If you don't want to destroy the Republican party some of y'all better get your head out of the sand. Just because someone has an R by their name does not make them a good candidate for the job. He's a crook and a arrogant one at that.

farmrag said:

---

If you don't want to destroy the Republican party some of y'all better get your head out of the sand. Just because someone has an R by their name does not make them a good candidate for the job. He's a crook and a arrogant one at that.

---

You're talking about George P, right?

Quote:

---

We believe Mr. Paxton's legal problems are politically motivated and he will prevail once he has his day in court. We recall similar Democratic dishonest politically motivated efforts that successfully drove Tom DeLay from office in 2006, only to turn out with Mr. DeLay's complete vindication.

In our view, voting against Ken Paxton because of these political legal tactics achieves the objective of the Democrats.

---

Oh FFS. What a simple, easy way to dismiss all of Paxton's baggage, to claim that he's a victim of a political hit job. Anything to rationalize someone who you know to be a crooked, corrupt asshat.

Hydrocele_aggie said:

---

Can't wait to vote Paxton to piss this board off!

---

I don't think it will do that. Sentient humans won't vote for another Bush.

dont feed - er...

don't keep putting soap in the bubble jar people

Paxon has an ACTUAL record of winning ACTUAL cases in support of ACTUAL conservative policies.

Bush isn't even a ****ing lawyer. Forget he's a Bush. How the hell could a NON-LAWYER win ACTUAL cases against anyone?

farmrag said:

---

If you don't want to destroy the Republican party some of y'all better get your head out of the sand. Just because someone has an R by their name does not make them a good candidate for the job. He's a crook and a arrogant one at that.

---

Pea? I agree. The Bushes are swamp critters and crooks. They love the surveillance state and open borders.

larry culpepper said:

---

Quote:

---

We believe Mr. Paxton's legal problems are politically motivated and he will prevail once he has his day in court. We recall similar Democratic dishonest politically motivated efforts that successfully drove Tom DeLay from office in 2006, only to turn out with Mr. DeLay's complete vindication.

In our view, voting against Ken Paxton because of these political legal tactics achieves the objective of the Democrats.

---

Oh FFS. What a simple, easy way to dismiss all of Paxton's baggage, to claim that he's a victim of a political hit job. Anything to rationalize someone who you know to be a crooked, corrupt asshat.

---

Worked for the Biden goal tenders. People like you bought into it and supported him because the greater objective was winning against the Republicans. So why are you so concerned over people taking that same mentality for Paxton in Texas?

Yes. He uses his office to punish Texans he doesn't like. I don't like them either.

Quote:

---

Bush isn't even a ****ing lawyer. Forget he's a Bush. How the hell could a NON-LAWYER win ACTUAL cases against anyone?

---

He's worthless, but he has a JD.

Quote:

---

George P. Bush, the son of Florida's Jeb Bush, seeks to unseat Ken Paxton as Attorney General of Texas. Bush's only experience in the courtroom during the last ten years is when he is being sued. Most notably, the Daughters of the Republic of Texas (DRT) were forced to sue the General Land Office (GLO) after George P. Bush FIRED the Daughters from the Alamo and then tried to steal the DRT Library Collection of over 30,000 historical books, manuscripts and Texas artifacts. The Daughters fought back in a lawsuit to retain the collection and were awarded reimbursement of their legal fees. This cost taxpayers over $200,000 due to Bush's inabiltity to understand the law. As the current land commissioner, George P. Bush has failed in many aspects of his job. Since 2015, George P. Bush attempted to "Reimagine" the Alamo and relocate the Cenotaph memorial to the Alamo Defenders. Bush wasted six years of time and millions of dollars due to his inability to understand the legal ramifications of signing a lease with the City of San Antonio when he did not have a Texas Historical Commission permit secured which the lease was contingent upon. In essence, Bush put the "cart before the horse." Shortly after Bush and the City of San Antonio were stymied by the THC decision, Bush reinstated his law license which he had let lapse for over ten years. In addition to the many examples of Bush's legal inexperience and lack of knowledge, Bush failed in his basic duties as Land Commissioner by TWICE being a NO-SHOW before the Texas Legislature to give a biennial update of the General Land Office; by witholding Hurricane Harvey funds to Harris County/Houston; and by only doing a mediocre job with Texas' veterans homes.

On the campaign trail, Bush announced his candidacy in Austin and handed out koozies with a outlined picture of him and President Trump shaking hands. The koozie quoted Trump with printing that said, "The only Bush who likes me." Embarrasssing for Bush, Trump subsequently endorsed Ken Paxton weeks later. Bush is using his campaign coffers to tour the state for public events with few direct mailers.

