Pookers said:

---

And nobody should vote for her. She's still a gun grabbing lefty.

---

Wrong. Lots of moderate dems SHOULD vote for her. That's what is so scary to DNC, which she served as vice chair of in 2016 when the Clinton run DNC railroaded Bernie. She didn't go along with that, and couple years later she was labeled Russian agent. This probably has more to do with her decision than her noble patriotic duty message.

Rumors are that Hillary is gearing up to be the "moderate" that saves party from fringe leftists. Tusli just stole that thunder.

D-Fens said:

---

Pookers said:

---

And nobody should vote for her. She's still a gun grabbing lefty.

---

Wrong. Lots of moderate dems SHOULD vote for her. That's what is so scary to DNC, which she served as vice chair of in 2016 when the Clinton run DNC railroaded Bernie. She didn't go along with that, and couple years later she was labeled Russian agent. This probably has more to do with her decision than her noble patriotic duty message.

Rumors are that Hillary is gearing up to be the "moderate" that saves party from fringe leftists. Tusli just stole that thunder.

---

Good points.
I'm sure she has not forgot what Hillary did to her and what the establishment allowed.

While Hillary pushed the Russian hoax on Trump she actually labeled Tulsi as a Russian agent!

I would love to see her punch Hillary Clinton in the ****ing pie hole

An "unwitting" Russian agent. So Hillary basically said Tulsi was too stupid to know she was being utilized.

I'm also sure there were some off the record threats and Clinton shenanigans that came at Tulsi too. It's refreshing to see a Clinton enemy not only continue breathing, but also fight back.

That's great that she left the enemy of the nation party, however we still have to accept her.

Trying to get more cheddar for Hawai'i by being a swing vote... who gives her state more pork gets her vote.

agent-maroon said:

---

G. hirsutum Ag said:

---

Wonder if AOC gonna be next

---

Where would she go?

---

Communist party

SpreadsheetAg said:

---

Trying to get more cheddar for Hawai'i by being a swing vote... who gives her state more pork gets her vote.

---

She's not in Congress...

Wood so hard


Desantis/Gabbard 2024 calling it now.

Doh! I read up on her wiki profile and misread the dates

running as a independent now ??? she never said she was going republican.

A few timely quotes...










...and then there is this...

I swear this board things any female with a pulse is a smoke show.

This is her very long explanation but it's a great read and she gets to the heart of just how much the Democrat Party has changed. Not sure if her gun position has evolved but she certainly appears to be Pro 2nd Amendment now.

Quote:

---

I love our country. Our God-given rights of freedom, life, and liberty enshrined in our Constitution and Bill of Rights are my inspiration. I answered the call to duty and took an oath, dedicating my life to supporting and defending those freedoms, both in uniform and in public office.

Growing up in Hawaii gave me a special appreciation of our home, water, and precious natural resources. So when I was 21 years old I decided to run for Hawaii State House so that I could be in a position to protect our environment. I wasn't politically affiliated before that, but as I was about to file my election papers, I had to choose which party to affiliate with.

As I did my research, I was inspired by Democrats who stood up against the war in Vietnam, and those who fought for Hawaii's plantation workers who were being abused and exploited by wealthy landowners. I was inspired by leaders like Martin Luther King Jr. and Robert F. Kennedy and drawn to the ideals of a big-tent Democratic Party that stood up for working men and women the little guy. In contrast the Republican Party, seemed like one that stood for the interests of big business and warmongering elites. So I became a democrat and remained one for over 20 years an independent Democrat to be sure, but a Democrat nonetheless.

I can no longer remain in today's Democratic Party that is now under the complete control of an elitist cabal of warmongers driven by cowardly wokeness, who divide us by racializing every issue and stoke anti-white racism, actively work to undermine our God-given freedoms enshrined in our Constitution, are hostile to people of faith and spirituality, demonize the police and protect criminals at the expense of law-abiding Americans, believe in open borders, weaponize the national security state to go after political opponents, and above all, are dragging us ever closer to nuclear war.
Here are some of the main reasons I'm leaving the Democratic Party, in brief. I'll be tackling each of these in more depth in the coming weeks.

