Quote:

---

It's all for the exact same endgame. Every thing the elites push has an identical endgame scenario. A mass of low testosterone and compliant men, whorish women, and general genderless obese blobs with no connection to anything except consumerism.

Think Brave New World, that is exactly how they plan to control you.

---

That does make sense. On the low T thing ---- has anyone figured out a genuine way to just reverse it back to later 20th C levels?

Having asked that, throw a curve though: one thing I heard is unfortunately, only deeds and challenges raise it. Which might explain why it has faded. I don't know if that is true.

But the gender bending is not even due to low T or anything else. Its imposed from the top, and removing that imposition might get rid of much of it. Some of the rebellion against CRT in schools seems promising in that regard.

At least form a movement that is willing to reject all the messaging might help. Trump was on the path by undermining the media, but he can't see past doing everything himself.

CondensedFoggyAggie said:

---

BAP Enthusiast said:

---

CondensedFoggyAggie said:

---

BAP Enthusiast said:

---

CondensedFoggyAggie said:

---

Welp, interracial marriage has gone from 3% in 1970 to 10% in 2020 to 19% in 2019. Looks like it may be 30% by the time we get to 2030.

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/02/25/in-vice-president-kamala-harris-we-can-see-how-america-has-changed/

What a beautiful thing, couples finding love beyond race or backgrounds. This is what America is about.

---

Keep in mind most of this is white/Hispanic so these kinds of stats are always quite misleading especially when you consider that many Hispanics are often 50-80% white and even consider themselves white.

They always play these up like blacks and whites are mixing at higher rates when that isn't true, at all. It's easily one of the least common interracial relationships.

---

Actually,

Quote:

---

Overall increases in intermarriage have been fueled in part by rising intermarriage rates among black newlyweds and among white newlyweds. The share of recently married blacks with a spouse of a different race or ethnicity has more than tripled, from 5% in 1980 to 18% in 2015. Among recently married whites, rates have more than doubled, from 4% up to 11%.

At the same time, intermarriage has ticked down among recently married Asians and remained more or less stable among Hispanic newlyweds.

---

So it seems hispanic/asian interracial marriage rates have held steady or slightly declined since 1980, while white or black interracial marriage has doubled or tripled.

No doubt hispanic interracial marriage still remains a big chunk.

https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2017/05/18/1-trends-and-patterns-in-intermarriage/

---

White population declined while Hispanics and Asians grew. Despite their rates holding steady, the total amount doing it massively increased due to their growing populations.

In comparison, black/white couple rates have remained steady since 1980. This means that the growth in black and white numbers are likely both intermarrying with Hispanics or Asians. The black population has not noticeably changed as a percentage of the population.

Quote:

---

While the bulk of this report focuses on patterns of intermarriage among all newly married individuals, shifting the analysis to the racial and ethnic composition of intermarried newlywed couples shows that the most prevalent form of intermarriage involves one Hispanic and one white spouse (42%). While this share is relatively high, it marks a decline from 1980, when more than half (56%) of all intermarried couples included one Hispanic and one white person.

The next most prevalent couple type in 2015 among those who were intermarried included one Asian and one white spouse (15%). Couples including one black and one white spouse accounted for about one-in-ten (11%) intermarried couples in 2015, a share that has held more or less steady since 1980.

---

So again, my point still stands. White/hispanic is the most common by far followed by white/Asian. The next closest is white/multiracial, and then white/black. The white/black rate has not changed in a long time.

If you're going to use stats like these you should represent them correctly. The above lines up exactly with dating apps and responses.

---

You said blacks and white are NOT mixing at higher rates, when they are.

The percentage of black/white couples among interracial marriages is the same. However, the rate of interracial marriage itself is up, quite drastically. From 3% to almost 20%

Therefor, the ratio of black and white couples, among all couples have increased significantly, around 6~7x of 1970.

If a thousand couples married in 1970, 30 would be interracial, 3 would be white/black.

If a thousand couples married this year, 200 would be interracial, ~22 would be white/black.

That number will likely be up to 30 by 2030, 70% of them being black male/white female, 30% being white male/black female. I have to say its quite nice we've improved as a society where race is considered less of a 'barrier'.

---

The increase in whites is primarily from Asians and Hispanics because both populations grew massively. White population declined as a percentage while blacks stayed the same. The percentage of white/black couples has not changed since 1980. This means they have not increased in popularity. Nothing on that article indicated any increase on that front and it's pretty obvious that the increase is from the huge influx of Asians and Hispanics.

Black/white relationships are 4th on the list after white/hispanic, white/Asian, and white/multi.

