Hurry! Kill your baby! Before it's too late!

We need a "because you'd be in jail" moment here.

Get on Birth Control

Now.

Any form that is reliable.

Oral Contraceptives, Nuva Ring, Norplant, IUD.

Something.

Now.

— Dara Kass, MD (@darakass) September 1, 2021

This is also one of the tweets in that thread.

She gives away the game with this one. They view abortion as just another form of birth control

I hope she likes the heat because I hear hell is warm.

A day is coming where Jesus will judge these baby killers and they will get their just reward. In this life, or the next.

As I have said

Abortion is post conception birth control for convenience

Daily reminder that demons are real.

Liberals on here support her killing any baby she can.

This goes to show that vampires are real, if not mummies.

Her name is darkass

Lol, you don't have to worry, trust me. Vast majority of psycho women losing their **** over this never stood a chance with dudes. And many hate dudes.

I am actually OK with the law. This is one (of two) areas I am actually conservative on and you have 6 weeks. That said, I am surprised it doesn't include rape or incest. I'm not sure a women carrying a child that was conceived by someone who raped you is a good idea. In fact, It's a HORRIBLE IDEA. How can someone even come up with this craziness??

If you are not willing to deal with the consequences of an unplanned pregnancy, BOTH women and men, then DON'T have sex.

liberalag12 said:

---

I am actually OK with the law. This is one (of two) areas I am actually conservative on and you have 6 weeks. That said, I am surprised it doesn't include rape or incest. I'm not sure a women carrying a child that was conceived by someone who raped you is a good idea. In fact, It's a HORRIBLE IDEA. How can someone even come up with this craziness??

---

Six weeks seems pretty tight. The woman will need to have scheduled and conducted the procedure within days of being late. It's a good thing most of us aren't women and don't have to worry about it I guess.

liberalag12 said:

---

I am actually OK with the law. This is one (of two) areas I am actually conservative on and you have 6 weeks. That said, I am surprised it doesn't include rape or incest. I'm not sure a women carrying a child that was conceived by someone who raped you is a good idea. In fact, It's a HORRIBLE IDEA. How can someone even come up with this craziness??

---

If someone holds the perspective that abortion is equivalent to the murder of a postnatal infant, then it's intellectually and morally inconsistent to make exceptions for rape and incest. How the fetus came to be has no bearing whatsoever in that discussion.

And besides, the rape/incest argument is the boring trope of the intellectually lazy. It represents such a tiny percentage of abortions that it is barely relevant at all, and it's a question never posed in good faith. If you don't believe, go and see how many pro-choice individuals would be willing to entertain abortion limitations IF the pro-life side agreed to universal exceptions for rape and incest. If the answer is no (and it always will be) then why are we talking about it? Clearly its simply just a gotcha attempt lacking in sincerity.

I can't see how anyone can celebrate a law allowing murder up until the baby makes it past six weeks. That seems morally and intellectually inconsistent.

Not you personally IA, just in general.

So you'd prefer an unwanted child remind its mother of getting victimized for the rest of one of their lives?

TexasRebel said:

---

So you'd prefer an unwanted child remind its mother of getting victimized for the rest of one of their lives?

---

If one believes abortion is always murder at any stage of pregnancy, that's the only position you can hold. Anything else is tacit support of something you believe constitutes murder.

Now while I oppose widespread abortion as a means of birth control for several reasons, I dont believe aborting a 6 week old fetus is equivalent to stabbing a toddler to death. And in fact their actions prove that most who claim they do actually don't. But for that minority that DOES believe this, there is no other position their worldview allows for.

This is one unintended consequence of this law. It doesn't disallow abortion, it will speed up the decision making and, in my opinion, will put more onus of the decision on the female while also removing more responsibility of the decision from the male. There wont be much time for couples to make a rational well thought out choice together, instead they may be forced to act quickly in ways they may later regret.

Demonic.

Infection_Ag11 said:

---

liberalag12 said:

---

I am actually OK with the law. This is one (of two) areas I am actually conservative on and you have 6 weeks. That said, I am surprised it doesn't include rape or incest. I'm not sure a women carrying a child that was conceived by someone who raped you is a good idea. In fact, It's a HORRIBLE IDEA. How can someone even come up with this craziness??

---

If someone holds the perspective that abortion is equivalent to the murder of a postnatal infant, then it's intellectually and morally inconsistent to make exceptions for rape and incest. How the fetus came to be has no bearing whatsoever in that discussion.

And besides, the rape/incest argument is the boring trope of the intellectually lazy. It represents such a tiny percentage of abortions that it is barely relevant at all, and it's a question never posed in good faith. If you don't believe, go and see how many pro-choice individuals would be willing to entertain abortion limitations IF the pro-life side agreed to universal exceptions for rape and incest. If the answer is no (and it always will be) then why are we talking about it? Clearly its simply just a gotcha attempt lacking in sincerity.