The pro-war Democratic Party has led us to the brink of nuclear war. The party is led by warmongers who are firmly in the grips of the military industrial complex, and don't know or care about the cost of war, or who pays the price. President Biden and Democratic Party elite have pushed us to the precipice of nuclear war, risking starting WWIII and destroying the world as we know it. This is the most urgent existential threat we face. I ran for President in 2020 because I knew that this is where we were headed. All the signs were there. I raised this issue every day during the campaign, and on the national debate stage. But politicians and the media ignored it. They didn't care then, and they don't care now. Obviously I didn't win that election, and don't have the power to do what is necessary to prevent it. President Biden and Congress do. But they irresponsibly refuse to use that power to protect the safety of our country, the American people, and the world from the devastation of a nuclear holocaust. To protect our loved ones, our children, our world, I'm calling upon the American people to join me in standing up to these cowardly politicians now. This may be our last chance to do so.

Today's Democratic Party rejects the rule of law. The people's trust in the rule of law is the foundation for democracy. By weaponizing the security state and Federal law enforcement for their own partisan political ambitions, Democrat leaders are undermining the rule of law and turning our democracy into a banana republic. Across the country, Democrat politicians call for defunding the police, enacting laws that favor criminal's rights over those of everyday Americans, and so-called progressive DA's let violent criminals out of jail, refusing to charge them when many have been arrested 30, 40 or even 50 times. It should come as no surprise that crime and murder rates are rapidly increasing, people don't feel safe walking down the street in their own neighborhoods, and firearm purchases for self defense have drastically increased.

Under the Obama administration, the IRS was used to target conservative groups. Biden's DOJ recently indicted 11 pro-life activists for "organizing an event blockading an abortion clinic." They didn't use physical force. They weren't dangerous. But seven of them are facing 11 years in prison and fines of $250,000. The Biden DOJ and Department of Homeland Security has focused their newly formed Domestic Terror Unit to target parents who are vocally standing in opposition to radical curriculums and explicit sexual content being taught to young children in our public schools labeling parents as "terrorists" for showing up at school board meetings and demanding change. President Biden campaigned on unity and on healing the partisan divide, but he's now saying supporters of President Trump are the most extremist group in our country and a threat to our democracy. Elizabeth Warren and Kamala Harris claim the Supreme Court is illegitimate simply because they disagree with its rulings. The Biden administration stood by and did nothing as activists protested outside the homes of Supreme Court justices during all hours of the day and night, in clear violation of federal law. When the party in power does not believe in the rule of law, yet they are responsible for writing and enforcing laws, our democracy is doomed.

Today's Democratic Party does not believe in our constitutionally protected right to free speech. Fostering diversity of thought and freedom of expression is the foundation of any flourishing democracy. Democratic Party leaders don't agree. They are led by fanatical ideologues who pose a threat to our democracy because they don't believe in freedom - freedom of speech, freedom of thought, freedom of religion. They try to censor speech they don't like, labeling it as "misinformation," "hate speech," or "violent speech." They work hand-in-glove with corporate for-profit media and Big Tech to smear and silence political opponents and those who dare to challenge their authority, exposing their insecurities. The Biden Administration even tried launching their own "Ministry of Truth" to control what information we are allowed to read, hear, and say. Their ideology is one of hate, divisiveness, rather than respect and love - aloha, and is diametrically opposed to traditional 'liberalism' which recognizes the basic goodness of people and the autonomy of the individual, supporting civil liberties and a government of, by, and for the people. How can a political party that is opposed to freedom be trusted with our democracy? They can't be.

Today's Democratic Party does not believe in our constitutionally protected right to freedom of religion. The Constitution recognizes that our freedom comes from God - not governments. Unfortunately, Democratic Party leaders reject this truth and are hostile toward people of faith and spirituality, and actively undermine our religious freedom. During that 2020 Democratic National Convention, they chose to omit the words "under God" from our pledge of allegiance. High profile Democratic leaders mock or openly discriminate against people of faith, especially Christians. President Obama once ridiculed Americans for clinging to their guns and religion. Vice President Kamala Harris, as a senator in 2018 remarked that being a member of the Catholic charity organization, the Knights of Columbus, disqualified Brian Buescher from serving as a federal judge. Senator Dianne Feinstein derided now Justice Amy Coney Barrett, a devout Catholic, during a Senate confirmation hearing, stating that "the dogma lives loudly within you." Article 6, Section 3 of the Constitution states "no religious test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States." Today's Democratic party has forgotten that freedom of religion does not mean freedom from religion. Government must respect every American's deeply personal relationship with God, and our freedom to express and practice that faith without fear of state-sponsored reprisal, censorship or discrimination. Whether one believes in God or not is not the point. Any political party that is trying to erase the presence of God from every facet of public life and is hostile toward those who choose to worship God, cannot be trusted to protect our inalienable God-given rights enshrined in the Constitution and should not be in power.

