Roe out, question is who leaked???

103,235 Views | 1094 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by Agthatbuilds
wbt5845
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:23a, 5/4/22
AG
Yeah, I have no idea what controls SCOTUS has.

As for us, every hard copy is numbered and tracked - has to be turned in at end of day OR inventoried and stored in a container. Two people have to verify container contents before locking so no way to lie about that.without collusion.

Hopefully the idiot found a computer with an active USB port and put it on a stick. That'll be the easiest way to track down the perp.
Reply Quote
1
Keegan99
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:26a, 5/4/22
AG
It was, I think, hand stamped and dated, so likely an official printout, not an electronic transfer.

The most likely scenario in my mind is simply snagging it from the messy desk of a justice.
Reply Quote
SpreadsheetAg
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to RebelE Infantry • 8:37a, 5/4/22
AG
RebelE Infantry said:
Agthatbuilds said:


Desk pop!
Reply Quote
15
SpreadsheetAg
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Who?mikejones! • 8:40a, 5/4/22
AG
Agthatbuilds said:
Have we talked about the mechanics of the actual leak?

Is heard this from Mike Lee, who was a clerk-

There's a cpu system not connected to the internet on which justices and clerks work. It's completely contained within the Supreme Court offices and intended so that it can't be hacked nor can you email a copy of something to yourself.

There's a burn bag- if you need something printed out, which is apparently somewhat uncommon, then it is destroyed at the end of everyday. It is twice shredded, burned, and its ashes mixed with water so it can never be read or reconstituted.

It doesn't appear one can just come and go with whatever material they so desire.

Anyone have any insight on this?
Sandy Berger taped documents to his leg...

Cell phones have cameras (literal "screen shot")...
Reply Quote
5
Who?mikejones!
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SpreadsheetAg • 8:43a, 5/4/22
I dont believe they are allowed to have their cell phones.

If they were, they aren't now!
Reply Quote
. . .
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:22a, 5/4/22
Reply Quote
Who?mikejones!
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to . . . • 10:26a, 5/4/22
. . . said:


Wow...more than the KKK? Weather underground?
Reply Quote
17
Ag87H2O
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Who?mikejones! • 10:29a, 5/4/22
AG
Agthatbuilds said:


No no, they most definitely have the right and, indeed, the duty to change unconstitutional law. It's literally their job.
And to think this load of intellect passes for a U.S. Representative.

The only thing she represents very well is the ignorance of the members of her Party.
Reply Quote
16
Daddy-O5
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:30a, 5/4/22
AG
I posted this in another thread, but worth repeating at this point.

R's: "We'd really rather you murder fewer babies, but if you're going to murder babies let's not decide it in the courts"

D's: "These racist MAGA people won't let the gays go to school!
Reply Quote
25
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:33a, 5/4/22
AG
In today's edition of whataboutism: Suddenly Dems are shouting about slippery slopes?
Reply Quote
14
Decay
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Who?mikejones! • 10:50a, 5/4/22
AG
Agthatbuilds said:
. . . said:


Wow...more than the KKK? Weather underground?
you can literally bomb the same building that people walked around in and not be considered as great a threat to "democracy"
Reply Quote
6
Sea Speed
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to WHOOP!'91 • 10:57a, 5/4/22
AG
WHOOP!'91 said:
Keegan99 said:
This is a nonsense reply. The poster provided a pretty detailed explanation of controls that, if in place, would largely prevent "not following the rules they don't like".

How would you suggest the leak circumvented those controls?
I don't think anything would stop somebody from stuffing a printout down their shorts instead of putting it in the burn bag.


I work in top secret spaces. Depending on classification? Every is page printed out is logged and accounted for.
Reply Quote
1
FrioAg 00
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Who?mikejones! • 10:58a, 5/4/22
AG
I can verify this one, but really don't think this is correct. Have a friend who clerked for SCOTUS last year.

He spent a ton of time reading at home, but reading submissions may be very different from what gets written by scotus
Reply Quote
Sea Speed
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to . . . • 11:01a, 5/4/22
AG
. . . said:


This is sickening and absolutely scary. Wow.
Reply Quote
7
WHOOP!'91
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Sea Speed • 11:05a, 5/4/22
AG
Sea Speed said:
WHOOP!'91 said:
Keegan99 said:
This is a nonsense reply. The poster provided a pretty detailed explanation of controls that, if in place, would largely prevent "not following the rules they don't like".

How would you suggest the leak circumvented those controls?
I don't think anything would stop somebody from stuffing a printout down their shorts instead of putting it in the burn bag.


