For as annoying as Van is, he's fairly self-aware about how he's annoying.

Live look @ cnn

Van Jones will do this periodically. He will softly call out his peers where someone like Pelosi would never do such a thing. It is all for show.

AgBQ-00 said:

---

You notice in the next to last video how he kept having to equivocate and say this is what I'm hearing it is not me saying this. How toxic is the purity test for those on set with him that he has to apologetically present that?

---

holy cow, that was unbearable to watch...

These people, liberals, media and Democrats are just insane.

They're like petulant children throwing tantrums when things don't go their way, name-calling included.

This isn't progressive vs. conservative anymore.

It's bat-shyte crazy vs. Americans.

It's unreal.

Things don't go their way, must mean everyone is racist, despite electing the first black and hispanic to positions in Virginia. All they're talking about it the POCs elected to Democrat offices.

ABATTBQ11 said:

---

AgBQ-00 said:

---

You notice in the next to last video how he kept having to equivocate and say this is what I'm hearing it is not me saying this. How toxic is the purity test for those on set with him that he has to apologetically present that?

---

Van Jones in the first uses "we" when taking about democrats. So does Cooper.

---

This is the first thing I noticed.

He makes good points, but he still completely misses what Americans care about more than liberal arrogance and messaging.

Our. Values. Don't. Align!

Some of them understand what is happening but the Democrats as a whole won't be able to stop themselves. They don't know how to compete with ideas.

Muy said:

---

He makes good points, but he still completely misses what Americans care about more than liberal arrogance and messaging.

Our. Values. Don't. Align!

---

He has enough awareness that I think he intentionally stops short. It would be damaging to expose their viewers to that reality: that Dems no longer represent their values. It's a strip-tease: just enough cleavage to make you think he might slip, but then no - it's just a tease - he retreats back to the party line.

Get Off My Lawn said:

---

Muy said:

---

He makes good points, but he still completely misses what Americans care about more than liberal arrogance and messaging.

Our. Values. Don't. Align!

---

He has enough awareness that I think he intentionally stops short. It would be damaging to expose their viewers to that reality: that Dems no longer represent their values. It's a strip-tease: just enough cleavage to make you think he might slip, but then no - it's just a tease - he retreats back to the party line.

---

But he really does seem like an intelligent guy. Is he really that incapable of thinking the Democrats maybe should try standing for something other than seeking to divide by voting blocks? He has enough stature to be a candidate himself for some places.

After 2016 they had a chance to do some soul searching and instead went all in on Orange man bad. They could do soul searching this time but instead they are attacking the voters.

When all you care about is power and wealth, you aren't making any decisions for the long term benefit of America or even your own party.

Everything the Democrats do lacks common sense, which everyday people can easily see and this is causing their downfall !

Malachi Constant said:

---

---

The whole sketch is worth reposting

titan said:

---

Get Off My Lawn said:

---

Muy said:

---

He makes good points, but he still completely misses what Americans care about more than liberal arrogance and messaging.

Our. Values. Don't. Align!

---

He has enough awareness that I think he intentionally stops short. It would be damaging to expose their viewers to that reality: that Dems no longer represent their values. It's a strip-tease: just enough cleavage to make you think he might slip, but then no - it's just a tease - he retreats back to the party line.

---

But he really does seem like an intelligent guy. Is he really that incapable of thinking the Democrats maybe should try standing for something other than seeking to divide by voting blocks? He has enough stature to be a candidate himself for some places.

---

I think he is. I made this point earlier but he's usually the first one to call out his own side and recognize when their message sucks or is not in alignment with the overall populace.

It doesn't change the fact that he's wrong on almost every issue, but he's self aware and can recognize when they are wrong.

IndividualFreedom said:

---

Van Jones will do this periodically. He will softly call out his peers where someone like Pelosi would never do such a thing. It is all for show.

---

True but he is usually right when he does it

I think Van Jones speaks his own mind, and he is certainly not the worst of the worst. Mostly because he occasionally speaks his mind.

AgBQ-00 said:

---

You notice in the next to last video how he kept having to equivocate and say this is what I'm hearing it is not me saying this. How toxic is the purity test for those on set with him that he has to apologetically present that?

---

Don't shoot the messenger, guys! What a little chode.

TexAgs91 said:

---

Meh... who watches CNN? Spoiler alert, they'll be back to calling conservatives idiots and racists within a week.

---

I agree, there really are very very few people who watch CNN these days, what is 4 or 5 million views a week compared to the millions in the population, now that most people know how the media is straight out rigged very few give news outlets like CNN much if any credit anymore.. but of course they will keep sprewing out what ever they are told to spit out, mostly propaganda or just straight up lies

Burrus86 said:

---

No

---

Yep. They're trying to act as the very "moral authority" that they are condemning. This makes them lower than the people they are condemning with all of these clips.

With all of their help, the progressives still show a huge ***** in their armor. And the liberal media throws them right under the bus. There is no honor among thieves.

I struggle to understand their self assigned label of progressive.

How is anything they are doing considered progressive?

It is more regressive than anything. Race baiting, lack of personal accountability, calling out others as the boogey man (pre-1960 it was minorities - now shifted to whites), two sets of rules - illegals and congress not required to get vax while others are, on and on

mkorzo said:

---

For as annoying as Van is, he's fairly self-aware about how he's annoying.

---

You think he came up with that himself? These problems existed before the elections that night.

I Have Spoken said:

---

AgBQ-00 said:

---

You notice in the next to last video how he kept having to equivocate and say this is what I'm hearing it is not me saying this. How toxic is the purity test for those on set with him that he has to apologetically present that?

---

Don't shoot the messenger, guys! What a little chode.

---

Although it's no surprise, the most illuminating part of that is his assumption that literally everyone on stage with him will vehemently disagree with what he's about to say. He knows that even the opinions of moderate democrats will be met with disdain on CNN. It's a microcosm of the Virginia election.

Ukraine Gas Expert said:

---

Too late jack asses

Almost two years they've told people they are racist, indoctrinated their children, pressed immoral issues down people's throats, and threatened them with unnecessary vaccines or removal from society. Gas lighting, inflation, supply chain issues on purpose, illegals, and way more than needs to be written.

Pepperidge farm remembers.

---

Van Jones had an epiphany when he was in jail in California. Marxism is the way forward. Dude is an absolute piece of human debris. Of course democrats love him.

troy_y said:

---

I struggle to understand their self assigned label of progressive.

How is anything they are doing considered progressive?

It is more regressive than anything. Race baiting, lack of personal accountability, calling out others as the boogey man (pre-1960 it was minorities - now shifted to whites), two sets of rules - illegals and congress not required to get vax while others are, on and on

---

Progressive in the sense of historicism. They are progressive in the sense that they seek progress toward "the revolution" and the eventual utopia