The weirdest situation is definitely the Asians though. American born Asian women mix at rates of abovd 50% while American born asian men are falling every year and now in the 30s. That's a huge dichotomy. I believe the rates of sexual activity also bear this out. Incel issues among Asians, Indians, etc are huge for the men (it's upwards of 30% of the men now) while the women apparently sleep with every white guy they can find. That is, more Asian/Indian women have sexuality activity than any other race of women. It's a powder keg waiting to explode, this isn't going to end well

CDUB98 said:

---

Quote:

---

Why is it those pushing the diversity narrative think black women are so I appealing?

---

Can you be a little more racist?

Good gawd.

---

I think you missed the point.

BAP Enthusiast said:

---

CondensedFoggyAggie said:

---

BAP Enthusiast said:

---

CondensedFoggyAggie said:

---

BAP Enthusiast said:

---

CondensedFoggyAggie said:

---

Welp, interracial marriage has gone from 3% in 1970 to 10% in 2020 to 19% in 2019. Looks like it may be 30% by the time we get to 2030.

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/02/25/in-vice-president-kamala-harris-we-can-see-how-america-has-changed/

What a beautiful thing, couples finding love beyond race or backgrounds. This is what America is about.

---

Keep in mind most of this is white/Hispanic so these kinds of stats are always quite misleading especially when you consider that many Hispanics are often 50-80% white and even consider themselves white.

They always play these up like blacks and whites are mixing at higher rates when that isn't true, at all. It's easily one of the least common interracial relationships.

---

Actually,

Quote:

---

Overall increases in intermarriage have been fueled in part by rising intermarriage rates among black newlyweds and among white newlyweds. The share of recently married blacks with a spouse of a different race or ethnicity has more than tripled, from 5% in 1980 to 18% in 2015. Among recently married whites, rates have more than doubled, from 4% up to 11%.

At the same time, intermarriage has ticked down among recently married Asians and remained more or less stable among Hispanic newlyweds.

---

So it seems hispanic/asian interracial marriage rates have held steady or slightly declined since 1980, while white or black interracial marriage has doubled or tripled.

No doubt hispanic interracial marriage still remains a big chunk.

https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2017/05/18/1-trends-and-patterns-in-intermarriage/

---

White population declined while Hispanics and Asians grew. Despite their rates holding steady, the total amount doing it massively increased due to their growing populations.

In comparison, black/white couple rates have remained steady since 1980. This means that the growth in black and white numbers are likely both intermarrying with Hispanics or Asians. The black population has not noticeably changed as a percentage of the population.

Quote:

---

While the bulk of this report focuses on patterns of intermarriage among all newly married individuals, shifting the analysis to the racial and ethnic composition of intermarried newlywed couples shows that the most prevalent form of intermarriage involves one Hispanic and one white spouse (42%). While this share is relatively high, it marks a decline from 1980, when more than half (56%) of all intermarried couples included one Hispanic and one white person.

The next most prevalent couple type in 2015 among those who were intermarried included one Asian and one white spouse (15%). Couples including one black and one white spouse accounted for about one-in-ten (11%) intermarried couples in 2015, a share that has held more or less steady since 1980.

---

So again, my point still stands. White/hispanic is the most common by far followed by white/Asian. The next closest is white/multiracial, and then white/black. The white/black rate has not changed in a long time.

If you're going to use stats like these you should represent them correctly. The above lines up exactly with dating apps and responses.

---

You said blacks and white are NOT mixing at higher rates, when they are.

The percentage of black/white couples among interracial marriages is the same. However, the rate of interracial marriage itself is up, quite drastically. From 3% to almost 20%

Therefor, the ratio of black and white couples, among all couples have increased significantly, around 6~7x of 1970.

If a thousand couples married in 1970, 30 would be interracial, 3 would be white/black.

If a thousand couples married this year, 200 would be interracial, ~22 would be white/black.

That number will likely be up to 30 by 2030, 70% of them being black male/white female, 30% being white male/black female. I have to say its quite nice we've improved as a society where race is considered less of a 'barrier'.

---

The increase in whites is primarily from Asians and Hispanics because both populations grew massively. White population declined as a percentage while blacks stayed the same. The percentage of white/black couples has not changed since 1980. This means they have not increased in popularity. Nothing on that article indicated any increase on that front and it's pretty obvious that the increase is from the huge influx of Asians and Hispanics.

Black/white relationships are 4th on the list after white/hispanic, white/Asian, and white/multi.

