Anonymous Source said:

---

Kvetch said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

Kvetch said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

blacksox said:

---

The front page story on CNN right now is two pictures of the shooter.

---

Yep, and they had his picture up once he was listed as a person of interest and it's been up since. But, for F16 purposes, it's easier to post a timeline feature article and then claim CNN is trying to hide the fact that the shooter is black. You get lots of stars that way.

---

So is your claim that coverage isn't different depending on the physical characteristics of the attacker? Are you still blaming the SUV in Waukesha?

---

Is his picture up or is it not? I believe it went up as soon as it was made publicly available and is still up now.

And here is the latest picture from the latest court date for the Waukesha killer. The story is from Reuters, a national news agency. Man, they're really going out of their way to hide his race, arent they?

---

Got it. You're a Huffington Post subscriber. Maybe Mother Jones.

Keep on huffing that glue and ignoring the reality of biased news coverage. I look forward to the days of coverage about the fact that this man is a black supremacist.

---

Wrong and wrong.
Kinda like you, but I can admit it.

You offered up NYC and Waukesha. I can pull up both stories currently and show you a picture of a black man. Tell me again about the "reality" of biased news coverage and how the perps race is being hidden by the big bad media.

---

Yeah. I lived through both, so I remember the coverage. Pulling the "most recent" article doesn't prove squat. Sorry your gaslighting doesn't work.

There is a trove of evidence to support that the media coverage of these types of events. You pulling some photo from the CNN website that nobody looks at is hardly proof.

HTH

Kvetch said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

Kvetch said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

Kvetch said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

blacksox said:

---

The front page story on CNN right now is two pictures of the shooter.

---

Yep, and they had his picture up once he was listed as a person of interest and it's been up since. But, for F16 purposes, it's easier to post a timeline feature article and then claim CNN is trying to hide the fact that the shooter is black. You get lots of stars that way.

---

So is your claim that coverage isn't different depending on the physical characteristics of the attacker? Are you still blaming the SUV in Waukesha?

---

Is his picture up or is it not? I believe it went up as soon as it was made publicly available and is still up now.

And here is the latest picture from the latest court date for the Waukesha killer. The story is from Reuters, a national news agency. Man, they're really going out of their way to hide his race, arent they?

---

Got it. You're a Huffington Post subscriber. Maybe Mother Jones.

Keep on huffing that glue and ignoring the reality of biased news coverage. I look forward to the days of coverage about the fact that this man is a black supremacist.

---

Wrong and wrong.
Kinda like you, but I can admit it.

You offered up NYC and Waukesha. I can pull up both stories currently and show you a picture of a black man. Tell me again about the "reality" of biased news coverage and how the perps race is being hidden by the big bad media.

---

Yeah. I lived through both, so I remember the coverage. Pulling the "most recent" article doesn't prove squat. Sorry your gaslighting doesn't work.

There is a trove of evidence to support that the media coverage of these types of events. You pulling some photo from the CNN website that nobody looks at is hardly proof.

HTH

---

See, the thing is, you're blaming CNN for hiding the guys race, when an article...several actually...can be produced that clearly shows they're not. Whether anyone looks at their website or not, the guy's picture is still on it. But it's easier to say "ThEy'Re hIdInG hIs rAcE fRoM mE" rather than looking to see for yourself.

Anonymous Source said:

---

Kvetch said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

Kvetch said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

Kvetch said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

blacksox said:

---

The front page story on CNN right now is two pictures of the shooter.

---

Yep, and they had his picture up once he was listed as a person of interest and it's been up since. But, for F16 purposes, it's easier to post a timeline feature article and then claim CNN is trying to hide the fact that the shooter is black. You get lots of stars that way.

---

So is your claim that coverage isn't different depending on the physical characteristics of the attacker? Are you still blaming the SUV in Waukesha?

---

Is his picture up or is it not? I believe it went up as soon as it was made publicly available and is still up now.

And here is the latest picture from the latest court date for the Waukesha killer. The story is from Reuters, a national news agency. Man, they're really going out of their way to hide his race, arent they?

---

Got it. You're a Huffington Post subscriber. Maybe Mother Jones.

Keep on huffing that glue and ignoring the reality of biased news coverage. I look forward to the days of coverage about the fact that this man is a black supremacist.

---

Wrong and wrong.
Kinda like you, but I can admit it.

