The spelling and grammar is correct. Did Trump actually buy Sidney Powell's nonsense?

Suppose this article is right and Trump planned this out all along. What was the purpose, just to assuage his damaged ego?

John Maplethorpe said:

---

The spelling and grammar is correct. Did Trump actually buy Sidney Powell's nonsense?

---

I have no idea, John. And neither do you. Do you not understand the difference between what you know and what you don't ACTUALLY know?

Don't have to be an expert. Dems control the Senate, Mitch and company wouldn't even mind that much.

John Maplethorpe said:

---

Don't have to be an expert. Dems control the Senate, Mitch and company wouldn't even mind that much.

---

Oh, I believe they'll try. They don't give a **** about the Constitution and they've proven that over and over and over.

Ronald Reagan said:

---

John Maplethorpe said:

---

The spelling and grammar is correct. Did Trump actually buy Sidney Powell's nonsense?

---

I have no idea, John. And neither do you. Do you not understand the difference between what you know and what you don't ACTUALLY know?

---

This isn't a courtroom. The balance of evidence and reporting from a solid source tells us something. The White House screening Powell's calls and visits also tells us something. They know she's batsh** crazy.

We know she's batsh** crazy so it's logical Mark Meadows and Pat Cippilone know it.

Ronald Reagan said:

---

John Maplethorpe said:

---

Don't have to be an expert. Dems control the Senate, Mitch and company wouldn't even mind that much.

---

Oh, I believe they'll try. They don't give a **** about the Constitution and they've proven that over and over and over.

---

Which article and paragraph of the constitution bars impeachment after leaving office? Are you familiar with the precedent impeachment cases under similar circumstances? They both had trials.

John Maplethorpe said:

---

Ronald Reagan said:

---

John Maplethorpe said:

---

The spelling and grammar is correct. Did Trump actually buy Sidney Powell's nonsense?

---

I have no idea, John. And neither do you. Do you not understand the difference between what you know and what you don't ACTUALLY know?

---

This isn't a courtroom. The balance of evidence and reporting from a solid source tells us something. The White House screening Powell's calls and visits also tells us something. They know she's batsh** crazy.

We know she's batsh** crazy so it's logical Mark Meadows and Pat Cippilone know it.

---

It's also logical that you should apply logic consistently. But you don't.

John Maplethorpe said:

---

The spelling and grammar is correct. Did Trump actually buy Sidney Powell's nonsense?

---

In addition to all of the other ownage of Maplethorpe, this is f'n hilarious.

JB99 said:

---

policywonk98 said:

---

JB99 said:

---

This fits. The day after the election Trump declares massive election fraud despite having zero evidence at the time. It was all planned out ahead of time.

---

Is this the same or different from Hillary openly telling Biden not to concede election night weeks before election? Something she obviously regrets doing herself. It made the work of the FBI and House Dems that much harder trying to get rid of him over the next 4 years.

Just a reminder. Progressives still beleive Bush stole 2000(SCOTUS), 2004(Swiftboat Lies), and Trump stole 2016(Russians).

---

There's delusional extremists on both sides who cry foul everytime their team loses. TDS is a two-way street. The same affliction that conservatives have mocked democrats for the last 4 years now afflicts the extremists on the right. Can't see the truth right in front of their face and instead go searching for any conspiracy theory they can find and cling to that despite all logic and reason.

---

Agreed. But only one side of extremists had Counter-intelligence agents and others within the FBI, DOJ, CIA, Five-Eyes, State Department, Democratic Congressional Committees, Hillary Campaign, Mainstream Media, Google, Facebook, Twitter, Perkins Coie, University Professors, New Media, DNC, John McCain, McCain Disciples(Lincoln Project et al), and contractors like Steele and Fusion GPS working nonstop feeding their extremist delusions and reporting them as facts so that the general public began to beleive these extremists views as the truth.

A significant advantage to be sure. I would even argue that so much collusion happened among this very large and powerful list that it should be counted as election interference in both 2018 and 2020. Certainly worthy of banners on every tweet they ever made that let everyone know that the lies they were communicating are "disputed".

You seem to be losing some posts.

Bonfire1996 said:

---

JB99 said:

---

This fits. The day after the election Trump declares massive election fraud despite having zero evidence at the time. It was all planned out ahead of time.

---

No evidence? Why did States stop counting? Why did Georgia lie about a water main break? Why did Michigan put up barriers to view the count?

The only people who deny the existence of evidence are those that don't want to hear it.

---

That's exactly what the you are doing. The authorities have answered and provided supporting evidence to answer your questions but you don't want to hear it.

Take, for instance, the water main break. It was a stuck urinal. The GA REPUBLICAN SoS explained the whole situation and posted all the security video and people like you are still bringing it up as if there is some wrongdoing.

I was pouring through the raw data and identified numerous anomalies showing everything from impossible variances in volumes to over-voting in multiple swing state counties, all Democrat.

While all you'll get from the naive (if being kind) to the brainless is gum bumping about 62 unsuccessful lawsuits. The truly hair-lipped idiots will say "recounts proved the votes were accurate".

Those were completely meaningless lawsuits seeking recounts to injunctive relief. The 3 seeking forensic access were buried and denied.

My world is data analytics and I contacted Ted Cruz and John Cornyn with the raw data and told them if they demanded a forensic discovery of 5 counties in PA, 3 in WI and 3 in Michigan I guarantee you will have incontrovertible proof of mass fraud. Cruz had me send the data and Cornyn dismisses it, saying multiple others were already on it.

I've staked my professional reputation on saying if they would give me just 3 days and only one of the States counties, unencumbered, my data analytics team would guarantee clear demonstration of the specific votes leading to the stolen election.

The results would show that the 90+ counties that have always been won by the winning candidate did so again, only these other counties stole it.