The weirdest situation is definitely the Asians though. American born Asian women mix at rates of abovd 50% while American born asian men are falling every year and now in the 30s. That's a huge dichotomy. I believe the rates of sexual activity also bear this out. Incel issues among Asians, Indians, etc are huge for the men (it's upwards of 30% of the men now) while the women apparently sleep with every white guy they can find. That is, more Asian/Indian women have sexuality activity than any other race of women. It's a powder keg waiting to explode, this isn't going to end well

---

Since you're completely ignoring the numbers, let me repeat

White/black couple percentage are 6~7 times more nowadays compared to 1970. Deny it for some reason all you want, the numbers are right there in the report. Even shows the black male/white female and opposite ratios, 70 to 30

And about Asians, since you're just pulling numbers out of a magical hat, let me read the actual numbers

Quote:

---

Just over one-third (36%) of Asian newlywed women have a spouse of a different race or ethnicity, while 21% of Asian newlywed men do.

---

But given your wild drivel and stereotyping of different cultures, we all know you don't give a **** about actual numbers.

CondensedFoggyAggie said:

---

BAP Enthusiast said:

---

CondensedFoggyAggie said:

---

BAP Enthusiast said:

---

CondensedFoggyAggie said:

---

BAP Enthusiast said:

---

CondensedFoggyAggie said:

---

Welp, interracial marriage has gone from 3% in 1970 to 10% in 2020 to 19% in 2019. Looks like it may be 30% by the time we get to 2030.

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/02/25/in-vice-president-kamala-harris-we-can-see-how-america-has-changed/

What a beautiful thing, couples finding love beyond race or backgrounds. This is what America is about.

---

Keep in mind most of this is white/Hispanic so these kinds of stats are always quite misleading especially when you consider that many Hispanics are often 50-80% white and even consider themselves white.

They always play these up like blacks and whites are mixing at higher rates when that isn't true, at all. It's easily one of the least common interracial relationships.

---

Actually,

Quote:

---

Overall increases in intermarriage have been fueled in part by rising intermarriage rates among black newlyweds and among white newlyweds. The share of recently married blacks with a spouse of a different race or ethnicity has more than tripled, from 5% in 1980 to 18% in 2015. Among recently married whites, rates have more than doubled, from 4% up to 11%.

At the same time, intermarriage has ticked down among recently married Asians and remained more or less stable among Hispanic newlyweds.

---

So it seems hispanic/asian interracial marriage rates have held steady or slightly declined since 1980, while white or black interracial marriage has doubled or tripled.

No doubt hispanic interracial marriage still remains a big chunk.

https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2017/05/18/1-trends-and-patterns-in-intermarriage/

---

White population declined while Hispanics and Asians grew. Despite their rates holding steady, the total amount doing it massively increased due to their growing populations.

In comparison, black/white couple rates have remained steady since 1980. This means that the growth in black and white numbers are likely both intermarrying with Hispanics or Asians. The black population has not noticeably changed as a percentage of the population.

Quote:

---

While the bulk of this report focuses on patterns of intermarriage among all newly married individuals, shifting the analysis to the racial and ethnic composition of intermarried newlywed couples shows that the most prevalent form of intermarriage involves one Hispanic and one white spouse (42%). While this share is relatively high, it marks a decline from 1980, when more than half (56%) of all intermarried couples included one Hispanic and one white person.

The next most prevalent couple type in 2015 among those who were intermarried included one Asian and one white spouse (15%). Couples including one black and one white spouse accounted for about one-in-ten (11%) intermarried couples in 2015, a share that has held more or less steady since 1980.

---

So again, my point still stands. White/hispanic is the most common by far followed by white/Asian. The next closest is white/multiracial, and then white/black. The white/black rate has not changed in a long time.

If you're going to use stats like these you should represent them correctly. The above lines up exactly with dating apps and responses.

---

You said blacks and white are NOT mixing at higher rates, when they are.

The percentage of black/white couples among interracial marriages is the same. However, the rate of interracial marriage itself is up, quite drastically. From 3% to almost 20%

Therefor, the ratio of black and white couples, among all couples have increased significantly, around 6~7x of 1970.

If a thousand couples married in 1970, 30 would be interracial, 3 would be white/black.

If a thousand couples married this year, 200 would be interracial, ~22 would be white/black.

That number will likely be up to 30 by 2030, 70% of them being black male/white female, 30% being white male/black female. I have to say its quite nice we've improved as a society where race is considered less of a 'barrier'.

---

The increase in whites is primarily from Asians and Hispanics because both populations grew massively. White population declined as a percentage while blacks stayed the same. The percentage of white/black couples has not changed since 1980. This means they have not increased in popularity. Nothing on that article indicated any increase on that front and it's pretty obvious that the increase is from the huge influx of Asians and Hispanics.

