The Fife said:
aeroag14 said:
aggiehawg said:
Rapier108 said:
RONA Ag said:
Beat40 said:
No Spin Ag said:
javajaws said:
Dilettante said:
But Russia won't leave. They will likely accomplish their aims, right? Even if the cost was higher than expected (although I don't think we know what they expected). The region could be relatively stable then, leaving the question of how long we intend to maintain these sanctions.
You leave the sanctions in place so long as Putin remains in the Ukraine. It's that simple.
This.
The part that takes it from simple arithmetic to calculus is the nuclear component. Going to have to walk that line and not push the dangerous animal so far into the corner that he feels the only recourse is to let one fly.
We have nuclear deterrents for that. If he launches a nuke so be it. His own people will remove him from office. We can't be afraid to act because of something as trivial as a "will he push the button"
It's not letting 1 nuke fly.
It is letting his entire strategic arsenal fly all at once.
I seriously doubt his generals would let him do that. Our submarine nuclear arsenal would take them out.
The problem, whether correct or incorrect, is that Putin also believes that his submarine nuclear arsenal would take us out.
At this point I'm wondering how much of the total arsenal is INOP?
So am I. I would imagine the ones on the subs would be the best maintained. But the ones in the silos?
They are using poorly trained conscripts in a major invasion. Their comms are messed up. Their logistics are messed up.
How often would they have test drills for their nuclear arsenal? It's a fair question.