unmade bed said:

---

Jabin said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

Jabin said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

Well it says the selection right under the office…

---

So? If they are printed, how do we know that they accurately reflect how the voter actually voted? They are just a paper copy of a digital file, and digital files can be manipulated six ways to Sunday. That piece of paper isn't evidence of anything.

If that is all you have, then what that tells us is that there is no actual way to audit the election results.

---

Well hopefully they would read their selections before they put it in the ballot box… if the voter doesn't get to see this piece of paper then yeah their is a problem.

---

Good point. Does the voter see the piece of paper and put it in the box, or do they vote on a screen and never see any paper? I don't believe that all EVMs provide paper to the voter but simply tally the votes electronically. Could be wrong, though, and a quick search didn't answer the question.

---

In Brazos County, Texas we vote on screen and never see paper results. We don't use dominion here though and no one seems to care.

---

The entire point of Dominion machines is to fix this problem, you are trusting the machine, you should get a piece of paper with your selections to put in a box.

Manhattan said:

---

unmade bed said:

---

Jabin said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

Jabin said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

Well it says the selection right under the office…

---

So? If they are printed, how do we know that they accurately reflect how the voter actually voted? They are just a paper copy of a digital file, and digital files can be manipulated six ways to Sunday. That piece of paper isn't evidence of anything.

If that is all you have, then what that tells us is that there is no actual way to audit the election results.

---

Well hopefully they would read their selections before they put it in the ballot box… if the voter doesn't get to see this piece of paper then yeah their is a problem.

---

Good point. Does the voter see the piece of paper and put it in the box, or do they vote on a screen and never see any paper? I don't believe that all EVMs provide paper to the voter but simply tally the votes electronically. Could be wrong, though, and a quick search didn't answer the question.

---

In Brazos County, Texas we vote on screen and never see paper results. We don't use dominion here though and no one seems to care.

---

The entire point of Dominion machines is to fix this problem, you are trusting the machine, you should get a piece of paper with your selections to put in a box.

---

Link?

It would be interesting to find out how many people actually review their ballot to make sure that it accurately reflects their votes.

the picture has been posted multiple times in this thread...

I'd take it a step further, the voter ought to be able to keep an official record of thier vote

Manhattan said:

---

the picture has been posted multiple times in this thread...

---

So?

Where is the evidence that all dominion machines print out a ballot like that which is then scanned? You just keep posting a picture as if that answers every possible question.

Also, somebody above claimed that an audit was done on 7 million ballots. They were challenged on that and asked for a link, but as best I can recall never provided one.

Assuming that you are correct that all dominion machines do print out ballots which are scanned, has an audit been done post election on those ballots and compared them to the reported results?

Manhattan said:

---

unmade bed said:

---

Jabin said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

Jabin said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

Well it says the selection right under the office…

---

So? If they are printed, how do we know that they accurately reflect how the voter actually voted? They are just a paper copy of a digital file, and digital files can be manipulated six ways to Sunday. That piece of paper isn't evidence of anything.

If that is all you have, then what that tells us is that there is no actual way to audit the election results.

---

Well hopefully they would read their selections before they put it in the ballot box… if the voter doesn't get to see this piece of paper then yeah their is a problem.

---

Good point. Does the voter see the piece of paper and put it in the box, or do they vote on a screen and never see any paper? I don't believe that all EVMs provide paper to the voter but simply tally the votes electronically. Could be wrong, though, and a quick search didn't answer the question.

---

In Brazos County, Texas we vote on screen and never see paper results. We don't use dominion here though and no one seems to care.

---

The entire point of Dominion machines is to fix this problem, you are trusting the machine, you should get a piece of paper with your selections to put in a box.

---

Would you accept a piece of paper with no QR or bar code. Just a simple print out that with your name and who you voted for

Your answer to this question will explain much

Maroon Dawn said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

unmade bed said:

---

Jabin said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

Jabin said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

Well it says the selection right under the office…

---

So? If they are printed, how do we know that they accurately reflect how the voter actually voted? They are just a paper copy of a digital file, and digital files can be manipulated six ways to Sunday. That piece of paper isn't evidence of anything.

If that is all you have, then what that tells us is that there is no actual way to audit the election results.