Black/white relationships are 4th on the list after white/hispanic, white/Asian, and white/multi.

The weirdest situation is definitely the Asians though. American born Asian women mix at rates of abovd 50% while American born asian men are falling every year and now in the 30s. That's a huge dichotomy. I believe the rates of sexual activity also bear this out. Incel issues among Asians, Indians, etc are huge for the men (it's upwards of 30% of the men now) while the women apparently sleep with every white guy they can find. That is, more Asian/Indian women have sexuality activity than any other race of women. It's a powder keg waiting to explode, this isn't going to end well

---

Since you're completely ignoring the numbers, let me repeat

White/black couple percentage are 6~7 times more nowadays compared to 1970. Deny it for some reason all you want, the numbers are right there in the report.

And about Asians, since you're just pulling numbers out of a magical hat, let me read the actual numbers

Quote:

---

Just over one-third (36%) of Asian newlywed women have a spouse of a different race or ethnicity, while 21% of Asian newlywed men do.

---

But given your wild drivel and stereotyping of different cultures, we all know you don't give a **** about actual numbers.

---

Hahah funny coming from you. Your posting history as a whole shows neither do you. Especially regarding economics and history.

ttu_85 said:

---

CondensedFoggyAggie said:

---

BAP Enthusiast said:

---

CondensedFoggyAggie said:

---

BAP Enthusiast said:

---

CondensedFoggyAggie said:

---

BAP Enthusiast said:

---

CondensedFoggyAggie said:

---

Welp, interracial marriage has gone from 3% in 1970 to 10% in 2020 to 19% in 2019. Looks like it may be 30% by the time we get to 2030.

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/02/25/in-vice-president-kamala-harris-we-can-see-how-america-has-changed/

What a beautiful thing, couples finding love beyond race or backgrounds. This is what America is about.

---

Keep in mind most of this is white/Hispanic so these kinds of stats are always quite misleading especially when you consider that many Hispanics are often 50-80% white and even consider themselves white.

They always play these up like blacks and whites are mixing at higher rates when that isn't true, at all. It's easily one of the least common interracial relationships.

---

Actually,

Quote:

---

Overall increases in intermarriage have been fueled in part by rising intermarriage rates among black newlyweds and among white newlyweds. The share of recently married blacks with a spouse of a different race or ethnicity has more than tripled, from 5% in 1980 to 18% in 2015. Among recently married whites, rates have more than doubled, from 4% up to 11%.

At the same time, intermarriage has ticked down among recently married Asians and remained more or less stable among Hispanic newlyweds.

---

So it seems hispanic/asian interracial marriage rates have held steady or slightly declined since 1980, while white or black interracial marriage has doubled or tripled.

No doubt hispanic interracial marriage still remains a big chunk.

https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2017/05/18/1-trends-and-patterns-in-intermarriage/

---

White population declined while Hispanics and Asians grew. Despite their rates holding steady, the total amount doing it massively increased due to their growing populations.

In comparison, black/white couple rates have remained steady since 1980. This means that the growth in black and white numbers are likely both intermarrying with Hispanics or Asians. The black population has not noticeably changed as a percentage of the population.

Quote:

---

While the bulk of this report focuses on patterns of intermarriage among all newly married individuals, shifting the analysis to the racial and ethnic composition of intermarried newlywed couples shows that the most prevalent form of intermarriage involves one Hispanic and one white spouse (42%). While this share is relatively high, it marks a decline from 1980, when more than half (56%) of all intermarried couples included one Hispanic and one white person.

The next most prevalent couple type in 2015 among those who were intermarried included one Asian and one white spouse (15%). Couples including one black and one white spouse accounted for about one-in-ten (11%) intermarried couples in 2015, a share that has held more or less steady since 1980.

---

So again, my point still stands. White/hispanic is the most common by far followed by white/Asian. The next closest is white/multiracial, and then white/black. The white/black rate has not changed in a long time.

If you're going to use stats like these you should represent them correctly. The above lines up exactly with dating apps and responses.

---

You said blacks and white are NOT mixing at higher rates, when they are.

The percentage of black/white couples among interracial marriages is the same. However, the rate of interracial marriage itself is up, quite drastically. From 3% to almost 20%

Therefor, the ratio of black and white couples, among all couples have increased significantly, around 6~7x of 1970.

If a thousand couples married in 1970, 30 would be interracial, 3 would be white/black.

If a thousand couples married this year, 200 would be interracial, ~22 would be white/black.

