Seriously? WTF?!?!?
Post Reply
1 of 1
How Does Montana have a Dem Senator?
3,435 Views |
31 Replies |
Last: 3 yr ago by Gigem314
Missoula.
It's like Santa Fe, with colder weather and dirtier Californians
It's like Santa Fe, with colder weather and dirtier Californians
The same reason the democrats gave as a candidate for Senate here last election who rode around on a motorcycle.
California D-Bags are buying land in like kind exchanges to avoid taxation and they are flooding Montana--- don't you "yellowstone" bro?
The better question is how does Georgia have two of them.
flashplayer said:
The better question is how does Georgia have two of them.
Atlanta and Savannah
How do places like MA and VT get Republican governors?
98Ag99Grad said:
How do places like MA and VT get Republican governors?
NM. Thought you said Senator.
New Englanders are a special breed that love to pretend that Republicans live there and that there's political dichotomy when there is none.
See Mitt Romney as an example.
Maybe the Republican candidates were crappy candidates and the voters weren't blinded by party loyalty?
You spend 2 months complaining about election results run by state officials in your own party and convincing your base their vote doesn't matter...flashplayer said:
The better question is how does Georgia have two of them.
Recipe for disaster.
chris1515 said:
Maybe the Republican candidates were crappy candidates and the voters weren't blinded by party loyalty?
To switch from one party to the other requires a 180 about face on everything a person believes in. There is zero common ground between the two sides. My guess, as aluded to above, Californians have screwed their own state up enough now they are moving and contaminating other states.
Montanans have elected him three times, so he must be doing something right.
A big influence of Californians. Also a very high percentage of Montanans go through life depending on handouts.
Short Answer: DOMINIONflashplayer said:
The better question is how does Georgia have two of them.
Maybe it is a simpler answer. Maybe he does things right, and if its not broken, you don't fix it. Including him changing his party handle? Not sure just how "remote" Montana is from the political field, but it seems to be so. Maybe its just seen like Texas Democrats used to be.chris1515 said:
Montanans have elected him three times, so he must be doing something right.
FrioAg 00:
Leftist Democrats "have completely overplayed the Racism accusation. Honestly my first reaction when I hear it today is to assume bad intentions by the accuser, not the accused."
Leftist Democrats "have completely overplayed the Racism accusation. Honestly my first reaction when I hear it today is to assume bad intentions by the accuser, not the accused."
Montana is a very large welfare state. The only reason no one thinks of Montana being a welfare state is because the population is low.
flashplayer said:
The better question is how does Georgia have two of them.
Dominion?
Liberals are Damn Liars! Terminate Section 230! It has been ONLY 72!hours since my last banning for defending my conservative values against liberal snowflake cupcakes and the LIBERAL Mod’s that protect them! Fairness is a myth! Stop trying to silence us! Decent LAW ABIDING HUMAN BEINGS MATTER and so do our voices. When you protect the wicked, the Anarchist, the deviant, you become One of them!
ALL LIVES MATTER - I support police and motorcycle riders. Patriot Gun Owners Unite!
ALL LIVES MATTER - I support police and motorcycle riders. Patriot Gun Owners Unite!
chris1515 said:
Maybe the Republican candidates were crappy candidates and the voters weren't blinded by party loyalty?
In this scenario, the Democrats would have been better candidates? I want some of what you're smoking!
This.flashplayer said:
The better question is how does Georgia have two of them.
Currently a happy listless vessel and deplorable. #FDEMS TRUMP 2024.
Fight Fight Fight.
Fight Fight Fight.
Remember Tom Dashle of South Dakota?
That one i never understood
That one i never understood
BTKAG97 said:
Montana is a very large welfare state. The only reason no one thinks of Montana being a welfare state is because the population is low.
It has more than a million residents, about twice the size of Wyoming. Pick up Beaumont and drop it in Montana and the state has two Democratic Senators. Drop Beaumont in Wyoming and it's the largest city and threatening to turn the state blue too.
Montana is low density population state. Atlanta metro alone has 6 times the population of Montana and is 60% of Ga's total population. The bad guys in Blue are starting to win the large urban areas in Red States. That trend must be reversed or we are going to have problems. Texas has the same problem Ga does.annie88 said:This.flashplayer said:
The better question is how does Georgia have two of them.
They wouldn't like all the fraud the Beaumont crowd would take with them.Faustus said:BTKAG97 said:
Montana is a very large welfare state. The only reason no one thinks of Montana being a welfare state is because the population is low.
It has more than a million residents, about twice the size of Wyoming. Pick up Beaumont and drop it in Montana and the state has two Democratic Senators. Drop Beaumont in Wyoming and it's the largest city and threatening to turn the state blue too.
And the zeppelin known as Abrams.......her mail in dirty ballots got it done.SeMgCo87 said:Short Answer: DOMINIONflashplayer said:
The better question is how does Georgia have two of them.
Well, luckily for Montana, Beaumont is our problem, not theirs.Faustus said:BTKAG97 said:
Montana is a very large welfare state. The only reason no one thinks of Montana being a welfare state is because the population is low.
It has more than a million residents, about twice the size of Wyoming. Pick up Beaumont and drop it in Montana and the state has two Democratic Senators. Drop Beaumont in Wyoming and it's the largest city and threatening to turn the state blue too.
As a Montana resident, living in one of the poorest counties in the state, the welfare notion doesn't hold water. Our county voted like 94% for Trump. There is a large contingency of Union supporters up here, not to mention Butte, Bozeman, Missoula, and Kalispell, which account for probably 95%+ of the Democrat voters.
Why do Californians still vote dem after successfully avoiding taxation?
Tester is also a very gifted politician/liar. He convinced a lot of people, just 2 years ago I think, yet again that he is somehow a 'conservative Democrat.'
I'll wait to see what he actually does about the anti-gun legislation that is coming. Hint; it will be a mean letter like Manchin's about keystone. Then they will both vote for whatever insanity is in an 'essential bill.'
I'll wait to see what he actually does about the anti-gun legislation that is coming. Hint; it will be a mean letter like Manchin's about keystone. Then they will both vote for whatever insanity is in an 'essential bill.'
cheatingflashplayer said:
The better question is how does Georgia have two of them.
Gig’em
Should the scum Democrats push to eliminate the electoral college, states like Montana with very few electoral votes will NOT matter to the scum Democrats. Currently, each state is important to the Presidential candidates due to the electoral college. The people of Montana are ignorant of this, and in fact voted for the Democrat congressional candidate who represent the party that wants to diminish Montana's importance.
Clob94 said:
California D-Bags are buying land in like kind exchanges to avoid taxation and they are flooding Montana--- don't you "yellowstone" bro?
