aggiehawg said:

---

Old Ag 74 said:

---

BluHorseShu said:

---

Old Ag 74 said:

---

larry culpepper said:

---

idk if there is even a point in engaging in this discussion. I'm obviously not going to change your mind and I can't speak for you on how it will be good for you.

But I wanted Trump to be out of office and never heard from again, to get covid under control and get back to normal, an administration that cares about science and investing in the future, a president who listens to his advisors and doesnt make horribly rash decisions, a president who doesn't appoint unqualified dip****s to cabinet positions based on nepotism, continued efforts to improve our healthcare system, restarting efforts to combat climate change and invest in clean energy, fix our economy and tax system so it's not just benefitting the wealthy and corporations, rehabilitate our relationships with our allies and reaffirm our commitment to the international community, stop kissing the asses of evil dictators, and to have a president who is a decent and kind person who genuinely cares about America and others, and wants to heal us.

However, ignore all of that. Even if none of the stuff above mattered, every single thing Trump has done since the election, to fight democracy, ignore the will of the people, prioritize himself over the country, and break centuries of tradition of peaceful transition of power all for his own disgusting selfish pride... that alone is reason enough to vote against Trump.

---

LOL - the great healer and uniter Biden telling a factory worker your full of sh**

---

Oh, is this where we start posting negative videos of either Biden or Trump saying either dumb and/or mean things? At this point, people are only posting things that are more likely to make themselves feel better rather than change anyone's mind. Its just F16 political ping pong (or badminton...if you're into shuttlecocks)

---

Show me a video where Trump tells a fellow American they are full of Sh**.

---

Can't. Because Trump does not hate Americans like Biden hates all Americans except those that riot, loot, steal, commit arson, murder, assault, attempted murder. Those are Biden voters. And if you belief that he got 80 million votes for that type of tyranny,

You are a tyrant wannabe and should be in prison for saying that.

Stay tuned.

---

Perfectly rational and well balanced take. Not at all ironic

(Hat tip to BMX who beat me to it)

Aiding and abetting the traitors to this country is absolutely deserving of prison.

While ya'll slobber over your legalese, the domestic enemies continue with their thirst for power.

Candace has a point there.

This multi-state case is so much more promising than those other ones and it looks like the rumors Ted Cruz was involved in the guidance of the write-up is correct. Much better.

One of the Lin or ?Powell ones even botched something like making an appeal when the district court had agreed to expedite the case. Baffling. Of course it crashed into a wall. Just tomfoolery.

titan said:

---

Candace has a point there.

This multi-state case is so much more promising than those other ones and it looks like the rumors Ted Cruz was involved in the guidance of the write-up is correct. Much better.

One of the Lin or ?Powell ones even botched something like making an appeal when the district court had agreed to expedite the case. Baffling. Of course it crashed into a wall. Just tomfoolery.

---

I find it entertaining how hard you latch onto an idea based upon nothing more than seeing it posted as speculation on the internet. This "Ted Cruz is driving the Texas lawsuit" is just the latest example

BMX Bandit said:

---

Quote:

---

You are a tyrant wannabe and should be in prison for saying that.

---

Blue star of irony

---

I'm having trouble getting a read on Hawg lately. Can't tell if she is just messing around or if she has really slipped over in to Pro-TDS land (TDS can be just as virulent in the pro-Trump folks as it with liberals and neo-cons).

There has been a ton of socks and trolls showing up here lately to spike football and do end one dances on things they barely comprehend, so I can understand her frustration and lack of patience. Unfortunately that seems to be the world we are in now, all about trolling and drinking tears and then on to the next shiny object on the Twitter.

titan said:

---

MASAXET said:

---

titan said:

---

Candace has a point there.

This multi-state case is so much more promising than those other ones and it looks like the rumors Ted Cruz was involved in the guidance of the write-up is correct. Much better.

One of the Lin or ?Powell ones even botched something like making an appeal when the district court had agreed to expedite the case. Baffling. Of course it crashed into a wall. Just tomfoolery.

