virtue and slander into truth, impotence into abstinence, arrogance into humility, plunder into philanthropy, thievery into honor, blasphemy into wisdom, brutality into patriotism, and sadism into justice. Anybody could do it; it required no brains at all. It merely required no character.”
Joseph Heller, Catch 22
GeorgiAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not counting undated ballots????



(kidding)
deddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
1872walker said:

Neehau said:

captkirk said:

Sorry, Fetterman
Quote:

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Tuesday sided with an argument made by Republicans in their lawsuit seeking to prevent the counting of improperly completed ballots in next week's general election, throwing out a lower court's ruling that would have allowed PA election officials to count absentee and mail-in ballots that were not correctly dated and signed.

PA's Supreme Court justices vacated the 3rd US Circuit Court of Appeals' decision that would have allowed the counting of ballots that were not completed as the Keystone State election laws require, and ruled that the "Pennsylvania county boards of elections are hereby ordered to refrain from counting any absentee and mail-in ballots received for the November 8, 2022 general election that are contained in undated or incorrectly dated outer envelopes."

The PA Supreme Court also in its ruling directed "the Pennsylvania county boards of elections segregate and preserve any ballots contained in undated or incorrectly dated outer envelopes" and noted that the "Court is evenly divided on the issue of whether failing to count such ballots violates 52 U.S.C. 10101(a)(2)(B)."

RNC Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel celebrated the win in Pennsylvania as "massive" for "election integrity."

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/spencerbrown/2022/11/01/pennsylvania-supreme-court-mail-in-ballots-n2615319
Hopefully this goes to the Supreme Court and is overturned. Trying to stop people from voting, especially older people or citizens with disabilities which this will impact, isn't democracy.


If you can't properly fill out a ballot you're not competent enough to vote.
There is no way POTUS could fill out a ballot.

No.****ing.Way.
Yet, that's where we are.
Red Red Wine
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It was in reply to Neehau saying Dems were responsible for the Civil Rights Act of 1964. (I asked him if he could name ONE THING that the Dims have done for minorities in this country besides: mess up their education, keep them in poverty, fill their streets with crime and drugs, not support two-parent homes........, etc... he named the Civil Rights Act and laid down some facts for the young fella or lady.

But it was REPUBLICANS that voted by an 80-20 margin of their members to pass it. The Dims in the House and Senate were about 63-37 split on yes/no votes on it.

I
schmellba99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Neehau said:

captkirk said:

Sorry, Fetterman
Quote:

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Tuesday sided with an argument made by Republicans in their lawsuit seeking to prevent the counting of improperly completed ballots in next week's general election, throwing out a lower court's ruling that would have allowed PA election officials to count absentee and mail-in ballots that were not correctly dated and signed.

PA's Supreme Court justices vacated the 3rd US Circuit Court of Appeals' decision that would have allowed the counting of ballots that were not completed as the Keystone State election laws require, and ruled that the "Pennsylvania county boards of elections are hereby ordered to refrain from counting any absentee and mail-in ballots received for the November 8, 2022 general election that are contained in undated or incorrectly dated outer envelopes."

The PA Supreme Court also in its ruling directed "the Pennsylvania county boards of elections segregate and preserve any ballots contained in undated or incorrectly dated outer envelopes" and noted that the "Court is evenly divided on the issue of whether failing to count such ballots violates 52 U.S.C. 10101(a)(2)(B)."

RNC Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel celebrated the win in Pennsylvania as "massive" for "election integrity."

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/spencerbrown/2022/11/01/pennsylvania-supreme-court-mail-in-ballots-n2615319
Hopefully this goes to the Supreme Court and is overturned. Trying to stop people from voting, especially older people or citizens with disabilities which this will impact, isn't democracy.
I say this with 100% sincerity - this is absolutely, positively pathetic. I mean, this is Fetterman/Biden level mentality here. I honestly feel sorry for you because it's patently evident you have serious mental ******ation and need assistance for daily tasks.
schmellba99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
coolerguy12 said:

1991sir said:

Exactly how does it affect the people you mention? I'm jw. That's like saying it's racist to require IDs to vote … when in reality it's actually racist to say that it's racist to require IDs to vote.


He just knows that most democrats are complete morons incapable of filling out a form. Just like he is racist and think minorities can't get an ID.
It's more of a case of "damn, this means that the folks we pay to fill out ballots sweat shop style are going to have to get the ballots right, which takes more time, which means less ballots. Or we are going to have to pay more people and that won't be good for our slush fund coffers!"
Martin Q. Blank
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Quote:

Hopefully this goes to the Supreme Court and is overturned. Trying to stop people from voting, especially older people or citizens with disabilities which this will impact, isn't democracy.
You forgot black people. They're also too stupid to put a date on their ballot.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Common sense judges following state law seems to be spreading,

Quote:

A Wisconsin judge on Wednesday granted the Republican National Committee's request for a temporary injunction ordering the county clerk to stop violating state laws that allow the public to observe the election and voting process, including during in-person absentee voting.

The judge approved the RNC request just hours after it was filed, which the RNC chalked up as another election integrity win in the 2022 cycle.

"In less than 24 hours, the RNC successfully sued and won in Green Bay to ensure the city's Democrat election officials follow the law on the books in Wisconsin," RNC chairwoman Ronna McDaniel said in a statement. "Bipartisan poll watching is a constitutional right in Wisconsin, and now the Green Bay Clerk will have to let them in the room to observe."
Quote:

The RNC has filed 75 election integrity lawsuits so far this election cycle
LINK

Wish the RNC had been that active in 2020.
B-1 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
japantiger said:

Red Red Wine said:

What the heck????

I had some good data on my posts!!
repost...I missed it
There were posts with interviews with minorities on the street that destroyed the "Minorities don't have ID myth" as well as a Candace Owens interview that gutted the concept, but what would she know about the subject?
Being in TexAgs jail changes a man……..no, not really
Refresh
Page 2 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.