Manhattan said:

---

Hammerly High Dive Crips said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

Because 10 year olds now have to travel to a different state to get an abortion, it already happened in Ohio.

---

When people have to focus on the one in a million cases, you know they are clinging desperately to a BSC stance. Pretty sure in most states that would fall under "life of the mother". A ten year old giving birth is not supposed to happen and a very clear threat to her life.

---

This is what Republicans want, 10 year olds having babies.

---

Yep, that's what we want. And liberals see babies as parasites and love to kill them. That latter statement, while silly, is far more accurate than yours.

Manhattan said:

---

akm91 said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

Because 10 year olds now have to travel to a different state to get an abortion, it already happened in Ohio.

---

Wasn't that story debunked?

---

It was confirmed and the perp is probably going to prison for the rest of his life.

---

Can you link a source to this?

Manhattan said:

---

akm91 said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

Because 10 year olds now have to travel to a different state to get an abortion, it already happened in Ohio.

---

Wasn't that story debunked?

---

It was confirmed and the perp is probably going to prison for the rest of his life.

---

It was confirmed that if an 8-10 year old gets pregnant they can't save the life of the 8-10 year old in Ohio? This is a hard fact? if so, that is clearly absurd, and I bet that is a wordsmithing thing and not the actual intent of any law.

Going to answer my question, or just tuck your tail as usual?

Manhattan said:

---

You shouldn't have to consult a lawyer to protect the wellbeing of a 10 year old rape victim.

---

Oh bull crap. We all know Dems only play politics. They could care less about that kid or anyone else.

Manhattan said:

---

IslanderAg04 said:

---

Going to answer my question, or just tuck your tail as usual?

---

Start a thread instead of trying to derail this one.

---

So *****ing out as usual. About as smart as your support for illegal immigrants so you can capitalize on cheap labor.

I ask again, why, when approached on a bipartisan exemption for rapes, do liberals still support abortions? If you think that's a derail then delete your damn account.

Hammerly High Dive Crips said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

Because 10 year olds now have to travel to a different state to get an abortion, it already happened in Ohio.

---

When people have to focus on the one in a million cases, you know they are clinging desperately to a BSC stance. Pretty sure in most states that would fall under "life of the mother". A ten year old giving birth is not supposed to happen and a very clear threat to her life.

---

Dems always try to shift the focus to the exception, not the rule in the vast, vast majority of these cases. Just like every other issue - they deceive and obfuscate to try and get their way, or throw a juvenile fit when they don't.

It is both pathetic and pitiful.

MAROON said:

---

CoppellAg93 said:

---

Why are they called "Mothers Against Greg Abbott" if they are arguing for not becoming mothers ???

---

Yep, my wife says no mother in her right mind would kill her baby. Maybe they just want to kill poor and minority babies?

---

There is cool couple who live a few streets over from us with kids about our age. I've only had casual interactions while walking the neighborhood with our families but thought they were the kind of people I'd like invite over to grill. They always have some of the best Christmas lights displays, interesting kid toys, obstacle course, etc. I just noticed they added a Mothers Against Greg Abbott sign to their front yard. I guess you just never know how severely some people suffer from extreme cognitive dissonance.

Manhattan said:

---

Republicans could have done that in any state where they have banned abortion. They chose to punish 10 year old girls, and Abbott's case, lie about eliminating rape.

And to address your detail, I have a thread on arresting those that hire illegal immigrants, until the law is changed, that is the solution.

---

You're behind the curve dude. This has been tried numerous times under Obama, and yet got turned down. It's literally one of the pushes that led to the repeal of row v wade.

Plus your state supports wide open baby killing. So you're in the clear if you knock up your sancha.

10 is very early for a girl to be child bearing. But I'm not a biologist.

ProgN said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

Because 10 year olds now have to travel to a different state to get an abortion, it already happened in Ohio.

---

Said 10 yr old was impregnated by an illegal alien. If your party actually did their f'ing job, he probably wouldn't have been here to rape her.

---

Exactly.

Pulitzer article. Not the original...sanitized without footnotes.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2002/06/30/in-mexico-an-unpunished-crime/3a772e5e-5b4e-4425-a6d6-710a47ff7f34/

Mommy Dearest against Greg Abbott

No Wire Hangars

Manhattan said:

---

IslanderAg04 said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

Republicans could have done that in any state where they have banned abortion. They chose to punish 10 year old girls, and Abbott's case, lie about eliminating rape.

And to address your detail, I have a thread on arresting those that hire illegal immigrants, until the law is changed, that is the solution.

