JasonD2005 said:
Grandpoopy bloviating on and on about condoms, bedrooms and "privacy."
Hearing him use the word "rational" is ironic.
Roe out, question is who leaked???
103,275 Views |
1094 Replies |
Last: 2 yr ago by Agthatbuilds
Hearing him use the word "rational" is ironic.
I don't trust the FBI to do anything honestly, or with neutrality, or in strict adherence to law.will25u said:
Get ready!!! THE FBI IS (IN) ON IT!BREAKING—
— Tricia Flanagan (R-NJ) (@NewDayForNJ) May 3, 2022
FBI now involved in Supreme Court document leak.
"Democracy: 2 wolves and 1 sheep deciding one what to have for supper. Liberty: 2 wolves set on supper, and finding 1 well armed sheep."
Too funny.
dunlay said:I don't trust the FBI to do anything honestly, or with neutrality, or in strict adherence to law.will25u said:
Get ready!!! THE FBI IS (IN) ON IT!BREAKING—
— Tricia Flanagan (R-NJ) (@NewDayForNJ) May 3, 2022
FBI now involved in Supreme Court document leak.
I hope Joe Rogan spends some time on this. It would be extremely popular for him to do what he did for the GW issue a few weeks ago. Have a pro abortion person on and talk it out for three hours, then have an anti abortion person on and talk it out for three hours. I hope he is willing to face the backlash for that though.
Roberts and the FBI will ensure this gets screwed up beyond comprehension.
That's how you know it was a Dem political operative that leaked it and that Biden thinks the Dems will benefit from it in some way.goatchze said:I'm not sure if that is the whole document, but I can't believe it did not lead with how horrible the leak was and that such illegal actions threaten to undermine the court and its workings.Agthatbuilds said:Biden statement on Supreme Court draft on Roe v. Wade pic.twitter.com/Xdnkfvbg9G
— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) May 3, 2022
OK, I can believe it.
JasonD2005 said:
Grandpoopy bloviating on and on about condoms, bedrooms and "privacy."
Diarys, showers, ands granddaughters....irony
I remember friends who got pregnant and it wound up not being the end of the world that the culture at the time and today's culture would tell you it is.Sully Dog said:I remember not getting anyone pregnant.GeorgiAg said:CanyonAg77 said:
Condoms are cheaper than abortion. Saying "no" is free.
Even the poorest and dumbest out there realize unprotected sex leads to babies. If abortion is taken away, they will switch birth control methods.
I have no idea why you persist with the assertion that people cannot change behavior
You were a teenager? Do you remember what it was like? Dumb and full of hormones.
It wasn't easy for them. Making a living and providing for the child was harder for them. But their was a lot of joy and by the time I had kids their kids were fully grown.
But all children should be cherished. Not murdered because they inconvenience someone. That is the worship Moloch and it is the same today as it was 3000 years ago when they would sacrifice children at the altar of Moloch.
https://carm.org/miscellaneous-topics/moloch-the-ancient-pagan-god-of-child-sacrifice/
This is Old Testament sin folks. When I first read the Bibles telling's of what Moloch worshipers would do I realized that in 3000+ years we have really not progressed as a society. How sad is that?
Maybe if we can stop sacrificing our babies it might be a start?
The world needs mean tweets
My Pronouns Ultra and MAGA
Trump 2024
My Pronouns Ultra and MAGA
Trump 2024
It's been speculated for months that RvW was going down. The left has been preparing for a plan and this is part of that plan.
My sister got knocked up her freshman year and decided to keep the baby. It was really hard for a couple years. The whole family helped pitch in while she worked and finished school.
She now has a great family, a husband, four kids (one step), is financially successful, and her baby girl just got a full ride to college to become a nurse.
It was hard, but life is hard. It was by no means the end of the world and my life would have been less fullfilled by not having that little girl in it.
She now has a great family, a husband, four kids (one step), is financially successful, and her baby girl just got a full ride to college to become a nurse.
It was hard, but life is hard. It was by no means the end of the world and my life would have been less fullfilled by not having that little girl in it.
Deplorable Neanderthal Clinger
https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/03/politics/susan-collins-reaction-kavanaugh-gorsuch/index.html
This is absurd. No judge should have a red line they cannot cross because of precedent.
Precedent is wholly overrated and has been proved as much by hundreds of cases that have overturned existing law.
