Ag_of_08 said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

Would anyone here trust their children to a babysitter who did drag? How about a homosexual?

---

Depends. I know plenty of people who do drag and are gay that are amazing human beings, and would never dream of touching a child. I'd be more suspicious of religious leaders, who are far more likely to molest them..

---

I would never let someone like that watch my kids.

I agree it depends, I wouldn't let everyone who goes to church with me watch my kids.

The difference is I would never let a drag queen or open homosexual watch my kids. Most on here feel the same way but don't have the courage to admit it.

You wouldn't believe them if I spent the time to collect them

Inwould never let a religious leader watch any I had any control of, If you want to discuss brainwashing and frequency of sexual perversion.

It seems to me to be a heinous mockery of womanhood.

agent-maroon said:

---

What's the problem with letting real women (moms, grandmoms, etc.) do the reading instead of forcing situations where fake women drag queens are doing it? Or having dads & granddads read? You've got the parents dragging (pun intended) their kids to these events so why not let them read to the kids.

---

Well, if parents are "dragging" their kids to see drag queens read, they don't want to read at story hour. They want to see this.

TxAgPreacher said:

---

Would anyone here trust their children to a babysitter who did drag? How about a homosexual?

---

I would have when he needed a baby sitter in the past. And I certainly would let him spend the weekend with his friend who has two moms.

Ag_of_08 said:

---

Inwould never let a religious leader watch any I had any control of, If you want to discuss brainwashing and frequency of sexual perversion.

---

I'm not far off here. I'm very protective of my children, and all Christian preachers and pastors are male according to scripture.

So any unmarried preacher would not be allowed to watch my children.

Only good Godly women I'm very close to, and their husbands.

The gay/trans/pedophile agenda might be the worst thing to ever happen to the world.

Just leave kids out of it. Why is that so hard to understand?

TxAgPreacher said:

---

Would anyone here trust their children to a babysitter who did drag? How about a homosexual?

---

Or a Catholic priest.

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

Would anyone here trust their children to a babysitter who did drag? How about a homosexual?

---

Or a Catholic priest.

---

Or any person you don't know well?

ITs aN aRtFoRm!

GMAFB

Drag = I like to dress like a woman and make-believe I'm a naughty girl.

Trans = although I was born a boy I'm a girl - especially now that I've mutilated myself.

One Louder said:

---

Ag_of_08 said:

---

No, it's not, and continuing to state that is just trying to craft a narrative.

---

Yes, it is. Why have they started targeting schools and libraries? I'm not saying it's swept the entire nation but I'm not waiting until it does so to speak out against it.

Maybe I'll hire a biologically female burlesque dancer to go perform at the local elementary school and see how that flies.

It's all inappropriate, including the clergy who are sexually abusing children. Does anyone really think someone who is against drag in schools supports skeevy clergy? The difference is that the whole idea behind sending drag performers into schools is nefarious. The idea of clergy interacting with children is benign except when a sick individual slips into the cracks or an organization covers for that behavior. The intent itself is not nefarious, unlike the drag being imported into schools.

---

Frankly, believe it is part of the Lefts deliberate attempt to run down women as part of the assault on the family by making relations such a disordered mess it interferes with it. Remember BLM's stated goal charter against the nuclear family -- that's an example. The alphebet gender benders are part of the same imo.

This referring to the growing emphasis and making everything about it you ask about, and not the existence of a rather more ordinary kind of drag and far from directed at kids in the past.

BallerStaf2003 said:

---

One Louder said:

---

Drag is the "starter kit" for exposing kids to gender non-conformity. That's why they are sent to schools and libraries.

---

Wrong. Vast majority of drag queens want nothing to do with children.

---

Well... then I guess there goes noon story hour at the local public library. Same time psychiatrists go to lunch.

Deus Vult said:

---

BallerStaf2003 said:

---

One Louder said:

---

Drag is the "starter kit" for exposing kids to gender non-conformity. That's why they are sent to schools and libraries.

---

Wrong. Vast majority of drag queens want nothing to do with children.

---

Then what is the proper definition of those things that keep showing up at the schools and libraries to put on shows for the kids?

---

Uhhhh... nevermind.

Quote:

---

It's an art form.

---

Dude, come on.

And if you think gay ideology and trans ideology aren't related, you haven't been paying attention. They are actually mutually exclusive (gay folk thinking they were born that way because of their genetics, trans folk thinking sexuality is on a scale and it's something we discover that's immaterial to our body or genetics), but they nonetheless both express a departure from humanity's general ideology of sex and gender.

This forum is the brain center for gender non-conformity studies in most of social media. There are people here who spend countless hours thinking about it and posting information to help keep the populace updated.

Very important info! We will get to the bottom of all this so soon!

BallerStaf2003 said:

---

MouthBQ98 said:

---

I can buy the performance art aspect. There is at least a history for it. Early theater had all male casts, so females roles were presumably effeminate males costumed for the part. In all male war zones, for entertainment, it wasn't uncommon for part of the show to be guys crudely impersonating women in comedy or skits. As entertainment I can see that.

I think the problem comes where is crosses over into burlesque and sexualization with VERY adult themes and behaviors, and the attempt by some to normalize that around minors. Drag isn't identity, and there doesn't need to be this push to bring it into the sphere of every day life of people not seeking out that entertainment.

---

A vastly exaggerated issue that the maga right uses to manipulate its members into fear based mania.

This woman sums it up nicely in a Viral clip from this week:

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTR99eAXY/

Notice she pointed out her own sexual abuse from her church. Meanwhile, cases of actual sexual abuse of minors continue in the church and it's completely ignored by this board. Here are three instances of child RAPE in various churches this week alone:

---

You make good posts sometimes but you're being obtuse if you believe the bold is true.

Sexual abuse is talked about at least 1x per month on this board and 100% of the posters condemn it, esp. when it involves churches.

You really don't help yourself or your credibility on this board when you make such blatantly false statements.

titan said:

---

One Louder said:

---

Ag_of_08 said:

---

No, it's not, and continuing to state that is just trying to craft a narrative.

---

Yes, it is. Why have they started targeting schools and libraries? I'm not saying it's swept the entire nation but I'm not waiting until it does so to speak out against it.

Maybe I'll hire a biologically female burlesque dancer to go perform at the local elementary school and see how that flies.

It's all inappropriate, including the clergy who are sexually abusing children. Does anyone really think someone who is against drag in schools supports skeevy clergy? The difference is that the whole idea behind sending drag performers into schools is nefarious. The idea of clergy interacting with children is benign except when a sick individual slips into the cracks or an organization covers for that behavior. The intent itself is not nefarious, unlike the drag being imported into schools.

---

Frankly, believe it is part of the Lefts deliberate attempt to run down women as part of the assault on the family by making relations such a disordered mess it interferes with it. Remember BLM's stated goal charter against the nuclear family -- that's an example. The alphebet gender benders are part of the same imo.

This referring to the growing emphasis and making everything about it you ask about, and not the existence of a rather more ordinary kind of drag and far from directed at kids in the past.

---

Letting boys play women's sports is a slap in the face to the women who worked and fought to get women's sports normalized all over the world. My aunt played BB in HS in the 50's and it was half court b/c "women did not have the stamina to play full court BB".