Radical gems wanting to give men a big FU ??
Seems their innate insecurity is showing…
Seems their innate insecurity is showing…
Is all the anger over RVW simply…
3,570 Views |
35 Replies |
Last: 2 yr ago by lethalninja
Radical fems… Thanks Apple..
flakrat
Joined:
Oct 1, 2002
Posts:
17,952
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Those gems are sneaky little b*******maroonthrunthru said:
Radical gems wanting to give men a big FU ??
Seems their innate insecurity is showing…
Quote:
The KOH-I-NOOR Diamond
This extremely famous diamond with finest white colour is weighted 105.602 carats. Originated from India mined from the Kollur mines of Guntur district, Andhra Pradesh, India, was originally owned by the Kakatiya dynasty.
Currently set in the front of the Queen Mother's Crown, displayed in the tower of London.
Mughal emperor Shah Jahan, incorporated Koh-i-Noor into his Peacock throne and his son Aurangzeb had him imprisoned in a fort. After that, it was reduced to 186 carats from somewhat 800 carats.
Since then the diamond has changed a lot of hands and every ruler faced with violence, murder, torture and treachery. It was given to Queen Victoria in 1850 and the British royal family aware of its curse, always passed the diamond in the hands of the wife of the male heir of British throne..
Seven and three are ten, not only now, but forever. There has never been a time when seven and three were not ten, nor will there ever be a time when they are not ten. Therefore, I have said that the truth of number is incorruptible and common to all who think. — St. Augustine
It's just an excuse to rile people up, the left doesn't care about women, or babies, or anyone.
Abortion is viewed as the lynchpin of feminism because first wave feminist theory holds that men and women can't be truly equal unless women can be freed from the "burden" of bearing children. Traditionally, women had and subsequently raised the children. In order for feminism to end these fundamental gender roles in society so that women would not be viewed as primarily responsible for not only having the children but for rearing the children, women had to have a way to not just prevent pregnancy (i.e. birth control) but to terminate a pregnancy if one occurred. Otherwise they would never be truly "equal" with men.
Without this option, the theory goes, women are mandated by nature and the ever-present inherently sexist society that is America to forever be second class citizens because of biology.
It's a pretty easy argument to make that even if this notion is true, 49 years of societal change has made the point moot. The irony of course is that one of the Justices that voted with the majority is a woman with 7 kids who, despite this alleged "burden", has managed to rise to the literal pinnacle of the legal profession.
Without this option, the theory goes, women are mandated by nature and the ever-present inherently sexist society that is America to forever be second class citizens because of biology.
It's a pretty easy argument to make that even if this notion is true, 49 years of societal change has made the point moot. The irony of course is that one of the Justices that voted with the majority is a woman with 7 kids who, despite this alleged "burden", has managed to rise to the literal pinnacle of the legal profession.
Well then, I've got news for them. Women will never be equal to men. Never. God did not make us that way.pagerman @ work said:
Abortion is viewed as the lynchpin of feminism because first wave feminist theory holds that men and women can't be truly equal unless women can be freed from the "burden" of bearing children. Traditionally, women had and subsequently raised the children. In order for feminism to end these fundamental gender roles in society so that women would not be viewed as primarily responsible for not only having the children but for rearing the children, women had to have a way to not just prevent pregnancy (i.e. birth control) but to terminate a pregnancy if one occurred. Otherwise they would never be truly "equal" with men.
Without this option, the theory goes, women are mandated by nature and the ever-present inherently sexist society that is America to forever be second class citizens because of biology.
It's a pretty easy argument to make that even if this notion is true, 49 years of societal change has made the point moot. The irony of course is that one of the Justices that voted with the majority is a woman with 7 kids who, despite this alleged "burden", has managed to rise to the literal pinnacle of the legal profession.
How stupid do you have to be to get in front of any moving vehicle and try to push it or stop it? And a big truck?
