BREAKING: Colorado Governor Jared Polis has just signed into law a bill legalizing abortions through all nine months, up until the moment of birth.

— Lila Rose (@LilaGraceRose) April 4, 2022

Evil, plain and simple.

We continue telling Sodom and Gomorrah "hold my beer".

Democratic Party cheers

Wanting an abortion at months 7, 8 or 9, I'd encourage you to consider adoption. WTF?

well this answers the question.

abortioniats belueve that passage through the birth canal magically makes u a person.

everyone born via c-section is subhuman.

I'm generally indifferent to most abortion discussions and arguments. But this is just sick.

Can we abort the Colorado governor?

The Dems left the Clinton "safe, legal, and rare" policy triangulation long ago, and are now into full-fledge infanticide.

EVIL.

I cannot fathom how a Christian can vote in favor of this and still profess the faith.

Someday these people will have to give account to Almighty God and explain why they signed off on genocide of the most vulnerable of God's people.

One of the bigger lies (of many) told by the left is that they want abortion to be safe, legal, and rare.

National Divorce! Now!

I have nothing in common with the evil left.

I wouldn't want to have a wife/GF/daughter have one but I support the right to choose up the first trimester or so, but nine months?

Gross.

WARNING - GRAPHIC

I posted this on the other relevant thread, but every sick piece of excrement that supports this evil should have to have these images burned into their brains. You support the murder of human beings. The most innocent among us.

https://www.liveaction.org/news/infant-bodies-infanticide-attempted-abortions/

Besides the all-out war against children in-utero, because it defines abortion as a right, the law could also be used to attempt to force medical professionals to commit or participate in abortions. There are zero conscience protections in the law.

— Lila Rose (@LilaGraceRose) April 4, 2022

I've been saying for years that progressives are demonic and should burn in hell, everyone else is just waking up.

Absolute insanity.

GeorgiAg said:

---

I wouldn't want to have a wife/GF/daughter have one but I support the right to choose up the first trimester or so, but nine months?

Gross.

---

3 months old is just as sick as 9. Murder is murder. If there's nothing wrong with it, why do you prefer not to be associated with people that get them?

Bill text:

REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH EQUITY ACT
25-6-401.

Short title. THE SHORT TITLE OF THIS PART 4 IS THE "REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH EQUITY ACT".

25-6-402. Definitions. AS USED IN THIS PART 4, UNLESS THE CONTEXT OTHERWISE REQUIRES:

(1) "ABORTION" MEANS ANY MEDICAL PROCEDURE, INSTRUMENT, AGENT, OR DRUG USED TO TERMINATE THE PREGNANCY OF AN INDIVIDUAL KNOWN OR REASONABLY BELIEVED TO BE PREGNANT WITH AN INTENTION OTHER THAN TO INCREASE THE PROBABILITY OF A LIVE BIRTH.

(2) "PREGNANCY" MEANS THE HUMAN REPRODUCTIVE PROCESS, BEGINNING WITH THE IMPLANTATION OF AN EMBRYO.

(3) "PUBLIC ENTITY" HAS THE SAME MEANING AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 24-10-103 (5) AND INCLUDES PRIVATE CONTRACT PRISONS, AS DEFINED IN SECTION 17-1-102.

(4) "REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE" MEANS HEALTH CARE AND OTHER MEDICAL SERVICES RELATED TO THE REPRODUCTIVE PROCESSES, FUNCTIONS, AND SYSTEMS AT ALL STAGES OF LIFE. IT INCLUDES, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO, FAMILY PLANNING AND CONTRACEPTIVE CARE; ABORTION CARE; PRENATAL, POSTNATAL, AND DELIVERY CARE; FERTILITY CARE; STERILIZATION SERVICES; AND TREATMENTS FOR SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS AND REPRODUCTIVE CANCERS.

25-6-403. Fundamental reproductive health-care rights.

