TX sues GA, MI, WI, and PA at Supreme Court
77,115 Views |
978 Replies |
Last: 3 yr ago by Rebel Yell
Why not Nevada? Is it because they already got sued when they decided to do unsolicited mass mailouts instead of normal absentee process?
ttu_85 said:John Maplethorpe said:
In you example a voter votes Trump but the paper ballot prints Biden correct? The BMDs don't record any votes, they aren't connected to anything.
We understand what you're saying, nobody denies code can be malicious, we're saying it doesn't work that way. The paper ballot is the official record and gets counted by another machine.
Given a Ga voter FIRST creates their vote on computer generated form probably HTML/JS . That loaded form can be processed or manipulated Before its printed locally or after
Show me an example where we can be sure, without the source code, that vote hasn't been tampered with. The state of Texas and others sure had concerns regarding Dominion.
We're not challenging anything software related, of course there could be hidden code tampering. But if it did what you're saying there would be a paper record, thousands of Trump voters would get printed ballots that say Biden/Harris. Or maybe you're suggesting the BMDs record an opposite electronic vote of the printed version? That wouldn't work.
The process ensures every voter holds a physical piece of paper with their selections clearly marked in English before they cast it in the tabulator, which can be verified with a hand count. Nothing gets counted until that last step.
where is the room for tampering?ttu_85 said:Was it a count or an audit ?schmendeler said:the printed form has who the voter selected written in english on it. they did a manual hand recount of these printed forms. the vote tally was essentially identical across the entire state. where is the room for tampering?ttu_85 said:John Maplethorpe said:
In you example a voter votes Trump but the paper ballot prints Biden correct? The BMDs don't record any votes, they aren't connected to anything.
We understand what you're saying, nobody denies code can be malicious, we're saying it doesn't work that way. The paper ballot is the official record and gets counted by another machine.
Given a Ga voter FIRST creates their vote on computer generated form probably HTML/JS . That loaded form can be processed or manipulated Before its printed locally or after
Show me an example where we can be sure, without the source code, that vote hasn't been tampered with. The state of Texas and others sure had concerns regarding Dominion.
Georgia Recount fraud affidavitsschmendeler said:the printed form has who the voter selected written in english on it. they did a manual hand recount of these printed forms. the vote tally was essentially identical across the entire state. where is the room for tampering?ttu_85 said:John Maplethorpe said:
In you example a voter votes Trump but the paper ballot prints Biden correct? The BMDs don't record any votes, they aren't connected to anything.
We understand what you're saying, nobody denies code can be malicious, we're saying it doesn't work that way. The paper ballot is the official record and gets counted by another machine.
Given a Ga voter FIRST creates their vote on computer generated form probably HTML/JS . That loaded form can be processed or manipulated Before its printed locally or after
Show me an example where we can be sure, without the source code, that vote hasn't been tampered with. The state of Texas and others sure had concerns regarding Dominion.
https://nationalfile.com/sworn-affidavits-georgia-recount-plagued-by-potential-voter-fraud-ballot-tampering/
Georgia recount may be as corrupt as the election itself
SWORN AFFIDAVITS: Georgia Recount Plagued by Potential Voter Fraud, Ballot Tampering
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Well was it a count or an audit ?schmendeler said:where is the room for tampering?ttu_85 said:Was it a count or an audit ?schmendeler said:the printed form has who the voter selected written in english on it. they did a manual hand recount of these printed forms. the vote tally was essentially identical across the entire state. where is the room for tampering?ttu_85 said:John Maplethorpe said:
In you example a voter votes Trump but the paper ballot prints Biden correct? The BMDs don't record any votes, they aren't connected to anything.
We understand what you're saying, nobody denies code can be malicious, we're saying it doesn't work that way. The paper ballot is the official record and gets counted by another machine.
Given a Ga voter FIRST creates their vote on computer generated form probably HTML/JS . That loaded form can be processed or manipulated Before its printed locally or after
Show me an example where we can be sure, without the source code, that vote hasn't been tampered with. The state of Texas and others sure had concerns regarding Dominion.
WHOOP!'91 said:pacecar02 said:
I predicted this, will Texas be the only one?
God Bless Texas. Glad we are in the fight, I hope every Republican state follows suit.
Look up 2016 Presidential Election, as well as "Dominion Voting Machines." All four States went Red for Trump and yet, all four States are using them fancy machines that witnesses say flip votes.JCRebel13 said:XpressAg09 said:
Also, interesting;
This is telling to me. If you'd have said that four red states would ALL have voted blue, all in the same election, you'd be laughed out the door. And yet, that's exactly what Democrats want you to believe.
Look up gerrymandering.
Or Arizona?
"we don't trust these people so they MUST be doing bad stuff!!!"richardag said:Georgia Recount fraud affidavitsschmendeler said:the printed form has who the voter selected written in english on it. they did a manual hand recount of these printed forms. the vote tally was essentially identical across the entire state. where is the room for tampering?ttu_85 said:John Maplethorpe said:
In you example a voter votes Trump but the paper ballot prints Biden correct? The BMDs don't record any votes, they aren't connected to anything.