Today's Democratic Party does not believe in our constitutionally protected right to bear arms. Our founders passed the Second Amendment out of a recognition that every one of us has a right to defend ourselves and our loved ones, and to serve as a check on a tyrannical government seeking to take away our God-given freedoms. The Democrat Party's hatred of the Second Amendment, and their increasing authoritarian instincts, poses a serious threat to our freedoms. "Hell yes, we're going to take your AR-15, your AK-47," Beto O'Rourke said at a debate when he was running for president. Our founders intentionally passed the Second Amendment right after the First Amendment. The majority ruling from the recent Supreme Court ruling striking down New York's law that barred people from concealed carry firearms summarized very clearly why Democrats are wrong to try to take away our rights: "Just as we do not need to seek a permit to stand on the street corner and exercise our right to free speech, we shouldn't have to seek permission for a law abiding citizen to carry their firearm. We as a society don't get to pick and choose which of our rights in the constitution are more worthy of protecting than another." Protecting our freedom to defend ourselves and those we love, and protecting our rights and freedoms enshrined in the Constitution against a tyrannical power is exactly why we must ensure our right to bear arms "shall not be infringed."

Today's Democratic Party is 'Big Brother' undermining our civil liberties: The Fourth Amendment of the constitution ensures 'the right of [the American] people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.' Democratic elite Party leaders have had many opportunities to get rid of unconstitutional provisions of the Patriot Act that violate our civil liberties - I introduced legislation while in Congress that would repeal the Patriot Act and address the dangerous FISA act being used to undermine our civil liberties, especially those protected by the Fourth Amendment. Every time, they choose the security state over our liberty. Whether it's using the IRS to snoop into our bank accounts for sending someone over $600 via Venmo, supporting the corrupt system of civil forfeiture to seize property from law-abiding Americans who have not even been charged with a crime, or getting credit card companies to keep track of any and all firearm and ammunition related purchases, today's Democratic Party stands with giving 'Big Brother' more power and control over our lives.

Today's Democratic Party racializes everything and blatantly foments anti-white racism. The Democratic machine has betrayed Dr. Martin Luther King's dream of a nation where we are judged based on the content of our character rather than the color of our skin. In their blind pursuit of power, Democrat leaders reduce each of us as God's children to the color of our skin, using identity politics to tear us apart for their own political gain. Democrats were silent in the face of Chicago's Mayor Lightfoot's blatantly racist policy of only accepting interviews with reporters of color because she was struck with the "overwhelming whiteness and maleness." Modern day segregation in schools is promoted by racial profiteers like Robin DiAngelo and the corrupt self-identified cultural Marxists who lead Black Lives Matter.

Today's Democratic party embraces and celebrates their racist agenda. They support programs that teach children that they are either 'the privileged' or 'the victims,' oppressors or the oppressed, solely because of the color of their skin. They've become the racists they claim to hate.

Today's Democratic Party is anti-woman. There's no greater expression of hatred and hostility toward women than to erase the existence of women as a category of people. The Democratic Party has long claimed to be champions of women, proud of Title IX and leveling the playing field for women and girls. But now, the Biden Administration and Democratic Party are spitting in the face of these achievements by rejecting the objective truth that women exist and are not just a construct in a person's mind. They can no longer define what a woman is, demand we replace words like "mother" with "birthing person," and place women at risk to please biological men who claim to be women at any given moment. They are taking away the opportunities and futures of women in sports by allowing transgender athletes, who until recently identified as men, and who have the biological advantages of men, to compete against women. The Biden administration is quietly trying to change Title IX through a back-door rule change that would remove women and biological sex from the Title IX statute, taking away opportunities for millions of female athletes across the country. They now go so far as to claim it is 'sexual harassment' to address someone by the wrong pronouns, trying to force us to comply with this insanity by regulating our speech and thought. By denying that there are biological differences between men and women, they are erasing women and denying the existence of objective truth. If one denies the existence of truth, there are no boundaries in our society and the truth becomes whatever those in power want it to be.

