MSM pushing A-OK narrative 4 todays Cyber Ninja Audit release

3,672 Views | 30 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by Faustus
damiond
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/elections/2021/09/23/arizona-audit-draft-report-confirms-biden-beat-trump-2020/5835521001/
The three-volume report by the Cyber Ninjas, the Senate's lead contractor, includes results that show Trump lost by a wider margin than the county's official election results. The data in the report also confirms that U.S. Sen. Mark Kelly won in the county.
Freaking media hacks are always the lap dogs of liberal
blacksox
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wow.. The hand-picked "auditors" concluded that Trump lost? That's not what they were being paid to discover.
fredfredunderscorefred
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I suspect the report will say "here are the votes, but here is why those votes are suspect...". This reporting is only saying the first part.
JW
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm certain that the votes were counted correctly. I'm also certain that many of those votes were fraudulent. That audit won't happen.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JW said:

I'm certain that the votes were counted correctly. I'm also certain that many of those votes were fraudulent. That audit won't happen.
Bingo.

The "count" is not the issue per say. The issue is the fraudulent ballots included in the count.

Doesn't matter how many times ballots are counted; if the fraudulent ballots are recounted each time, the totals will not change much if at all.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
FriscoKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Not so fast!

Albatross Necklace
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Audit: 23K votes with no ballots
(Biden "won" by 10K)




MSM:

RedComyn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Did any of you read the bits where it says that none of the votes they've highlighted as suspicious are necessarily fraudulent and that there is no indication that any one candidate or party as favored over others among them?

Or maybe you're all just grasping at infinitely smaller and smaller straws as you wheel the goalposts further and further.
HTownAg98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Albatross Necklace said:

Audit: 23K votes with no ballots
(Biden "won" by 10K)




MSM:



The notes that go with that table are kind of important.
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You must enjoy being wrong?
thirdcoast
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Of course the physical ballots provided are going to show Biden won. The problem is the authenticity of the ballots which Cyber Ninja will also expose and the MSM will claim is "conspiracy theory".
Anonymous Source
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
damiond said:

https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/elections/2021/09/23/arizona-audit-draft-report-confirms-biden-beat-trump-2020/5835521001/
The three-volume report by the Cyber Ninjas, the Senate's lead contractor, includes results that show Trump lost by a wider margin than the county's official election results. The data in the report also confirms that U.S. Sen. Mark Kelly won in the county.
Freaking media hacks are always the lap dogs of liberal
So we had the election.
Then we hired a company to find the "truth" about the election.
The "truth", as determined by the crackerjack auditing team, is that Trump lost by a bigger margin in AZ than what was thought. In fact, hell, he thought he won.
So the media reports the "truth", as found by the crackerjack auditing team, but because the "truth" they found doesn't line up with the "truth" you hoped for, you're pissed at the media?

Makes total sense. Keep ****ing that chicken.
Gig 'Em
Ghost of Andrew Eaton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm shocked that the audit this board called for is immediately being discredited by the same board when they don't get the results that they want. Shocked I tell you.
ironmanag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ummmm..

Okay

So the Audit actually shows that there was significant irregularites.

I don't get the liberal football spiking.

Don't y'all want clean elections?
torrid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Who's going to audit the audit?
Ghost of Andrew Eaton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
torrid said:

Who's going to audit the audit?


And who is going to care about the results?
Anonymous Source
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

torrid said:

Who's going to audit the audit?


And who is going to care about the results?
These people
Gig 'Em
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
blacksox said:

Wow.. The hand-picked "auditors" concluded that Trump lost? That's not what they were being paid to discover.
You're 100% wrong. From the beginning the forensic audit's purpose was to reveal the truth. I will wait to hear or read the audit's results.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

I'm shocked that the audit this board called for is immediately being discredited by the same board when they don't get the results that they want. Shocked I tell you.
Who has discredited the audit?
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Ghost of Andrew Eaton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
richardag said:

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

I'm shocked that the audit this board called for is immediately being discredited by the same board when they don't get the results that they want. Shocked I tell you.
Who has discredited the audit?