George P. Bush as the Attorney General of Texas would be extremely detrimental to our state. Bush is an unpracticed lawyer lacking the needed experience and conservative acumen to aggressively defend Texas against an over-zealous Federal Government seeking to deteriorate Texas' and other states' freedoms.

---

larry culpepper said:

---

Quote:

---

We believe Mr. Paxton's legal problems are politically motivated and he will prevail once he has his day in court. We recall similar Democratic dishonest politically motivated efforts that successfully drove Tom DeLay from office in 2006, only to turn out with Mr. DeLay's complete vindication.

In our view, voting against Ken Paxton because of these political legal tactics achieves the objective of the Democrats.

---

Oh FFS. What a simple, easy way to dismiss all of Paxton's baggage, to claim that he's a victim of a political hit job. Anything to rationalize someone who you know to be a crooked, corrupt asshat.

---

Well, the ACTUAL charges were filed in 2015. Yes. TWO THOUSAND AND FIFTEEN!!

You realize that was SEVEN years ago?

You realize there has been no trial?

Normal humans would certainly question the motive of the ACTUAL charges.

Science Denier said:

---

Paxon has an ACTUAL record of winning ACTUAL cases in support of ACTUAL conservative policies.

Bush isn't even a ****ing lawyer. Forget he's a Bush. How the hell could a NON-LAWYER win ACTUAL cases against anyone?

---

I'm not a lawyer, but I wouldn't have allowed the foisting of illegal mandates and other atrocities on the people of Texas.

Too much respect is given to lawyers and other "experts" and we've seen how THAT played out since early '20.

Bush, Paxton....it's **** sandwich versus turd burger.

Did P Bush just say he wouldn't fight against CRT

P Bush is dead in the water as long as people show up for the runoff in similar % as they did for the primary.

AggieKatie2 said:

---

Did P Bush just say he wouldn't fight against CRT

---

He did.

Thanks for reminding me to vote. Vote Bush………... not goin' do it!

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Quote:

---

Bush isn't even a ****ing lawyer. Forget he's a Bush. How the hell could a NON-LAWYER win ACTUAL cases against anyone?

---

He's worthless, but he has a JD.

---

So, should I say he never PRACTICED law? And, working for a couple of years as junior assistant doesn't ****ing count.

I guess that would be more factually correct.

Science Denier said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Quote:

---

Bush isn't even a ****ing lawyer. Forget he's a Bush. How the hell could a NON-LAWYER win ACTUAL cases against anyone?

---

He's worthless, but he has a JD.

---

So, should I say he never PRACTICED law? And, working for a couple of years as junior assistant doesn't ****ing count.

I guess that would be more factually correct.

---

I am not defending the guy. I'll certainly never vote for him. Just pointing out the fact. I agree with you.

Just voted for Paxton

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Science Denier said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Quote:

---

Bush isn't even a ****ing lawyer. Forget he's a Bush. How the hell could a NON-LAWYER win ACTUAL cases against anyone?

---

He's worthless, but he has a JD.

---

So, should I say he never PRACTICED law? And, working for a couple of years as junior assistant doesn't ****ing count.

I guess that would be more factually correct.

---

I am not defending the guy. I'll certainly never vote for him. Just pointing out the fact. I agree with you.

---

Sure. No problem. To me, he's not a lawyer and certainly one that won't be successful in defending the State of Texas in court, which is his primary role. A role that Paxson has done tremendously.

oh no said:

---

Quote:

---

Paxton has done an exemplary job as our AG as he continues to fight the Biden Administration using his legal expertise to stop illegal mandates (especially related to Covid vaccines); to address the illegal invasion at the Mexico border; to protect election integrity; and to defend the rights of Texans in a variety of lawsuits.

For Conservatives, Ken Paxton's job performance as Attorney General has been outstanding. Over the last 8 years, Mr. Paxton has aggressively challenged every overreach by the Obama and Biden administrations as well as consistently defended our fundamental constitutional rights, including those of the unborn. He has demonstrated courage, as shown by his filing of Texas v Pennsylvania in 2020, challenging the administration of the 2020 presidential election in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan and Wisconsin. And his winning record has been exceptional (See Biden Lawsuit Tracker Below):




The only reason Mr. Paxton has drawn challenges in this Primary is because of the potential personal legal problems he faces. The question facing 2022 Primary voters is whether those problems will likely negatively affect Mr. Paxton's ability to continue to provide the exemplary services he has been providing.

