2.2 million litres of water to produce 1 ton of lithium-EVs are doomed

12,004 Views | 172 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by rab79
WHOOP!'91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Neehau said:

WHOOP!'91 said:

Neehau said:

CDUB98 said:

Neehau said:

CDUB98 said:

Quote:

What was oil extraction like during the time of Spindletop?


Irrelevant.
Absolutely relevant. Wrong sir.


Yes it is. The industry doesn't work that way anymore, nor has it for a very long time.

As always, you show that you are absolutely clueless about the subject at hand and have no coherent argument based in reality.
You are missing the point. I have complete faith in the free market to ensure lithium mining is as clean as possible. This will happen organically. Much like oil extractions trajectory.
It isn't happening organically now. Governments have to give credits and incentives to get people off the cheaper, more reliable power sources. If it was happening organically, you would hear a lot less complaining from conservatives. Your mention of the free market is laughable in this context.
Conservative are complaining because of propaganda, fox news and the oil lobby. Otherwise, they shouldnt give a ***** Its smart economics even if only to someone doesn't understand it.
FIFY

Do you maintain government incentives are NOT a distortion to the free market?
lb3
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Picard said:

Hydrogen is the answer
Better start investing in Russian platinum mining stocks.
B-1 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Teslag said:

There is nothing wrong with strip mining. If you are completely opposed to strip mining you'd better get rid of everything you own and live in a cave because chances are almost all the **** in your house in some way came from a strip mine.
It not necessarily the strip mining in and of itself, but the care taken to insure proper reclamation and the reclamation (or lack of) afterwards that is the issue.
Being in TexAgs jail changes a man……..no, not really
CDUB98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Neehau said:

WHOOP!'91 said:

Neehau said:

CDUB98 said:

Neehau said:

CDUB98 said:

Quote:

What was oil extraction like during the time of Spindletop?


Irrelevant.
Absolutely relevant. Wrong sir.


Yes it is. The industry doesn't work that way anymore, nor has it for a very long time.

As always, you show that you are absolutely clueless about the subject at hand and have no coherent argument based in reality.
You are missing the point. I have complete faith in the free market to ensure lithium mining is as clean as possible. This will happen organically. Much like oil extractions trajectory.
It isn't happening organically now. Governments have to give credits and incentives to get people off the cheaper, more reliable power sources. If it was happening organically, you would hear a lot less complaining from conservatives. Your mention of the free market is laughable in this context.
Conservative are complaining because of propaganda, fox news and the oil lobby. Otherwise, they shouldnt give a ***** Its smart economics even if someone doesn't understand it.


And it is clearly obvious to the casual observer that you do not understand economics.
Red Red Wine
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

There is nothing wrong with strip mining. If you are completely opposed to strip mining you'd better get rid of everything you own and live in a cave because chances are almost all the **** in your house in some way came from a strip mine.


Bro, let me start by saying: Tesla's are cool. The actual car, but not necessarily you. I haven't met you so I can't say if you are or are not cool.

Now there are two different arguments here:

Are Tesla's fun to drive and look nice? Yes. I believe they are. The acceleration is awesome. But, are EVs such as Tesla the great panacea for climate change that is being shoved down our throats? No. We've all seen all the studies already so we won't go back into that.

HOWEVER, you made a claim that "chance are all the blank in your house come from strip mining".

I've worked in both petrochemical, refining, and even some mining industries over the last 30 years let me help you out.

Lithium mining: massive amounts of fuel consumed to mine and process the rock to create the lithium that goes into batteries. Have you seen mining equipment? The tire alone is bigger than your Tesla. So, essentially single purpose, massive strip mines for batteries of all sizes (and meds too I think).

O&G: Oil production and refining are used to produce energy for ICE vehicles, yes, but also nat gas, ethylene, and propylene and other by-products that go into Petrochemical plants for the production of plastics and synthetic materials that make up almost every single item in your home, your vehicle, etc. THIS IS WHERE ALL THE BLANK IN YOUR HOUSE CAME FROM. Try to brush your teeth without Oil and Gas producers.

The only mining that is required would possibly be for things that the refinery/petchem plant needs to process intermediate feed streams which is really just some catalyst in a few reactors. These catalysts have zeolites, alumina, silica with very small amounts of moly, nickel, platinum, palladium, rhenium, tungsten, cobalt, etc depending on the select catalyst (not all of those are on every catalyst - it's specific to purpose).