I work in top secret spaces. Depending on classification? Every is page printed out is logged and accounted for.
Well, this got out somehow. Maybe along with Christopher Walken's watch?
Reply Quote
5
Who?mikejones!
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to FrioAg 00 • 11:18a, 5/4/22
FrioAg 00 said:
I can verify this one, but really don't think this is correct. Have a friend who clerked for SCOTUS last year.

He spent a ton of time reading at home, but reading submissions may be very different from what gets written by scotus


Thanks. Do you know if that was covid related?
Reply Quote
Sea Speed
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to WHOOP!'91 • 11:25a, 5/4/22
AG
WHOOP!'91 said:
Sea Speed said:
WHOOP!'91 said:
Keegan99 said:
This is a nonsense reply. The poster provided a pretty detailed explanation of controls that, if in place, would largely prevent "not following the rules they don't like".

How would you suggest the leak circumvented those controls?
I don't think anything would stop somebody from stuffing a printout down their shorts instead of putting it in the burn bag.


I work in top secret spaces. Depending on classification? Every is page printed out is logged and accounted for.
Well, this got out somehow. Maybe along with Christopher Walken's watch?


Obviously. I'm just discussing controls that are in place in other need to know type gov installments.

I think lax protocols die to covid is probably a key part of this story.
Reply Quote
nortex97
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:45a, 5/4/22
AG
I'm starting to think it is Elizabeth Deutsch.

Quote:
We have a currently-serving Supreme Court law clerk whose career has been almost solely focused on abortion.

She wrote her law school note on abortion.
She wrote op-eds about reproductive rights.
She spent a year working on abortion for the ACLU.
She clerked for a stridently pro-choice appellate judge.

And it just so happens that her husband is a journalist, who shared bylines with Josh Gerstein at Politico, and it looks like they are still buds.


Reply Quote
3
Ag13
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:58a, 5/4/22
AG
I will find it incredible if the leaker ends up being someone that could be so easily connected to the reporter that broke the story. I know criminals can be dumb, but everyone clerking is from Harvard, Yale, etc. You would think there would be some slight effort to throw off the scent.

I am quite certain the leaker's identity will be revealed. This is too big of a story to sweep under the rug.
Reply Quote
12
aginlakeway
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ag13 • 12:00p, 5/4/22
AG
Ag13 said:
I will find it incredible if the leaker ends up being someone that could be so easily connected to the reporter that broke the story. I know criminals can be dumb, but everyone clerking is from Harvard, Yale, etc. You would think there would be some slight effort to throw off the scent.

I am quite certain the leaker's identity will be revealed. This is too big of a story to sweep under the rug.


Unless they think they'll be championed for leaking. Albeit likely disbarred.
"I'm sure that won't make a bit of difference for those of you who enjoy a baseless rage over the decisions of a few teenagers."
Reply Quote
7
Boo Weekley
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aginlakeway • 12:08p, 5/4/22
aginlakeway said:
Ag13 said:
I will find it incredible if the leaker ends up being someone that could be so easily connected to the reporter that broke the story. I know criminals can be dumb, but everyone clerking is from Harvard, Yale, etc. You would think there would be some slight effort to throw off the scent.

I am quite certain the leaker's identity will be revealed. This is too big of a story to sweep under the rug.


Unless they think they'll be championed for leaking. Albeit likely disbarred.
This, they'll be canonized forever by the evil left and might even be able to make much more money taking this path in life than working the court system.
Reply Quote
6
aginlakeway
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Boo Weekley • 12:14p, 5/4/22
AG
Boo Weekley said:
aginlakeway said:
Ag13 said:
I will find it incredible if the leaker ends up being someone that could be so easily connected to the reporter that broke the story. I know criminals can be dumb, but everyone clerking is from Harvard, Yale, etc. You would think there would be some slight effort to throw off the scent.

I am quite certain the leaker's identity will be revealed. This is too big of a story to sweep under the rug.


Unless they think they'll be championed for leaking. Albeit likely disbarred.
This, they'll be canonized forever by the evil left and might even be able to make much more money taking this path in life than working the court system.

Yep. Networks will pay a fortune for their services. As well other pro-Abortion organizations.
"I'm sure that won't make a bit of difference for those of you who enjoy a baseless rage over the decisions of a few teenagers."
Reply Quote
1
Boo Weekley
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aginlakeway • 12:15p, 5/4/22
aginlakeway said:
Boo Weekley said:
aginlakeway said:
Ag13 said:
I will find it incredible if the leaker ends up being someone that could be so easily connected to the reporter that broke the story. I know criminals can be dumb, but everyone clerking is from Harvard, Yale, etc. You would think there would be some slight effort to throw off the scent.

