Absolutely wrong, re: libs threatening SCOTUS

8,190 Views | 78 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by BQ78
Marcus Brutus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hungry Ojos
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lol, you're going back.

And there's nothing you can do about it.
TAMU1990
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The left has no boundaries. This is the party of the progressive democrat. If the shooting of a baseball field full of republicans and the summer of 2020 didn't prove it, nothing will. They MUST be defeated.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not even the most conservative Justice. Democrats continue to be the most worthless of humans.
fixer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kavanaugh needs to sit outside on his porch, with Ar 15, 12 pack, and a replay of his confirmation speech on repeat.

Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Didn't someone post a federal statute that makes this behavior a felony?
wbt5845
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Philip J Fry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Calmly walking into the capitol is way more threatening than this.
houag80
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It is in DC....but the DOJ will not prosecute. Utterly worthless.
aggieforester05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Can't have them cited for a noise complaint or loitering in a neighborhood? I get peaceful protesting and all that it entails, but disturbing a neighborhood all night would result in criminal penalties in most localities.

If I throw a party with a band later at night I get a ticket, but protesters outside my house causing a much bigger disturbance don't meet any legal resistance?
SwigAg11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I thought DC and Virginia had very specific laws against protesting outside homes like this?
AggieIce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gear up, get your mind right
oldyeller
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Philip J Fry said:

Calmly walking into the capitol is way more threatening than this.
If we're being fair, not everyone calmly walked in to the Capitol. That being said, this stuff is reprehensible. It's one thing to protest outside someone's place of business, quite another to do so at their private home. The distinction between public and private is central to the reasoning in Roe, and it's kind of sad that seeming supporters of Roe don't get that. We need a return to proper civics education in this country, and a return to civil discourse rather than simply shouting at and trolling each other.
doubledog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I am sure the democrats will push for a May 6 insurrection investigation against the pro-choice rioters...
jefe95
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Laws are only as strong as those who enforce them.

This garbage administration will not enforce nor prosecute any laws designed to prevent this. They are encouraging it. Their statements on the day of the leak said this was OK.
ALL IN 2013
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oldyeller said:

Philip J Fry said:

Calmly walking into the capitol is way more threatening than this.
If we're being fair, not everyone calmly walked in to the Capitol. That being said, this stuff is reprehensible. It's one thing to protest outside someone's place of business, quite another to do so at their private home. The distinction between public and private is central to the reasoning in Roe, and it's kind of sad that seeming supporters of Roe don't get that. We need a return to proper civics education in this country, and a return to civil discourse rather than simply shouting at and trolling each other.

If you want a return to civil discourse there has to be a few requirements met:
- rid the government of anybody who peddled the fake Russia story. Imprison the people who created the fake story and attempted the coup (hillary, comey, strzok, etc.)
- rid the government of anybody who voted to impeach trump for a phone call where they accused him of doing what Joe Biden actually did and bragged about. Which Biden did it to hide his own corruption while Trump did it to expose government corruption.
- have a true investigation into the 2020 election and arrest anybody who committed voter fraud and punish them to the fullest extent of the law.
- implement common sense voter laws such as voter ID
- stop treating protecting our nations borders as a partisan issue
- perform a real investigation into the origins and funding of the creation of Covid. Fauci needs to be held accountable.
- anybody who pushed a vaccine mandate needs to be removed from office for abuse of authority.

If you want a return to civil discourse then the first thing that must happen is the people that have put us in this position need to be held legally accountable. When the rule of law is ignored you create a situation where "civil discourse" goes out the window because people's voices and votes aren't heard.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SwigAg11 said:

I thought DC and Virginia had very specific laws against protesting outside homes like this?
Only if protesting against Democrats. Republicans are fair game. Will probably be able to legally murder conservatives if the Democrats get their way.
Ghost91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dems adopted the 'ends justify the means' ideology under obama. They are good, we are evil/literally Hitler, so anything and everything - EVERYTHING - that they 'have' to do is on the table and justified.

Scary point to be at.
Cinco Ranch Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

If you want a return to civil discourse there has to be a few requirements met:
- rid the government of anybody who peddled the fake Russia story. Imprison the people who created the fake story and attempted the coup (hillary, comey, strzok, etc.)
- rid the government of anybody who voted to impeach trump for a phone call where they accused him of doing what Joe Biden actually did and bragged about. Which Biden did it to hide his own corruption while Trump did it to expose government corruption.
- have a true investigation into the 2020 election and arrest anybody who committed voter fraud and punish them to the fullest extent of the law.
- implement common sense voter laws such as voter ID
- stop treating protecting our nations borders as a partisan issue
- perform a real investigation into the origins and funding of the creation of Covid. Fauci needs to be held accountable.
- anybody who pushed a vaccine mandate needs to be removed from office for abuse of authority.