The production of these minerals, metals, binders, etc make up such a small position in the refinery you would be extremely hard pressed to compare that to lithium mining. For example, some moly is a by-product of copper mining so it really isn't "adding" to the mining footprint and moly is used on quite a bit of catalyst. Also, many of these metals are reclaimed to be RE-USED: moly, platinum, palladium, rhenium, nickel and some rare occasions cobalt and tungsten. Can't currently say that about lithium although I would imagine there are some start-ups who would love to figure out how to reclaim lithium from old car batteries (or any batteries for that matter).

So, to say: everything in your home came from strip mining is much less truthful than saying "everything in your home came from OIL" which is actually a much more HONEST statement. The catalyst used in refining is NOT in your home.

Now, construction of a home is a bit different: We don't build homes with copper pipes anymore (Pex tubing - plastics from OIL), but we do use nails and screws so you do have iron ore for that small amount of material. The foundation has concrete and rebar, but sand is pretty abundant and some homes are pier and beam with no concrete foundation so that's a factor too. Just seems more obvious to say OIL put all the junk in your home vs strip mining.



CDUB98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Have you seen mining equipment?


One time I got to play with a front end loader from a mining equipment manufacturer that had a 50 cubic yard bucket. It was pretty badass.

/humblebrag
CDUB98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Can't currently say that about lithium although I would imagine there are some start-ups who would love to figure out how to reclaim lithium from old car batteries (or any batteries for that matter).


Based upon where I work, I can tell you for a fact this is coming up soon, and already underway on a small scale. Recycling of lithium batteries is necessary.
IslanderAg04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CDUB98 said:

Quote:

Have you seen mining equipment?


One time I got to play with a front end loader from a mining equipment manufacturer that had a 50 cubic yard bucket. It was pretty badass.

/humblebrag


Jeez, thats half of kyle.
CDUB98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
IslanderAg04 said:

CDUB98 said:

Quote:

Have you seen mining equipment?


One time I got to play with a front end loader from a mining equipment manufacturer that had a 50 cubic yard bucket. It was pretty badass.

/humblebrag


Jeez, thats half of kyle.


DAMMITT!!

50 cubic feet

I have no idea why I typed yards.
tk for tu juan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
50 cubic yard bucket is around 15-ft long x 12 to 15-ft wide x around 6-ft deep

(15 x 15 x 6) / 27 ft3 per cu yd = 50 cu yd
IslanderAg04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CDUB98 said:

IslanderAg04 said:

CDUB98 said:

Quote:

Have you seen mining equipment?


One time I got to play with a front end loader from a mining equipment manufacturer that had a 50 cubic yard bucket. It was pretty badass.

/humblebrag


Jeez, thats half of kyle.


DAMMITT!!

50 cubic feet

I have no idea why I typed yards.


Was about to say, that's a massive bucket.
CDUB98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Okay, I'm finally getting this right. I had to refresh my memory.

The loader had a 50 ton capacity.

Depending on the ore, the bucket would be larger or smaller to accommodate a full load each scoop.

Geez, it's been way too long.
CDUB98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
tk for tu juan said:

50 cubic yard bucket is around 15-ft long x 12 to 15-ft wide x around 6-ft deep

(15 x 15 x 6) / 27 ft3 per cu yd = 50 cu yd


Well, maybe I was thinking right the first time.

Bottom line, it was yuge and it was fun to play with, but I have no doubt the drivers of those things are beat to hell after a 10 hour shift.
Cromagnum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Picard said:

Hydrogen is the answer





Not even close.
YNWA_AG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
wait so 29,000 litres of water is needed for 1 model s
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
YNWA_AG said:

wait so 29,000 litres of water is needed for 1 model s


7660 gallons? OMG!

That's enough for over four pounds of beef!!!! Four pounds!!!
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Seems interesting
2022 Electric Vehicle Tax Credits: Which EVs & Hybrids Qualify?

I thought the tax credits disappeared. Oh, seems only Tesla is omitted.
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tesla lost their tax credits in 2019.
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Teslag said:

Tesla lost their tax credits in 2019.
I know. The article and my statement pointed out Tesla lost their tax credit.

Point is there are still many many people purchasing EVs and Hybrids that do receive tax credits on many many vehicles. Some by foreign owned companies.

Seem kind of totally screwed up. Typical federal government bull*****
Picard
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I see y'all took my hydrogen comment literally. Well then, I guess we make the jump to fusion next.

How about a fusion reactor powered Type 6 Shuttlecraft? Anyone?


Fightin_Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Picard said:

Hydrogen is the answer





That we get from nat gas? Why not just use nat gas?