We understand what you're saying, nobody denies code can be malicious, we're saying it doesn't work that way. The paper ballot is the official record and gets counted by another machine.
Given a Ga voter FIRST creates their vote on computer generated form probably HTML/JS . That loaded form can be processed or manipulated Before its printed locally or after
Show me an example where we can be sure, without the source code, that vote hasn't been tampered with. The state of Texas and others sure had concerns regarding Dominion.
https://nationalfile.com/sworn-affidavits-georgia-recount-plagued-by-potential-voter-fraud-ballot-tampering/
Georgia recount may be as corrupt as the election itself
SWORN AFFIDAVITS: Georgia Recount Plagued by Potential Voter Fraud, Ballot Tampering
schmendeler said:
embarrassing for our state.
Please stop complaining and leave Texas for a liberal utopia like Portland.
schmendeler said:
embarrassing for our state.
Nope.
Proud of our state for actually having the balls to do something. Instead of looking the other way like so many choose to do.
LOL, are you aware of how 'gerrymandering' works, and who it is designed to benefit in late 20th/early 21st century America? This is a graphical illustration of both the state houses in the pertinent states by party.JCRebel13 said:XpressAg09 said:
Also, interesting;
This is telling to me. If you'd have said that four red states would ALL have voted blue, all in the same election, you'd be laughed out the door. And yet, that's exactly what Democrats want you to believe.
Look up gerrymandering.
You think MI/PA/WI/GA somehow drew their maps at a state level in favor of Republicans? Have a cite for that?
South Dakota next to join the lawsuit.Ag87H2O said:WHOOP!'91 said:pacecar02 said:
I predicted this, will Texas be the only one?
God Bless Texas. Glad we are in the fight, I hope every Republican state follows suit.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
This does not jive the with computerized adjudication part of the process.GeorgiAg said:
the voter gets the printed ballot. If they voted "Trump" and see "Biden" on their printed ballot, they don't have to put it in the ballot box.
If the software had been changing votes by the thousands, this would have been all over the news and in thousands of affidavits.
no i'd like texas to be great again.thirdcoast said:schmendeler said:
embarrassing for our state.
Please stop complaining and leave Texas for a liberal utopia like Portland.
Its in the suitcasesschmendeler said:the printed form has who the voter selected written in english on it. they did a manual hand recount of these printed forms. the vote tally was essentially identical across the entire state. where is the room for tampering?ttu_85 said:John Maplethorpe said:
In you example a voter votes Trump but the paper ballot prints Biden correct? The BMDs don't record any votes, they aren't connected to anything.
We understand what you're saying, nobody denies code can be malicious, we're saying it doesn't work that way. The paper ballot is the official record and gets counted by another machine.
Given a Ga voter FIRST creates their vote on computer generated form probably HTML/JS . That loaded form can be processed or manipulated Before its printed locally or after
Show me an example where we can be sure, without the source code, that vote hasn't been tampered with. The state of Texas and others sure had concerns regarding Dominion.
So will this count as one loss or four?
Presidential elections are state-wide. Meaning, regardless of districts' shapes, the state's population, as a whole, makes up that states' votes.notex said:LOL, are you aware of how 'gerrymandering' works, and who it is designed to benefit in late 20th/early 21st century America? This is a graphical illustration of both the state houses in the pertinent states by party.JCRebel13 said:XpressAg09 said:
Also, interesting;
This is telling to me. If you'd have said that four red states would ALL have voted blue, all in the same election, you'd be laughed out the door. And yet, that's exactly what Democrats want you to believe.
Look up gerrymandering.
You think MI/PA/WI/GA somehow drew their maps at a state level in favor of Republicans? Have a cite for that?
So, back to my point, in 2016 all four states (as a whole, regardless of districts' shapes) voted red. And now, all four went blue? And all four used Dominion machines...
Don't need a 'cite' for that.
Really? So this is fine?John Maplethorpe said:
You blog links are garbage. The whole process was video recorded with Republican poll watchers observing.
My lying eyes see Ruby Freeman counting a ballot stack several times thru a scanner with no poll watchers present, after her daughter brought them to her.
Now, she's lawyered up, I know, but your post is a flat/blatant lie.
I always care, but feel free to create another strawman if you'd likeRGLAG85 said:Since when do you actually care about taxpayers and their money except to screw them over?CondensedFoggyAggie said:
Well, now I know 5 states that will spend additional taxpayer money on lawyers.
You didn't even read one of the articles, I can tell by your ridiculous statement. Carry on with your delusional denials.schmendeler said:"we don't trust these people so they MUST be doing bad stuff!!!"richardag said:Georgia Recount fraud affidavitsschmendeler said:the printed form has who the voter selected written in english on it. they did a manual hand recount of these printed forms. the vote tally was essentially identical across the entire state. where is the room for tampering?ttu_85 said:John Maplethorpe said:
In you example a voter votes Trump but the paper ballot prints Biden correct? The BMDs don't record any votes, they aren't connected to anything.