That number will likely be up to 30 by 2030, 70% of them being black male/white female, 30% being white male/black female. I have to say its quite nice we've improved as a society where race is considered less of a 'barrier'.

---

The increase in whites is primarily from Asians and Hispanics because both populations grew massively. White population declined as a percentage while blacks stayed the same. The percentage of white/black couples has not changed since 1980. This means they have not increased in popularity. Nothing on that article indicated any increase on that front and it's pretty obvious that the increase is from the huge influx of Asians and Hispanics.

Black/white relationships are 4th on the list after white/hispanic, white/Asian, and white/multi.

The weirdest situation is definitely the Asians though. American born Asian women mix at rates of abovd 50% while American born asian men are falling every year and now in the 30s. That's a huge dichotomy. I believe the rates of sexual activity also bear this out. Incel issues among Asians, Indians, etc are huge for the men (it's upwards of 30% of the men now) while the women apparently sleep with every white guy they can find. That is, more Asian/Indian women have sexuality activity than any other race of women. It's a powder keg waiting to explode, this isn't going to end well

---

Since you're completely ignoring the numbers, let me repeat

White/black couple percentage are 6~7 times more nowadays compared to 1970. Deny it for some reason all you want, the numbers are right there in the report.

And about Asians, since you're just pulling numbers out of a magical hat, let me read the actual numbers

Quote:

---

Just over one-third (36%) of Asian newlywed women have a spouse of a different race or ethnicity, while 21% of Asian newlywed men do.

---

But given your wild drivel and stereotyping of different cultures, we all know you don't give a **** about actual numbers.

---

Hahah funny coming from you. Your posting history as a whole shows neither do you. Especially regarding economics and history.

---

Feel free to refute my claims with numbers, charts, research, whatever.

CondensedFoggyAggie said:

---

ttu_85 said:

---

CondensedFoggyAggie said:

---

BAP Enthusiast said:

---

CondensedFoggyAggie said:

---

BAP Enthusiast said:

---

CondensedFoggyAggie said:

---

BAP Enthusiast said:

---

CondensedFoggyAggie said:

---

Welp, interracial marriage has gone from 3% in 1970 to 10% in 2020 to 19% in 2019. Looks like it may be 30% by the time we get to 2030.

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/02/25/in-vice-president-kamala-harris-we-can-see-how-america-has-changed/

What a beautiful thing, couples finding love beyond race or backgrounds. This is what America is about.

---

Keep in mind most of this is white/Hispanic so these kinds of stats are always quite misleading especially when you consider that many Hispanics are often 50-80% white and even consider themselves white.

They always play these up like blacks and whites are mixing at higher rates when that isn't true, at all. It's easily one of the least common interracial relationships.

---

Actually,

Quote:

---

Overall increases in intermarriage have been fueled in part by rising intermarriage rates among black newlyweds and among white newlyweds. The share of recently married blacks with a spouse of a different race or ethnicity has more than tripled, from 5% in 1980 to 18% in 2015. Among recently married whites, rates have more than doubled, from 4% up to 11%.

At the same time, intermarriage has ticked down among recently married Asians and remained more or less stable among Hispanic newlyweds.

---

So it seems hispanic/asian interracial marriage rates have held steady or slightly declined since 1980, while white or black interracial marriage has doubled or tripled.

No doubt hispanic interracial marriage still remains a big chunk.

https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2017/05/18/1-trends-and-patterns-in-intermarriage/

---

White population declined while Hispanics and Asians grew. Despite their rates holding steady, the total amount doing it massively increased due to their growing populations.

In comparison, black/white couple rates have remained steady since 1980. This means that the growth in black and white numbers are likely both intermarrying with Hispanics or Asians. The black population has not noticeably changed as a percentage of the population.

Quote:

---

While the bulk of this report focuses on patterns of intermarriage among all newly married individuals, shifting the analysis to the racial and ethnic composition of intermarried newlywed couples shows that the most prevalent form of intermarriage involves one Hispanic and one white spouse (42%). While this share is relatively high, it marks a decline from 1980, when more than half (56%) of all intermarried couples included one Hispanic and one white person.

The next most prevalent couple type in 2015 among those who were intermarried included one Asian and one white spouse (15%). Couples including one black and one white spouse accounted for about one-in-ten (11%) intermarried couples in 2015, a share that has held more or less steady since 1980.

---

So again, my point still stands. White/hispanic is the most common by far followed by white/Asian. The next closest is white/multiracial, and then white/black. The white/black rate has not changed in a long time.

If you're going to use stats like these you should represent them correctly. The above lines up exactly with dating apps and responses.

---

You said blacks and white are NOT mixing at higher rates, when they are.