You offered up NYC and Waukesha. I can pull up both stories currently and show you a picture of a black man. Tell me again about the "reality" of biased news coverage and how the perps race is being hidden by the big bad media.

---

Yeah. I lived through both, so I remember the coverage. Pulling the "most recent" article doesn't prove squat. Sorry your gaslighting doesn't work.

There is a trove of evidence to support that the media coverage of these types of events. You pulling some photo from the CNN website that nobody looks at is hardly proof.

HTH

---

See, the thing is, you're blaming CNN for hiding the guys race, when an article...several actually...can be produced that clearly shows they're not. Whether anyone looks at their website or not, the guy's picture is still on it. But it's easier to say "ThEy'Re hIdInG hIs rAcE fRoM mE" rather than looking to see for yourself.

---

I didn't say they're hiding his race in this case. I really haven't followed this. But your defense of a media that constantly covers crimes differently based on the perpetrators race is absurd. There was a manhunt here in Austin last year, and the local media didn't release the guys race until like a day after his "general description" was announced. They actually admitted it was purposeful to "prevent racial biases."

You don't get to make the absurd claim that the media doesn't bias their coverage of these events. That's extreme gaslighting.

Kvetch said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

Kvetch said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

Kvetch said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

Kvetch said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

blacksox said:

---

The front page story on CNN right now is two pictures of the shooter.

---

Yep, and they had his picture up once he was listed as a person of interest and it's been up since. But, for F16 purposes, it's easier to post a timeline feature article and then claim CNN is trying to hide the fact that the shooter is black. You get lots of stars that way.

---

So is your claim that coverage isn't different depending on the physical characteristics of the attacker? Are you still blaming the SUV in Waukesha?

---

Is his picture up or is it not? I believe it went up as soon as it was made publicly available and is still up now.

And here is the latest picture from the latest court date for the Waukesha killer. The story is from Reuters, a national news agency. Man, they're really going out of their way to hide his race, arent they?

---

Got it. You're a Huffington Post subscriber. Maybe Mother Jones.

Keep on huffing that glue and ignoring the reality of biased news coverage. I look forward to the days of coverage about the fact that this man is a black supremacist.

---

Wrong and wrong.
Kinda like you, but I can admit it.

You offered up NYC and Waukesha. I can pull up both stories currently and show you a picture of a black man. Tell me again about the "reality" of biased news coverage and how the perps race is being hidden by the big bad media.

---

Yeah. I lived through both, so I remember the coverage. Pulling the "most recent" article doesn't prove squat. Sorry your gaslighting doesn't work.

There is a trove of evidence to support that the media coverage of these types of events. You pulling some photo from the CNN website that nobody looks at is hardly proof.

HTH

---

See, the thing is, you're blaming CNN for hiding the guys race, when an article...several actually...can be produced that clearly shows they're not. Whether anyone looks at their website or not, the guy's picture is still on it. But it's easier to say "ThEy'Re hIdInG hIs rAcE fRoM mE" rather than looking to see for yourself.

---

I didn't say they're hiding his race in this case. I really haven't followed this. But your defense of a media that constantly covers crimes differently based on the perpetrators race is absurd. There was a manhunt here in Austin last year, and the local media didn't release the guys race until like a day after his "general description" was announced. They actually admitted it was purposeful to "prevent racial biases."

You don't get to make the absurd claim that the media doesn't bias their coverage of these events. That's extreme gaslighting.

---

You haven't really followed this, but somehow you are certain this guy's picture is being withheld because of race? Why don't you just say, "I'm not paying that much attention to this, but since everyone else is saying they're gonna hide this guy's picture, that must be what they're gonna do." Are you that big of a lemming?

Here's where your whole argument goes out the window. Spend most of the time *****ing about CNN, then throw up something a local media outlet did to bolster your claim.

Fact: CNN has the guy's picture up, and has since it was made available.
Fact: There are recent pictures of the black man accused in the Waukesha killings, even though the mantra here is, "Well, he's black and so they'll hide this story and you'll never see any pictures".

KXAN and KVUE aren't national news.

Anonymous Source said:

---

Kvetch said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

Kvetch said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

Kvetch said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

Kvetch said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

blacksox said:

---

The front page story on CNN right now is two pictures of the shooter.

---

Yep, and they had his picture up once he was listed as a person of interest and it's been up since. But, for F16 purposes, it's easier to post a timeline feature article and then claim CNN is trying to hide the fact that the shooter is black. You get lots of stars that way.