We understand what you're saying, nobody denies code can be malicious, we're saying it doesn't work that way. The paper ballot is the official record and gets counted by another machine.
Given a Ga voter FIRST creates their vote on computer generated form probably HTML/JS . That loaded form can be processed or manipulated Before its printed locally or after
Show me an example where we can be sure, without the source code, that vote hasn't been tampered with. The state of Texas and others sure had concerns regarding Dominion.
https://nationalfile.com/sworn-affidavits-georgia-recount-plagued-by-potential-voter-fraud-ballot-tampering/
Georgia recount may be as corrupt as the election itself
SWORN AFFIDAVITS: Georgia Recount Plagued by Potential Voter Fraud, Ballot Tampering
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
I was responding to jcrebel, not you, fwiw.
i read through them. it's a bunch of people that claim bad stuff happened because they don't understand what they are looking at. these claims have been around for a while. they are trash.richardag said:You didn't even read one of the articles, I can tell by your ridiculous statement. Carry on with your delusional denials.schmendeler said:"we don't trust these people so they MUST be doing bad stuff!!!"richardag said:Georgia Recount fraud affidavitsschmendeler said:the printed form has who the voter selected written in english on it. they did a manual hand recount of these printed forms. the vote tally was essentially identical across the entire state. where is the room for tampering?ttu_85 said:John Maplethorpe said:
In you example a voter votes Trump but the paper ballot prints Biden correct? The BMDs don't record any votes, they aren't connected to anything.
We understand what you're saying, nobody denies code can be malicious, we're saying it doesn't work that way. The paper ballot is the official record and gets counted by another machine.
Given a Ga voter FIRST creates their vote on computer generated form probably HTML/JS . That loaded form can be processed or manipulated Before its printed locally or after
Show me an example where we can be sure, without the source code, that vote hasn't been tampered with. The state of Texas and others sure had concerns regarding Dominion.
https://nationalfile.com/sworn-affidavits-georgia-recount-plagued-by-potential-voter-fraud-ballot-tampering/
Georgia recount may be as corrupt as the election itself
SWORN AFFIDAVITS: Georgia Recount Plagued by Potential Voter Fraud, Ballot Tampering
notex said:Really? So this is fine?John Maplethorpe said:
You blog links are garbage. The whole process was video recorded with Republican poll watchers observing.
My lying eyes see Ruby Freeman counting a ballot stack several times thru a scanner with no poll watchers present, after her daughter brought them to her.
Now, she's lawyered up, I know, but your post is a flat/blatant lie.
His links were about the hand recount, try to keep up.
Coincidentally, which would have caught any hijinks you imagine you're seeing in that video from the original count, which was investigated by Republican appointed officials.
So what Cruz was saying was 'Hey! You know, we left this United States place because it was bogus. So if we don't get some cool rules ourselves, pronto, we'll just be bogus too.
The links don't reference the video evidence of counters not following procedures and their suspicious activity. If you weren't so delusional you might actually take the time to read some of the sworn affidavits by some very reputable people.John Maplethorpe said:
You blog links are garbage. The whole process was video recorded with Republican poll watchers observing.
But go ahead continue your delusional denials.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Hardly dumb and pointless...unless you are for cheating and discarding the Constitution when it suits your ends.. Maybe you should move to California.... I am sure they would welcome you with open arms.schmendeler said:do something! even if it's really dumb and pointless! the base will love it!M-K-TAG said:schmendeler said:
embarrassing for our state.
Nope.
Proud of our state for actually having the balls to do something. Instead of looking the other way like so many choose to do.
John Maplethorpe said:
This would be a great precedent - states go around reversing other states elections based on narrow legal technicalities in how they were operated.
That's the goal of the plaintiff regardless of what others have responded. It's an attempt to subvert the election for a wannabe autocrat.
richardag said:The links don't reference the video evidence of counters not following procedures and their suspicious activity. If you weren't so delusional you might actually take the time to read some of the sworn affidavits by some very reputable people.John Maplethorpe said:
You blog links are garbage. The whole process was video recorded with Republican poll watchers observing.
But go ahead continue your delusional denials.
So reputable the FBI will interview them as part of a real investigation or we'll hear them in court under cross, right? No. None of this will happen because it's a fantasy.
And he posts a communist. Funnypeacedude said:
So what Cruz was saying was 'Hey! You know, we left this United States place because it was bogus. So if we don't get some cool rules ourselves, pronto, we'll just be bogus too.
Featured Stories
See All
No. 20 Aggies finish Players Era with a 81-77 victory over Rutgers
by Luke Evangelist
Aggies sweep Gamecocks, will carry four-game heater into tourney
by Neil Jhurani
12:07
6h ago
1.0k
24:54
5h ago
1.5k
The TexAgs Tailgate: No. 20 Texas A&M vs. No. 3 Texas
by Richard Zane