(1) EVERY INDIVIDUAL HAS A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO MAKE DECISIONS ABOUT THE INDIVIDUAL'S REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, INCLUDING THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO USE OR REFUSE CONTRACEPTION.

(2) A PREGNANT INDIVIDUAL HAS A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO CONTINUE A PREGNANCY AND GIVE BIRTH OR TO HAVE AN ABORTION AND TO MAKE DECISIONS ABOUT HOW TO EXERCISE THAT RIGHT.

(3) A FERTILIZED EGG, EMBRYO, OR FETUS DOES NOT HAVE INDEPENDENT OR DERIVATIVE RIGHTS UNDER THE LAWS OF THIS STATE.

25-6-404. Public entity - prohibited actions. (1) A PUBLIC ENTITY SHALL NOT:

(a) DENY,RESTRICT,INTERFEREWITH,ORDISCRIMINATEAGAINSTAN INDIVIDUAL'S FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO USE OR REFUSE CONTRACEPTION OR TO CONTINUE A PREGNANCY AND GIVE BIRTH OR TO HAVE AN ABORTION IN THE REGULATION OR PROVISION OF BENEFITS, FACILITIES, SERVICES, OR INFORMATION; OR

(b) DEPRIVE, THROUGH PROSECUTION, PUNISHMENT, OR OTHER MEANS, AN INDIVIDUAL OF THE INDIVIDUAL'S RIGHT TO ACT OR REFRAIN FROM ACTING DURING THE INDIVIDUAL'S OWN PREGNANCY BASED ON THE POTENTIAL, ACTUAL, OR PERCEIVED IMPACT ON THE PREGNANCY, THE PREGNANCY'S OUTCOMES, OR ON THE PREGNANT INDIVIDUAL'S HEALTH.

25-6-405. Application.

(1) THIS PART 4 APPLIES TO ALL STATE AND LOCAL LAWS, ORDINANCES, POLICIES, PROCEDURES, REGULATORY GUIDELINES AND RULES, PRACTICES, EXECUTIVE ORDERS, AND GOVERNMENTAL ACTIONS AND THEIR IMPLEMENTATION, WHETHER STATUTORY OR OTHERWISE. THE RIGHTS PROTECTED UNDER THIS PART 4 ARE A MATTER OF STATEWIDE CONCERN.

(2) NOTHING IN THIS PART 4 MAY BE CONSTRUED TO AUTHORIZE A PUBLIC ENTITY TO BURDEN AN INDIVIDUAL'S FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS RELATING TO REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE.

Why stop at nine libs? Just let doctors murder toddlers if they're a burden, right?

You know how we know Christians are on the right side? Because they're not blowing up abortion clinics left and right. Because even when the brazen godless are at work, we still try to be better. There's many places that would behead people for doing this (and also for being gay, natch).

Liberals have no idea the privilege they have to murder babies.

Kvetch said:

---

GeorgiAg said:

---

I wouldn't want to have a wife/GF/daughter have one but I support the right to choose up the first trimester or so, but nine months?

Gross.

---

3 months old is just as sick as 9. Murder is murder. If there's nothing wrong with it, why do you prefer not to be associate with people that get them?

---

People ought to have he right to their own religious belief system and 3 months looks like a human-lizard chimera. It's not viable.

Fireman said:

---

Wanting an abortion at months 7, 8 or 9, I'd encourage you to consider adoption. WTF?

---

Maybe sterilization as well. It's especially repulsive after 7,8 and 9 months.

There is not a single argument for this to be allowable. None.

It would appear satan the Colorado government is proud of their work.

Some of you are acting like earth isn't in the middle of a climate crisis caused by overpopulation. This bill is great news for our dying planet and the most critical global initiative to reduce temperatures by 1.5 degrees. Gosh!!

GeorgiAg said:

---

Kvetch said:

---

GeorgiAg said:

---

I wouldn't want to have a wife/GF/daughter have one but I support the right to choose up the first trimester or so, but nine months?

Gross.