---

Well hopefully they would read their selections before they put it in the ballot box… if the voter doesn't get to see this piece of paper then yeah their is a problem.

---

Good point. Does the voter see the piece of paper and put it in the box, or do they vote on a screen and never see any paper? I don't believe that all EVMs provide paper to the voter but simply tally the votes electronically. Could be wrong, though, and a quick search didn't answer the question.

---

In Brazos County, Texas we vote on screen and never see paper results. We don't use dominion here though and no one seems to care.

---

The entire point of Dominion machines is to fix this problem, you are trusting the machine, you should get a piece of paper with your selections to put in a box.

---

Would you accept a piece of paper with no QR or bar code. Just a simple print out that with your name and who you voted for

Your answer to this question will explain much

---

You want peoples names on a piece of paper with their votes? That is incredibly ****ed up…

And I have already stated, the QR is useless with OCR now a thing.

Manhattan said:

---

Maroon Dawn said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

unmade bed said:

---

Jabin said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

Jabin said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

Well it says the selection right under the office…

---

So? If they are printed, how do we know that they accurately reflect how the voter actually voted? They are just a paper copy of a digital file, and digital files can be manipulated six ways to Sunday. That piece of paper isn't evidence of anything.

If that is all you have, then what that tells us is that there is no actual way to audit the election results.

---

Well hopefully they would read their selections before they put it in the ballot box… if the voter doesn't get to see this piece of paper then yeah their is a problem.

---

Good point. Does the voter see the piece of paper and put it in the box, or do they vote on a screen and never see any paper? I don't believe that all EVMs provide paper to the voter but simply tally the votes electronically. Could be wrong, though, and a quick search didn't answer the question.

---

In Brazos County, Texas we vote on screen and never see paper results. We don't use dominion here though and no one seems to care.

---

The entire point of Dominion machines is to fix this problem, you are trusting the machine, you should get a piece of paper with your selections to put in a box.

---

Would you accept a piece of paper with no QR or bar code. Just a simple print out that with your name and who you voted for

Your answer to this question will explain much

---

You want peoples names on a piece of paper with their votes? That is incredibly ****ed up…

And I have already stated, the QR is useless with OCR now a thing.

---

And exactly how we knew you'd react to any real confirmation that doesn't allow a computer to override your vote

Manhattan said:

---

Maroon Dawn said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

unmade bed said:

---

Jabin said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

Jabin said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

Well it says the selection right under the office…

---

So? If they are printed, how do we know that they accurately reflect how the voter actually voted? They are just a paper copy of a digital file, and digital files can be manipulated six ways to Sunday. That piece of paper isn't evidence of anything.

If that is all you have, then what that tells us is that there is no actual way to audit the election results.

---

Well hopefully they would read their selections before they put it in the ballot box… if the voter doesn't get to see this piece of paper then yeah their is a problem.

---

Good point. Does the voter see the piece of paper and put it in the box, or do they vote on a screen and never see any paper? I don't believe that all EVMs provide paper to the voter but simply tally the votes electronically. Could be wrong, though, and a quick search didn't answer the question.

---

In Brazos County, Texas we vote on screen and never see paper results. We don't use dominion here though and no one seems to care.

---

The entire point of Dominion machines is to fix this problem, you are trusting the machine, you should get a piece of paper with your selections to put in a box.

---

Would you accept a piece of paper with no QR or bar code. Just a simple print out that with your name and who you voted for

Your answer to this question will explain much

---

You want peoples names on a piece of paper with their votes? That is incredibly ****ed up…

And I have already stated, the QR is useless with OCR now a thing.

---

Doesnt have to be a name, could be their voting number for the day

I just jumped in this thread, but, if someone isn't given a receipt then it can't really be audited

Manhattan said:

---

Maroon Dawn said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

unmade bed said:

---

Jabin said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

Jabin said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

Well it says the selection right under the office…

---

So? If they are printed, how do we know that they accurately reflect how the voter actually voted? They are just a paper copy of a digital file, and digital files can be manipulated six ways to Sunday. That piece of paper isn't evidence of anything.

If that is all you have, then what that tells us is that there is no actual way to audit the election results.