The percentage of black/white couples among interracial marriages is the same. However, the rate of interracial marriage itself is up, quite drastically. From 3% to almost 20%

Therefor, the ratio of black and white couples, among all couples have increased significantly, around 6~7x of 1970.

If a thousand couples married in 1970, 30 would be interracial, 3 would be white/black.

If a thousand couples married this year, 200 would be interracial, ~22 would be white/black.

That number will likely be up to 30 by 2030, 70% of them being black male/white female, 30% being white male/black female. I have to say its quite nice we've improved as a society where race is considered less of a 'barrier'.

---

The increase in whites is primarily from Asians and Hispanics because both populations grew massively. White population declined as a percentage while blacks stayed the same. The percentage of white/black couples has not changed since 1980. This means they have not increased in popularity. Nothing on that article indicated any increase on that front and it's pretty obvious that the increase is from the huge influx of Asians and Hispanics.

Black/white relationships are 4th on the list after white/hispanic, white/Asian, and white/multi.

The weirdest situation is definitely the Asians though. American born Asian women mix at rates of abovd 50% while American born asian men are falling every year and now in the 30s. That's a huge dichotomy. I believe the rates of sexual activity also bear this out. Incel issues among Asians, Indians, etc are huge for the men (it's upwards of 30% of the men now) while the women apparently sleep with every white guy they can find. That is, more Asian/Indian women have sexuality activity than any other race of women. It's a powder keg waiting to explode, this isn't going to end well

---

Since you're completely ignoring the numbers, let me repeat

White/black couple percentage are 6~7 times more nowadays compared to 1970. Deny it for some reason all you want, the numbers are right there in the report.

And about Asians, since you're just pulling numbers out of a magical hat, let me read the actual numbers

Quote:

---

Just over one-third (36%) of Asian newlywed women have a spouse of a different race or ethnicity, while 21% of Asian newlywed men do.

---

But given your wild drivel and stereotyping of different cultures, we all know you don't give a **** about actual numbers.

---

Hahah funny coming from you. Your posting history as a whole shows neither do you. Especially regarding economics and history.

---

Feel free to refute my claims with numbers, charts, research, whatever.

---

Dont really care about this issue but I have hit your leftest drivil many times in the past and will again. I promise.

ttu_85 said:

---

CondensedFoggyAggie said:

---

ttu_85 said:

---

CondensedFoggyAggie said:

---

BAP Enthusiast said:

---

CondensedFoggyAggie said:

---

BAP Enthusiast said:

---

CondensedFoggyAggie said:

---

BAP Enthusiast said:

---

CondensedFoggyAggie said:

---

Welp, interracial marriage has gone from 3% in 1970 to 10% in 2020 to 19% in 2019. Looks like it may be 30% by the time we get to 2030.

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/02/25/in-vice-president-kamala-harris-we-can-see-how-america-has-changed/

What a beautiful thing, couples finding love beyond race or backgrounds. This is what America is about.

---

Keep in mind most of this is white/Hispanic so these kinds of stats are always quite misleading especially when you consider that many Hispanics are often 50-80% white and even consider themselves white.

They always play these up like blacks and whites are mixing at higher rates when that isn't true, at all. It's easily one of the least common interracial relationships.

---

Actually,

Quote:

---

Overall increases in intermarriage have been fueled in part by rising intermarriage rates among black newlyweds and among white newlyweds. The share of recently married blacks with a spouse of a different race or ethnicity has more than tripled, from 5% in 1980 to 18% in 2015. Among recently married whites, rates have more than doubled, from 4% up to 11%.

At the same time, intermarriage has ticked down among recently married Asians and remained more or less stable among Hispanic newlyweds.

---

So it seems hispanic/asian interracial marriage rates have held steady or slightly declined since 1980, while white or black interracial marriage has doubled or tripled.

No doubt hispanic interracial marriage still remains a big chunk.

https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2017/05/18/1-trends-and-patterns-in-intermarriage/

---

White population declined while Hispanics and Asians grew. Despite their rates holding steady, the total amount doing it massively increased due to their growing populations.

In comparison, black/white couple rates have remained steady since 1980. This means that the growth in black and white numbers are likely both intermarrying with Hispanics or Asians. The black population has not noticeably changed as a percentage of the population.

Quote:

---

While the bulk of this report focuses on patterns of intermarriage among all newly married individuals, shifting the analysis to the racial and ethnic composition of intermarried newlywed couples shows that the most prevalent form of intermarriage involves one Hispanic and one white spouse (42%). While this share is relatively high, it marks a decline from 1980, when more than half (56%) of all intermarried couples included one Hispanic and one white person.

