Really entertaining thread on the e board about this.

There is a great thread on the entertainment board on this subject.

Secondly, I thought it was a well presented fact diving excursion, at least on its face. Would like to see a counter position to some main points. Really shows you want this social media era is capable. Polarization will be the norm going forward, as it has been for the last decade.

Did they say who Q is?

stetson said:

---

Did they say who Q is?

---

Epstein

stetson said:

---

Did they say who Q is?

---

Ron Watkins, aka Codemonkey, 8 chan administrator.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ron_Watkins

aggieforester05 said:

---

Really entertaining thread on the e board about this.

---

Yessir. Baller is in a tizzy using their primary username.

dmart90 said:

---

I assume some of you watched it - or at least part of it. Curious as to what you think. I thought the documentary was pretty well done - certainly over the top at times. The director is a lefty and that comes through for sure.

---

Hey, let's watch a movie about the holocaust written by actual Nazis.

Couldn't pay me to watch it.

Does it explain what the hell it was? An immediate turn-off was time travel and ufos constantly invoked. Time travel even more than any ufos. What seems somewhat plausible was the claims about trafficking that would emerge into separate thread given the Epstien revelations.

To those who won't watch...is there any part of you that believes some of the qanon theories? I appreciate you may think it's slanted, but on its face qanon is pretty far out there with no need to slant a thing.

What are you calling the qanon theories though? That's part of the problem. None of the spin-off threads talking about it, even the trafficking ones, explained just what it was claiming was going on. Who doing what. The existence of some under the surface cabal, or shadow government, is obvious because of the coordinated four year `palace coup' against President Trump. Ok, fine, that's easy to grant--- in fact, it appears to have fully seized power. But what ever was Q supposedly organizing---- its a bit like Jan 6--- it wasn't what the Democrats say it was because it would have done something organized if so.

But as far as claims of this or that the more persuasive stuff that seemed worth keeping up with was and is on the "Mueller dismisses" thread. That always seemed to have more verifiable statements and events. The Election thread is going in a similar fashion currently.

Took a look at the first page of the Entertainment thread on this documentary to see . From what TCTTS is posting, it actually sounds like a half-way good or more work. The whole subject is very nebulous to me, but it sounds like if one wants to get into the weeds this may be worth doing so. What caught my attention was it apparently also explains Anonymous -- -which long before Trump was a group active and wondered what was up with that. That might be enough to take a look, but this kind of thing is really contorted.

https://texags.com/forums/13/topics/3190879/replies/59009827

And BCG Disciple nicely accounted for some of the resonance here.

Quote:

---

But would make for great drama if they spent time delving in to how and why the circumstances behind q made it more likely to be believed. Ie, the alphabet agencies documented attempts to operate as a dem arm to prevent the effectiveness of our first non politician who ran on attacking them and draining the swamp. There is a reason why some of the q narratives resonated like they did.

---

That as we know, is simply fact. Same thing gives force to the Mueller and Elections threads. As well as the Big Tech cover-ups and deletions.

Anyway. first impression of that thread.