---

3 months old is just as sick as 9. Murder is murder. If there's nothing wrong with it, why do you prefer not to be associate with people that get them?

---

People ought to have he right to their own religious belief system and 3 months looks like a human-lizard chimera. It's not viable.

---

So if technology eventually advances to where a 2-3 month old fetus is viable...you'll be against abortion in these cases? We should define whether someone deserves the right to life based on technology available at the time? Is that it?

Amen!

GeorgiAg said:

---

Kvetch said:

---

GeorgiAg said:

---

I wouldn't want to have a wife/GF/daughter have one but I support the right to choose up the first trimester or so, but nine months?

Gross.

---

3 months old is just as sick as 9. Murder is murder. If there's nothing wrong with it, why do you prefer not to be associate with people that get them?

---

People ought to have he right to their own religious belief system and 3 months looks like a human-lizard chimera. It's not viable.

---

When does a person become a person? You can't just have an arbitrary line for murder.

Sadly this has been in the works for a while. I can't comprehend how people can think that this is moral. Just when I think I can tolerate the left-leaning politics in this state this **** happens...

Colorado:
Fentanyl gets slap on the wrist, weed is legal, #1 in car theft, homeless encampments, rising crime & murder rates, & it's legal to kill a full-term healthy baby 1 second before it exits the birth canal. But at least the mountains are pretty. https://t.co/QtY8SNj7Ac pic.twitter.com/GciW13I3X7

— Karl Dierenbach (@Dierenbach) April 2, 2022

That feeling you get when you secure the right to kill a full term baby as long as it hasn't left the mother's body. https://t.co/B1hTVbuoFB

— Karl Dierenbach (@Dierenbach) April 4, 2022

ProgN said:

---

Besides the all-out war against children in-utero, because it defines abortion as a right, the law could also be used to attempt to force medical professionals to commit or participate in abortions. There are zero conscience protections in the law.

— Lila Rose (@LilaGraceRose) April 4, 2022

---

Anything requiring the labor of someone else isn't a right.

The left is communicating with the right via states rights.


Texas limits its abortion options, so, Colorado responds in kind by going wide open.

This isn't about freedom anymore. This is about pissing off your neighbor in any way possible.

GeorgiAg said:

---

Kvetch said:

---

GeorgiAg said:

---

I wouldn't want to have a wife/GF/daughter have one but I support the right to choose up the first trimester or so, but nine months?

Gross.

---

3 months old is just as sick as 9. Murder is murder. If there's nothing wrong with it, why do you prefer not to be associate with people that get them?

---

People ought to have he right to their own religious belief system and 3 months looks like a human-lizard chimera. It's not viable.

---

Aren't lawyers supposed to be good at logic or something?

MemphisAg1 said:

---

ProgN said:

---

Besides the all-out war against children in-utero, because it defines abortion as a right, the law could also be used to attempt to force medical professionals to commit or participate in abortions. There are zero conscience protections in the law.

— Lila Rose (@LilaGraceRose) April 4, 2022

---

Anything requiring the labor of someone else isn't a right.

---

Nobody required anything. Rape is still illegal.

ThunderFighter06 said:

---

Sadly this has been in the works for a while. I can't comprehend how people can think that this is moral. Just when I think I can tolerate the left-leaning politics in this state this **** happens...

Colorado:
Fentanyl gets slap on the wrist, weed is legal, #1 in car theft, homeless encampments, rising crime & murder rates, & it's legal to kill a full-term healthy baby 1 second before it exits the birth canal. But at least the mountains are pretty. https://t.co/QtY8SNj7Ac pic.twitter.com/GciW13I3X7

— Karl Dierenbach (@Dierenbach) April 2, 2022

That feeling you get when you secure the right to kill a full term baby as long as it hasn't left the mother's body. https://t.co/B1hTVbuoFB

— Karl Dierenbach (@Dierenbach) April 4, 2022

---

white liberal women disgusting...they look like trash