The next most prevalent couple type in 2015 among those who were intermarried included one Asian and one white spouse (15%). Couples including one black and one white spouse accounted for about one-in-ten (11%) intermarried couples in 2015, a share that has held more or less steady since 1980.

---

So again, my point still stands. White/hispanic is the most common by far followed by white/Asian. The next closest is white/multiracial, and then white/black. The white/black rate has not changed in a long time.

If you're going to use stats like these you should represent them correctly. The above lines up exactly with dating apps and responses.

---

You said blacks and white are NOT mixing at higher rates, when they are.

The percentage of black/white couples among interracial marriages is the same. However, the rate of interracial marriage itself is up, quite drastically. From 3% to almost 20%

Therefor, the ratio of black and white couples, among all couples have increased significantly, around 6~7x of 1970.

If a thousand couples married in 1970, 30 would be interracial, 3 would be white/black.

If a thousand couples married this year, 200 would be interracial, ~22 would be white/black.

That number will likely be up to 30 by 2030, 70% of them being black male/white female, 30% being white male/black female. I have to say its quite nice we've improved as a society where race is considered less of a 'barrier'.

---

The increase in whites is primarily from Asians and Hispanics because both populations grew massively. White population declined as a percentage while blacks stayed the same. The percentage of white/black couples has not changed since 1980. This means they have not increased in popularity. Nothing on that article indicated any increase on that front and it's pretty obvious that the increase is from the huge influx of Asians and Hispanics.

Black/white relationships are 4th on the list after white/hispanic, white/Asian, and white/multi.

The weirdest situation is definitely the Asians though. American born Asian women mix at rates of abovd 50% while American born asian men are falling every year and now in the 30s. That's a huge dichotomy. I believe the rates of sexual activity also bear this out. Incel issues among Asians, Indians, etc are huge for the men (it's upwards of 30% of the men now) while the women apparently sleep with every white guy they can find. That is, more Asian/Indian women have sexuality activity than any other race of women. It's a powder keg waiting to explode, this isn't going to end well

---

Since you're completely ignoring the numbers, let me repeat

White/black couple percentage are 6~7 times more nowadays compared to 1970. Deny it for some reason all you want, the numbers are right there in the report.

And about Asians, since you're just pulling numbers out of a magical hat, let me read the actual numbers

Quote:

---

Just over one-third (36%) of Asian newlywed women have a spouse of a different race or ethnicity, while 21% of Asian newlywed men do.

---

But given your wild drivel and stereotyping of different cultures, we all know you don't give a **** about actual numbers.

---

Hahah funny coming from you. Your posting history as a whole shows neither do you. Especially regarding economics and history.

---

Feel free to refute my claims with numbers, charts, research, whatever.

---

Dont really care about this issue but I have hit your leftest many time drivel in the past and will again. I promise.

---

Great, put me on perm ignore, problem solved. Thanks for the heads up.

CondensedFoggyAggie said:

---

BAP Enthusiast said:

---

CondensedFoggyAggie said:

---

BAP Enthusiast said:

---

CondensedFoggyAggie said:

---

BAP Enthusiast said:

---

CondensedFoggyAggie said:

---

Welp, interracial marriage has gone from 3% in 1970 to 10% in 2020 to 19% in 2019. Looks like it may be 30% by the time we get to 2030.

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/02/25/in-vice-president-kamala-harris-we-can-see-how-america-has-changed/

What a beautiful thing, couples finding love beyond race or backgrounds. This is what America is about.

---

Keep in mind most of this is white/Hispanic so these kinds of stats are always quite misleading especially when you consider that many Hispanics are often 50-80% white and even consider themselves white.

They always play these up like blacks and whites are mixing at higher rates when that isn't true, at all. It's easily one of the least common interracial relationships.

---

Actually,

Quote:

---

Overall increases in intermarriage have been fueled in part by rising intermarriage rates among black newlyweds and among white newlyweds. The share of recently married blacks with a spouse of a different race or ethnicity has more than tripled, from 5% in 1980 to 18% in 2015. Among recently married whites, rates have more than doubled, from 4% up to 11%.

At the same time, intermarriage has ticked down among recently married Asians and remained more or less stable among Hispanic newlyweds.

---

So it seems hispanic/asian interracial marriage rates have held steady or slightly declined since 1980, while white or black interracial marriage has doubled or tripled.

No doubt hispanic interracial marriage still remains a big chunk.

https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2017/05/18/1-trends-and-patterns-in-intermarriage/

---

White population declined while Hispanics and Asians grew. Despite their rates holding steady, the total amount doing it massively increased due to their growing populations.