---

Well hopefully they would read their selections before they put it in the ballot box… if the voter doesn't get to see this piece of paper then yeah their is a problem.

---

Good point. Does the voter see the piece of paper and put it in the box, or do they vote on a screen and never see any paper? I don't believe that all EVMs provide paper to the voter but simply tally the votes electronically. Could be wrong, though, and a quick search didn't answer the question.

---

In Brazos County, Texas we vote on screen and never see paper results. We don't use dominion here though and no one seems to care.

---

The entire point of Dominion machines is to fix this problem, you are trusting the machine, you should get a piece of paper with your selections to put in a box.

---

Would you accept a piece of paper with no QR or bar code. Just a simple print out that with your name and who you voted for

Your answer to this question will explain much

---

You want peoples names on a piece of paper with their votes? That is incredibly ****ed up…

And I have already stated, the QR is useless with OCR now a thing.

---

This country made it from the late 1700s to the early 2000s on paper ballots; we can return to these methods. Only ****ing idiots think its a good idea to have an electronic system count / tabulate votes. No electronic device is safe from hacking / manipulation.

THAT IS WHY DOMINION HAS A PAPER TRAIL WITH YOUR VOTES SPELLED OUT.

Manhattan said:

---

THAT IS WHY DOMINION HAS A PAPER TRAIL WITH YOUR VOTES SPELLED OUT.

---

Why are you shouting? Evidence would be better. So far, you haven't provided any.

Jabin said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

THAT IS WHY DOMINION HAS A PAPER TRAIL WITH YOUR VOTES SPELLED OUT.

---

Why are you shouting? Evidence would be better. So far, you haven't provided any.

---

Because it has been posted and people like you and Hawg continue to lie about dominion.

Manhattan said:

---

Jabin said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

THAT IS WHY DOMINION HAS A PAPER TRAIL WITH YOUR VOTES SPELLED OUT.

---

Why are you shouting? Evidence would be better. So far, you haven't provided any.

---

Because it has been posted and people like you and Hawg continue to lie about dominion.

---

You poor thing. You're failing miserably. Maybe you'll be better after the election.

Rockdoc said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

Jabin said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

THAT IS WHY DOMINION HAS A PAPER TRAIL WITH YOUR VOTES SPELLED OUT.

---

Why are you shouting? Evidence would be better. So far, you haven't provided any.

---

Because it has been posted and people like you and Hawg continue to lie about dominion.

---

You poor thing. You're failing miserably. Maybe you'll be better after the election.

---

I'm fine, I'm worried that suckers are going to continue to fall for this **** and beat the **** out of some more cops and end up in prison.

Manhattan said:

---

Rockdoc said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

Jabin said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

THAT IS WHY DOMINION HAS A PAPER TRAIL WITH YOUR VOTES SPELLED OUT.

---

Why are you shouting? Evidence would be better. So far, you haven't provided any.

---

Because it has been posted and people like you and Hawg continue to lie about dominion.

---

You poor thing. You're failing miserably. Maybe you'll be better after the election.

---

I'm fine, I'm worried that suckers are going to continue to fall for this **** and beat the **** out of some more cops and end up in prison.

---

Nobody believes this.

Manhattan said:

---

Rockdoc said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

Jabin said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

THAT IS WHY DOMINION HAS A PAPER TRAIL WITH YOUR VOTES SPELLED OUT.

---

Why are you shouting? Evidence would be better. So far, you haven't provided any.

---

Because it has been posted and people like you and Hawg continue to lie about dominion.

---

You poor thing. You're failing miserably. Maybe you'll be better after the election.

---

I'm fine, I'm worried that suckers are going to continue to fall for this **** and beat the **** out of some more cops and end up in prison.

---

Really? Where did that happen?

Manhattan said:

---

Jabin said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

THAT IS WHY DOMINION HAS A PAPER TRAIL WITH YOUR VOTES SPELLED OUT.

---

Why are you shouting? Evidence would be better. So far, you haven't provided any.

---

Because it has been posted and people like you and Hawg continue to lie about dominion.

---

How can I have lied? I have just asked you questions.

Your responses, or lack there of, are interesting.

Jabin said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

Jabin said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

THAT IS WHY DOMINION HAS A PAPER TRAIL WITH YOUR VOTES SPELLED OUT.