Going forward, I hope nominees no longer answer senators questions with some predetermined "it's the law, and that's what I consider it to be" sort of answer and instead answer it "it depends on the merits of the case and precedent may or may not be pertinent"
This is absurd. No judge should have a red line they cannot cross because of precedent.
Precedent is wholly overrated and has been proved as much by hundreds of cases that have overturned existing law.
Going forward, I hope nominees no longer answer senators questions with some predetermined "it's the law, and that's what I consider it to be" sort of answer and instead answer it "it depends on the merits of the case and precedent may or may not be pertinent"
The scotus has overturned 240 cases they previous ruled. Precedent is for lower courts to consider, not the scotus.
When are they supposed to officially release the decision?
So many other threads popping up. This is how I imagine staff this morning:
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
flakrat said:
When are they supposed to officially release the decision?
Usually in the summer months
SIAP
JUST IN: The Supreme Court confirms the authenticity of the draft opinion revealed last night by Politico. The chief justice has ordered an investigation into the leak. pic.twitter.com/XZweHdyhCG
— SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) May 3, 2022
Wow, was thinking today or this week. That's a long time to REEEEEEEE before the official word comes out.The Debt said:flakrat said:
When are they supposed to officially release the decision?
Usually in the summer months
Honest questions: Would she have kept the baby if she didnt have the support system of a "whole family" and the opportunity to work and finish school? If your parents would have pushed her away, and did not support her, would she have chosen differently?Sully Dog said:
My sister got knocked up her freshman year and decided to keep the baby. It was really hard for a couple years. The whole family helped pitch in while she worked and finished school.
She now has a great family, a husband, four kids (one step), is financially successful, and her baby girl just got a full ride to college to become a nurse.
It was hard, but life is hard. It was by no means the end of the world and my life would have been less fullfilled by not having that little girl in it.
The most complex cases, which are usually also the most controversial, end up being released on the last day of the term, which is usually in June, but on occasion can run into July.flakrat said:Wow, was thinking today or this week. That's a long time to REEEEEEEE before the official word comes out.The Debt said:flakrat said:
When are they supposed to officially release the decision?
Usually in the summer months
The Court says they don't hold these cases on purpose until the end, just that ones like this take so long to write, revise, and get enough justices to agree on the final majority opinion. They also have to give any dissenting judges time to write their opinions.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Emotional Support Cobra
Joined:
Feb 5, 2003
Posts:
37,951
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
flakrat said:Wow, was thinking today or this week. That's a long time to REEEEEEEE before the official word comes out.The Debt said:flakrat said:
When are they supposed to officially release the decision?
Usually in the summer months
It's even long enough to start on a birth control regimen in case you don't have one in place. Imagine taking proactive steps to prevent pregnancy because you can anticipate 1 of your 10 family planning options might become less convenient.
Amazingly, the threads have been fairly civil, so far. A few drive by troll comments and posts trying to bait people for a ban, and that's about it.BenFiasco14 said:
So many other threads popping up. This is how I imagine staff this morning:
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Also a long time to try and intimidate just one judge to change their opinion. Less likely this would have leaked if the current score wasn't 5-4.flakrat said:Wow, was thinking today or this week. That's a long time to REEEEEEEE before the official word comes out.The Debt said:flakrat said:
When are they supposed to officially release the decision?
Usually in the summer months
No justice on the Court is oblivious to the blowback of overturning Roe.
Very much doubt that intimidation would have any effect. If anything, it may only further cement positions.
Very much doubt that intimidation would have any effect. If anything, it may only further cement positions.
I assume that Roberts not writing this opinion means he was not in the majority. Alito, Trump appointees and Thomas are the 5.rwpag71 said:Also a long time to try and intimidate just one judge to change their opinion. Less likely this would have leaked if the current score wasn't 5-4.flakrat said:Wow, was thinking today or this week. That's a long time to REEEEEEEE before the official word comes out.The Debt said:flakrat said:
When are they supposed to officially release the decision?
Usually in the summer months
is there a bigger group of hypocrites than radical leftist feminists?!
"hands off my body to kill my baby"
"shut down the economy and FORCE everyone's bodies to take an unproven Covid vaccine!!"
"hands off my body to kill my baby"
"shut down the economy and FORCE everyone's bodies to take an unproven Covid vaccine!!"