In comparison, black/white couple rates have remained steady since 1980. This means that the growth in black and white numbers are likely both intermarrying with Hispanics or Asians. The black population has not noticeably changed as a percentage of the population.

Quote:

---

While the bulk of this report focuses on patterns of intermarriage among all newly married individuals, shifting the analysis to the racial and ethnic composition of intermarried newlywed couples shows that the most prevalent form of intermarriage involves one Hispanic and one white spouse (42%). While this share is relatively high, it marks a decline from 1980, when more than half (56%) of all intermarried couples included one Hispanic and one white person.

The next most prevalent couple type in 2015 among those who were intermarried included one Asian and one white spouse (15%). Couples including one black and one white spouse accounted for about one-in-ten (11%) intermarried couples in 2015, a share that has held more or less steady since 1980.

---

So again, my point still stands. White/hispanic is the most common by far followed by white/Asian. The next closest is white/multiracial, and then white/black. The white/black rate has not changed in a long time.

If you're going to use stats like these you should represent them correctly. The above lines up exactly with dating apps and responses.

---

You said blacks and white are NOT mixing at higher rates, when they are.

The percentage of black/white couples among interracial marriages is the same. However, the rate of interracial marriage itself is up, quite drastically. From 3% to almost 20%

Therefor, the ratio of black and white couples, among all couples have increased significantly, around 6~7x of 1970.

If a thousand couples married in 1970, 30 would be interracial, 3 would be white/black.

If a thousand couples married this year, 200 would be interracial, ~22 would be white/black.

That number will likely be up to 30 by 2030, 70% of them being black male/white female, 30% being white male/black female. I have to say its quite nice we've improved as a society where race is considered less of a 'barrier'.

---

The increase in whites is primarily from Asians and Hispanics because both populations grew massively. White population declined as a percentage while blacks stayed the same. The percentage of white/black couples has not changed since 1980. This means they have not increased in popularity. Nothing on that article indicated any increase on that front and it's pretty obvious that the increase is from the huge influx of Asians and Hispanics.

Black/white relationships are 4th on the list after white/hispanic, white/Asian, and white/multi.

The weirdest situation is definitely the Asians though. American born Asian women mix at rates of abovd 50% while American born asian men are falling every year and now in the 30s. That's a huge dichotomy. I believe the rates of sexual activity also bear this out. Incel issues among Asians, Indians, etc are huge for the men (it's upwards of 30% of the men now) while the women apparently sleep with every white guy they can find. That is, more Asian/Indian women have sexuality activity than any other race of women. It's a powder keg waiting to explode, this isn't going to end well

---

Since you're completely ignoring the numbers, let me repeat

White/black couple percentage are 6~7 times more nowadays compared to 1970. Deny it for some reason all you want, the numbers are right there in the report. Even shows the black male/white female and opposite ratios, 70 to 30

And about Asians, since you're just pulling numbers out of a magical hat, let me read the actual numbers

Quote:

---

Just over one-third (36%) of Asian newlywed women have a spouse of a different race or ethnicity, while 21% of Asian newlywed men do.

---

But given your wild drivel and stereotyping of different cultures, we all know you don't give a **** about actual numbers.

---

That is exactly almost word for word what the pew research article, that you posted, says:

Quote:

---

Significant growth in the Hispanic and Asian populations in the U.S. since 1980, coupled with the high rates of intermarriage among Hispanic and Asian newlyweds, has been an important factor driving the rise in intermarriage. Since that time, the share of all newlyweds that were Hispanic rose 9 percentage points, from 8% to 17%, and the share that were Asian grew from 2% to 6%. At the same time, the share of white newlyweds declined by 15 points and the share of black newlyweds held steady.

---

That is, the rise was driven by Hispanics and Asian rises in population.

I have read that article multiple times and cannot find where they speak about the increase in white/black percentages or for that being the primary reason for white and black overall increases. I have found other articles about the increase but it's surprisingly difficult to find these stats since 1980. It does look like you are correct about the increase since 1970 though. Other articles state that. I do find it interesting that the increase happened between 1970 and 1980 as a percentage and then has held steady since then (the pew research article makes a note of that). Makes me wonder why.

The laws banning whites from marrying persons who were black or asian didn't get completely removed until about 1967 or 68 I think? Might have something to do with the 1970 to 1980 increase. Don't know, didn't check, but that was around that time when a lot was going on w/respect to the war and changing attitudes. Serviceman meets a young lady overseas and wants to marry her but his state doesn't recognize it as legal and such perhaps? That might pave the way for other relationships to feel more secure in applying for a license?