mwm said:
Rumsfeld wasn't exactly my hero, but if this is factual, it tells me alot about the traitor in the WH:
THAT SENATOR WAS JOE BIDEN.
***
From the book "When the Center Held." by Donald Rumsfeld in 2018
Great post. Rumsfeld apparently wasn't a big nation-builder either. This is from a fellow Bush Administration official who is a critic of that point of view.
https://www.rand.org/blog/2021/07/donald-rumsfeld-anti-nation-builder.htmlQuote:
Many will regret that Rumsfeld did not succeed in avoiding long-term commitments of American forces in Afghanistan and Iraq. Yet the effect of Rumsfeld's resistance was to make unavoidable operations more difficult and eventually less successful. The judgment as to whether these missions were avoidable turns on whether one believes that the United States can invade a country, overthrow its government, and escape responsibility for the consequences.
With regard to a feudal area with a token national government and real power in the hands of regional warlords and opium cartels, you can most certainly refuse to build something that was never there.
Rumsfeld understood the situation in Afghanistan far better than his Wilsonian counterparts in the Bush 43 Administration.
But once you decide to tread down the path of nation-building, you should be prepared for the long haul.
If you decide to leave, then you should maintain what you have left behind to the point where your opposition will end up doing as you wish them to do in a policy sense.
What we've done here is engage in a unilateral surrender to the Taliban for no good reason either in the short or long terms of American foreign policy.
A conditional framework was established by President Trump and his extremely capable foreign policy team.
Team Jackass decided to ditch it in favor of handing the Taliban everything they wanted without conditions.