---

You're behind the curve dude. This has been tried numerous times under Obama, and yet got turned down. It's literally one of the pushes that led to the repeal of row v wade.

Plus your state supports wide open baby killing. So you're in the clear if you knock up your sancha.

---

If you don't know the difference between an unviable fetus and a baby you might need to go to science class with KBJ.

---

And if you dont understand an action of stopping life, you have no soul.

Manhattan said:

---

Republicans could have done that in any state where they have banned abortion. They chose to punish 10 year old girls, and Abbott's case, lie about eliminating rape.

And to address your detail, I have a thread on arresting those that hire illegal immigrants, until the law is changed, that is the solution.

---

So does an abortion punish the baby?

Is the ten y/o still alive?

Republicans should answer with an ad where this ads ends, have the girl look up and say "I choose life" and then flash ahead to 30 years from now and have a Mom dressing her young daughter telling her she is about to meet the grandma who bravely let her have her life and to the daughter "your life". She opens the door and grandma is smiling/crying meeting her granddaughter.

IslanderAg04 said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

IslanderAg04 said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

Republicans could have done that in any state where they have banned abortion. They chose to punish 10 year old girls, and Abbott's case, lie about eliminating rape.

And to address your detail, I have a thread on arresting those that hire illegal immigrants, until the law is changed, that is the solution.

---

You're behind the curve dude. This has been tried numerous times under Obama, and yet got turned down. It's literally one of the pushes that led to the repeal of row v wade.

Plus your state supports wide open baby killing. So you're in the clear if you knock up your sancha.

---

If you don't know the difference between an unviable fetus and a baby you might need to go to science class with KBJ.

---

And if you dont understand an action of stopping life, you have no soul.

---

"They" can't spell 'economics' and you assume they passed biology?

That's not what that ad conveys to me at all. And I am not pro-abortion by any stretch.

Oscar Diggs said:

---

Republicans should answer with an ad where this ads ends, have the girl look up and say "I choose life" and then flash ahead to 30 years from now and have a Mom dressing her young daughter telling her she is about to meet the grandma who bravely let her have her life and to the daughter "your life". She opens the door and grandma is smiling/crying meeting her granddaughter.

---

Damn! I like how you think my friend. That would be a powerful counter ad.

Manhattan said:

---

IslanderAg04 said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

Republicans could have done that in any state where they have banned abortion. They chose to punish 10 year old girls, and Abbott's case, lie about eliminating rape.

And to address your detail, I have a thread on arresting those that hire illegal immigrants, until the law is changed, that is the solution.

---

You're behind the curve dude. This has been tried numerous times under Obama, and yet got turned down. It's literally one of the pushes that led to the repeal of row v wade.

Plus your state supports wide open baby killing. So you're in the clear if you knock up your sancha.

---

If you don't know the difference between an unviable fetus and a baby you might need to go to science class with KBJ.

---

Okay, so tell me when a baby becomes a person. With rights.

What is the difference between a 90 day old baby and a 91 day old baby?

And since you brought up science class, educate me.

Manhattan said:

---

Or the kid dies during child birth, or her reproductive system is so ****ed up she never gets to have kids.

You are talking about forcing a 10 year old to give birth.

---

What percentage of abortions are what you are talking about?

PS I know the answer.

Manhattan said:

---

Viability- if science gets to where you can take out a zygote and take it to term in a machine then okay ban abortion and do that.

---

So right now twenty weeks?

Martin Cash said:

---

IslanderAg04 said:

---

So what if legislation was made and agreed upon to exclude rapes, incest, health of the mother, and health of the baby. This has been brought up numerous times, and yet your party still shoots it down. With liberals it's all or nothing. Almost like yall enjoy the thought of dead babies, and fronting the bill to the tax payers.

---

I'll ask this question for the millionth time. It's never been answered.

Why should incest be an exception?

---

Really?!?

I don't have the statistics; but I have to assume that in most of those cases it is BOTH rape and incest (dad, uncle, etc) - it's not two cousins f*****g like rabbits out in the barn.

Manhattan said:

---

Yes, basically was law earlier this year.

---

Is that the law in blue states? No abortions after 20 weeks?

And you support the blue states, correct?

And if so then you support killing viable babies, correct?

Manhattan said:

---

Because 10 year olds now have to travel to a different state to get an abortion, it already happened in Ohio.

---

Lol

I don't support everything democrats do… abortion shouldn't be used in place of birth control.

But it should probably remain legal because we have seen what happens when it's not, abortions still happen and women suffer.