---

Why are you shouting? Evidence would be better. So far, you haven't provided any.

---

Because it has been posted and people like you and Hawg continue to lie about dominion.

---

How can I have lied? I have just asked you questions.

Your responses, or lack there of, are interesting.

---

Nor have I lied.

I post sources and links. Manhattan cannot and will not do that with any news outlet that is honest.

Sadly that includes Fox. Even Brett Baier was angry that the Arizona call was way too early and likely wrong.

DrEvazanPhD said:

---

Whistle Pig said:

---

Quote:

---

No, it's not just one person.

---

It was a small handful of people connected to Suzi Voyles, several contradicting her claims. The ballots in question were checked by election investigators, the ballot images published. There were no "perfect" ballots, the tally sheets contradict her claims, and the mail ballots she claimed had no folds, in fact had folds. Here's a twitter thread breaking everything down if you're interested.

🧵
In 3 affidavits, hearings and interviews, Suzi Voyles claimed there was a 'pristine' batch of ballots in the audit.

- 107 identical Biden ballots
- same 'eclipse' marks
- same races/referendums voted for
- BMD test ballots

Audit tally sheets and ballot images say otherwise. pic.twitter.com/O8TfBHNeIx

— Paola Poot (@PootDibou) August 16, 2022

---

Joined 7/21/2022, 100% on politics. Whose sock are you?

---

part of the share blue team.

Poor poster with nothing. Why I usually have him or ze, zer, whatever, on ignore.

Worthless as a poster here. Paid shill.

aggiehawg said:

---

Jabin said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

Jabin said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

THAT IS WHY DOMINION HAS A PAPER TRAIL WITH YOUR VOTES SPELLED OUT.

---

Why are you shouting? Evidence would be better. So far, you haven't provided any.

---

Because it has been posted and people like you and Hawg continue to lie about dominion.

---

How can I have lied? I have just asked you questions.

Your responses, or lack there of, are interesting.

---

Nor have I lied.

I post sources and links. Manhattan cannot and will not do that with any news outlet that is honest.

Sadly that includes Fox. Even Brett Baier was angry that the Arizona call was way too early and likely wrong.

---

You refuse to admit that Dominion voting machines have a paper trail.

Hmmm.. Maybe we found the Dominion employee. They were so good Texas decided not to certify them.

Quote:

---

Nor have I lied.

---

Quote:

---

Completely and irrefutably incorrect.

Humans can't read QR codes. And that is what Dominion uses. They have never denied that. Even in the states, such as Geogia, where that is against state law.

---

You're either lying, intentionally misleading, or grossly misinformed 2 years later, "wise old sage".


All BMD ballots print the selections in English. These ballots are the official voting record, they are not "receipts". We vote the same way in most Texas counties. You go to the BMD(Ballot Marking Device) and make your selections, then you print your ballot *you have not cast your vote yet*, then you go to the tabulator and insert the ballot. That's where your vote is counted. The paper ballots are retained and can be audited to verify the machine count.

Signel said:

---

Hmmm.. Maybe we found the Dominion employee. They were so good Texas decided not to certify them.

---

He knows how the dems cheat and he's worried it will
be stopped as it's their only hope.

In related news, Dominion is suing everybody for lying or knowingly promoting liars.

Quote:

---

In recent days, Sean Hannity, Tucker Carlson and Jeanine Pirro were among the network hosts scheduled to appear for questioning in Dominion's lawsuit, which is seeking $1.6 billion in damages from the cable news network. Dominion has argued that Fox Corp.'s Fox News and Fox Business made false claims that its voting machines rigged the results of the 2020 election between Donald Trump and Joe Biden. Top brass Rupert Murdoch and Lachlan Murdoch are also expected to be deposed since the parent company has been sued, too.

---

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/09/02/fox-news-personalities-face-questioning-as-dominion-lawsuit-moves-forward.html

Quote:

---

Dominion and Smartmatic have launched a series of defamation lawsuits against individuals and groups who spread election fraud conspiracy theories related to their voting machines during the 2020 presidential election.