I am quite certain the leaker's identity will be revealed. This is too big of a story to sweep under the rug.


Unless they think they'll be championed for leaking. Albeit likely disbarred.
This, they'll be canonized forever by the evil left and might even be able to make much more money taking this path in life than working the court system.

Yep. Networks will pay a fortune for their services. As well other pro-Abortion organizations.
EXACTLY. Might even be able to make a few $mil with a book deal...or become a regular media contributor.
Reply Quote
2
Señor Chang
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to . . . • 12:21p, 5/4/22
AG
. . . said:
Is Biden saying the Supreme Court is part of the MAGA crowd? His ventriloquists need some better material.

Reply Quote
13
American Hardwood
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ag13 • 12:27p, 5/4/22
AG
Ag13 said:
I will find it incredible if the leaker ends up being someone that could be so easily connected to the reporter that broke the story. I know criminals can be dumb, but everyone clerking is from Harvard, Yale, etc. You would think there would be some slight effort to throw off the scent.

I am quite certain the leaker's identity will be revealed. This is too big of a story to sweep under the rug.
Recent history shows that some people are treated (D)ifferently and face no consequences for their crimes. The perp in this case probably feels quite safe.
Reply Quote
5
FrioAg 00
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Who?mikejones! • 12:31p, 5/4/22
AG
Agthatbuilds said:
FrioAg 00 said:
I can verify this one, but really don't think this is correct. Have a friend who clerked for SCOTUS last year.

He spent a ton of time reading at home, but reading submissions may be very different from what gets written by scotus


Thanks. Do you know if that was covid related?


Ok, spoke with him. Verified that electronic documents would be very difficult but it's never been difficult at all to bring paper copies home.
Reply Quote
FireAg
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to . . . • 12:33p, 5/4/22
AG
. . . said:

Someone help me…

How does a Roe v Wade decision keep LBGQT kids from attending school? I'm not connecting those dots…
Reply Quote
21
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to FireAg • 12:37p, 5/4/22
AG
Quote:
How does a Roe v Wade decision keep LBGQT kids from attending school? I'm not connecting those dots…
something something...slippery slope...something something.
Reply Quote
3
FrioAg 00
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to FireAg • 12:37p, 5/4/22
AG
It's called a red haring.

Yesterday they said this would lead to bans on interracial marriage.

Logic has nothing to do with this.
Reply Quote
16
FireAg
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to FrioAg 00 • 12:41p, 5/4/22
AG
FrioAg 00 said:
It's called a red haring.

Yesterday they said this would lead to bans on interracial marriage.

Logic has nothing to do with this.

School attendance and interracial marriages would still be protected civil rights, am I wrong?

Roe has no impact on civil rights that I am aware of…
Reply Quote
6
BenFiasco14
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Señor Chang • 12:41p, 5/4/22
AG
Señor Chang said:
. . . said:
Is Biden saying the Supreme Court is part of the MAGA crowd? His ventriloquists need some better material.



Wtf does this have to do with lgbt ??
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
Reply Quote
1
FireAg
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BenFiasco14 • 12:44p, 5/4/22
AG
BenFiasco14 said:
Señor Chang said:
. . . said:
Is Biden saying the Supreme Court is part of the MAGA crowd? His ventriloquists need some better material.



Wtf does this have to do with lgbt ??

That's what I'm saying…did Joe get his court fights mixed up?
Reply Quote
1
FrioAg 00
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:46p, 5/4/22
AG
You seem to be under the assumption that Joe or his puppeteers care about their statements being based in fact or truth

And Joe just reads (poorly) whatever they put in front of him
Reply Quote
5
1 edit
Actual Talking Thermos
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiehawg • 12:50p, 5/4/22
aggiehawg said:
In today's edition of whataboutism: Suddenly Dems are shouting about slippery slopes?
Its less of a slippery slope and more of a water slide that Alito is attempting to construct with big flashing signs pointing to it. In terms of overturning Lawrence and Obergefell and generally allowing for legal persecution of/discrimination against LGBT folks.
Reply Quote
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BenFiasco14 • 12:50p, 5/4/22
AG
BenFiasco14 said:
Señor Chang said:
. . . said:
Is Biden saying the Supreme Court is part of the MAGA crowd? His ventriloquists need some better material.



Wtf does this have to do with lgbt ??


He's starting to sound like a couple of our favorite former f16 posters.
Reply Quote
2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.