Animal cruelty can be a felony in Texas which would have prevented him from buying a gun
Until the people that decide who should go to these institutions say that having a certain view point makes you insane and needing to go to these institutions.Tony Franklins Other Shoe said:of the billions our govt wastes on ridiculous ***** I'm all for channeling money to put these types of people in institutions until they prove they are not a threat. But that's profiling and there are lot of people that aren't comfortable with that despite how accurate it could be.ChrisTAMU said:Rapier108 said:
Every single time.
People know about these freaks, and do nothing about them.
Hurting animals is one of the biggest red flags that a person is extremely unstable and likely to move on to hurting or killing people.
I agree with you, 100%. But what do we do? Commit people to institutions for killing animals? I personally would be all for that but I'd like to know what's possible.
ChrisTAMU said:Rapier108 said:
Every single time.
People know about these freaks, and do nothing about them.
Hurting animals is one of the biggest red flags that a person is extremely unstable and likely to move on to hurting or killing people.
I agree with you, 100%. But what do we do? Commit people to institutions for killing animals? I personally would be all for that but I'd like to know what's possible.
Kennedy made it impossible!ChrisTAMU said:Rapier108 said:
Every single time.
People know about these freaks, and do nothing about them.
Hurting animals is one of the biggest red flags that a person is extremely unstable and likely to move on to hurting or killing people.
I agree with you, 100%. But what do we do? Commit people to institutions for killing animals? I personally would be all for that but I'd like to know what's possible.
bevokilla said:
Animal cruelty can be a felony in Texas which would have prevented him from buying a gun
mc_shipman said:
Conservatives have to be the ones to champion mental health services because we also champion the second amendment. Responsible gun owners need to make sure that firearms are used to defend the weak rather than attack them, and part of that is ensuring absolutely broken individuals can't get the tools to do this kind of thing.
Dems have a standard seemingly proactive response to every public shooting. Bans guns shouted from every platform. Republicans have the passive response of "No, we won't ban guns because this is a mental health problem." It frequently doesn't sit well with Johnny Q Public, so conservatives need to actually champion mental health both because it is a good thing to do and because it gives them a proactive stance to take.
Liberals enable much of this, as you say, because it feeds into their political platform. I would have a hard time believing that their efforts would be aimed at creating healthy people rather than lifelong loyalists. Mental health should be about actual health rather than programming a human.
Uh… so no one has pointed out that this is bat sheet crazy? The shooter is a CIA plant? That's quite the leap. It's technically not impossible, but it is unreasonable to claim it as fact based on the flimsy evidence provided.Daddy said:
I believe this is all to change the narrative about gun owners and mental Illness to get guns out of people's hands that they can declare mentally ill
This is a CIA plant.
Got fronted money... bulletproof vest, Daniel defense ar 15s, military grade optics, military grade ammo, Ford f 250s, expensive dresses, door open, pd ordered to stand down, and 3 months of working at Wendy's 10 to 15 hours per week. This guy had a plan and a purpose and did it despite buying rifles what 2 weeks ago?
Fortunately a border patrol in shorts and flup flops with the barbers shot gun shot him while the pd were in body armor outside waiting