Today's Democratic Party is undermining families. Families are the bedrock of civilization. Today's Democratic party does not recognize this truth and the importance of the central foundational role that families play in our society and civilization. They want to strip away the rights of parents to raise their kids, claiming the government knows what's better for your children than you do. Former Democratic Governor Terry McAuliffe said last year that there is no role for parents in determining a school's curriculum. The largest teacher's union in the country and one of the Democratic party's biggest donors, the National Education Association, recently passed a resolution that endorses the teaching of Critical Race Theory in classrooms across the country. Public school districts are implementing policies that sexualize kids as young as five or six years old. Taxpayer dollars are used to bring in drag strippers and encourage gender transition surgery in minors all kept secret from their parents. HHS secretary Rachel Levine says young children should be empowered to get "gender-affirmation treatment" which involves puberty blockers, chemical castration, and irreversible surgeries causing long-term harm to children. If parents do not comply, the Federal government threatens to take your children away. Families are the foundation of civilization and our society, and today's Democratic Party's policies are quickly eroding that foundation to the detriment of us all.

I look forward tackling each of these issues in more depth in the coming weeks.

I believe in a government that is of the people, by the people, and for the people. Unfortunately, today's Democratic Party does not. Instead, it stands for a government of, by, and for the powerful elite.

Let's remember the ideals our founders laid out for us. Draw inspiration from their hopes for this country, and take action to actually bring about a government that is truly of, by, and for the people.

So today, I'm calling on my fellow common sense independent minded Democrats to join me in leaving the Democratic Party. If you can no longer stomach the direction that so-called woke Democratic Party ideologues are taking our country, I invite you to join me.

---

This is great news.

It has nothing to do with Republicans or conservatives. What she might be able to have some part in is a revival of the non-Left part of the Democratic block. As Dennis Prager pointed out the modern dilemma is liberals are voting for a party that does not reflect their interests. The DNC has become LEFT, not LIBERAL and all their totalitarian and micro-managing trends regarding freedom of speech and action are NOT Liberal. Remember all the Liberal complaints about Bush and Cheney and incursion on freedosms? I sure do, and so does Prager.

Liberals are not LEFTIST --- not if they stop and look at their values. Left is NOT AMERICAN it is Euro-socialist. Liberals have been a part of the other side of the coin of the American Idea for a long time. But until they stop voting for this brand of Democratic Party they will continue to play a role in extinguishing liberty and freedom here, rather than defending it, as they thought they were doing in opposing the neocons. (And are looking a bit more vindicated on that score---especially in regards to the use of war for money making returns)

Like Andrew Yang's new movement, perhaps you can yet see a group of Liberals become like the Reagan Democrats --- temporarily voting against the DNC to allow a better future instead of the ReGressive one.

She should be seen in that context. She is simply liberal.

By the way, forget pushing back on ACA national healthcare. That is over. Even the GOP said they were giving up on the other week. You can thank McCain for that defeat. So Tulsi's support of that is irrelevant.

Irish 2.0 said:

---

Ya know who she actually reminds me of; Joe Lieberman. Just much better looking

---

except Joe Lieberman was an actual moderate.

Gabbard is very liberal, just knows the democrat's focus on attacking white people and being woke is bad for business.

make no mistake, she agrees with the democrats on every important policy issue.

she isn't setting herself up to run for office, she's setting herself up for more media appearances.

Who are these moderate democrats some of you keep referring to?

They are unicorns. They don't exist! If they were capable of independent thought from full party conformity they wouldn't be democrats.

Need proof? You can't find democrats that will stand up and say men can't get pregnant.

If their leadership insists the sky is green, they will just nod along despite all evidence to the contrary

sam callahan said:

---

Who are these moderate democrats some of you keep referring to?

They are unicorns. They don't exist! If they were capable of independent thought from full party conformity they wouldn't be democrats.

Need proof? You can't find democrats that will stand up and say men can't get pregnant.

If their leadership insists the sky is green, they will just nod along despite all evidence to the contrary

---

Even if you believe that, this is still the way you break that up. Once you get a few making a stand, more will. You need some to start.

Watch this short fascinating experiment on how group-think works, but also how once you get some to join the one defiant, it grows and people will stand for the truth more. But very few will if are the only one, unless very sure of their territory.



