Seriously? WTF?!?!?
flashplayer said:
The better question is how does Georgia have two of them.
98Ag99Grad said:
How do places like MA and VT get Republican governors?
the sad thing is I think you may actually think that.chris1515 said:
Maybe the Republican candidates were crappy candidates and the voters weren't blinded by party loyalty?
You spend 2 months complaining about election results run by state officials in your own party and convincing your base their vote doesn't matter...flashplayer said:
The better question is how does Georgia have two of them.
chris1515 said:
Maybe the Republican candidates were crappy candidates and the voters weren't blinded by party loyalty?
Short Answer: DOMINIONflashplayer said:
The better question is how does Georgia have two of them.
Maybe it is a simpler answer. Maybe he does things right, and if its not broken, you don't fix it. Including him changing his party handle? Not sure just how "remote" Montana is from the political field, but it seems to be so. Maybe its just seen like Texas Democrats used to be.chris1515 said:
Montanans have elected him three times, so he must be doing something right.
flashplayer said:
The better question is how does Georgia have two of them.
chris1515 said:
Maybe the Republican candidates were crappy candidates and the voters weren't blinded by party loyalty?
This.flashplayer said:
The better question is how does Georgia have two of them.
BTKAG97 said:
Montana is a very large welfare state. The only reason no one thinks of Montana being a welfare state is because the population is low.
Montana is low density population state. Atlanta metro alone has 6 times the population of Montana and is 60% of Ga's total population. The bad guys in Blue are starting to win the large urban areas in Red States. That trend must be reversed or we are going to have problems. Texas has the same problem Ga does.annie88 said:This.flashplayer said:
The better question is how does Georgia have two of them.
They wouldn't like all the fraud the Beaumont crowd would take with them.Faustus said:BTKAG97 said:
Montana is a very large welfare state. The only reason no one thinks of Montana being a welfare state is because the population is low.
It has more than a million residents, about twice the size of Wyoming. Pick up Beaumont and drop it in Montana and the state has two Democratic Senators. Drop Beaumont in Wyoming and it's the largest city and threatening to turn the state blue too.
And the zeppelin known as Abrams.......her mail in dirty ballots got it done.SeMgCo87 said:Short Answer: DOMINIONflashplayer said:
The better question is how does Georgia have two of them.
Well, luckily for Montana, Beaumont is our problem, not theirs.Faustus said:BTKAG97 said:
Montana is a very large welfare state. The only reason no one thinks of Montana being a welfare state is because the population is low.
It has more than a million residents, about twice the size of Wyoming. Pick up Beaumont and drop it in Montana and the state has two Democratic Senators. Drop Beaumont in Wyoming and it's the largest city and threatening to turn the state blue too.
cheatingflashplayer said:
The better question is how does Georgia have two of them.
Clob94 said:
California D-Bags are buying land in like kind exchanges to avoid taxation and they are flooding Montana--- don't you "yellowstone" bro?