UE up by 11,000 right now

8,373 Views | 65 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by Funky Winkerbean
We fixed the keg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
grabs gun
points at foot
shouts, "ORANGE MAN BAD!"
pulls trigger

Now wonders why unemployment ticks up, taxes go up, energy costs go up, middle class shrinks, and poor get poorer.

wash-rinse-repeat
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Fightin_Aggie said:

Govt will have the krap sued out of them. No due process or legal reason to cancel the permit. Very 3rd world look
The phrase "arbitrary and capricious decision with no basis in the administrative record" comes to mind from Dr. Kaiser's environmental law class...
aTm2004
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aTm2004 said:


Not that I disagree with the general sentiment expressed, but cancelling Keystone XL has no impact on our independence. Not bringing in Canadian oil has no effect, and the Dakota oil will keep being transported by rail car.
hbtheduce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rail car is expensive and is less safe than a pipeline.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
hbtheduce said:

Rail car is expensive and is less safe than a pipeline.
I totally agree. But the oil will still get refined in the US. Stopping the pipeline just changes how it gets there. I am only taking exception to the tweet I was replying to claiming that killing the pipeline ended US oil independence. It is still a terrible move by Biden that I think will get overturned in court, but that doesn't mean we should lie about the true impact.
Cassius
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AOC worked to kill the NY Amazon deal. They don't care.
aTm2004
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
She actually got some blowback from that, but then they all fell in line like good lemmings. I hope NYC goes back to the way it was in the 80's. They deserve it.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Operators will not drill in the Bakken when it's not economical to do so. Transportation is a huge hindrance that makes Bakken drilling far more expensive than say Permian drilling. So when oil price is low, drill rigs might still be up and running in the Permian and other plays that have have the infrastructure, climate and geography to make it cheaper to drill, but they'll be stacked or moving out of the Bakken. That alone costs a lot of jobs, not just in E&P, but also the services that support it and in all industries in the communities built around oil in ND. Further, if we can't produce enough in TX, NM, OK and we're not drilling to produce more in ND, we need to import crude from offshore and around the globe, thus losing energy independence.
tamc1956ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
UE?
W
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
XOM approaching $50 this morning
Ragoo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
txags92 said:

hbtheduce said:

Rail car is expensive and is less safe than a pipeline.
I totally agree. But the oil will still get refined in the US. Stopping the pipeline just changes how it gets there. I am only taking exception to the tweet I was replying to claiming that killing the pipeline ended US oil independence. It is still a terrible move by Biden that I think will get overturned in court, but that doesn't mean we should lie about the true impact.
kill a pipeline for the environment to burn a shirt on of diesel instead. Logic.
rgag12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Part of the dem strategy to make carbon fuels expensive so more and more people adopt electric.

evestor1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
i hope they do not do that b/c electric cars use electicity from gas and coal...not wind and solar.


I wonder how happy the Appalachian Trail Conservatory would be if they installed a few thousand windmills and a few hundred acres of solar panels on their trail.
Boo Weekley
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Keystone Pipeline cancelled bc of "Greta's feelz" and men in womens' locker rooms and showers...just getting started. Hell of an agenda! Way to pave the way for the rest of the world. No way our powerful adversaries aren't choking from laughter.

Way to go libs...you're hurting American but that doesn't matter...what matters is that you're spiting your political opponents. Feel good?
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aTm2004 said:

She actually got some blowback from that, but then they all fell in line like good lemmings. I hope NYC goes back to the way it was in the 80's. They deserve it.
I think it pretty much already has.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Agree. None of what they are doing "for the climate" makes any logical sense. But it makes them feel good to do it. And we all know feelings are far more important than logic. Logic is mostly just mansplaining isnt it?
WHOOP!'91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dem policy seems even dumber now than it did under Hussein. Trump's America First policies are in stark contrast to the globalist cabal.
A & M, GIVE US ROOM!

Kozmozag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And Biden starts off foreign relations with a kick to the nuts of Trudeau.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Kozmozag said:

And Biden starts off foreign relations with a kick to the nuts of Trudeau.
Not really. Trudeau doesn't like Alberta all that much...Kind of like Biden and Texas. It was a kick to the nuts of Canada for sure, but Trudeau would probably shut down the Alberta oil sands operations if he thought he could do it and not get thrown out of office.
aTm2004
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Kozmozag said:

And Biden starts off foreign relations with a kick to the nuts of Trudeau.
Eh...even Obama is more masculine than Beta Male.
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Are you libs excited about destroying more lives?
AggieGunslinger
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They aren't jobs in blue states, they see this crap as retribution for not voting "properly" 4 years ago.
eATMup-Reveille
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sid Farkas said:

BurnetAggie99 said:

Back to $4 dollar gas and losing our energy independence
Four dollar gas will be an impossible dream for middle class Californians who have to drive 50 miles to and from work everyday.

But the democrats are the party who care more about the middle class
Well, of COURSE the Dems want to be sure people move into the larger metropolitan cities, or at least not move out so that they will be forced to play "Satan Says".
JustPanda
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No - the dakotas
JustPanda
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Keystone serves no purpose - you guys are arguing over a project w little to no demand.

Dakota Access is the key. Keystone wasn't good for America. It was a legacy project that became a political football. It was more a rallying cry than functional demand mitigation.

DAPL is the key pipeline at the moment
Get Off My Lawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"Show my your opinion of Keystone and I'll show you your politics!"

This has never been about the merits, and only ever about political funding. Folks try to spin it, but there's no reason for 99% of us to care about a routine privately funded subterranean infrastructure project in flyover country.

It's like arguing ND vs A&M for the playoffs when we SHOULD be arguing both against OSU. It's a distraction.

In reality; Team Blue told you to be against Keystone and you therefore look to rationalize that position.
Cassius
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JustPanda said:

Keystone serves no purpose - you guys are arguing over a project w little to no demand.

Dakota Access is the key. Keystone wasn't good for America. It was a legacy project that became a political football. It was more a rallying cry than functional demand mitigation.

DAPL is the key pipeline at the moment


You have absolutely no clue what you are talking about.
Ag CPA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Cassius said:

JustPanda said:

Keystone serves no purpose - you guys are arguing over a project w little to no demand.

Dakota Access is the key. Keystone wasn't good for America. It was a legacy project that became a political football. It was more a rallying cry than functional demand mitigation.

DAPL is the key pipeline at the moment


You have absolutely no clue what you are talking about.
Oh great,the F16 know-it-all is back.
Cassius
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag CPA said:

Cassius said:

JustPanda said:

Keystone serves no purpose - you guys are arguing over a project w little to no demand.

Dakota Access is the key. Keystone wasn't good for America. It was a legacy project that became a political football. It was more a rallying cry than functional demand mitigation.

DAPL is the key pipeline at the moment


You have absolutely no clue what you are talking about.
Oh great,the F16 know-it-all is back.


Still waiting on your expert sources. You just ran away like a scared little kitten. You've got nothing.
JustPanda
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Care to fill me in - I'm open ears
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Cassius said:

Ag CPA said:

Cassius said:

JustPanda said:

Keystone serves no purpose - you guys are arguing over a project w little to no demand.

Dakota Access is the key. Keystone wasn't good for America. It was a legacy project that became a political football. It was more a rallying cry than functional demand mitigation.

DAPL is the key pipeline at the moment


You have absolutely no clue what you are talking about.
Oh great,the F16 know-it-all is back.


Still waiting on your expert sources. You just ran away like a scared little kitten. You've got nothing.


You're doing the same thing.

Enlighten us.
Refresh
Page 2 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.