D-Fens said:
How stupid do you have to be to get in front of any moving vehicle and try to push it or stop it? And a big truck?
Idiots do idiot things because they're idiots
Wow, there it is. This place doesn't disappoint.El_Zorro said:
Well then, I've got news for them. Women will never be equal to men. Never. God did not make us that way.
Actual Talking Thermos said:Wow, there it is. This place doesn't disappoint.El_Zorro said:
Well then, I've got news for them. Women will never be equal to men. Never. God did not make us that way.
Neither does your constant faux outrage
The amazing thing to me is people trying to act like the guy in the truck is doing something wrong for not wanting to stop his truck so they can pull him out and beat the crap out of him while destroying his vehicle instead of the guy who is driving slowly so that anyone can easily move out of the way. Screw that, you get in front of my truck and threaten me in any way you are going under the tires.
"The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help."
Ronald Reagan
Ronald Reagan
ThunderCougarFalconBird
Joined:
Oct 10, 2006
Posts:
49,104
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
haha your side just took a total loss on one of your major political issuesActual Talking Thermos said:Wow, there it is. This place doesn't disappoint.El_Zorro said:
Well then, I've got news for them. Women will never be equal to men. Never. God did not make us that way.
Abortion severely reduces the dangers of promiscuity for women. That's what they are so unhappy about.
I'm just holding up the mirror.DrEvazanPhD said:Actual Talking Thermos said:Wow, there it is. This place doesn't disappoint.El_Zorro said:
Well then, I've got news for them. Women will never be equal to men. Never. God did not make us that way.
Neither does your constant faux outrage
So promiscuity for men is cool, just not women. Got it. The fact is, there are a bunch of men wanting laws that will never affect them like it does women. That's what they are mad about.
"Oh no! Someone claimed that biological differences exist! I'm gonna shame them with snarky throw-away lines and feel self important!" - the lukewarm contents of the thermos.Actual Talking Thermos said:I'm just holding up the mirror.DrEvazanPhD said:Actual Talking Thermos said:Wow, there it is. This place doesn't disappoint.El_Zorro said:
Well then, I've got news for them. Women will never be equal to men. Never. God did not make us that way.
Neither does your constant faux outrage
In terms of biology (bearing children, strength, musculature, and any number of other things) he's correct.Actual Talking Thermos said:I'm just holding up the mirror.DrEvazanPhD said:Actual Talking Thermos said:Wow, there it is. This place doesn't disappoint.El_Zorro said:
Well then, I've got news for them. Women will never be equal to men. Never. God did not make us that way.
Neither does your constant faux outrage
And that shouldn't be problematic to anyone. In fact it should be obvious.
Men and women should be equal under the law, and women should be free to "pursue happiness" in any way they see fit, and they should be free from discrimination in those pursuits.
This also should be obvious.
But there are fundamental differences between men and women that are basic, factual and immutable. Failure to recognize this does not change that fact.
There used to be social boundaries and institutions meant to curb promiscuity. Remind me - which side tore them all down as "oppressive?"SteveA said:
So promiscuity for men is cool, just not women. Got it. The fact is, there are a bunch of men wanting laws that will never affect them like it does women. That's what they are mad about.
Perhaps you need a lesson in reality. I'm not saying you can't make someone equal under the law but in reality, men and women are not equal.Actual Talking Thermos said:Wow, there it is. This place doesn't disappoint.El_Zorro said:
Well then, I've got news for them. Women will never be equal to men. Never. God did not make us that way.
Let me illustrate it for you:
Promiscuity (or the lack thereof) has less than nothing to do with it.SteveA said:
So promiscuity for men is cool, just not women. Got it. The fact is, there are a bunch of men wanting laws that will never affect them like it does women. That's what they are mad about.
Roe was overturned because it was a massive intrusion into the jurisdictions of the states. Roe was a decision that, per noted liberal constitutional law scholar John Hart Ely, not merely "bad constitutional law"; rather "it is not constitutional law and gives no sense of an obligation to try to be."