Dominion filed three $1.6 billion defamation suits against One America News, Newsmax, and Patrick Byrne Tuesday, and more could be on their way. Dominion has sent cease-and-desist notices and warnings to preserve documents to more than 150 people, and its CEO previously told CNBC that the company was "not ruling anyone out."

---

https://www.businessinsider.com/everyone-dominion-smartmatic-suing-defamation-election-conspiracy-theories-2021-2

Rockdoc said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

Rockdoc said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

Jabin said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

THAT IS WHY DOMINION HAS A PAPER TRAIL WITH YOUR VOTES SPELLED OUT.

---

Why are you shouting? Evidence would be better. So far, you haven't provided any.

---

Because it has been posted and people like you and Hawg continue to lie about dominion.

---

You poor thing. You're failing miserably. Maybe you'll be better after the election.

---

I'm fine, I'm worried that suckers are going to continue to fall for this **** and beat the **** out of some more cops and end up in prison.

---

Really? Where did that happen?

---

Just after George Floyd died. Don't you remember?

Manhattan said:

---

THAT IS WHY DOMINION HAS A PAPER TRAIL WITH YOUR VOTES SPELLED OUT.

---

What do you do about Dominion when a significant number of those paper ballots were tabulated on their machines incorrectly?

Don't you think there should be criminal investigations?

Quote:

---

What do you do about Dominion when a significant number of those paper ballots were tabulated on their machines incorrectly?

---

That didn't happen. That's why this thread is so funny, why we're laughing at you, why Dominion is suing everybody in sight, and likely to win.

Illegal ballots were cast in several states. That is the problem. The truck load of ballots filled out for Biden in Pa was never investigated. Again, ballots were illegally cast.

Whistle Pig said:

---

Quote:

---

What do you do about Dominion when a significant number of those paper ballots were tabulated on their machines incorrectly?

---

That didn't happen. That's why this thread is so funny, why we're laughing at you, why Dominion is suing everybody in sight, and likely to win.

---

I'm sure the lawsuit has everything to do with integrity, and not with silencing opposition.

Eh, sock?

Jabin said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

unmade bed said:

---

Jabin said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

Jabin said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

Well it says the selection right under the office…

---

So? If they are printed, how do we know that they accurately reflect how the voter actually voted? They are just a paper copy of a digital file, and digital files can be manipulated six ways to Sunday. That piece of paper isn't evidence of anything.

If that is all you have, then what that tells us is that there is no actual way to audit the election results.

---

Well hopefully they would read their selections before they put it in the ballot box… if the voter doesn't get to see this piece of paper then yeah their is a problem.

---

Good point. Does the voter see the piece of paper and put it in the box, or do they vote on a screen and never see any paper? I don't believe that all EVMs provide paper to the voter but simply tally the votes electronically. Could be wrong, though, and a quick search didn't answer the question.

---

In Brazos County, Texas we vote on screen and never see paper results. We don't use dominion here though and no one seems to care.

---

The entire point of Dominion machines is to fix this problem, you are trusting the machine, you should get a piece of paper with your selections to put in a box.

---

Link?

It would be interesting to find out how many people actually review their ballot to make sure that it accurately reflects their votes.

---

Do you not check yours? If so, that is on the voter. I never want to have accidentally selected the wrong candidate. So I always double check against my paper ballot.

I lived in PA the last few years and they use paper ballots, not the Dominion system afaik.

My guess, though, is that a significant number of people don't check their ballots. It's dumb not to, but a bunch of people are not so bright.

Whistle Pig said:

---

Quote:

---

What do you do about Dominion when a significant number of those paper ballots were tabulated on their machines incorrectly?

---

That didn't happen. That's why this thread is so funny, why we're laughing at you, why Dominion is suing everybody in sight, and likely to win.

---

So VoterGA is lying through their teeth, but Act Blue is a bastion of nothing but truth with no spin?

We will see how the VoterGA lawsuit plays out. If even one of the 15 points that they claim in their ballot review analysis is correct, Dominion executives need to go to jail.

Why doesn't Dominion release an app that lets you read the QR code? That seems like a simple thing to do.

If I'm Dominion, I want to do everything in my power to avoid even the appearance of impropriety.

If the QR codes match the selections, release the QR code scanning algorithm. What harm could be done?