---

So is your claim that coverage isn't different depending on the physical characteristics of the attacker? Are you still blaming the SUV in Waukesha?

---

Is his picture up or is it not? I believe it went up as soon as it was made publicly available and is still up now.

And here is the latest picture from the latest court date for the Waukesha killer. The story is from Reuters, a national news agency. Man, they're really going out of their way to hide his race, arent they?

---

Got it. You're a Huffington Post subscriber. Maybe Mother Jones.

Keep on huffing that glue and ignoring the reality of biased news coverage. I look forward to the days of coverage about the fact that this man is a black supremacist.

---

Wrong and wrong.
Kinda like you, but I can admit it.

You offered up NYC and Waukesha. I can pull up both stories currently and show you a picture of a black man. Tell me again about the "reality" of biased news coverage and how the perps race is being hidden by the big bad media.

---

Yeah. I lived through both, so I remember the coverage. Pulling the "most recent" article doesn't prove squat. Sorry your gaslighting doesn't work.

There is a trove of evidence to support that the media coverage of these types of events. You pulling some photo from the CNN website that nobody looks at is hardly proof.

HTH

---

See, the thing is, you're blaming CNN for hiding the guys race, when an article...several actually...can be produced that clearly shows they're not. Whether anyone looks at their website or not, the guy's picture is still on it. But it's easier to say "ThEy'Re hIdInG hIs rAcE fRoM mE" rather than looking to see for yourself.

---

I didn't say they're hiding his race in this case. I really haven't followed this. But your defense of a media that constantly covers crimes differently based on the perpetrators race is absurd. There was a manhunt here in Austin last year, and the local media didn't release the guys race until like a day after his "general description" was announced. They actually admitted it was purposeful to "prevent racial biases."

You don't get to make the absurd claim that the media doesn't bias their coverage of these events. That's extreme gaslighting.

---

You haven't really followed this, but somehow you are certain this guy's picture is being withheld because of race? Why don't you just say, "I'm not paying that much attention to this, but since everyone else is saying they're gonna hide this guy's picture, that must be what they're gonna do." Are you that big of a lemming?

Here's where your whole argument goes out the window. Spend most of the time *****ing about CNN, then throw up something a local media outlet did to bolster your claim.

Fact: CNN has the guy's picture up, and has since it was made available.
Fact: There are recent pictures of the black man accused in the Waukesha killings, even though the mantra here is, "Well, he's black and so they'll hide this story and you'll never see any pictures".

KXAN and KVUE aren't national news.

---

Yeah, ok bud. How are those fiery but mostly peaceful protests? You are still ignoring the fact that the Waukesha reporting was completely biased because of the race of the perpetrator. Not to mention their coverages of Rittenhouse and Sandmann.

Your entire premise that CNN is forthright because they eventually put up photos that other outlets put up is ridiculous. Fact is, their coverage is HEAVILY biased based on racial lines regardless of what photo they put up of this guy. There's years of evidence to prove that. Go Toobin yourself to CNN+ somewhere else.

Kvetch said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

Kvetch said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

Kvetch said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

Kvetch said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

Kvetch said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

blacksox said:

---

The front page story on CNN right now is two pictures of the shooter.

---

Yep, and they had his picture up once he was listed as a person of interest and it's been up since. But, for F16 purposes, it's easier to post a timeline feature article and then claim CNN is trying to hide the fact that the shooter is black. You get lots of stars that way.

---

So is your claim that coverage isn't different depending on the physical characteristics of the attacker? Are you still blaming the SUV in Waukesha?

---

Is his picture up or is it not? I believe it went up as soon as it was made publicly available and is still up now.

And here is the latest picture from the latest court date for the Waukesha killer. The story is from Reuters, a national news agency. Man, they're really going out of their way to hide his race, arent they?

---

Got it. You're a Huffington Post subscriber. Maybe Mother Jones.

Keep on huffing that glue and ignoring the reality of biased news coverage. I look forward to the days of coverage about the fact that this man is a black supremacist.

---

Wrong and wrong.
Kinda like you, but I can admit it.

You offered up NYC and Waukesha. I can pull up both stories currently and show you a picture of a black man. Tell me again about the "reality" of biased news coverage and how the perps race is being hidden by the big bad media.

---

Yeah. I lived through both, so I remember the coverage. Pulling the "most recent" article doesn't prove squat. Sorry your gaslighting doesn't work.

