Quote:
Unless you are living under a rock, EVs are the future.
This is one of those statements that goes unchallenged, but it's not so clear.
Future? 10 years? 100 years? What "future". We'd have decades of effort to build enough powerplants and expand the grid to service that "future".
Part of that "future" is reliance upon improvements in technology, e.g. batteries. How about other technologies that might improve enough to surpass battery powered evs? Fuel cell technology, although could be considered an "ev" it's not part of the current model, but could well surpass the current notion of an ev and be the "future".
It's also possible that some unforeseen development (if I knew what that was I'd be rich) will be "the future". Heck, star trek transporters, magnetic rail cars, I don't know - the issue is that predicting "the future" rarely works even for those not living under rocks.
In 1985 CDs were the future of recorded music if you weren't living under a rock. Thirty years later they were essentially irrelevant. It's like the 1870 prediction of life not being possible in New York City in 1970 because of no place to put the manure.