MouthBQ98 said:

---

He actually could have. These states were close, but we will never know now, will we?

---

Yeah. Just give up. That is a good strategy

Tom Kazansky 2012 said:

---

golfinag18 said:

---

That still doesn't say that people were removed, it just allows closer observation and that's a good thing. Just because someone doesn't support Trump doesn't mean that they support cheating. Pretty much everyone wants a fair election.

---

No they dont.

This wont hold up in court. Good luck.

---

Will you admit defeat if it does hold up in court?

golfinag18 said:

---

Tom Kazansky 2012 said:

---

golfinag18 said:

---

That still doesn't say that people were removed, it just allows closer observation and that's a good thing. Just because someone doesn't support Trump doesn't mean that they support cheating. Pretty much everyone wants a fair election.

---

No they dont.

This wont hold up in court. Good luck.

---

Will you admit defeat if it does hold up in court?

---

In this instance? no. This ruling for this example is inconsequential.

If the court calls for throwing out fraudulent ballots and ballot stuffing and it is determined that biden won fair in square, yes of course i will.

Someone tell Ted Cruz he now has an opportunity to regain his dignity.

Husky Boy Jr. said:

---

Of course he won legitimately. Only QAnon nut jobs like our current president would claim otherwise.

---

F off

The zero hedge article I've seen posted on this thread mentions that Biden underperformed in cities compared to Obama/Hillary outside of MI/WI/PA/GA is wrong. He considerably outperformed in cities across the country - its literally provable.

MouthBQ98 said:

---

Quote:

---

But the Dems apparently cheated anyways in targeted systematic fashion just to be sure and now we may never truly know. Now the result will always be suspect and we are even more divided.

So terrible.

---

---

Do not believe he did. Enough indicators to suggest otherwise all across the board.

At any rate, your prediction of 1 September has been fulfilled:

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

MouthBQ98:
The republic is in serious danger. This could result in two sharply divided sides disagreeing over who the rightful president is, and how we should resolve it. 2000 was bad and even then it was a fairly straightforward and clean election that just happened to be very close in one state.

The waters are already muddied by this one with voting law changes that will aid Targeted cheating. This could get 1861 bad.

post>
The Plan to Cheat With Mail-In Ballots
https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3134602/replies/57283513

---

---

Stealing the GA election and Senate might be the final thing. Hopefully it doesn't happen.

golfinag18 said:

---

Tom Kazansky 2012 said:

---

golfinag18 said:

---

That still doesn't say that people were removed, it just allows closer observation and that's a good thing. Just because someone doesn't support Trump doesn't mean that they support cheating. Pretty much everyone wants a fair election.

---

No they dont.

This wont hold up in court. Good luck.

---

Will you admit defeat if it does hold up in court?

---

Will you if it doesn't?

MallalieuAg said:

---

Quote:

---

The election was stolen. We are now Russia and Venezuela if we just sit and accept it.

---

---

The Russians genuinely love Putin. Those may not be fake..

mesocosm said:

---

MouthBQ98 said:

---

But the Dems apparently cheated anyways in widespread systematic fashion just to be sure and now we may never truly know. Now the result will always be suspect and we are even more divided.


So terrible.

---

Link to credible evidence of cheating?

---

Whether there was cheating or not we may never. The way everything played out over the last week does have the appearance of fraud. That was the same argument by the way the left used with the Russia stuff for instance when Trump fired Comey many people assumed it was because he had something to hide. There can be legitimate reasons for the irregularities and those in charge (not some random person on twitter claiming everything is debunked) needs to explain them.

Tone2002 said:

---

But yet they couldn't do this same thing in 2016.

---

Didn't think they needed to. Remember, HillBill was projected to win in a no contest landslide. Nothing was left to chance this go round.

Keller6Ag91 said:

---

Tone2002 said:

---

But yet they couldn't do this same thing in 2016.

---

Quote:

---

Didn't think they needed to. Remember, HillBill was projected to win in a no contest landslide. Nothing was left to chance this go round.

---

---

Exactly. Not only that, the smug assurance is why they didn't think they needed to. They didn't use the tools at their disposal fully. They tried like mad after Nov 8th, if your recall -- even to EC scenarios with Electors. HRC's "will you accept the results" in October sounds like a pre-decided thing, but they were thrown off by blue states defecting. Something like the Reagan boll-weevil vote among Democrats.

This time around, they rigged everything from quite likely trying to make sure the economy was held down, to over-hyped race incidents, and 24/7 lies about it, changing in advance voting procedures and laws all over the country, and finally, employing the fraud methods Blajovich outlined is standard operating procedure for such fraud..