We believe Mr. Paxton's legal problems are politically motivated and he will prevail once he has his day in court. We recall similar Democratic dishonest politically motivated efforts that successfully drove Tom DeLay from office in 2006, only to turn out with Mr. DeLay's complete vindication.
In our view, voting against Ken Paxton because of these political legal tactics achieves the objective of the Democrats.

Don't fall for these fake charges. Reward Mr. Paxton's stellar performance by returning him to office.

---

---

Isnt he under indictment in Collin County which went red in 2020?

Always an interesting take to tell someone how to vote. Totalitarian much?

Lol at those who voted for Biden hating on Paxton because they think he's corrupt. What hypocrites you are.

nhamp07 said:

---

Isnt he under indictment in Collin County which went red in 2020?

---

And James Comey, Robert Mueller, and Liz Cheney are "republicans." And then?

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

nhamp07 said:

---

Isnt he under indictment in Collin County which went red in 2020?

---

And James Comey, Robert Mueller, and Liz Cheney are "republicans." And then?

---

What does that have to do with anything related to his indictment in Collin County?

Science Denier said:

---

larry culpepper said:

---

Quote:

---

We believe Mr. Paxton's legal problems are politically motivated and he will prevail once he has his day in court. We recall similar Democratic dishonest politically motivated efforts that successfully drove Tom DeLay from office in 2006, only to turn out with Mr. DeLay's complete vindication.

In our view, voting against Ken Paxton because of these political legal tactics achieves the objective of the Democrats.

---

Oh FFS. What a simple, easy way to dismiss all of Paxton's baggage, to claim that he's a victim of a political hit job. Anything to rationalize someone who you know to be a crooked, corrupt asshat.

---

Well, the ACTUAL charges were filed in 2015. Yes. TWO THOUSAND AND FIFTEEN!!

You realize that was SEVEN years ago?

You realize there has been no trial?

Normal humans would certainly question the motive of the ACTUAL charges.

---

hang on, you are insinuating that these are bogus charges because they were filed in 2015?

he was indicted in July 2015. He has successfully delayed the trial over all these years. AFAIK there is still no trial date.

I think you're a little confused. If anything his consistent delaying of the trial is a bad look for him, not prosecutors.

Quote:

---

Like most Paxton supporters, you can't defend him. You just like him because he pisses off liberals. Such simple minded thinking.

---

Every politician that pisses off liberals has done 10x better than any (D) alternative.

El_Zorro said:

---

Yes. He uses his office to punish Texans he doesn't like. I don't like them either.

---

That's not what the AG's office is supposed to do. I suggest you move to a country that operates more in line with your views, like Russia or North Korea.

nhamp07 said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

nhamp07 said:

---

Isnt he under indictment in Collin County which went red in 2020?

---

And James Comey, Robert Mueller, and Liz Cheney are "republicans." And then?

---

What does that have to do with anything related to his indictment in Collin County?

---

"Republican" can mean a lot of things.

larry culpepper said:

---

El_Zorro said:

---

Yes. He uses his office to punish Texans he doesn't like. I don't like them either.

---

That's not what the AG's office is supposed to do. I suggest you move to a country that operates more in line with your views, like Russia or North Korea.

---

What is the current US AG doing? What did Eric Holder do? How do you rationalize that?

nhamp07 said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

nhamp07 said:

---

Isnt he under indictment in Collin County which went red in 2020?

---

And James Comey, Robert Mueller, and Liz Cheney are "republicans." And then?

---

What does that have to do with anything related to his indictment in Collin County?

---

Mueller indicted Concord Management based on BS charges. So basically

One of Paxton's former colleagues waited four years in 2015 to file a complaint about some stock he received as a gift in 2011, before he was the AG. Here we are, 7 years since the complaint, and over a decade after those stock shares were given to him. No reason to use those charges as an excuse to vote P Bush now since Paxton has been doing a good job regardless of the charges that have been hanging around forever. Whether it's political witch hunt gamesmanship that will eventually go away or if anything ever actually comes of it, let him keep doing what he's been doing for Texans for now. Better option than P Bush who will do nothing and might struggle to beat commies Garza or Jaworski in November.

01agtx said:

---

Lol at those who voted for Biden hating on Paxton because they think he's corrupt. What hypocrites you are.

---

It's amusing to watch the rationalization of them criticizing people who are voting Paxton because he fights the Democrats...when they were the ones who voted for the corrupt Biden and overlooked his numerous baggage because he was fighting Trump and the Republicans.

Oh, but now we need to have a super serious conversation about ethics and electing people without political agendas. This time they really mean it!

The bush family belongs in a very dark place.