---

Really? Obviously, you probably are a man like me. Imagine being a women, and having a child you are developing in the womb reminding you every day of what happened to you etc.. Do ya think that might be a bit traumatic? Shouldn't that person decide on choosing what to do in that dilemma? Besides, tramua therapy is about getting a person's power back that has been taking away. How is that hard to understand? I do know some women still give birth to the child in a miraculous gift of grace and forgiveness, turning a traumatic incident into life which is amazing, to say the least.

My response to her:

https://twitter.com/Buckeye662/status/1433342041937760264?t=W74jmZorLOutyuW6emFmxw&s=19

Faustus said:

---

I can't see how anyone can celebrate a law allowing murder up until the baby makes it past six weeks. That seems morally and intellectually inconsistent.

Not you personally IA, just in general.

---

I believe the intent was to ban abortion around the time the baby's heart begins beating. Since the medical profession defines end of life as when the heart stops beating, it seems consistent to say life begins with a beating heart.

I'm not saying that's necessarily my definition on when life begins, honestly I'm not qualified to make that call. I think the timing on when abortion becomes illegal may have been designed to survive the inevitable court challenges. An outright ban on all abortions is DOA at SCOTUS, at least if you believe the Senate testimony of ACB (because of precedent).

Thanks to Abbott and the Texas GOP.

the Coronavirus now has more reproductive rights than the women of Texas.

Lol seethe harder

liberalag12 said:

---

Infection_Ag11 said:

---

liberalag12 said:

---

I am actually OK with the law. This is one (of two) areas I am actually conservative on and you have 6 weeks. That said, I am surprised it doesn't include rape or incest. I'm not sure a women carrying a child that was conceived by someone who raped you is a good idea. In fact, It's a HORRIBLE IDEA. How can someone even come up with this craziness??

---

If someone holds the perspective that abortion is equivalent to the murder of a postnatal infant, then it's intellectually and morally inconsistent to make exceptions for rape and incest. How the fetus came to be has no bearing whatsoever in that discussion.

And besides, the rape/incest argument is the boring trope of the intellectually lazy. It represents such a tiny percentage of abortions that it is barely relevant at all, and it's a question never posed in good faith. If you don't believe, go and see how many pro-choice individuals would be willing to entertain abortion limitations IF the pro-life side agreed to universal exceptions for rape and incest. If the answer is no (and it always will be) then why are we talking about it? Clearly its simply just a gotcha attempt lacking in sincerity.

---

Really? Obviously, you probably are a man like me. Imagine being a women, and having a child you are developing in the womb reminding you every day of what happened to you etc.. Do ya think that might be a bit traumatic? Shouldn't that person decide on choosing what to do in that dilemma? Besides, tramua therapy is about getting a person's power back that has been taking away. How is that hard to understand? I do know some women still give birth to the child in a miraculous gift of grace and forgiveness, turning a traumatic incident into life which is amazing, to say the least.

---

He is right. Tell me- how is adding the trauma of having killed your baby on top of the trauma of being raped "getting control back"?

At any rate, these cases are so rare that they almost don't bear mentioning in the debate. They are without a doubt used as a cop out.

If a rape occurs, take a plan B while being evaluated at the hospital. Well inside 6 weeks.

Bourre said:

---

If a rape occurs, take a plan B while being evaluated at the hospital. Well inside 6 weeks.

---

I would hope that is common practice at hospitals for rape victims.

I'm confused. I thought this law only allowed anyone to sue a doctor for performing an abortion after 6 weeks. This is not necessarily a ban since it can still be done, but a civil suit can be brought against the doctor for doing it.

A lotta dudes who don't have the prospect of caring for a human being for at least 18 years have some pretty strong opinions on this.

Sadly, this will likely be problematic in cases of incest rape, as the child won't know until well outside the 6 weeks.

This law should have had provisions allowed to go slightly beyond 6 weeks in cases of rape, severe deformity, risk of mothers death etc.

GeorgiAg said:

---

A lotta dudes who don't have the prospect of caring for a human being for at least 18 years have some pretty strong opinions on this.

---

A woman can put the baby up for adoption. KILLING the baby before it is born is the most selfish and immoral thing a woman can do.

Such a dumb argument

Stupid@17 said:

---

Sadly, this will likely be problematic in cases of incest rape, as the child won't know until well outside the 6 weeks.

This law should have had provisions allowed to go slightly beyond 6 weeks in cases of rape, severe deformity, risk of mothers death etc.

---

I imagine that there will be no shortage of depraved doctors who will sign anything that will legally warrant the death of the baby.