I feel like today's 2A ruling is setting the stage

3,027 Views | 22 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by petroleo y agua
1872walker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
For their decision Row vs. Wade. This SCOTUS goes to 11.
Cromagnum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If they announce a decision on Roe tomorrow to reverse the ruling all hell is going to break loose online. LOL
Get Off My Lawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I get that the lawdawgs keep saying "you do t know how SCOTUS works - they don't plan which they release or in what order... but it's shaping up to look a lot like a "pull pin - walk away" scenario. Perhaps Roberts is just claiming he's undecided. Perhaps they're sitting on it intentionally. Functionally - the result is the same.
aggie93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Get Off My Lawn said:

I get that the lawdawgs keep saying "you do t know how SCOTUS works - they don't plan which they release or in what order... but it's shaping up to look a lot like a "pull pin - walk away" scenario. Perhaps Roberts is just claiming he's undecided. Perhaps they're sitting on it intentionally. Functionally - the result is the same.
Actually reading how direct they were in this opinion it makes me wonder if the threats against them is having the opposite effect of what is intended and it is making the conservative Justices realize that there is no appeasing the leftist mob.
"The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help."

Ronald Reagan
Big_Russ
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They should have overturned RvW before today's NY State Rifle ruling. Since they didn't, now there will be guns EVERYWHERE killing people with reckless abandon when announced!
Cromagnum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Big_Russ said:

They should have overturned RvW before today's NY State Rifle ruling. Since they didn't, now there will be guns EVERYWHERE killing people with reckless abandon!


You joke, but somewhere there is a furious libbie pounding away that fear on zhis keyboard right now.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
1872walker said:

For their decision Row vs. Wade. This SCOTUS goes to 11.

Row vs Wade



coupland boy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag with kids said:

1872walker said:

For their decision Row vs. Wade. This SCOTUS goes to 11.

Row vs Wade






That is such a dad joke. Username fits.
Artorias
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Had to rule on the 2a case first so New Yorkers can legally arm themselves before all the riots.
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Current law is actually the Casey case that already substantially modified RvW.
JSKolache
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag with kids said:

1872walker said:

For their decision Row vs. Wade. This SCOTUS goes to 11.

Row vs Wade




Is that Gorsuch?
Alte Schule
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I thought that Roe Vs. Wade was a decision made by illegal immigrants on how to cross the Rio Grande.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MouthBQ98 said:

Current law is actually the Casey case that already substantially modified RvW.
Which is why Roberts' rumored position to somehow overrule Casey without overruling Roe was just dumb from the get-go.

That's too fine of a distinction to be made with any legitmacy.
1872walker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I ducking hate autocorrect
ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggie93 said:

Get Off My Lawn said:

I get that the lawdawgs keep saying "you do t know how SCOTUS works - they don't plan which they release or in what order... but it's shaping up to look a lot like a "pull pin - walk away" scenario. Perhaps Roberts is just claiming he's undecided. Perhaps they're sitting on it intentionally. Functionally - the result is the same.
Actually reading how direct they were in this opinion it makes me wonder if the threats against them is having the opposite effect of what is intended and it is making the conservative Justices realize that there is no appeasing the leftist mob.


I wouldn't say they've ever attempted to appease, aside from maybe Roberts. I think they moreso want to maintain the perception of neutrality, which means sticking to more narrow rulings on only the issues at hand and avoiding language that may be viewed as emotional.

I agree the treatment of Kav and Barrett, along with the leak and protests, is taking a toll on that resolve though. If the left wants to continue to politicize everything that doesn't go their way, there's no sense or utility in maintaining neutrality, and they might as well be more direct and broad in their rulings and setting of precedent. It's not like giving them a **** you is going to set off protests or spur criticism of the Court that isn't already happening.
TxTarpon
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Quote:

If they announce a decision on Roe tomorrow to reverse the ruling all hell is going to break loose online. LOL
Do it right before the July 4 weekend so fireworks will be easily obtained.
----------------------------------
Texans make the best songwriters because they are the best liars.-Rodney Crowell

We will never give up our guns Steve, we don't care if there is a mass shooting every day of the week.
-BarronVonAwesome

A man with experience is not at the mercy of another man with an opinion.
Dallasag517
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Cromagnum said:

If they announce a decision on Roe tomorrow to reverse the ruling all hell is going to break loose online. LOL
i'm not sure the phrase "all hell is going to break loose" is going to be adequate to describe the reaction should the supremes reverse.
XXXVII
How long do you want to ignore this user?
1872walker said:

For their decision Row vs. Wade. This SCOTUS goes to 11.



Uh, phrasing? SCOTUS should remain at 9.
DeSantis 2024

FJB, FJB, FJB, etc
Psycho Bunny
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm off work tomorrow, please make a ruling on Roe v Wade so I can troll twitter on my day off.
TxTarpon
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Quote:

I'm off work tomorrow, please make a ruling on Roe v Wade so I can troll twitter on my day off.
Do it day drinking and live stream on Twitch!!

That would be epic!
----------------------------------
Texans make the best songwriters because they are the best liars.-Rodney Crowell

We will never give up our guns Steve, we don't care if there is a mass shooting every day of the week.
-BarronVonAwesome

A man with experience is not at the mercy of another man with an opinion.
petroleo y agua
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Will the resident crybabies disappear or will they troll F16 into oblivion?

I'm hoping zhey engage and have their heads caved in, per usual, of course.
S540841
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I thought guns made people safer?
petroleo y agua
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Welcome, rook. The poster you are replying to engaged in "sarcasm." Sarcasm is defined to mean "the use of irony to mock or convey contempt."

In this case, showing contempt and mocking gun grabbers.

Guns make people safer from criminals…as a deterrent and to eliminate a threat.

Welcome to the board, but maybe post less.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.