---

I find it entertaining how hard you latch onto an idea based upon nothing more than seeing it posted as speculation on the internet. This "Ted Cruz is driving the Texas lawsuit" is just the latest example

---

CNN is a hostile source, so it seems true. That's why.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/12/09/politics/trump-ted-cruz-supreme-court/index.html

When they start attacking Cruz, it gives credence.

---

That, in no way, supports your texags-led theory

unmade bed said:

---

BMX Bandit said:

---

Quote:

---

You are a tyrant wannabe and should be in prison for saying that.

---

Blue star of irony

---

I'm having trouble getting a read on Hawg lately. Can't tell if she is just messing around or if she has really slipped over in to Pro-TDS land (TDS can be just as virulent in the pro-Trump folks as it with liberals and neo-cons).

There has been a ton of socks and trolls showing up here lately to spike football and do end one dances on things they barely comprehend, so I can understand her frustration and lack of patience. Unfortunately that seems to be the world we are in now, all about trolling and drinking tears and then on to the next shiny object on the Twitter.

---

It's the latter of your two options but it's by no means lately

Is Trump using this to take Cruz out of 2024? Embarrass Cruz here and blame him for the court loss?

So why are they keeping it secret?

Cruz came out quickly in favor of the Kelly v PA case. Has he commented on this one?

Look, I'm 100% in on this Texas suit. But, all the circus side shows of those hack lawyers like Powell and "Lin Wood" have done nothing more than hurt the legitimacy of the argument.

Like the poster said, it's part of the game to post a tweet or meme, be happy and get drunk off "librul tears" until it's proven wrong or misinformation, then rinse and repeat. It's like Preparation H - it doesn't cure the hemorrhoids, but it makes them feel better.

titan said:

---

MASAXET said:

---

titan said:

---

MASAXET said:

---

titan said:

---

Candace has a point there.

This multi-state case is so much more promising than those other ones and it looks like the rumors Ted Cruz was involved in the guidance of the write-up is correct. Much better.

One of the Lin or ?Powell ones even botched something like making an appeal when the district court had agreed to expedite the case. Baffling. Of course it crashed into a wall. Just tomfoolery.

---

I find it entertaining how hard you latch onto an idea based upon nothing more than seeing it posted as speculation on the internet. This "Ted Cruz is driving the Texas lawsuit" is just the latest example

---

CNN is a hostile source, so it seems true. That's why.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/12/09/politics/trump-ted-cruz-supreme-court/index.html

When they start attacking Cruz, it gives credence.

---

That, in no way, supports your texags-led theory

---

You seem peculiarly vested in Cruz not being involved. Why is that? It seems reasonable --- its very well written and to the point. It "looks" new, crisp, unlike some of the others. If its not Cruz, its someone with his skill.

Not sure why you are so bent on belittling the board as a source either.

---

Nice counter Titan, that guy is a partisan hack and has been in hiding until recently. Not worth your time. I think Cruz stole his girl or thunder. Seems personal.

Hey I replied to your Roman question on the other thread.Sent you an email

Mr. AGSPRT04 said:

---

SLAM said:

---

The boys are back in town and this time they brought some allies.

---

We might as well claim the original borders while we are at it.

---

Cut Boulder and Denver out. Then Co looks great. We get what matters

SLAM said:

---

Looks like some local GA people aren't too happy with their own state right now. I can't imagine this is normal.

---

Georgians are probably more like Texans than an other state. Problem is Ga is dominated by a single super metro 6.4MM/10.7MM. Texas not so much. Atlanta is not loved outside the perimeter.

ttu_85 said:

---

SLAM said:

---

Looks like some local GA people aren't too happy with their own state right now. I can't imagine this is normal.

---

Georgians are probably more like Texans than an other state. Problem is Ga is dominated by a single super metro 6.4MM/10.7MM. Texas not so much. Atlanta is not loved outside the perimeter.

---

You add Houston, Dallas, and Austin together and its 2x as many people with the same mentality.