Most folks on this thread.
American Hardwood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Name a few. I don't see anyone on this thread saying the audit is invalid.
Ghost of Andrew Eaton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
American Hardwood said:

Name a few. I don't see anyone on this thread saying the audit is invalid.
You see what you want to see. Have an awesome and less obtuse day.
American Hardwood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

American Hardwood said:

Name a few. I don't see anyone on this thread saying the audit is invalid.
You see what you want to see. Have an awesome and less obtuse day.
So you can't. Thanks. Have a nice weekend tilting at windmills.
Ghost of Andrew Eaton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
American Hardwood said:

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

American Hardwood said:

Name a few. I don't see anyone on this thread saying the audit is invalid.
You see what you want to see. Have an awesome and less obtuse day.
So you can't. Thanks. Have a nice weekend tilting at windmills.
This thread is about not trusting the results of the audit. If you can't find it, nothing I add will convince you. There is no point in discussing this further.
Malibu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
American Hardwood said:

Name a few. I don't see anyone on this thread saying the audit is invalid.
It's not that they're discrediting the audit. It's that when yet another data point, this one from a Q Anon stop the steal confirmed Trump supporter in Cyber Ninjas, reveals yet again that no data yet supports the notion that this election was stolen, the goal posts change to "well, we know that there were illegal and fraudulent ballots for Biden in there that were counted, but an audit couldn't possibly uncover that." If you can test that hypothesis knock yourself out. It seems that many posters are left with wishful thinking that Trump won rather than resigning themselves to the idea that maybe, Biden actually won this thing, and that data and audits are confirming that.
American Hardwood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

American Hardwood said:

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

American Hardwood said:

Name a few. I don't see anyone on this thread saying the audit is invalid.
You see what you want to see. Have an awesome and less obtuse day.
So you can't. Thanks. Have a nice weekend tilting at windmills.
This thread is about not trusting the results of the audit. If you can't find it, nothing I add will convince you. There is no point in discussing this further.
Quote:

Quote:

Who has discredited the audit?


Most folks on this thread.
This is what we are talking about. You claimed that the folks on this thread discredited the audit. I asked you to identify them and you can't. Now you want to move the goalposts from 'discrediting' to 'distrusting' so go ahead and identify the posters on this thread who said they didn't trust the audit now.
Ghost of Andrew Eaton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
American Hardwood said:

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

American Hardwood said:

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

American Hardwood said:

Name a few. I don't see anyone on this thread saying the audit is invalid.
You see what you want to see. Have an awesome and less obtuse day.
So you can't. Thanks. Have a nice weekend tilting at windmills.
This thread is about not trusting the results of the audit. If you can't find it, nothing I add will convince you. There is no point in discussing this further.
Quote:

Quote:

Who has discredited the audit?


Most folks on this thread.
This is what we are talking about. You claimed that the folks on this thread discredited the audit. I asked you to identify them and you can't. Now you want to move the goalposts from 'discrediting' to 'distrusting' so go ahead and identify the posters on this thread who said they didn't trust the audit now.
Discrediting=Distrusting in most reasonable people's opinions. But then again you are just being obtuse. Have a good weekend.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
show Trump lost by a wider margin

Yeah, no.
Currently a happy listless vessel and deplorable. #FDEMS TRUMP 2024.
Fight Fight Fight.
Oak Tree
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The MSM is totally controlled by the progressive Democrat leadership. They are paid to use progressive propaganda to create a narrative to help Democrats.

DC Republicans decided not to uphold the law against Democrats for years now. Should Republicans focus on the MSM or the DC Republicans if they want justice and a fair election?
HTownAg98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Some interesting developments today. The Arizona Republic sued the Arizona Senate and Cyber Ninjas to get documents that Cyber Ninjas was supposed to turn over to the Senate, and never did. Cyber Ninjas' attorney asked to be removed as counsel because he isn't being paid, and the judge denied it. The judge has had enough, and has held Cyber Ninjas in contempt, sanctioning Cyber Ninjas $50,000/day until they turn over the documents that have been requested.
Faustus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thanks for the bump.

I googled to see what was going on, and this came from Cyber Ninja's counsel's motion to withdraw:

https://www.newsweek.com/cyber-ninjas-arizona-election-probe-lawyer-asks-quit-alleges-he-isnt-being-paid-1663824

Quote:

. . .
Cyber Ninjas CEO Doug Logan has been called to give a deposition to American Oversight's lawyers on Jan. 5.
. . .
Wilenchik told a judge last month that Cyber Ninjas has no money and can't afford to pay for the review or redaction of records.

"Who's paying for that?" Wilenchik said to Maricopa County Superior Court Judge John Hannah. "Because the plaintiff is not, the Senate is not, and this company is insolvent."

Cyber Ninjas has released some documents but maintains it is doing so voluntarily. Among them is a financial statement suggesting the ballot review cost nearly $9 million. Cyber Ninjas received $5.7 million from political groups led by Trump allies who have aggressively promoted the former president's false claims that the election was stolen from him, along with $1 million paid by donors directly to subcontractors. Altogether, Cyber Ninjas reported a net loss of more than $2 million from the audit.
. . .
They took in almost $7 million, produced the report, and closed shop on that corporate entity. I wonder if Logan appeared for deposition yesterday.

Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.