Love Gun said:Cool. Email that to the Soros bought DA up there. I'm sure they would appreciate your psychological analysis to convict officers that did nothing wrong.bmks270 said:Love Gun said:
Saw the video. The cops entered with a key at around 0645. They had both a knock and no-knock warrant. As soon as they breached, weapon lights lit up the room. They all screamed "Police! Search Warrant!", among other commands like to get on the ground. They kicked a sectional couch where a dude was covered in a blanket, possibly sleeping. He sat up, grabbed a very visible pistol off of the coffee table/ottoman thing, and they lit him up with three shots.
Now, the usual suspects have been clamoring that the decedent wasn't even on the warrant, and that he was likely confused by their commands. Not sure I've ever heard the new policy out there where police have to have a warrant to ventilate someone that goes for a weapon after you've made your presence known.
So....
Not on warrant = Irrelevant
Carry permit holder = Irrelevant
Early morning confusion = Irrelevant
Reach for gun when in a room full of cops that have made themselves and their mission known = Play stupid games
I'm sorry he lost his life, but he made his choice.
He was disoriented and ambushed by a swat team. He didn't make any choices. He had an unconscious reflex to the environmental stimulus. None of it was consciously processed.
Where did I say the officers should be convicted?
Everything may be legal, but that doesn't mean it is just.
The laws and procedures should be changed. That would be one positive outcome.