Asch Conformity Experiment - YouTube

agent-maroon said:

---

G. hirsutum Ag said:

---

Wonder if AOC gonna be next

---

Where would she go?

---

back to bartending?

ABATTBQ11 said:

---

agent-maroon said:

---

G. hirsutum Ag said:

---

Wonder if AOC gonna be next

---

Where would she go?

---

Communist party

---

She wouldn't need to be leaving the Democratic Party for that.

BMX Bandit said:

---

Irish 2.0 said:

---

Ya know who she actually reminds me of; Joe Lieberman. Just much better looking

---

except Joe Lieberman was an actual moderate.

Gabbard is very liberal, just knows the democrat's focus on attacking white people and being woke is bad for business.

make no mistake, she agrees with the democrats on every important policy issue.

she isn't setting herself up to run for office, she's setting herself up for more media appearances.

---

I have to disagree with you about Lieberman's moderate status. As I recall, he was very, very liberal in his voting record. Where he got sideways with democrats was his support of Israel and the Gulf War. Supporting Bush in the war was entirely unacceptable by the democrats, and he was punished for it.

That was my realization moment on just exactly how far leftist the dems really were. There was NO tolerance of anyone that was not 100% on board with complete partisan leftism, even for a Jew who just wanted support for Israel.

This is an interesting experiment, but played out in the real world look at what happens. All of the conforming ideas are allowed to persist, but the dissenting opinion, which is already heavily weighted against human nature of wanting to conform, is stomped out and censored.

This does not allow for the "free thinkers" to rationally choose to stray from the narrative. Because they think their ideas are invalid.

TheCougarHunter said:

---

Wood so hard


Desantis/Gabbard 2024 calling it now.

---

No way. Glad she's seen the light and dropping the Party of the hard left wing, but she's still a lib.

Darth Randy said:

---

Has her gun stance changed? Doubt it.

No, she hasn’t.

She’s still pro-abortion.

She’s still pro-UBI and single-payer healthcare.

She’s still with the left on “climate justice”

Her stance on the 2nd Amendment is inconsistent.

I’m not sure why everyone keeps saying she’s “moving to the right”. She’s a leftist.

— Governor Dill (@TheGreenOldDill) October 4, 2022

---

nailed it

BadMoonRisin said:

---

This is an interesting experiment, but played out in the real world look at what happens. All of the conforming ideas are allowed to persist, but the dissenting opinion, which is already heavily weighted against human nature of wanting to conform, is stomped out and censored.

This does not allow for the "free thinkers" to rationally choose to stray from the narrative. Because they think their ideas are invalid.

---

The stamping out is being done by big money. That's why it is going to take a massive movement to even push back on that. But you still need that `starter' guy or gal that makes the stand. One of the reasons all the quibbling about Trump is his money is one of the things that allows him to make the stands he does--- and which unless enough of body politic supports him forcefully, DeSantis may not have the money shield from Big Tech.

However, also do not agree with those who say there won't ever be a larger opposing the Left stand--- I think most are waiting to see if next month can show the system possibly still works after 2020.

All the stamping and censoring means is the more the response has to go outside the box and those boundaries get increasingly pushed out-- -even as far as things like TEXIT and 1775-redux if the despotism increases.

Quote:

---

I have to disagree with you about Lieberman's moderate status

---

thats fair. i was thinking of him compared to 2022. looking at his record, he was not moderate.

another one of the "nice liberals." in many ways, more dangerous than the leftists.

they lull people (including me) into thinking they are moderate, but they really are far left. Gabbard is not moderate, she just won't spit in your food at dinner.

TheCougarHunter said:

---

Wood so hard


Desantis/Gabbard 2024 calling it now.

---

perfect example of what I said above.

great to see her call them out, and she has sacrificed her political career to do so because she will not be successful as an independent.

However, I wish these people would just fight to regain control of the democratic party and kick the leftist out of their party. It took great courage for her to do this but the bigger fight is for "liberals" to stand up to "leftists" and tell the leftists to go create their own communist party and stop bogarting the democratic party.

I hope the eat each other, but somehow the leftists have got to go.

There seems to be a confusion of Liberal with Moderate.

The issue here is you need a genuine Liberal faction again -- that is willing and able to withdraw their support from the Democrats if they insist on staying a Left collectivist identity politics course -- i.e, Jacobin.