The subject matter of the law and the politics behind it had no bearing on the decision yesterday. At all. Because that is politics. The ruling was about the constitution, regardless of the subject matter.
All I know about this whole thing is I am having a blast watching all these liberal grease stains like Waters & Warren just absolutely lose their sh.t over this.
SteveA said:
So promiscuity for men is cool, just not women. Got it. The fact is, there are a bunch of men wanting laws that will never affect them like it does women. That's what they are mad about.
It's not that it's cool, but that women have much more to lose from promiscuity. I'm more concerned with the children that are affected by a woman's bad choices.
The anger is because this ruling cuts back on the cash Planned Parenthood is able to kick back to The Party
I hate how the left forgets that they told us men can get pregnant too five minutes ago and all I hear about on the roe thing is women's reproductive rights.
It's a bad decision for a woman but not a man? That's horse ***** It's pretty hypocritical railing against women, but not getting the word out to guys that stick their dick in anything that they are half of the problem. But dudes like sex, so…
The Supreme Court is not a legislature.SteveA said:
It's a bad decision for a woman but not a man? That's horse ***** It's pretty hypocritical railing against women, but not getting the word out to guys that stick their dick in anything that they are half of the problem. But dudes like sex, so…
HTH.
This. Planned Parenthood is a HUGE source of Dem Cash. This decision cuts into the amount that Planned Parenthood can give to Dems. That is why the politicians are so upset. Dem politicians really care very little about women or babies, it is all about the money supply.JBAggie00 said:
The anger is because this ruling cuts back on the cash Planned Parenthood is able to kick back to The Party
On job applications, after the authorized to work in US and felony conviction, there should be a box asking if you have ever stood in front of a vehicle and tried to stop its movement.
SteveA said:
It's a bad decision for a woman but not a man? That's horse ***** It's pretty hypocritical railing against women, but not getting the word out to guys that stick their dick in anything that they are half of the problem. But dudes like sex, so…
Women are the gateway to sex, not men. If women would stop having sex and making babies with violent and irresponsible men, humanity would be much better off.
Women want the ability to sleep with bad boys who are irresponsible and not be saddled with the consequences.
D-Fens said:
On job applications, after the authorized to work in US and felony conviction, there should be a box asking if you have ever stood in front of a vehicle and tried to stop its movement.
Well there was one time my drunk buddy got lured out of the Hall of Fame by this heifer.
What's "your" definition of "equal"?Actual Talking Thermos said:Wow, there it is. This place doesn't disappoint.El_Zorro said:
Well then, I've got news for them. Women will never be equal to men. Never. God did not make us that way.
Yes, I put "your" in quotes.
Their god, government, has just condemned them. They feel judged. They can't bear it. I believe most of the vocal pro-death women have had abortions and can't handle the feeling of condemnation and judgement when a government restricts it. It basically means government is saying they are a bad person who did wrong. Liberals hate accountability and judgement.
SteveA said:
So promiscuity for men is cool, just not women. Got it. The fact is, there are a bunch of men wanting laws that will never affect them like it does women. That's what they are mad about.
Why did females evolve the way they did then? Sounds like they created their own problem. Does this prove that men are superior since men evolved in such a way that they are not affected. If women had evolved to lay eggs instead, this would not be an issue for them. Sounds like the females are to blame.
Considering they could pass a federal law tomorrow if they wanted to, I'd say most don't actually care and just want to use it for November.
Featured Stories
See All
Texas A&M adds former UAB quarterback Jacob Zeno via transfer portal
by Ryan Brauninger
28:37
10h ago
8.8k
Elko should keep gambling in Vegas in ways that increase A&M's odds
by Olin Buchanan
27:45
5h ago
662
Pick 'Em & Rip 'Em sponsored by PrizePicks: Week 16
by Matthew Dawson