Cromagnum said:

---

ttu_85 said:

---

SLAM said:

---

Looks like some local GA people aren't too happy with their own state right now. I can't imagine this is normal.

---

Georgians are probably more like Texans than an other state. Problem is Ga is dominated by a single super metro 6.4MM/10.7MM. Texas not so much. Atlanta is not loved outside the perimeter.

---

You add Houston, Dallas, and Austin together and its 2x as many people with the same mentality.

---

Getting close (7.3MM+7.1MM+2.5MM)/29MM. Still better ratio than Ga.

2X? I bet it's closer to 10X than it is to 2X.

queso1 said:

---

Look, I'm 100% in on this Texas suit. But, all the circus side shows of those hack lawyers like Powell and "Lin Wood" have done nothing more than hurt the legitimacy of the argument.

Like the poster said, it's part of the game to post a tweet or meme, be happy and get drunk off "librul tears" until it's proven wrong or misinformation, then rinse and repeat. It's like Preparation H - it doesn't cure the hemorrhoids, but it makes them feel better.

---

Ok, I'm not a fan of Powell or Lin. Fine. They should be summarily ignored.

And, I don't get the twist up on the paper ballots and Dominion servers. My take is that no one on this board knows what they are talking about either way on that subject.

But, there are not that many things that have been "proven wrong" in the last 40 days. The reason is, that the system was set up so that nothing could be proven either way. That was part of the design, not a bug.

The Republican establishment in two tweets

Define Trumpism for us please.

sclaff said:

---

The Republican establishment in two tweets

---

Jebby still mad

sclaff said:

---

The Republican establishment in two tweets

---

They are worried their RINO buddies and pals will lose their seats in a Trump second term

Satellite of Love said:

---

Define Trumpism for us please.

---

anything not in lockstep with their leftist ideals.

titan said:

---

MASAXET said:

---

titan said:

---

MASAXET said:

---

titan said:

---

Candace has a point there.

This multi-state case is so much more promising than those other ones and it looks like the rumors Ted Cruz was involved in the guidance of the write-up is correct. Much better.

One of the Lin or ?Powell ones even botched something like making an appeal when the district court had agreed to expedite the case. Baffling. Of course it crashed into a wall. Just tomfoolery.

---

I find it entertaining how hard you latch onto an idea based upon nothing more than seeing it posted as speculation on the internet. This "Ted Cruz is driving the Texas lawsuit" is just the latest example

---

CNN is a hostile source, so it seems true. That's why.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/12/09/politics/trump-ted-cruz-supreme-court/index.html

When they start attacking Cruz, it gives credence.

---

That, in no way, supports your texags-led theory

---

You seem peculiarly vested in Cruz not being involved. Why is that? It seems reasonable --- its very well written and to the point. It "looks" new, crisp, unlike some of the others. If its not Cruz, its someone with his skill.

Not sure why you are so bent on belittling the board as a source either.

---

The only thing I'm belittling is the consistent effort to see two unrelated points and necessarily link them for no good reason.

You've seen really crappy lawsuits brought in the past challenging the election, and now you see one that is not essentially written in crayon, so you assume that means Cruz must be involved. There is literally nothing to suggest that he has been involved yet, and plenty to suggest he has not.

Look, we may find out Cruz has been secretly holed up in an office shadow writing the briefs the whole time - it wouldn't be the first time briefs have been shadow written and appears that Trump's was in this case. But, there are hundreds of appellate attorneys who could have written that brief and nothing suggests it was Cruz. But, since you aren't personally familiar with other appellate proceedings, you limit the possibilities to the narrow data sets you're familiar with. That's fine and we all do it to certain extents, but for some reason you can't see that you do it.

I respect Cruz and his background. Since the TX solicitor general apparently wants nothing to do with this case, Texas would be lucky to have Cruz involved. But I'll believe it when I see it.

BMX Bandit said:

---

People calling Cornyn a RINO is really one of the ignorant things ever on this board. He is the quintessential Republican.


(And he's probably right about this)

---

100% this