Democrats, and many RINO's, along with the media are now simply ignoring reality, by saying the election wasn't stolen, including narrative spin drivel posted by the OP.

If they want to claim no mass fraud Was committed then why shouldn't they be the strongest proponents of what I'm seeking? You already know the answer to that.

Rockdoc said:

---

You seem to be losing some posts.

---

He went off the deep end. No idea if he caught a ban but if so it was deserved. It was a mental breakdown.

Refuse to believe any fake news or the fact we have this many idiots in our country that would have voted for that Democrat ticket.

oldarmy1 said:

---

I was pouring through the raw data and identified numerous anomalies showing everything from impossible variances in volumes to over-voting in multiple swing state counties, all Democrat.

While all you'll get from the naive (if being kind) to the brainless is gum bumping about 62 unsuccessful lawsuits. The truly hair-lipped idiots will say "recounts proved the votes were accurate".

Those were completely meaningless lawsuits seeking recounts to injunctive relief. The 3 seeking forensic access were buried and denied.

My world is data analytics and I contacted Ted Cruz and John Cornyn with the raw data and told them if they demanded a forensic discovery of 5 counties in PA, 3 in WI and 3 in Michigan I guarantee you will have incontrovertible proof of mass fraud. Cruz had me send the data and Cornyn dismisses it, saying multiple others were already on it.

I've staked my professional reputation on saying if they would give me just 3 days and only one of the States counties, unencumbered, my data analytics team would guarantee clear demonstration of the specific votes leading to the stolen election.

The results would show that the 90+ counties that have always been won by the winning candidate did so again, only these other counties stole it.

Democrats, and many RINO's, along with the media are now simply ignoring reality, by saying the election wasn't stolen, including narrative spin drivel posted by the OP.

If they want to claim no mass fraud Was committed then why shouldn't they be the strongest proponents of what I'm seeking? You already know the answer to that.

---

This man has a LOT of street cred.

Thank you for the post, Sir.

oldarmy1 said:

---

I was pouring through the raw data and identified numerous anomalies showing everything from impossible variances in volumes to over-voting in multiple swing state counties, all Democrat.

While all you'll get from the naive (if being kind) to the brainless is gum bumping about 62 unsuccessful lawsuits. The truly hair-lipped idiots will say "recounts proved the votes were accurate".

Those were completely meaningless lawsuits seeking recounts to injunctive relief. The 3 seeking forensic access were buried and denied.

My world is data analytics and I contacted Ted Cruz and John Cornyn with the raw data and told them if they demanded a forensic discovery of 5 counties in PA, 3 in WI and 3 in Michigan I guarantee you will have incontrovertible proof of mass fraud. Cruz had me send the data and Cornyn dismisses it, saying multiple others were already on it.

I've staked my professional reputation on saying if they would give me just 3 days and only one of the States counties, unencumbered, my data analytics team would guarantee clear demonstration of the specific votes leading to the stolen election.

The results would show that the 90+ counties that have always been won by the winning candidate did so again, only these other counties stole it.

Democrats, and many RINO's, along with the media are now simply ignoring reality, by saying the election wasn't stolen, including narrative spin drivel posted by the OP.

If they want to claim no mass fraud Was committed then why shouldn't they be the strongest proponents of what I'm seeking? You already know the answer to that.

---

Media Coalition, University of Chicago and a few other universities were given unfettered access to ballots and other data and information in the aftermath of 2000. Will be interesting to see if that same access is granted in the states and counties in question.

Quote:

---

I was pouring through the raw data and identified numerous anomalies showing everything from impossible variances in volumes to over-voting in multiple swing state counties, all Democrat.

---

Name the counties and show your work. "Over-voting" typically means multiple votes in a single race which spoils a ballot, do you mean unusual high turnout? I doubt you've actually looked in to it.

Quote:

---

My world is data analytics and I contacted Ted Cruz and John Cornyn with the raw data and told them if they demanded a forensic discovery of 5 counties in PA, 3 in WI and 3 in Michigan I guarantee you will have incontrovertible proof of mass fraud. Cruz had me send the data and Cornyn dismisses it, saying multiple others were already on it.

---

They patted you on the head and blew you off because they know the election wasn't stolen.

Quote:

---

I've staked my professional reputation on saying if they would give me just 3 days and only one of the States counties, unencumbered, my data analytics team would guarantee clear demonstration of the specific votes leading to the stolen election.

---

This seems to contradict the notion that you already have enough data to "prove" fraud with "impossible variances"

Quote:

---

The results would show that the 90+ counties that have always been won by the winning candidate did so again, only these other counties stole it.

---

Show your work. There are not 90, nor are there even 9 counties that always side with the winner. There were only 16 "bellweather" misses in 2020. But there were also 15 bellweather misses in 2016, it doesn't mean either were stolen.

Something was amiss with the election. i can't prove it, but I still feel it in my gut. There's also clues in this article to make me view it askance. This line, for example:

Quote:

---

At the residence about 200 guests donors, Cabinet secretaries, White House physician Sean Conley, TV boosters Diamond and Silk, and other VIPs gathered for the official election night party. They munched on beef sliders. Most did not wear masks.

---

For God's sake!

Cool thread. Another pathetic loser who does nothing but argue 24/7 with strangers on the internet.

texsn95 said:

---

Cool thread. Another pathetic loser who does nothing but argue 24/7 with strangers on the internet.

---

Is this you?

Quote:

---

Stroke out already and do the country a favor you traitorous hag.

Hey look, it's jmiller arguing on the internet again. With strangers! Nice life.

https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3176519/replies/58532919

---

You seem like you're doing really great, you never argue or disparage strangers "on the internet".

Black and white.

"Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office"

You got banned again. Can you please let people know before you have a meltdown? People are tired of missing them