There is a trove of evidence to support that the media coverage of these types of events. You pulling some photo from the CNN website that nobody looks at is hardly proof.

HTH

---

See, the thing is, you're blaming CNN for hiding the guys race, when an article...several actually...can be produced that clearly shows they're not. Whether anyone looks at their website or not, the guy's picture is still on it. But it's easier to say "ThEy'Re hIdInG hIs rAcE fRoM mE" rather than looking to see for yourself.

---

I didn't say they're hiding his race in this case. I really haven't followed this. But your defense of a media that constantly covers crimes differently based on the perpetrators race is absurd. There was a manhunt here in Austin last year, and the local media didn't release the guys race until like a day after his "general description" was announced. They actually admitted it was purposeful to "prevent racial biases."

You don't get to make the absurd claim that the media doesn't bias their coverage of these events. That's extreme gaslighting.

---

You haven't really followed this, but somehow you are certain this guy's picture is being withheld because of race? Why don't you just say, "I'm not paying that much attention to this, but since everyone else is saying they're gonna hide this guy's picture, that must be what they're gonna do." Are you that big of a lemming?

Here's where your whole argument goes out the window. Spend most of the time *****ing about CNN, then throw up something a local media outlet did to bolster your claim.

Fact: CNN has the guy's picture up, and has since it was made available.
Fact: There are recent pictures of the black man accused in the Waukesha killings, even though the mantra here is, "Well, he's black and so they'll hide this story and you'll never see any pictures".

KXAN and KVUE aren't national news.

---

Yeah, ok bud. How are those fiery but mostly peaceful protests? You are still ignoring the fact that the Waukesha reporting was completely biased because of the race of the perpetrator. Not to mention their coverages of Rittenhouse and Sandmann.

Your entire premise that CNN is forthright because they eventually put up photos that other outlets put up is ridiculous. Fact is, their coverage is HEAVILY biased based on racial lines regardless of what photo they put up of this guy. There's years of evidence to prove that. Go Toobin yourself to CNN+ somewhere else.

---

I figured this was about the time we got to the whataboutisms

Glad to see you have no real rebuttal. Enjoy Don Lemon tonight covering the black supremacist NYC attacker. I'm done responding to your drivel.

Kvetch said:

---

Glad to see you have no real rebuttal. Enjoy Don Lemon tonight covering the black supremacist NYC attacker. I'm done responding to your drivel.

---

Never watched Don Lemon a day in my life.
Have a good day believing what others tell you without bothering to flesh it out for yourself!

White supremacy knows no racial barriers. That's why its so insidious.

PaulC_80 said:

---

Jeeper79 said:

---

Appears to be this guy. If so, this was almost certainly a hate crime. I'm also not sure this guy is even stable.



Edit: I haven't been able to 100% confirm this is the same guy.

---

I am going to guess CNN will eventually ID him as a Black White Supremist.

---

This

Anonymous Source said:

---

blacksox said:

---

The front page story on CNN right now is two pictures of the shooter.

---

Yep, and they had his picture up once he was listed as a person of interest and it's been up since. But, for F16 purposes, it's easier to post a timeline feature article and then claim CNN is trying to hide the fact that the shooter is black. You get lots of stars that way.

---

They didn't have a description of him or a picture yesterday evening, even though his name was already out there.

Wow

80sGeorge said:

---

Info thread

Breaking: NYPD named Frank James as a person of interest in the #Brooklyn mass shooting. I looked into his social media. Like the Waukesha suspect & the Louisville BLM activist who allegedly tried to assassinate a mayoral candidate, he appeared to be a fan of black nationalism. pic.twitter.com/aUQZGakJfW

— Andy Ngô 🏳️‍🌈 (@MrAndyNgo) April 12, 2022

---

I was told it was southern states gun laws that caused this shooting though. And the news would never lie to us plebes!

WTH?!?!?

This mofo has years of racist, nasty, social media posts THAT ARE NOT TAKEN DOWN.
They remain for years.
Everyone found them after his name was out there.

Downright pathetic that social media allows his racist BS to remain with NO BANs.

Meanwhile us white folk question vaccines, question transgender, question radial islam and we get a suspension or a ban.

Fully expecting a recycled Neil Young protest ballad to come out shortly emphasizing that.

And by seeing the title of the thread involving CNN, I immediately thought that it was Trump being named.