I worry that this leaker has potentially put the lives of some of the justices in danger.
redcrayon said:
I worry that this leaker has potentially put the lives of some of the justices in danger.
Good. A little bloodshed would light this candle and we could get started on the 2nd civil war.
I got my money on the side that procreates and has "weapons of war" rather than the side that self-sterilizes and gets triggered by words.
I started a thread when the leak came out that Roberts was not authoring the opinion that it was likely a 5-4 decision and Roberts was not in the majority. That would mean Thomas as the senior justice in the majority assigning who would write for the majority. I thought Thomas would want it for himself so surprised it was Alito.WHOOP!'91 said:I assume that Roberts not writing this opinion means he was not in the majority. Alito, Trump appointees and Thomas are the 5.rwpag71 said:Also a long time to try and intimidate just one judge to change their opinion. Less likely this would have leaked if the current score wasn't 5-4.flakrat said:Wow, was thinking today or this week. That's a long time to REEEEEEEE before the official word comes out.The Debt said:flakrat said:
When are they supposed to officially release the decision?
Usually in the summer months
My pansexual queer 3-year-old child of color, Pebble Solomon Haworth, just read the Politico SCOTUS leak, looked up at me and asked, through tears, “non-birthing parent, why would Ron DeSantis do this?”
— Ian Haworth (@ighaworth) May 3, 2022
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
Dred Scott /thumbs-up emojAgthatbuilds said:
https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/03/politics/susan-collins-reaction-kavanaugh-gorsuch/index.html
This is absurd. No judge should have a red line they cannot cross because of precedent.
Precedent is wholly overrated and has been proved as much by hundreds of cases that have overturned existing law."
I agree. We should give ourselves a Blue StarRapier108 said:Amazingly, the threads have been fairly civil, so far. A few drive by troll comments and posts trying to bait people for a ban, and that's about it.BenFiasco14 said:
So many other threads popping up. This is how I imagine staff this morning:
The Debt said:
The scotus has overturned 240 cases they previous ruled. Precedent is for lower courts to consider, not the scotus.
Pardon me 241
Yes. The decision wasn't made because of the support structure. In fact, some family members thought she should have had an abortion.tysker said:Honest questions: Would she have kept the baby if she didnt have the support system of a "whole family" and the opportunity to work and finish school? If your parents would have pushed her away, and did not support her, would she have chosen differently?Sully Dog said:
My sister got knocked up her freshman year and decided to keep the baby. It was really hard for a couple years. The whole family helped pitch in while she worked and finished school.
She now has a great family, a husband, four kids (one step), is financially successful, and her baby girl just got a full ride to college to become a nurse.
It was hard, but life is hard. It was by no means the end of the world and my life would have been less fullfilled by not having that little girl in it.
On the idea of support structures are only within families is silly. There are childcare services at universities now-a-days. Many have discounted and free tuition for single parents. There are student loans, church programs, and pro-life movement has created thousands of support centers for mothers and children who choose not to abort. There is far more support outside of the family than there has ever been.
We don't live in 1979 anymore.
Edit: For spelling, grammar and the English language
Deplorable Neanderthal Clinger
FWIW, since the Dems control the levers of government, does anyone here believe the dems had one of the intelligence agencies spy on the judges, and/or the interns?
Obama did it when the CIA spied on all Congressmen, which I'm sure was Republican Congressmen, or Dems with ethics. Since the Hill and the White House are filled with Obama retreads, I'm sure the wagons were circled as far back as November of '21 and saved this for a rainy day.
How would this play out if a spy agency did this? I can't imagine the truth ever being found, because I'm pretty sure they'll find the intern/judge who released this information in February.
Obama did it when the CIA spied on all Congressmen, which I'm sure was Republican Congressmen, or Dems with ethics. Since the Hill and the White House are filled with Obama retreads, I'm sure the wagons were circled as far back as November of '21 and saved this for a rainy day.
How would this play out if a spy agency did this? I can't imagine the truth ever being found, because I'm pretty sure they'll find the intern/judge who released this information in February.
Featured Stories
See All
47:40
16h ago
8.0k
Myopic Aggies focused on task at hand with South Carolina up next
by Olin Buchanan
19:09
26m ago
742
9:13
21h ago
1.5k
Players to Watch: No. 10 Texas A&M at South Carolina
by Olin Buchanan
suburban cowboy
SIAP: Texas A&M Baseball lands commitment from top Catcher
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
49