Or an even more energy rich resource - gasoline
The world needs mean tweets

My Pronouns Ultra and MAGA

Trump 2024
Tony Franklins Other Shoe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Spindletop? What an idiot.

Person Not Capable of Pregnancy
Bill Clinternet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tony Franklins Other Shoe said:

Spindletop? What an idiot.
Your post has been flagged for the insult. It is actually very relevant. It isnt my fault if you refuse/dont see the importance of the analog.
"I am neither an Athenian nor a Greek, but a citizen of the world"-Plato, attributed to Socrates, Theaetetus-
cevans_40
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GAC06 said:

YNWA_AG said:

wait so 29,000 litres of water is needed for 1 model s


7660 gallons? OMG!

That's enough for over four pounds of beef!!!! Four pounds!!!

Where did this fuzzy math come from?
WHOOP!'91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Neehau said:

Tony Franklins Other Shoe said:

Spindletop? What an idiot.
Your post has been flagged for the insult. It is actually very relevant. It isnt my fault if you refuse/dont see the importance of the analog.
I asked earlier for the relevance but you never replied. How is Spindletop relevant to strip mining? A, it was 120 years ago and B, why would we look at anything other than extraction processes today for each energy source?

And as I pointed out earlier, even Spindletop-era extraction processes weren't as damaging to the environment as strip mining is today.
deddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Neehau said:

B-1 83 said:

Neehau said:

This is oil company lobby propaganda.


I see troll boy disappeared after dropping this bombshell………..with nothing to back it up. Classic.
Any type of resource extraction is harmful to the planet. This is because removing these raw materials can result in soil degradation, water shortages, biodiversity loss, damage to ecosystem functions and an increase in global warming.

Trying to play it off as lithium mining being any worse than petroleum extraction or any other mining is ridiculous.


So are they all the same? How much "better" is lithium mining than petroleum extraction? Enlighten us
deddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Neehau said:

Tony Franklins Other Shoe said:

Spindletop? What an idiot.
Your post has been flagged for the insult. It is actually very relevant. It isnt my fault if you refuse/dont see the importance of the analog.


I was actually learning things in this thread until your worthless posts came along. Every ****ing time .

You don't have to have an opinion on things you don't know about. It'd ok to get educated once in a while
CDUB98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
WHOOP!'91 said:

Neehau said:

Tony Franklins Other Shoe said:

Spindletop? What an idiot.
Your post has been flagged for the insult. It is actually very relevant. It isnt my fault if you refuse/dont see the importance of the analog.
I asked earlier for the relevance but you never replied. How is Spindletop relevant to strip mining? A, it was 120 years ago and B, why would we look at anything other than extraction processes today for each energy source?

And as I pointed out earlier, even Spindletop-era extraction processes weren't as damaging to the environment as strip mining is today.


I doubt he even knows what the Spindletop area looks like now.
halfastros81
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Maybe the Feds can pretend to supply us with EV's , batteries , replacement batteries, power generation , and electrical transmission /distribution requisite to charge and drive them , and we the people in turn can pretend to drive them.

I think there's some similar old Soviet analogy .
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
cevans_40 said:

GAC06 said:

YNWA_AG said:

wait so 29,000 litres of water is needed for 1 model s


7660 gallons? OMG!

That's enough for over four pounds of beef!!!! Four pounds!!!

Where did this fuzzy math come from?


https://ksubci.org/2020/11/16/does-beef-production-really-use-that-much-water/amp/
CSTXAg92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Picard said:

Hydrogen is the answer
Eventually, yes. Currently, no.
cecil77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CSTXAg92 said:

Picard said:

Hydrogen is the answer
Eventually, yes. Currently, no.

That applies to EVs as well. Not an answer now.
CSTXAg92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
cecil77 said:

CSTXAg92 said:

Picard said:

Hydrogen is the answer
Eventually, yes. Currently, no.

That applies to EVs as well. Not an answer now.

Agreed. But (finally) making progress at a very strong pace.
cecil77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Not that strong. Need and entirely different battery technology.

And even then the end-to-end energy efficiency isn't all that different from ICE, which still have their own improvements over the next decades.

cevans_40
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GAC06 said:

cevans_40 said:

GAC06 said:

YNWA_AG said:

wait so 29,000 litres of water is needed for 1 model s


7660 gallons? OMG!

That's enough for over four pounds of beef!!!! Four pounds!!!

Where did this fuzzy math come from?


https://ksubci.org/2020/11/16/does-beef-production-really-use-that-much-water/amp/

Lol. Green water? That's some good stuff right there.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.