Its almost not an issure for conservatives or Republicans to comment on because it is not about "is she conservative" --- it is similar to Andrew Yang in that regard.

National health system, that's a classic liberal notion. Never required CRT. The idea of UBI, some kind of system where everyone has a safety net--- that too is liberal, and doesn't require anti-white or tearing down the past or removing monuments, etc. Legalized weed--- again liberal, not Maoist.

Oh, and Liberal used to mean really concerned about freedom of speech and thought -- The Democrats /Big Tech/Woke is thought control. That's not Liberal either.

Look back the (justified) liberal concern about the Patriot Act and the expansion of the alphabets power by the Neocons.

See?

aggie93 said:

---

This is her very long explanation but it's a great read and she gets to the heart of just how much the Democrat Party has changed. Not sure if her gun position has evolved but she certainly appears to be Pro 2nd Amendment now.

Quote:

---

I love our country. Our God-given rights of freedom, life, and liberty enshrined in our Constitution and Bill of Rights are my inspiration. I answered the call to duty and took an oath, dedicating my life to supporting and defending those freedoms, both in uniform and in public office.
...

---

---

Unless she makes a very convincing and humbling apology I have a hard time believing all of that. Some of it I can see she honestly believes, but some of it I think she's spinning out BS for an invite to the Republican party.

BMX Bandit said:

---

TheCougarHunter said:

---

Wood so hard


Desantis/Gabbard 2024 calling it now.

---

perfect example of what I said above.

---

Don't act like you wouldn't

javajaws said:

---

aggie93 said:

---

This is her very long explanation but it's a great read and she gets to the heart of just how much the Democrat Party has changed. Not sure if her gun position has evolved but she certainly appears to be Pro 2nd Amendment now.

Quote:

---

I love our country. Our God-given rights of freedom, life, and liberty enshrined in our Constitution and Bill of Rights are my inspiration. I answered the call to duty and took an oath, dedicating my life to supporting and defending those freedoms, both in uniform and in public office.
...

---

---

Unless she makes a very convincing and humbling apology I have a hard time believing all of that. Some of it I can see she honestly believes, but some of it I think she's spinning out BS for an invite to the Republican party.

---

I hear what you're saying, but then again Republicans owe a big apology to the country for supporting the invasion of Iraq & Afghanistan and running the country trillions of dollars into debt. While simultaneously supporting the Patriot Act and turning a blind eye to NSA surveillance.

I can cut her a little slack as long as we can agree on on the preservation of freedom of speech and government accountability.

Zarathustra said:

---

javajaws said:

---

aggie93 said:

---

This is her very long explanation but it's a great read and she gets to the heart of just how much the Democrat Party has changed. Not sure if her gun position has evolved but she certainly appears to be Pro 2nd Amendment now.

Quote:

---

I love our country. Our God-given rights of freedom, life, and liberty enshrined in our Constitution and Bill of Rights are my inspiration. I answered the call to duty and took an oath, dedicating my life to supporting and defending those freedoms, both in uniform and in public office.
...

---

---

Unless she makes a very convincing and humbling apology I have a hard time believing all of that. Some of it I can see she honestly believes, but some of it I think she's spinning out BS for an invite to the Republican party.

---

I hear what you're saying, but then again Republicans owe a big apology to the country for supporting the invasion of Iraq & Afghanistan and running the country trillions of dollars into debt. While simultaneously supporting the Patriot Act and turning a blind eye to NSA surveillance.

I can cut her a little slack as long as we can agree on on the preservation of freedom of speech and government accountability.

---

THAT. What is she to apologize for --- initially trusting her party that she was aligned to and tending to vote for them (not always notice) the way one well, does? Are Republican voters to feel special need to apologize for above? I took Colin Powell at his word in the Feb 2003 UN speech about Iraq-- and then the admin's statements about various ongoing threats. (Something that seems to have alienated Powell incidentally when he saw the years after) I feel no need to apologize for not being cynical enough.

She has said this kind of stuff long enough to be pretty clear that she is realizing the Democrats are no longer Liberal, but anti-American. She even touches on the kid perversion agenda.

Anything to remind democrats how extreme the dnc has become. The rnc should avoid being the mirror image of the extreme left dnc. The future of the rnc will have to include a large swath of former democrats, especially of minority and old school union democrats who feel the left has squeezed them out.

i for one can't believe a noted republican has left the democratic party