If you want a return to civil discourse then the first thing that must happen is the people that have put us in this position need to be held legally accountable. When the rule of law is ignored you create a situation where "civil discourse" goes out the window because people's voices and votes aren't heard.
F'in A.

The only thing I can add is to bring in the media to suffer severe consequences (no idea what those are or how to implement them) for their role in all of this.
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The scariest part is that no Democrats will publicly denounce the behavior.

Silence is support and anyone voting for Democrats is now complicit.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Justice Samuel Alito has reportedly been moved to an undisclosed location for safety, after leftwing radicals attempting to intimidate conservative justices for considering overruling Roe v. Wade, all in the name of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, listed conservative justices' home addresses online.
Link
DCAggie13y
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SwigAg11 said:

I thought DC and Virginia had very specific laws against protesting outside homes like this?


Those laws only apply to Republicans.
aggie93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YouBet said:

Not even the most conservative Justice. Democrats continue to be the most worthless of humans.
That's the point. Kav and Roberts are the 2 most likely to be swing votes so they are doing everything they can to intimidate them and scare them into fearing for their personal safety and the safety of their families if they don't comply.

You know, Democracy!
"The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help."

Ronald Reagan
_mpaul
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I usually listen to NPR on the way in to church each Sunday. (Don't ask why.) This morning, they were teasing an upcoming story, something along the lines of, "Why is the religious right so attached the abortion issue?" as if they just couldn't understand. I chuckled: Yeah, the "right," who wants to let the people decide the issue rather than nine unelected lawyers, per the Constitution and particularly the 10th Amendment, they're the ones that are "so attached" to the abortion issue.
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

Quote:

Justice Samuel Alito has reportedly been moved to an undisclosed location for safety, after leftwing radicals attempting to intimidate conservative justices for considering overruling Roe v. Wade, all in the name of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, listed conservative justices' home addresses online.
Link
Hey, at least it's no January 6th.
_mpaul
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggie93 said:

YouBet said:

Not even the most conservative Justice. Democrats continue to be the most worthless of humans.
That's the point. Kav and Roberts are the 2 most likely to be swing votes so they are doing everything they can to intimidate them and scare them into fearing for their personal safety and the safety of their families if they don't comply.

You know, Democracy!
First, I don't think that's much a threat. They have the U.S. Marshal Service at their disposal. Second, I don't think either is swayable. Third, even if they were on the fence, I would expect them to sway towards Alito, thereby giving the left a giant middle finger. Not worried about it at all.
Aggie Joe 93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They are literally protesting for their right to murder their own children because they would be briefly inconvenienced otherwise.

So, nothing they do should really surprise anyone.
TyHolden
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Didn't Beetlejuice have her street blocked off? Why can't a judge do this?
Ferg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Against Federal Law to protest outside a Justice's residence.

mesocosm
How long do you want to ignore this user?
[Start another thread if you want to discuss that subject but do not derail this thread. -Staff]
aggie93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
_mpaul said:

aggie93 said:

YouBet said:

Not even the most conservative Justice. Democrats continue to be the most worthless of humans.
That's the point. Kav and Roberts are the 2 most likely to be swing votes so they are doing everything they can to intimidate them and scare them into fearing for their personal safety and the safety of their families if they don't comply.

You know, Democracy!
First, I don't think that's much a threat. They have the U.S. Marshal Service at their disposal. Second, I don't think either is swayable. Third, even if they were on the fence, I would expect them to sway towards Alito, thereby giving the left a giant middle finger. Not worried about it at all.
If anyone is swayable it is them, Roberts seemed to have been swayed and intimidated on Obamacare with less. I don't expect them to actually change their votes but that's really not the point. It's just wrong on so many levels for this to be allowed to occur, this is quite literally how you end up with the entire system of government breaking down. It cannot be allowed to happen.
"The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help."

Ronald Reagan
gonemaroon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yet somehow Bret finds himself siding with these lunatics -

This is all wrong, IDK how we fix this **** but this is pure nonsense - intimidating ANYONE is dead wrong.
XXXVII
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ferg said:

Against Federal Law to protest outside a Justice's residence.




They need to arrest everyone outside a supreme court justice's house and give them the maximum fine and jail time.

Every. Single. Person.
DeSantis 2024

FJB, FJB, FJB, etc
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That's reserved for a country that follows and enforces its laws equally and without bias.
Cromagnum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
XXXVII said:

Ferg said:

Against Federal Law to protest outside a Justice's residence.




They need to arrest everyone outside a supreme court justice's house and give them the maximum fine and jail time.

Every. Single. Person.


Don't worry, if they are found to have voted Republican they will. I know there aren't too many conservatives who are pro-choice but they do exist. All the rest will simply be ignored.
Last Page
Page 1 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.