aggiehawg said:
I'm confused too. But this is in state court not federal and appears unrelated to the Trump campaign.
Don't think this is a fraud case. This case is about the constitutionality of Pennsylvania statute Act 77.Faustus said:
Evidentiary hearing this Friday.
I think this is great. Weigh the evidence, and if there's fraud root it out, and if not the board will agree and we'll move on.
Wrong. Until the certificate of ascertainment signed by Gov. Wolf is transmitted to the National Archives, the election is not fully certified.HTownAg98 said:
The order does nothing. Certification has already happened and been perfected. Any other administrative things done later are outside of the scope of certification.
I could find no news story that stated the transmittal to the archives had taken place. Only that Wolf had signed off.HTownAg98 said:
The governor already did that.
Fair enough. I stand corrected.HTownAg98 said:
https://www.wmcactionnews5.com/2020/11/24/pennsylvania-certifies-biden-winner-presidential-vote/
BMX Bandit said:
Don't believe this case has any fraud allegations
BMX Bandit said:
I know.
Pointing that out beside people are already using this as evidence fraud occurred. This case had nothing to do with Dominion or ballot stuffing allegations
BMX Bandit said:
I know.
Pointing that out beside people are already using this as evidence fraud occurred. This case had nothing to do with Dominion or ballot stuffing allegations